Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,255 posts)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:57 AM Mar 2016

Why the cosmic primary screw-up in Arizona?

Yes, it affected the Democratic primary vote, but that's not why Arizona screwed up its election. Pretty much everything in Arizona is controlled by Republicans. If there was a reason for the state to mess up a primary election deliberately, it's targeting the Republicans, not the Democrats. The Republican primary is the one that was the focus, if anything was, of the messing around with voter registrations. Also, disenfranchising Democrats and minority voters is a high priority in that state, but not to control primaries. That effort targets general elections, to protect Republicans by having fewer Democratic voters.

Would a better system have changed the percentages in the Democratic races? That's impossible to say, really, but I doubt it would have resulted in any major shift in the percentages for our two candidates. That's my take, and I could be wrong.

Will it be redone? Almost certainly not. The results, in the end, will stand as they are. Any lawsuits over the handling of the election would not be decided until long after the November election. The same applies to any FEC investigation. That won't happen before the November election, and certainly not before our nominating convention.

Will Whitehouse.gov petitions help? Absolutely not. Elections are run by state officials, not the federal government. The White House has no input into how they are done, no matter how screwed up they were.

Does it all matter? It does, but not in this year's Democratic presidential nomination race. Arizona doesn't have a huge delegation to send to the Democratic Convention, so any change in the results would not materially affect the overall delegate count.

What can we do about Arizona elections? Precious little. Unless you are an Arizona resident, there's really nothing you can do to change the political landscape there. If you are an Arizona resident, you can work to elect more Democrats in that state and hope they'll be able to fix the corruption and manipulation that's going on. I hope Arizona Democrats do exactly that. It's the only way things will change.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the cosmic primary screw-up in Arizona? (Original Post) MineralMan Mar 2016 OP
Use the anger...to get more people out to vote in future elections. Fresh_Start Mar 2016 #1
But don t you agree that floriduck Mar 2016 #2
Every citizen should be alowed to vote, and even if the result were the same Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #5
Of course everyone should be able to vote. MineralMan Mar 2016 #10
"this election is over" aspirant Mar 2016 #17
Not every citizen should be allowed to vote in a Democratic Party primary. randome Mar 2016 #15
No but every citizen should be allowed to vote, even if floriduck Mar 2016 #25
Republican Michele Reagan, Arizona's Secretary of State, runs elections. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #3
Yes. There's the culprit. She's the one who MineralMan Mar 2016 #11
I certainly hope so. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #24
"People who need to get a hate on. . ." floriduck Mar 2016 #27
No, it was not meant for you anyone here. I should have said anger. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #28
At least it was a primary and not a caucus. onehandle Mar 2016 #4
and, to be blunt, it can also be about money geek tragedy Mar 2016 #6
That's a real shame, geek. Punkingal Mar 2016 #7
K & R. Thanks for posting. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #8
Thank you Mineral Man Haveadream Mar 2016 #9
A voter registration drive and education on how to check to make MineralMan Mar 2016 #13
Is there a way Haveadream Mar 2016 #18
The DNC does allocate funds for state party organizations. MineralMan Mar 2016 #20
This is why Krytan11c Mar 2016 #12
What can be done? Precious little. Now be quiet and pretend it doesn't matter. Scuba Mar 2016 #14
Lol. Perfect! KPN Mar 2016 #29
demand to count lmbradford Mar 2016 #16
Many county clerks are elected. RandySF Mar 2016 #19
Exactly. Elections are controlled by elected officials MineralMan Mar 2016 #21
Elected? aspirant Mar 2016 #23
They were all instructed by the County Clerk MineralMan Mar 2016 #36
Do you live in Arizona? MineralMan Mar 2016 #37
The issue is a fundamental flaw in our system of government. tabasco Mar 2016 #22
Arizona Democrats can expect the same fun in the general election. Voting after midnight is no big think Mar 2016 #26
k&r, thank you saidsimplesimon Mar 2016 #30
In 2014 we had some very Progressive candidates - but voters still failed to show up. dbackjon Mar 2016 #32
Who were those progressives? saidsimplesimon Mar 2016 #34
General dbackjon Mar 2016 #35
Thank you, jon saidsimplesimon Mar 2016 #38
If Democrats and Independents would actually vote in mid-term elections, it would be different dbackjon Mar 2016 #31
Last week a judge in Adams Co, IL ordered that disenfranchised voters who were turned away in line JimDandy Mar 2016 #33

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
1. Use the anger...to get more people out to vote in future elections.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:59 AM
Mar 2016

to change state government so that the party that benefits by voter suppression does not control the election process.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
2. But don t you agree that
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:00 AM
Mar 2016

those voters who were turned away could possibly have made a difference? And that every citizen should be allowed to vote? Anything less is just a stain on our election process.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
5. Every citizen should be alowed to vote, and even if the result were the same
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:07 AM
Mar 2016

they would have made a difference by the very fact that they chose to make their voice heard.

The blame lies with Arizona Secretary of State, Michelle Reagan, who made Katherine Harris proud last night. And we thought the butterfly ballot, hanging chads, and the 2000 Florida recount was a cluster fuck.

MineralMan

(146,255 posts)
10. Of course everyone should be able to vote.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:26 AM
Mar 2016

I'm not arguing that Arizona didn't do a poor job with this election, either from incompetence or deliberately. In any election, the outcome could be different with more people voting. But, this election is over, and the results will be what they are. Any changes will have to come for future elections.

Arizona residents should be outraged and take whatever action they can. The rest of us have no say in Arizona, though.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
15. Not every citizen should be allowed to vote in a Democratic Party primary.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:33 AM
Mar 2016

If Independents want to start their own party, they should do so. There are enough complaints about the two-party system that a third party would be welcome, I would think.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
25. No but every citizen should be allowed to vote, even if
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016

Independents want to change their party preference. Otherwise, there will only be a two-party system. There were no Independent candidates this cycle. The reason people become Independent is because the two parties offer different candidates from one election cycle to the other. And these people should be able to participate for one side or the other. That is all I am saying.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
3. Republican Michele Reagan, Arizona's Secretary of State, runs elections.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:03 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:09 PM - Edit history (1)

People who feel the need to get angry should make nasty posts about her. The Screwup in Arizona is her fault.

Meet Michele Reagan
In a state full of success stories, newly-elected Secretary of State Michele Reagan has risen to Arizona's second highest elective office. Through a combination of hard work, commitment to public service and the pioneer spirit; she exemplifies what it means to be an Arizonan.

Moving from the south suburbs of Chicago in 1991, Secretary Reagan adopted Arizona as her second home and opened FASTSIGNS in Phoenix, learning quickly about the issues that face the state's businesses each day. During this time, she gained the respect of customers and local business which led to leadership positions within civic and professional groups. Her steadfast advocacy for small business, community involvement, fiscal conservatism and a desire to do more became the catalyst to run for public office.

Secretary Reagan's illustrious career in public service has spanned more than a decade in both houses of the legislature. Recognized as a tireless champion of small businesses, Ms. Reagan was named Chair of the Commerce Committee in the House, and later, Chair of the Economic Development and Jobs Creation Committee in the Senate.

During her candidacies for office, Secretary Reagan developed a passion for fair, accurate and efficient elections. This passion contributed to the formation of the first Senate Elections Committee, of which she was Chair. During her tenure, she was widely praised for her work to make needed reforms to the state's system of elections, and was encouraged by community advocates, state and local leaders, and the last four Secretaries to run for the state's Chief Election Officer. Ms. Reagan was elected to serve as Arizona's 20th Secretary of State in 2014.

MineralMan

(146,255 posts)
11. Yes. There's the culprit. She's the one who
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:28 AM
Mar 2016

needs feedback from angry Arizona voters. Perhaps she'll lose next time she runs.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
27. "People who need to get a hate on. . ."
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:05 PM
Mar 2016

It appears you are responding to my post. If so, there is no hate from me, just your misplaced assumption. If it was not meant for me, I apologize.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
28. No, it was not meant for you anyone here. I should have said anger.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:07 PM
Mar 2016

I will change it.

It was my response to Mineral Man's post. I think people should recognize who is responsible for the Arizona fiasco

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
4. At least it was a primary and not a caucus.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:03 AM
Mar 2016

Where 'independents' and Republicans select our candidates.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. and, to be blunt, it can also be about money
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:09 AM
Mar 2016

states have to pay for elections, and they often do not put a very high price tag on voting rights

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
7. That's a real shame, geek.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:16 AM
Mar 2016

I don't say this as a Bernie supporter. I say it as an American citizen. There is no democracy without voting, and that should be more important than anything else. (I don't think Hillary stole Arizona...I think both Democrats were screwed last night and the democrat will be screwed in the GE.)

Haveadream

(1,630 posts)
9. Thank you Mineral Man
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:19 AM
Mar 2016

The take away from the shenanigans of the Republicans in Arizona is that we have all learned that calculated suppression of minority and poor voters is not just for the South anymore. No wonder the States out West are so red! Arizona, like Nevada has a massive population of those voters. The Republicans in charge are doing everything they can to make sure they don't have a voice. This is the State that has a "tent city". They are a disgrace.


I also have an idea for the General Election. Would doing a Dem. registration and provisional ballot voting drive in the poor and minority areas make a discernerable difference in November? Hoping so much to give Dem. voters in Arizona a voice!





MineralMan

(146,255 posts)
13. A voter registration drive and education on how to check to make
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:31 AM
Mar 2016

sure you are registered should be a major effort for Democrats in Arizona, and in many other states where voter suppression is taking place. Arizona is just one example. Its Republicans do not want the mass of Hispanic voters to have any say in Arizona elections, so they try hard to suppress their votes along with the votes of other Democrats.

Similar problems exist in many states. Those states should be investigated by the appropriate federal agencies.

Haveadream

(1,630 posts)
18. Is there a way
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:42 AM
Mar 2016

for the DNC to earmark monies for state election efforts? (From your original post I'm am surmising not?) Can people contribute to the Arizona Dem. State Party?

See, THIS is where the "establishment" of the Party and contributing to it become so incredibly important! Without organization, resources and infrastructure, we are without power to help the impoverished and disenfranchised. I am truly hoping that new voters come to realize just how important that support is. There are so many minorities who are depending on that help to have any prayer of a voice in their states.





MineralMan

(146,255 posts)
20. The DNC does allocate funds for state party organizations.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:52 AM
Mar 2016

However, those funds are limited, and the state parties decide what to do with them. Yes, people can donate to state party organizations, but most people choose to support those in their own states.

The real problem is that elections are the primary responsibility of the states, rather than the federal government. Changing that materially would require a constitutional amendment, which would certainly fail to be ratified by enough states. Elections are one of the states' rights issues that have the strongest support to keep them state functions.

Some changes were made, but only with regard to presidential elections, our only national election, really, and mostly regarding voting rights issues. The federal government has very little recourse it can take in state election oversight, unfortunately. Every other office is a state or local jurisdiction thing. Most states would strongly resist federal control of elections.

Within the states, responsibility for individual elections falls on county officials. There's tons of room for incompetence or meddling by those officials, so that's another area to examine.

And primary elections are even less standardized. They're more of a party function than a government function, really, although the state authorities run the elections in most states. States with caucus systems leave most everything to the parties themselves.

There is no simple solution. It is a matter for all 50 states to deal with. The place for activism is within your own state, really.

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
12. This is why
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:31 AM
Mar 2016

I mailed in my ballot in Arizona and immediately switched my affiliation I. The Democratic Party here too often bends to the will of the pukes, putting up only a token fight.

lmbradford

(517 posts)
16. demand to count
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:41 AM
Mar 2016

Provisional ballots should be counted immediately and added to the total. An injunction by a judge would be helpful, especially since these ballots are mostly legitimate considering the documented screw ups are in the thousands. Counting those ballots would go a long way to correcting the problem.

MineralMan

(146,255 posts)
21. Exactly. Elections are controlled by elected officials
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:54 AM
Mar 2016

at all levels. That's where change has to start. Elect new people. That's what voters can do.

MineralMan

(146,255 posts)
37. Do you live in Arizona?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 03:01 PM
Mar 2016

If so, apply to be a poll worker where you live. Someone is going to do that job. Why not you?

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
22. The issue is a fundamental flaw in our system of government.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:54 AM
Mar 2016

"Fuck it, you fix it, Arizona."

Good thing that's not what LBJ told blacks in Alabama a few decades ago.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

Total complacence with the status quo.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
26. Arizona Democrats can expect the same fun in the general election. Voting after midnight is no big
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:04 PM
Mar 2016

deal...

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
30. k&r, thank you
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:22 PM
Mar 2016

It's difficult to elect more Democrats in Arizona because the candidates run like Republicans. It is difficult to fund them for the same reasons. The Democratic Party needs to recruit and fund better, more progressive candidates. imo

The Koch brothers (ALEC) are heavily invested in the current bat dodo crazy line up and legislators that work tirelessly to suppress the vote. These bottom feeders know that they benefit when turnout is low or Democratic leaning voters are purged. What Democratic candidate has promised to tackle these thugs if elected?

It is my opinion that the DNC and state party need to change direction. We Democratic voters are operating on yoyo (you're on your own) rules.

If you are an Arizona resident, you can work to elect more Democrats in that state and hope they'll be able to fix the corruption and manipulation that's going on. I hope Arizona Democrats do exactly that. It's the only way things will change.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
34. Who were those progressives?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

Which election are you referring to, the primaries/or general? Thanks for the detail

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
35. General
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:04 PM
Mar 2016

AG Felecia Rottellini
Super of Schools David Garcia

SOS Terry Goddard is not as progressive as those two, but still left of center.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
38. Thank you, jon
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 12:59 PM
Mar 2016

They need younger, more liberal campaign managers, imo. Of course, that's assuming they(sp) really hold more progressive values than(sp) Republicans, or Mrs. Clinton.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
31. If Democrats and Independents would actually vote in mid-term elections, it would be different
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:24 PM
Mar 2016

The GOP was able to change the state-wide office elections to off-cycle years, knowing that would keep them in power.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
33. Last week a judge in Adams Co, IL ordered that disenfranchised voters who were turned away in line
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:03 PM
Mar 2016

be given 5 additional days to come back and vote. The same thing can and should be done in this case.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why the cosmic primary sc...