Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 11:18 PM Mar 2016

Who Benefits from Private Courts in the TPP? We’ll Give You One Guess (AFL-CIO)

03/24/2016

Ian Kaplan


The Trans-Pacific Partnership sets up private “corporate courts,” with few rules, that are only open for multinational companies to sue countries. Nearly all the winnings in these "corporate courts" go to the world’s biggest corporations and richest people—and most of the rest goes to the lawyers who work in these tribunals, according to a new study.

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) is the official name of these corporate courts, which have been included in trade and investment treaties for more than 20 years. A history of bizarre decisions and outrageous payouts has convinced many countries to reject the system. Now two researchers have analyzed the rulings of those courts. It turns out that most of the wins, and 95% of the money awarded, went to the world’s biggest corporations and to individuals worth more than $100 million. They won more than $8.5 billion in the cases studied. Small companies and even not-quite-super-rich people almost never used ISDS courts—and usually lost when they did.

The big winners are oil and gas companies, international banks and the people who own them, and the very small group of lawyers and judges who work on these cases and collect hundreds of millions of dollars in legal fees. The big losers, of course, are the working people who think they have the right to decide the laws in their own countries and have them judged in their own courts, and find they have to pay out billions of dollars instead.TPP supporters say that ISDS is a way of protecting “investors” from governments that might abuse them. It turns out a look at the cases shows that the investors are who we need to be protected from.

Text TRADE to 235246 to receive updates on the TPP and other issues.



http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Political-Action-Legislation/Who-Benefits-from-Private-Courts-in-the-TPP-We-ll-Give-You-One-Guess

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who Benefits from Private Courts in the TPP? We’ll Give You One Guess (AFL-CIO) (Original Post) Jefferson23 Mar 2016 OP
k&r rhett o rick Mar 2016 #1
These are the putzes who're withholding an endorsement, delrem Mar 2016 #2
Obama's final legacy. Scuba Mar 2016 #3

delrem

(9,688 posts)
2. These are the putzes who're withholding an endorsement,
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:46 AM
Mar 2016

even while HRC is getting endorsements from tons of sell-out union leaderships.
Way to take a stand, LABOR!

What a bloody disgrace.

eta: I mean, why not just take an open transparent in house vote of all the membership, and publish the results of that. Show those results as being the final and only word on what the union membership says? Why not try a little of this so-called "democracy"?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Who Benefits from Private...