Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I will happily admit that Bernie Sanders is chipping away at Clinton's lead today... (Original Post) brooklynite Mar 2016 OP
Give the guy and his campaign credit, nobody saw this coming. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #1
I see you have memorized some of Bernie's stump talking pts. riversedge Mar 2016 #12
Not a clue what you are talking about. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #15
Don't attack JWS hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #19
Yes it has to be a consistent gouging in order to gain the needed delegates. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #2
ok Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #3
I've said again and again cwydro Mar 2016 #4
Don't think you have New York completely secured. Live Bait Mar 2016 #5
Its a closed primary Trenzalore Mar 2016 #7
I've worked on losing campaigns in NYC... brooklynite Mar 2016 #8
+48 points, closed primary. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #61
Why is she performing so poorly in Washington state? Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #6
My niece and her husband live in Washington State.. one_voice Mar 2016 #34
I think you're right, i think the beltway people dont understand the momentum behind legalization Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #47
It's an open caucus MadBadger Mar 2016 #57
Doubtful. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #62
It's exciting where progressives want to take the country. GOP be damned. YOHABLO Mar 2016 #9
You won't get an objection from me... brooklynite Mar 2016 #18
What do you think she should do to appeal to those voters? libtodeath Mar 2016 #10
I'm not sure she should... brooklynite Mar 2016 #11
Seriously? libtodeath Mar 2016 #14
That would be a weak strategy in a GE hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #21
I'm recognizing that the Primary electorate isn't the General Election electorate... brooklynite Mar 2016 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #33
So you seriously think Hillary won't need the votes of SheilaT Mar 2016 #28
Absolutely, she will... brooklynite Mar 2016 #30
Once again, the Lesser of Two Evils choice. SheilaT Mar 2016 #32
I think in a year in which voters seem to be hungry for LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #35
notwithstanding the chest-thumping of the "Bernie or Bust" advocates beedle Mar 2016 #38
So would Zell Miller AgingAmerican Mar 2016 #46
She shouldn't use up any time or resources on them. Lil Missy Mar 2016 #17
So just let them vote for trump or cruz by default? libtodeath Mar 2016 #20
false choice. Lil Missy Mar 2016 #23
How? libtodeath Mar 2016 #27
Do you have any evidence that such people would vote for the Republican? Lil Missy Mar 2016 #42
How is that not the same thing? libtodeath Mar 2016 #45
If you don't know I guess we are done with this. Lil Missy Mar 2016 #51
* libtodeath Mar 2016 #52
your concern is noted ibegurpard Mar 2016 #13
As was predicted. He still can't recover enough to overcome her delegate lead. Lil Missy Mar 2016 #16
She should be embarassed........... Logical Mar 2016 #22
Winners have no reason to be embarrassed. hack89 Mar 2016 #24
Yes, if they have a 50 point lead and it drops to a 8 point lead. Embarrassing! nt Logical Mar 2016 #25
Is it the quality of her opponent that makes it embarrassing? hack89 Mar 2016 #37
Yes, an unknown. Finally you get it. nt Logical Mar 2016 #39
I mean weak and insignificant hack89 Mar 2016 #48
Either way, she is terrible. Face it. nt Logical Mar 2016 #49
Yet she is kicking his ass and will be the nominee hack89 Mar 2016 #50
After losing 50 points. nt Logical Mar 2016 #53
If it takes away the sting of defeat then go for it hack89 Mar 2016 #54
Seriously, I am not disappointed. Bernie exposed her flaws and hopefully hurt her. Who knows..... Logical Mar 2016 #56
Or Bernie made her a stronger GE candidate by pushing her hard hack89 Mar 2016 #59
No, someone needed to expose her flaws so she can fix them for the GE. She would of been too...... Logical Mar 2016 #60
She's winning, no need to be embarrassed. Lil Missy Mar 2016 #44
Two things, your track record is not good and you are West Coast Clueless. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #29
Today is almost over. On a holiday weekend, where few are seeing news. onehandle Mar 2016 #31
Hate to tell you it's front page on every news webpage mucifer Mar 2016 #36
Oh, it's on the 'news webpage.' onehandle Mar 2016 #41
Ok look for yourself mucifer Mar 2016 #43
I'm confused; I thought "the MSM" wasn't covering Sanders... brooklynite Mar 2016 #55
everywhere - even England. 840high Mar 2016 #58
*SNORT* he's going to net 50 delegates in WA. Barack_America Mar 2016 #40
Agree. By Green Papers, I think 57 over Hillary from WA and AK is a good guess. DLnyc Mar 2016 #64
I Certainly See It corbettkroehler Mar 2016 #63

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
1. Give the guy and his campaign credit, nobody saw this coming.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:42 PM
Mar 2016

When he first announced, NOBODY anywhere thought this could get this close.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
15. Not a clue what you are talking about.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:05 PM
Mar 2016

I am a Bernie and Hillary supporter.

I think Bernie has to be congratulated for doing a great job in his campaign in spite of some real unpleasantness from many of his supporters.

Your questioning me like this gives them fuel.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
19. Don't attack JWS
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:14 PM
Mar 2016

A. Your assumption is wrong.

B. There is no value in dividing ourselves into factions.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
4. I've said again and again
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016

that I love both our candidates.

A hard fought primary is good for everyone.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
34. My niece and her husband live in Washington State..
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:37 PM
Mar 2016

he's military. Was very conservative. Bought into the whole Fox/Rush bullshit about Obama. Used to argue with me. Eventually he started liking stuff on my fb page. Asking my opinion on things. He knows I'm undecided as to who I'm voting for.

I'm pretty sure he went with Bernie. While he wasn't jumping up and down over Hillary he didn't hate her. One of the things he liked about Bernie (over Hillary) was the legalizing pot-actually that was probably the most significant.

He thought Hillary had a better relationship with the AA community--he's AA (yes he knows all about the 90's stuff).

He wasn't 'afraid' of her militarily. He thought they balanced out with healthcare/school just had different ways of getting there.

But he feels strongly on legalizing mj. So my guess he went with Bernie. I'll know later, he's going to tell me.

He now thinks Obama is great and hates the pukes.

It's possible to change a mind here and there.


edited to add: change a mind from conservative to liberal.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
47. I think you're right, i think the beltway people dont understand the momentum behind legalization
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

Out here.

Instead it is treated like some boutique fringe thing, instead of an issue which is likely to bring lots of people to the polls in states like CA this november.

Hillary has studiously avoided it as much as possible, even clumsily pivoting to "heroin addiction" when directly asked about marijuana in the debates (!!)

Of course, DWS is worse, openly backing strict prison sentences for both recreational and medical marijuana users.

Meanwhile, even leaving aside writing off the entire pacific Northwest, Colordao is an electoral swing state.

Hillary should pay attn to pols like Gavin Newsom and Jeff Merkeley, who have gotten ahead of this issue.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
9. It's exciting where progressives want to take the country. GOP be damned.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:51 PM
Mar 2016

We stand together, and if Hillary Clinton becomes the President of the U.S., then it will be our duty (as true progressives) to hold her feet to the fire. We have to. We should also focus on regaining control of the House and Senate. Just think of the possibilities that could come to fruition. Not that I am giving up hope of a Sanders win. It's not going to happen by just showing up at the polls. We have to get involved because our lives depend on it.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
11. I'm not sure she should...
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:59 PM
Mar 2016

...most exit polls have shown Clinton winning AMONG DEMOCRATS. I think that when we return to the northeast/Mid-Atlantic, the DEMOCRATIC VOTERS will blunt whatever momentum Sanders has developed.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
21. That would be a weak strategy in a GE
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:17 PM
Mar 2016

Are you giving up hope that Hillary will reach the GE?

Her campaign is having a bad night, but it's not fatal. This is still a competitive race.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
26. I'm recognizing that the Primary electorate isn't the General Election electorate...
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:24 PM
Mar 2016

...and I'm not worried that Clinton will be able to beat Donald Trump.

Response to brooklynite (Reply #26)

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
30. Absolutely, she will...
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:33 PM
Mar 2016

...and notwithstanding the chest-thumping of the "Bernie or Bust" advocates, I think she'll be a far better choice than Donald Trump.

Do you disagree?

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
32. Once again, the Lesser of Two Evils choice.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:35 PM
Mar 2016

I, for one, have had enough of that. I'm not entirely sure what I'll do in November if Hillary is the nominee, because I see her as only marginally less bad for the country than any Republican.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
35. I think in a year in which voters seem to be hungry for
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:40 PM
Mar 2016

change, that running the ultimate establishment candidate, one with more baggage than a symphony orchestra on a world tour, isn't the best idea. Given the choice between Trump and Hillary, many voters will be tempted to choose "none of the above."

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
38. notwithstanding the chest-thumping of the "Bernie or Bust" advocates
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:53 PM
Mar 2016

there's a couple of other factors at play here:
1 - the ability to excite independents into turning out (Hillary doesn't have the ability IMO, while Bernie at least stands a chance. He's no "Obama' in that respect, but at least there's some 'there there'.

2 - not being another member of the Bush/Clinton dynasty and turning potential voters against voting; Again, an advantage Bernie has over Clinton.

There's other form of 'chest thumping', and it's the inexplicable believe that establishment Democrats have about 'closed primaries' and Hillary's ability to win that narrow, 'captive' vote, and what it might have to do with predicting the results for the GE.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
17. She shouldn't use up any time or resources on them.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:12 PM
Mar 2016

They are never going to vote for her, no matter what. So there's no sense in wasting time and money on them.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
42. Do you have any evidence that such people would vote for the Republican?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:02 PM
Mar 2016

My opinion is that it's more likely they would write-in Bernie, or not vote at all.

Just my 2 cents.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
37. Is it the quality of her opponent that makes it embarrassing?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:52 PM
Mar 2016

You might have a point there.

In any case, do you think it will mean squat in a couple of months when she is the nominee?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
48. I mean weak and insignificant
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

the type of opponent that would be an embarrassment to lose some states to.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
54. If it takes away the sting of defeat then go for it
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:56 PM
Mar 2016

we all have our ways to cope with disappointment.

It doesn't mean shit if she lost 50 points when she is sitting in the Oval Office, does it?

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
56. Seriously, I am not disappointed. Bernie exposed her flaws and hopefully hurt her. Who knows.....
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 10:01 PM
Mar 2016

what shit comes out in the GE about her.

If it wasn't for bernie she would of ran unopposed and not been called out about anything.

Only arrogant hill fans think losing 50 points in 3 months is a good thing. But maybe after 2008 you are use to it.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
59. Or Bernie made her a stronger GE candidate by pushing her hard
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 11:08 PM
Mar 2016

and exposing weakness in her message and organization that she now has plenty of time to fix. Resiliency and flexibility are critical for a successful candidate- having a strong primary challenger is good for honing a GE message.

So it is important for you for Hillary to be weakened going into the the GE? If Bernie can't win the GE then Hillary must lose?

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
60. No, someone needed to expose her flaws so she can fix them for the GE. She would of been too......
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 11:56 PM
Mar 2016

comfortable without a challenge.

What bernie did to her is minor compared what the GE will do.

The primary debates and complaints about her was just a tune up.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
29. Two things, your track record is not good and you are West Coast Clueless.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:32 PM
Mar 2016

August 12: "Has Bernie Sanders plateaued? Only a couple points of growth. It appears that a lot of his original growth was in anticipation of his campaign, rather than because of it."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251507696

March 17: "Bye bye, Bernie: The Democratic race is all but over."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511512956

I'll stop but not for lack of material.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
31. Today is almost over. On a holiday weekend, where few are seeing news.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

Today was the swan song for the 'Not Hillary' Party.

It landed on his podium and bid him farewell.

mucifer

(23,530 posts)
36. Hate to tell you it's front page on every news webpage
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:46 PM
Mar 2016

You might wish him away.

But, he won these races and he deserves the acknowledgement as much as she would have if she won.

mucifer

(23,530 posts)
43. Ok look for yourself
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:04 PM
Mar 2016

www.nytimes.com
www.chicagotribune.com
www.washingtonpost.com
www.bostonglobe.com


see what is on page one

DLnyc

(2,479 posts)
64. Agree. By Green Papers, I think 57 over Hillary from WA and AK is a good guess.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:58 AM
Mar 2016

Hints are he'll get some more from HI. Since he seems to have taken (again by Green Papers) another 21 off Hillary's lead Tuesday (AR, UT, ID), I would say he took 76 out of her lead this week, before HI.

If I weighed 300-plus pounds and lost 76 in a week, I would call that something of a gouge, yes!

corbettkroehler

(1,898 posts)
63. I Certainly See It
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:37 AM
Mar 2016

His numbers in AK and WA were phenomenal, in keeping with the thresholds which the pundits say he must maintain in order to reach the convention as a contender.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I will happily admit that...