Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:02 PM Mar 2016

Put aside the GD-P animosity for a second: post who you think is the strongest VP pick for both

Just curious who people think either candidate would be best off choosing.

In my case:

Sanders: Landrieu or Beshear

Clinton: Villaraigosa or Castro

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Put aside the GD-P animosity for a second: post who you think is the strongest VP pick for both (Original Post) Recursion Mar 2016 OP
Elisabeth Warren Sky Masterson Mar 2016 #1
*Horrible* pick for Sanders Recursion Mar 2016 #2
I don't know why people keep pushing her Renew Deal Mar 2016 #7
Me either. Agschmid Mar 2016 #13
Warren is the only VP that would cause me to vote Hillary Sky Masterson Mar 2016 #15
Elizabeth Warren was born and raised in Oklahoma oberliner Mar 2016 #24
Per conventional 20th century wisdom musiclawyer Mar 2016 #36
In this Internet Age, I think regionalism only has play anymore in the South, particularly Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #52
Bernie -- Rep. Jan Schiakovsky Armstead Mar 2016 #3
Ooh... damn good picks in both cases Recursion Mar 2016 #5
Tulsi Gabbard for Bernie. PERFECT candidate Peregrine Took Mar 2016 #4
Bernie could do better than Tulsi Gabbard. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #38
I really think the Castros are not ready Renew Deal Mar 2016 #6
What do you think about O'Malley? Recursion Mar 2016 #8
Clearly ready Renew Deal Mar 2016 #17
I'd love to have him on the ticket. Agschmid Mar 2016 #18
Exactly: great personality, no particular draw to the 2016 ticket. Recursion Mar 2016 #20
Less ready than Rubio? Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #33
Do you think he's ready to be president? Renew Deal Mar 2016 #66
Senator Sherrod Brown from my state of Ohio. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #9
He'd be a strong and safe pick for either, and pretty much seal Ohio, which we need Recursion Mar 2016 #11
I think that's the plan. Vattel Mar 2016 #12
Villaraigosa? You have got to be kidding. Vattel Mar 2016 #10
That matters less than people seem to think Recursion Mar 2016 #19
He is not qualified for dog catcher in my view. Castro would be way better. Vattel Mar 2016 #34
Both would do well to consider Joe Biden. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #14
Clinton: Brown Sanders: Warren Vattel Mar 2016 #16
Sanders/Warren doubles down on New England. The textbook says not to do that. Recursion Mar 2016 #22
Yeah, but the textbooks said no "Double Bubba" in Clinton/Gore...... socialist_n_TN Mar 2016 #25
That's true. I guess I was thinking more about who would make a good VP. Vattel Mar 2016 #40
Warren is from Oklahoma and when she speaks that is massively apparent. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #54
Landrieu or Beshears? Live Bait Mar 2016 #21
Not kidding at all. Landrieu was instrumental in getting ACA passed Recursion Mar 2016 #23
How about a VP pick that would also put the entire South in play? Live Bait Mar 2016 #27
Clinton: Brown Sanders: Barbara Lee or Tulsi Gabbard icecreamfan Mar 2016 #26
Good eye! Live Bait Mar 2016 #29
Thread title says put aside the animosity yet you attack the likely Democratic nominee Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #39
Excuse me, she is not the likely Democratic nominee. Live Bait Mar 2016 #44
LIkely based on the stats, not my personal desire, since I am a Bernie voter. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #46
I doubt you are a Bernie supporter. Punkingal Mar 2016 #51
Your comment does far more harm than good, not only a Bernie supporter but almost Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #53
I have been a Bernie supporter for YEARS. Punkingal Mar 2016 #55
Doubling down, I see, on your harming of our candidate by questioning someone who Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #56
I never mention Bernie or Bust. Punkingal Mar 2016 #57
God no, of course not. But your and others attitude about Hillary going way back to the Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #64
I understand what you are saying about Hillary, but I don't think it really matters here. Punkingal Mar 2016 #65
Yes, cool, thanks Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #68
I don't think Tulsi brings much to the table, otherwise not bad choices. Agschmid Mar 2016 #35
Tulsi Gabbard for Sanders angrychair Mar 2016 #28
But Lee puts the entire South in play. Live Bait Mar 2016 #32
I have nothing good to say about Lee metroins Mar 2016 #47
As much as I would love to see a purple or blue south angrychair Mar 2016 #50
Louisisana Governor: John Bel Edwards for either one. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #30
If she wants it, Elizabeth Warren for both of them socialist_n_TN Mar 2016 #31
Sanders: Barbara Lee Clinton: Anthony Weiner JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #37
Hey that's a Dangerous pick... Agschmid Mar 2016 #42
Well played sir... JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #59
The type of pick each needs: firebrand80 Mar 2016 #41
I like Mark Warner or Tim Kaine, really for both. MadBadger Mar 2016 #43
Julian Castro Tikki Mar 2016 #45
Castro as VP for Hillary DrDan Mar 2016 #48
Villaraigosa former mayor of LA??? basselope Mar 2016 #49
......... Kalidurga Mar 2016 #58
Feingold is our best chance of taking back the senate. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #60
Yeah, but I still like him for a VP pick Kalidurga Mar 2016 #61
Sanders: Nina Turner. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #62
the smart clinton picks would be DonCoquixote Mar 2016 #63
Warren for Hillary if she wants to attract Bernie supporters. I can't decide for Bernie. Vinca Mar 2016 #67
Okay. LWolf Mar 2016 #69

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. *Horrible* pick for Sanders
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:04 PM
Mar 2016

Doubling down on New England is an awful idea.

Doubtful pick for Clinton for similar reasons (NY is pretty close to NE).

Also she spells her name with a "z".

Renew Deal

(81,841 posts)
7. I don't know why people keep pushing her
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:08 PM
Mar 2016

She has been very clear that she doesn't want to be president and that she feels she could be more effective in the senate.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
15. Warren is the only VP that would cause me to vote Hillary
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:11 PM
Mar 2016

Without holding my nose.
Plus she has the added benefit of being a woman which would help Bernie.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
24. Elizabeth Warren was born and raised in Oklahoma
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

She spent much of her adult life living and working in Texas.

She moved to Massachusetts in her late 40s.

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
52. In this Internet Age, I think regionalism only has play anymore in the South, particularly
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

with respect to VP picks.

My Bernie VP picks are, in order of preference:

1. Elizabeth Warren - must announce 5 days before New York & New England states that follow. This would end the nominating process quickly with Bernie winning.

2. Tulsi Gabbard - has lots of pluses including good party & plenty of tick-box creds. Plus crossover potential from horny republicon males - a potential devastating blow if Trump is the repug candidate (its the Sarah Palin syndrome in the republicon party)

3. Nina Turner - weakest political credentials as a state official but that state is Ohio. She is an intelligent young black woman with real passion and a flair for the stump.

My Hillary VP picks are:

I have none; a waste of my time.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
3. Bernie -- Rep. Jan Schiakovsky
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:05 PM
Mar 2016

She's very progressive, but also close to Obama, so a good bridge candidate.

Clinton? Maybe Sen Sherrod Brown.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
38. Bernie could do better than Tulsi Gabbard.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:23 PM
Mar 2016

Just because she endorsed him doesn't make her a good pick. It would actually make the most sense to pick a progressive that was with Hillary.

Renew Deal

(81,841 posts)
6. I really think the Castros are not ready
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:06 PM
Mar 2016

Probably less ready than Rubio.

Maybe Sherrod Brown. It's "his turn" in many ways. There are some more I could change me up with.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. What do you think about O'Malley?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:08 PM
Mar 2016

I'm still ultimately an O'Malley supporter, but the sad truth is I can't see him bringing much to either candidate in the VP spot...

Fair point about Castro, but I think Villaraigosa could do a lot.

Renew Deal

(81,841 posts)
17. Clearly ready
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:11 PM
Mar 2016

O'Malley is as qualified as anyone and can make points. I just don't understand why he doesn't connect.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. Exactly: great personality, no particular draw to the 2016 ticket.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:13 PM
Mar 2016

I think he'd do great in DWS's job, though...

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
33. Less ready than Rubio?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:21 PM
Mar 2016

I cant find the words to respond other than "no, Rubio was not only not ready, but has zero in the brains department"

Renew Deal

(81,841 posts)
66. Do you think he's ready to be president?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

Because that's really the question. I'm sure he's smart, but his experience is very limited.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
9. Senator Sherrod Brown from my state of Ohio.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:08 PM
Mar 2016

That's the progressive I think Hillary will choose with an importance on Ohio in the general.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. He'd be a strong and safe pick for either, and pretty much seal Ohio, which we need
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:10 PM
Mar 2016
Unless we're facing Kasich, in which case we need to write Ohio off, sadly, and pick off a few Appalachian states.
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
10. Villaraigosa? You have got to be kidding.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:09 PM
Mar 2016

That wouldn't exactly make the ticket seem less corrupt.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. That matters less than people seem to think
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:12 PM
Mar 2016


I think Villaraigosa would be a good match for Clinton and an awful match for Sanders, and I think that's because they would have to run very different campaigns, and you're basically describing why.
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
34. He is not qualified for dog catcher in my view. Castro would be way better.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:22 PM
Mar 2016

edited to add: My apologies to dog catchers everywhere.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
14. Both would do well to consider Joe Biden.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:11 PM
Mar 2016

Biden could burnish Sanders' foreign policy credentials. And he could hopefully moderate some of Clinton's more hawkish views.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
22. Sanders/Warren doubles down on New England. The textbook says not to do that.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:14 PM
Mar 2016

Not saying it's impossible, just that the theory of the day says not to do that.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
25. Yeah, but the textbooks said no "Double Bubba" in Clinton/Gore......
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

And that worked out pretty well for the Dems.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
40. That's true. I guess I was thinking more about who would make a good VP.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:23 PM
Mar 2016

Another issue is whether she would be willing.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
54. Warren is from Oklahoma and when she speaks that is massively apparent.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

She sounds like my elder Aunts, or like my Mom but most specifically like my Mother's late cousin Leela.

 

Live Bait

(93 posts)
21. Landrieu or Beshears?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:14 PM
Mar 2016

Are you effing kidding me?

I think I know who Bernie will ask. I'll just wait until Bernie secures the nomination first.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
23. Not kidding at all. Landrieu was instrumental in getting ACA passed
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:15 PM
Mar 2016

And Bernie is damn sure going to run on having expanding clinic funding in ACA, along with Landrieu.

Beshear puts KY in play, which is worth it simply for that.

 

Live Bait

(93 posts)
27. How about a VP pick that would also put the entire South in play?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

as in a 50-state strategy.

I know *exactly* who Bernie will pick if he wants this to happen.

 

Live Bait

(93 posts)
29. Good eye!
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:19 PM
Mar 2016

I like your picks for Sanders.

Brown should not be anywhere near Clinton if he wants to keep his dignity.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
39. Thread title says put aside the animosity yet you attack the likely Democratic nominee
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:23 PM
Mar 2016

in such a disgusting way that it is hard to imagine you voting Democratic.

 

Live Bait

(93 posts)
44. Excuse me, she is not the likely Democratic nominee.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:24 PM
Mar 2016

Please put your damn bias aside, and let the rest of the states play it out.

You'd be amazed to find out that at the end, it will be Bernie, not Clinton.

Plus, it was an advice for Brown, not an attack to Clinton, so...

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
46. LIkely based on the stats, not my personal desire, since I am a Bernie voter.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:26 PM
Mar 2016

Your ugly character assassination of ACCORDING TO THE STATS likely Democratic nominee is disgusting.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
53. Your comment does far more harm than good, not only a Bernie supporter but almost
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:40 PM
Mar 2016

certainly was one before you knew who he was.

Some of you are so new at this, it is embarrassing.

Your comment should make me angry, but at this point I no longer am surprised.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
55. I have been a Bernie supporter for YEARS.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:45 PM
Mar 2016

I have also been on this board since 2002, and I've seen a lot. Some things are very transparent.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
56. Doubling down, I see, on your harming of our candidate by questioning someone who
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:48 PM
Mar 2016

supports him both verbally and financially.

This is an immature approach you are taking, that if someone is not Bern or Bust they must be a liar, etc.

This is a good example of why Bernie is not getting certain votes that he needs, thankfully I have not contributed to this problem.

you have, of course, as is clearly seen here.

You will not find a single comment of mine that tears down either candidate.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
57. I never mention Bernie or Bust.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:55 PM
Mar 2016

And the line "this is an example of why Bernie is not getting certain votes that he needs" is a popular one here. Are you saying you might not vote for Bernie because of me?

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
64. God no, of course not. But your and others attitude about Hillary going way back to the
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:21 PM
Mar 2016

beginning of this election, here and on the internet, is the issue.

I watched and said nothing for a long time as a lurker but I finally had to engage the insanity I was seeing.

The repeated remarks about not voting if Hillary is the nominee, whether you have said this or not at this point doesn't matter because the endless bashing of Hillary does have it's consequences.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
65. I understand what you are saying about Hillary, but I don't think it really matters here.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:51 PM
Mar 2016

We are Democrats, and if we can't complain and vent to each other what is the point of being here? I was a huge Bill Clinton supporter. I met them in New Hampshire at a town hall the Saturday before the Gennifer Flowers story broke, and I was solidly in their corner from that point on. I supported them right through the Lewinsky scandal, and I thought it was outrageous the way they were treated.

But a lot of things since have opened my eyes...the Telecommunications Act, which caused us to no longer have a free press, the crime bill, which gave us the awful 3 strikes law, and I could go on and on. Hillary supported these things, even spoke up for them, and I no longer feel the Clintons offer what I want as a Democrat. I was raised by FDR democrats, I got interested in politics because of the Kennedys, and I want that back. Bernie speaks more to the things that matter to me. I also think Clinton and her surrogates have played dirty...Bernie cares about people, ALL people, and it should never have been said that he doesn't.

Having said all that, I am disgusted with all 3 of the Republican choices, and I certainly won't vote for whoever their nominee is. All three of them are equally dangerous, including Kasich, who pretends to be so nice. He was a real shit when he was in Congress, and I haven't forgotten that.

I apologize for getting on your case. I hope we can understand each other better now.

angrychair

(8,670 posts)
28. Tulsi Gabbard for Sanders
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:18 PM
Mar 2016

Smart, well-spoken, great debater, veteran, women, person of color (native Pacific Islander) likely to the right of Sanders on some issues. Very strong VP.


Clinton: not sure but I would think anyone from the progressive caucus would help. She needs someone to the left of here if she is to bring at lest some Sanders supporters back to her side.

 

Live Bait

(93 posts)
32. But Lee puts the entire South in play.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:20 PM
Mar 2016

Working on that 50 state strategy, plus the EV's from Texas could go to Sanders, easily.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
47. I have nothing good to say about Lee
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:28 PM
Mar 2016

If she were chosen, her entire family and business dealings will go on spotlight.

This would not be good for her.

angrychair

(8,670 posts)
50. As much as I would love to see a purple or blue south
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:33 PM
Mar 2016

I realized in 2012 that was just a dream. If the first black president and the greatest president of the modern era cannot carry a southern state than no one can. (not counting FL, it is not a southern state in the same context as AL or SC)

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
31. If she wants it, Elizabeth Warren for both of them
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:20 PM
Mar 2016

Keeps the assassins away. Balances both of the tickets philosophy in different ways.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
37. Sanders: Barbara Lee Clinton: Anthony Weiner
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:22 PM
Mar 2016

Wait wait wait, why the hell would I pick Weiner who is scandal-ridden? Because I know he gives a damn about the American people which is more than I can say about Clinton.

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
41. The type of pick each needs:
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:24 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie: Someone strong on national security/foreign policy. He needs to assure people there will be an experienced, steady hand in his ear. A person on the younger side would be nice too.

Hillary: Someone that excites the base and young people. Doesn't necessarily need to be a Hispanic person, the GOP is doing a fine job of turning out that constituency.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
48. Castro as VP for Hillary
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:32 PM
Mar 2016

young, Hispanic, from the South, local and national experience, educated

what's not to like?

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
49. Villaraigosa former mayor of LA???
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:32 PM
Mar 2016

I don't think she needs someone with a sex scandal running on a ticket with her.

For Sanders I think Sherrod Brown would be a good choice.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
58. .........
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

For Bernie: Tulsi Gabbard, Nina Turner, or Russ Feingold For Hillary: Brian Schweitzer just cuz I like him and he deserves more name recognition.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
61. Yeah, but I still like him for a VP pick
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:03 PM
Mar 2016

I have to admit it's mostly because of the CON head exploding factor though. I really love seeing CONs lose their chit.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
62. Sanders: Nina Turner.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:03 PM
Mar 2016

Clinton: Tulsi Gabbard. Because that would at least show a willingness to rebuild the bridges she and Debbie were happy to burn.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
63. the smart clinton picks would be
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:05 PM
Mar 2016

Liz Warren: yes, she seems like a poor fit, but picking her would say that has a deal to those ion the bernie/warren orbit, that is you elect Hillary, then after she goes, you can put Liz in. It is the same sort of deal she made with Obama.

Cory Booker: A very cagey pol who knows how to fight. He can attack Trump in his home area and make him look like crap.

And as much as I am the Latino, I do not think Castro or Villarafiosa would work. Both of them are lightweights that people could not see in the Oval Office. If I had to pick a Latino, I would rather have Bill Richardson (who despite the name, is Mexican-American) He is useful especially if the GOP rolls out Susanna Martinez.

Vinca

(50,233 posts)
67. Warren for Hillary if she wants to attract Bernie supporters. I can't decide for Bernie.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:55 PM
Mar 2016

It would have to be someone who shares his vision and a minority might help him. Ben Jealous? Nina Turner?

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
69. Okay.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:56 PM
Mar 2016

Sanders: A woman. Warren would be great. So would some others:

Barbara Lee; Rosa DeLauro; Donna Edwards; Nydia Velazquez; Judy Chu....the list goes on and on.

Clinton? I've got nothing, because I don't think she'd choose anyone I'd be interested in. I don't want a neo-liberal in the WH, and I don't want a VP a neo-liberal would choose as running mate. If she chose a running mate who is clearly NOT a neo-liberal, it might help her a bit in November, but I can't see her doing that. If she did, it wouldn't be anything more than window dressing, but I really don't think she, and the establishment she heads, would want to set up a future candidate who was not on the neo-liberal bandwagon.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Put aside the GD-P animos...