Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:15 PM Mar 2016

33% of Bernie Sanders Supporters Won't Back Hillary in the General



33% of Bernie Sanders supporters claim they will not support Hillary Clinton in the general election. This is the #BernieOrBust crowd. We discuss the pros and cons of being Bernie or Bust in this segment.
196 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
33% of Bernie Sanders Supporters Won't Back Hillary in the General (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 OP
Let's revisit this in October. RandySF Mar 2016 #1
Polls said the same in '08 firebrand80 Mar 2016 #2
That's funny! Hlllary is not Obama. She doesn't inspire people. And her negatives are astronomical. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #6
Didn't she gather more votes than Obama? itsrobert Mar 2016 #16
Too funny. Democrats only. That's a sample taken from about 1/3 of the electorate. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #47
Well why isn't Sanders inspiring those Democrats? brush Mar 2016 #80
That's a fair question and I wish I knew the answer. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #82
Or perhaps the concerns of the Bernistas are not the concerns of the Clinton voters dbackjon Mar 2016 #188
Interesting you said "long memories" angrychair Mar 2016 #193
The graveyard whistle concerto, by H. Clinton and D. Brock. eom Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #108
I Think 33% Is About Right... CorporatistNation Mar 2016 #25
So they'll vote against Clinton instead of vote against Trump? brush Mar 2016 #63
Young people won't show up TheFarseer Mar 2016 #85
That's proven to be true in most elections brush Mar 2016 #96
And is the most admired woman rock Mar 2016 #30
Yeah, when something like 7% wins the title, that's not saying much. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #46
Did I mention rock Mar 2016 #50
Donald Trump thanks you for those comments. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #151
Hillary is very inspiring she winning the nomination: Sanders people are GOP lewebley3 Mar 2016 #177
And yet if you're wrong.... daleanime Mar 2016 #57
Excellent first response! KPN Mar 2016 #133
They probably didn't vote for Obama either Trenzalore Mar 2016 #3
I bet you are absolutely correct... FarPoint Mar 2016 #7
You think you know it all don't you? Avalux Mar 2016 #43
So then.. FarPoint Mar 2016 #45
My God! What is a good enough reason then to keep Trump out of the White House? brush Mar 2016 #86
Ya might wanna dial it back a little bit. Avalux Mar 2016 #114
Oh boy! That's even worse. brush Mar 2016 #119
Avalux is not wrong. Svafa Mar 2016 #137
How do you account for them voting the same 90% of the time then? brush Mar 2016 #141
There is a world of difference in that ~10%. Svafa Mar 2016 #143
Here's some interesting reading that dispells many repug talking points floated here regularly brush Mar 2016 #148
What are you talking about? I didn't say a single thing about "superpredators." Svafa Mar 2016 #150
I'd love kaleckim Mar 2016 #181
Some folks here are bound and determined to not support Hillary and they dont give Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #154
I'll bet you're both wrong. In fact, I know you are. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #132
That's not true of the left of the Democratic party. We voted for Obama. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #9
I certainly don't mean all Sanders supporters Trenzalore Mar 2016 #14
I have voted for every Democratic presidential candidate since 1992 - TBF Mar 2016 #37
Trump thanks you. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #156
I voted for Obama twice Politicalboi Mar 2016 #12
Are you Bernie or Bust? Trenzalore Mar 2016 #15
most people are not going to directly answer that question restorefreedom Mar 2016 #66
she did timmymoff Mar 2016 #24
Not true TrueDemVA Mar 2016 #33
Instead you want to help along someone who is for all that plus even worse. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #55
I don't know that. With 840high Mar 2016 #59
You're looking the wrong direction TrueDemVA Mar 2016 #68
No I will blame anyone who is stubborn enough to give us a Repub President. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #74
I will not ask you to understand TrueDemVA Mar 2016 #75
You know who is giving you that Republican President? Maedhros Mar 2016 #178
If you wont vote for Hillary in GE then Trump thanks you. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #157
You are wrong... Silver_Witch Mar 2016 #34
I bet Andy823 Mar 2016 #41
So, naturally kaleckim Mar 2016 #182
You're sorely mistaken, and no doubt a reason why people here are turned off from her. onecaliberal Mar 2016 #76
I know I didn't. basselope Mar 2016 #163
I voted for Obama once, then he showed me what kind of President he was.[n/t] Maedhros Mar 2016 #179
A lot of Bernie's supporters are independents or not regular voters who Bernie has motivated. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #4
So, what do you want to happen? FarPoint Mar 2016 #5
Goodman. LOL... SidDithers Mar 2016 #8
Which both goodman and Humanist report are quoting a Wall Street Journal poll... nt GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #11
Welcome to DU...nt SidDithers Mar 2016 #22
We're supposed to give in to those that Politicalboi Mar 2016 #10
that^ 840high Mar 2016 #60
By "change that" you mean "vote your way or else" ...? musicblind Mar 2016 #122
1) the BERNIE OR BUST gang will end up voting for Clinton, despite what an internet video says brooklynite Mar 2016 #13
Needless worry! peace13 Mar 2016 #17
That number will drop ... Onlooker Mar 2016 #18
Hillary's going to move to the center regardless. strategery blunder Mar 2016 #28
"Hillary will move to the center if she can't get the left" marions ghost Mar 2016 #40
Should be changed to read, bvar22 Mar 2016 #172
Yep marions ghost Mar 2016 #184
As a Bernie supporter, I doubt these numbers will hold up ... cloudythescribbler Mar 2016 #19
Hillary and Her Supporters Don't Silver_Witch Mar 2016 #35
Believe me, we want you. I was a McGovern supporter so I can certainly relate to you. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #62
In my opinion, it'll be closer to 40-45% which will be plenty enough to sink her in the general. ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #20
Shhhh! Those Negatives are a right wing conspiracy... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #21
Facts are inconvenient for some ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #23
Res ipsa loquitur DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #26
Sow the wind... harvest the whirlwing nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #27
Daring Hillary to win? Sheepshank Mar 2016 #94
It is not a threat nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #99
For months BS supporters flooded this board, badgered alert stalked and swarmed with comments like: Sheepshank Mar 2016 #102
And Hillary Clinton supporters questioned my nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #120
so that is the same level of nasty as what was in the quote I gave you? Sheepshank Mar 2016 #125
Having my self identity questioned is not nasty????? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #126
I don't need to cry you a fucking river...you're doing great all by yourself n/t Sheepshank Mar 2016 #127
You are a textbook example nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #128
and making up shit, and labeling is exactly the crappola I've been dealing with for months. Sheepshank Mar 2016 #129
So I made it up that people queationed my self identity? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #130
this is exactly the making up shit I was talking about. Sheepshank Mar 2016 #131
This is not making up shit nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #135
oh dear, not only am I a nazi and antisemitic, but a racist too? Sheepshank Mar 2016 #136
I have told you what is going on nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #138
your escalating rage seems too manufactured Sheepshank Mar 2016 #139
Not escalating nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #140
you have yet to produce escalating facts. haa haa haa n/t Sheepshank Mar 2016 #158
Well those who are blind to what is going on nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #159
I suppose I could post before and after pics of crystal meth users, and a bunch of tweets Sheepshank Mar 2016 #160
It has all to do with it nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #161
and the ridiculous continues Sheepshank Mar 2016 #165
Yup I find the erasing of minorities ridicolous nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #166
Oh, did you make another ASSumption? Another shit stirring attempt Sheepshank Mar 2016 #167
My MO I showed evidence nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #169
two shits Sheepshank Mar 2016 #170
why would you not vote in November treestar Mar 2016 #145
I will, who I vote for nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #147
everyone would do what is best for themselves treestar Mar 2016 #149
DO you understand how hurtful it is what HRC supporters have done nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #152
Why not have a forum just for polls. Bad Dog Mar 2016 #29
Those numbers will not hold. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #31
I guess Hillary and her Supporters... Silver_Witch Mar 2016 #32
33% of sanders supporters who are in the end supporting trump are NO beachbumbob Mar 2016 #36
Let me ask you, using your logic ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #39
There's supposedly many Repubs who will vote Dem instead of Trump. Esp. women for Hillary. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #53
The question is whether Hillary supporters will back Bernie - TBF Mar 2016 #38
I think Hillary is terrible, but I will vote for her and most Bernie supporters will in the end. nt Logical Mar 2016 #42
And 99% of Clinton supporters will vote MineralMan Mar 2016 #44
It tells me Bernie is not as reviled as Hillary. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #49
I stand by what I said. MineralMan Mar 2016 #52
Well, good for you. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #54
I'm a Democrat, you see. MineralMan Mar 2016 #58
Looks like we both started 840high Mar 2016 #64
Tells me exactly what everone already knew to be true. NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #174
19% said they'd vote for Kasich. So most likely they don't mind seeing a Republican in there. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #48
The Democratic rank-and-file have demonstrated a consistent pattern: Maedhros Mar 2016 #180
I wonder what percentage of Hillary supporter won't support Bernie in the GE? Amimnoch Mar 2016 #51
Consider me part of the 67% phleshdef Mar 2016 #56
I'll be voting for a candidate that I prefer. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #61
Yep LowOiL Mar 2016 #87
If you don't want to go along with what the party decides creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #100
A vote against the Democratic candidate is a vote against gay rights, women, POC, Muslims, etc Democat Mar 2016 #106
I'm not voting for Trump. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #111
The Naderites thought they might change things but instead we got Bush policies. No-one revolted kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #65
Calling Bullshit Meteor Man Mar 2016 #83
If you don't like the party creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #101
If Nader had endorsed Gore there would have been no Iraq War Democat Mar 2016 #105
If tens of thousands of conservadems voted for Gore nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #142
#AnyoneButHer including a half eaten ham sandwich / FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #113
There's a couple of Hillary talking points that are particularly stupid lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #67
Always good to have a precise count of idiots. Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #69
Does this surprise anyone? I'm sure 95% of DU's Sanders supporters in key states would pinch their Vote2016 Mar 2016 #70
So we should stop supporting Hillary Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #71
pros and cons aside, this is a TREMENDOUS red flag for her strength in the GE MisterP Mar 2016 #72
Meh......... Beacool Mar 2016 #73
People are caught up in the primaries benpollard Mar 2016 #77
That 33% Will Be Responsible For A President Trump... Corey_Baker08 Mar 2016 #78
Is that a threat? Or Blackmail? nt GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #79
No That's The Reality Of The Situation Corey_Baker08 Mar 2016 #88
You have it backwards... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #89
No creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #92
Wrong, liberals need to vote for the Democratic candidate over Trump Democat Mar 2016 #107
Do we have to vote for someone to the right of Reagan and Bush. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #116
it's blackmail AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #93
"Bernie or Bust" is blackmail. baldguy Mar 2016 #110
Wrong! Meteor Man Mar 2016 #84
Bernie is more electable Rass Mar 2016 #98
^This^ farleftlib Mar 2016 #171
No, Hillary Clinton will be the reason. CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #118
Say what you want, but I know who I'm blaming if we run a shitty and corrupt candidate. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #134
No if Hillary gets the nomination, Bernie Sanders will go out and campaign for her. YOHABLO Mar 2016 #81
Other polls show different numbers creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #90
Who needs them? n/t Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #91
A third? I question that estimate. HassleCat Mar 2016 #95
Sour grapes don't stick around for long, no worry Tarc Mar 2016 #97
If Hillary gets the nomination, most Bernie supporters will end up voting for her gollygee Mar 2016 #103
Most children, by the time they go to high school, get over the ... SFnomad Mar 2016 #104
If they want to Naderize themselves and give us a fascist GOP POS to occupy the WH. baldguy Mar 2016 #109
That goes for 100% of the people in my household. / FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #112
Ask Hillary Clinton whether she would accept the VP slot... Orsino Mar 2016 #115
Teabaggers, Libertarians and anarchists that don't vote. I imagine they won't vote for a woman. seabeyond Mar 2016 #117
33% of Bernie's supporters are disaffected libertarians with no one from the Paul family to vote for CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #121
+ 1 JoePhilly Mar 2016 #173
Ratchet that number upwards after today's disgusting, Rovian, right-wing flavored attack. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #123
So 67% will back her? I think that's high. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #124
they may think differently by November treestar Mar 2016 #144
They'll get over it. The tantrums and threats are just part of primaries. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #146
I won't be getting over the piece of sleazy shit that Brock introduced today. djean111 Mar 2016 #155
I just dont believe that G_j Mar 2016 #153
That estimate seems low. basselope Mar 2016 #162
Sounds awfully similar to 2008 Hugabear Mar 2016 #164
Now if only 100% of them would leave the Party BKH70041 Mar 2016 #168
I'd settle for them leaving DU. LonePirate Mar 2016 #183
Angry white people.nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #175
Fortunately I live in one of the bluest of the blue states Califonz Mar 2016 #176
So many posts from a new person in their first few days on DU are suspicious... Sancho Mar 2016 #185
I lurked... since before the Iowa caucus GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #186
Really...it's not rude to ask.. Sancho Mar 2016 #189
I didn't join and start spamming non-stop... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #190
This message was self-deleted by its author Sheepshank Mar 2016 #194
You arrived instantly snarky, argumentative, rude and demeaning to many DUers Sheepshank Mar 2016 #195
I did not... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #196
i think that number is over by at least 25 points 0rganism Mar 2016 #187
Considering that over half of Bernie's supporters are independents, they very well could go to Trump reformist2 Mar 2016 #191
could, but they won't 0rganism Mar 2016 #192

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
16. Didn't she gather more votes than Obama?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:28 PM
Mar 2016

And currently has 2 million more votes than Bernie.

Seems like she inspires plenty.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
47. Too funny. Democrats only. That's a sample taken from about 1/3 of the electorate.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:29 PM
Mar 2016

The Clinton name gets her a big head start in the Democratic party. It doesn't translate outside the party.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
82. That's a fair question and I wish I knew the answer.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:21 PM
Mar 2016

Perhaps the party has drifted too far rightward and there is no place in it for leftists. Or perhaps Hillary had too big an advantage with name recognition, money, fellow Third Way Democratic insiders, a primary schedule set up to be heavily front loaded with more conservative states more favorable to her. One thing that does seem to help her a lot is the short memory of many Democrats.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
188. Or perhaps the concerns of the Bernistas are not the concerns of the Clinton voters
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:14 PM
Mar 2016

Take my in-laws - older, Hispanic (my mother-in-law was born in Mexico)

Goldman-Sachs or too big to fail? Not a concern, since the local banks never would lend to them anyways
Jobs to Mexico? Those jobs were never available to them anyways


What they do know is that Bill Clinton (and Hillary by association) was the first President that they felt actually cared about them, and spoke about their concerns and listened to them.


The Hispanic voters I know have VERY long memories, and that is helping Hillary.

angrychair

(8,693 posts)
193. Interesting you said "long memories"
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:18 PM
Mar 2016

What did they actually get from all that listening?
To be blunt about it, Dems have a poor record for supporting minorities.
While PBO has done the DREAM Act, he has also deported more Hispanics than any other president in modern history.
While many blacks hail the Clintons, few specifics are given as to what specific laws are connected to them. At the same time many attribute the 1994 Crime Bill as have a dramatic and disparate impact on people of color.

The huge difference in prison populations and incarceration rates of people of color and whites is impossible to explain away as chance. Institutional racism is the only explanation.

So, out of honest curiosity, what specifically, came from being a good listener?

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
25. I Think 33% Is About Right...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:29 PM
Mar 2016

IF Dems want to win... then Bernie is the only choice. The cascade of Indys and Repubs and a solid cohort of Democrats who are pissed at the Establishment DNC and how they skewed the primary will come out hell bent for election to vote AGAINST CLINTON INC. with a vengence. Just a fact... Listen a little and you will hear this .

brush

(53,764 posts)
63. So they'll vote against Clinton instead of vote against Trump?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:03 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:19 PM - Edit history (3)

What a strange bit of fools' gold to brag about.

brush

(53,764 posts)
96. That's proven to be true in most elections
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:10 AM
Mar 2016

The youth demographic votes less than any other so all this is probably not that important.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
46. Yeah, when something like 7% wins the title, that's not saying much.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:27 PM
Mar 2016

She's also the most reviled woman.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
3. They probably didn't vote for Obama either
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:20 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie attracts support from some interesting areas as well as traditional liberals.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
43. You think you know it all don't you?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:09 PM
Mar 2016

The presumptuousness of Hillary supporters is rather off-putting. BTW - I voted for Obama twice, I've been a Dem my whole life, and well, not sure I would vote for Hillary. Telling me that I must force myself to do so to keep Trump out of office isn't a good enough reason.

brush

(53,764 posts)
86. My God! What is a good enough reason then to keep Trump out of the White House?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:32 PM
Mar 2016

Do you realize the magnitude of what you're saying?

Voting for someone who voted with Sanders 90% of the time is not enough to keep someone who is diametrically opposed to Bernie in every way and dangerous for the country is not a good enough reason?

Ya might wanna rephrase that.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
114. Ya might wanna dial it back a little bit.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:29 AM
Mar 2016

I do realize what I'm saying, and Hillary as president is just as detrimental to the country as Trump. I don't see much daylight between the two.

Svafa

(594 posts)
137. Avalux is not wrong.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:00 PM
Mar 2016

There is less of a difference between Clinton and Republicans (Drumpf included) than there is between Sanders and Clinton.

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

brush

(53,764 posts)
141. How do you account for them voting the same 90% of the time then?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:37 PM
Mar 2016

Stop doing the repugs dirty work for them by spreading the "Clinton is a republican" meme.

Progressives should be able to recognize dirty-trick, repug talking points when encountered and know better than to just buy it hook, line and sinker.

Trump and other repugs have hinted at Sanders being a "commie" but you don't see Clinton supporters buying that bull crap and spreading it all over the internet.

Svafa

(594 posts)
143. There is a world of difference in that ~10%.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:44 PM
Mar 2016

Not to mention, her time in the senate is also only a small part of her political life; her tenure as SOS needs to be taken into account. And if she and her supporters want to consider her time as FLOTUS when discussing her political experience, then it's fair to consider the projects she supported then too.

No one here is a stranger to Clinton's more conservative stances. Support for NAFTA, DOMA, DADT, Iraq War, Wall Street bailout, fracking, no-fly zone in Syria, Honduran coup....Sure sounds like she has an awful lot more in common with republicans than she has in common with Sanders.

brush

(53,764 posts)
148. Here's some interesting reading that dispells many repug talking points floated here regularly
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:08 PM
Mar 2016
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/3/26/honest-and-unmerciful-an-open-letter-to-matt-taibbi-of-rolling-stone-magazine

Here's a quote from the article which is an open letter to reporter Matt Taibi:

Like most Hillary critics, you took aim at her out-of-context quote taken on young African-American men who became known as "super-predators" at the time. If you had done even a tiny bit of research, you would have realized that not only did Clinton use this term a single time but she used it to specifically describe gang members and not all African-American males. The fact that you took this smear as being factual shows that you, like many others in the media, were duped into believing something that simply was not true.

Svafa

(594 posts)
150. What are you talking about? I didn't say a single thing about "superpredators."
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:10 PM
Mar 2016

I brought up the legitimate grievances progressives should have with her rather conservative and hawkish record. The article you linked to mentioned the Iraq War, but it made no mention of ANY of the other things I brought up. And I'm sorry, but how the hell is criticizing someone for supporting shitty "free" trade deals, discriminatory legislation, and interventionist military strategy a republican talking point? Last time I checked, those are all things that most republicans are quite fond of.

kaleckim

(651 posts)
181. I'd love
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:01 PM
Mar 2016

for you to play the clip of her saying that to a room full of black people and make the argument you just made there. You wouldn't have the damn guts. She apologized for good reason and, besides, it wasn't just the word she used but the reason she was using it. She did push for very harsh sentencing laws, she did support prison privatization (some of those groups have been bundlers for her campaign this election cycle) and she and her husband did gut social programs that benefited the poor. The cuts decimated the black community and yet they bragged about those cuts for years, ending big government as we know it, and all that horribleness.

I have to ask, people like yourself call this stuff "repug talking points". What would a left wing critique of her look like? Cause it seems you people struggle seeing the difference, which is mind blowing. A left wing critique of her would apply even more to them.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
154. Some folks here are bound and determined to not support Hillary and they dont give
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:16 PM
Mar 2016

a good god damn how that ultimately hams others.

And no, NOT in the primary, in the GE.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
9. That's not true of the left of the Democratic party. We voted for Obama.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:23 PM
Mar 2016

Probably a lot of the independent voters supporting Bernie did as well.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
14. I certainly don't mean all Sanders supporters
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:26 PM
Mar 2016

However anecdotally the guy from high school on my Facebook that hovers between Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders and is Bernie or Bust doesn't like Obama.

I assume those types with confusing political leanings who are attracted to Bernie for being an outsider will not be embracing Hillary Clinton if she were the nominee.

TBF

(32,047 posts)
37. I have voted for every Democratic presidential candidate since 1992 -
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:33 PM
Mar 2016

and I will be voting for Bernie this fall. One way or another. (I also actively volunteered on Obama's campaign).

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
66. most people are not going to directly answer that question
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

it is clear that admins want to be more strict about tos at this point, so anyone who outright says they will not vote for the dem nom (no matter who it is) risks a hide or even perhaps a ban.

and questions or posts designed to elicit such responses are probably also at risk of being hidden or banned i would imagine


it starts getting very tricky here as the primaries move along

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
24. she did
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:01 PM
Mar 2016

if you counted Michigan, like Hillary tried, knowing they were on double secret probation. Hillary went on the ballot, but Obama didn't. She's a scammer all the way from 08 and before

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
33. Not true
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:18 PM
Mar 2016

I voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012, Kerry in 2004 and Gore in 2000. I have always voted Democrat. This year is no different, that's why I am voting for the only person that represents what the Democratic Party stands for, Bernie Sanders. With all of that being said, I will not vote for Hillary and that is my choice whether you agree with it or not.

I don't feel like my vote should go towards someone who hasn't guaranteed to protect and strengthen social security, who doesn't want to fight for single payer insurance, who continues to hold private fundraisers for the elite only, who voting for an awful war, someone who feels glass steagall is not needed, someone who continues to take money from the private prison industry along with many other scumbag donors, etc. The list can keep going, but I think you get the picture.

The establishment needs to go.

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
68. You're looking the wrong direction
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:29 PM
Mar 2016

Blame Hillary and DWS and the establishment sellouts for turning their backs on us.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
74. No I will blame anyone who is stubborn enough to give us a Repub President.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:14 PM
Mar 2016

Whoever causes that. When you saw 8 years of Bush, wasn't that enough to scare the hell out of you?

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
75. I will not ask you to understand
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:06 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:46 AM - Edit history (1)

You have your reasons and I have mine. I wish you luck with all sincerity.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
178. You know who is giving you that Republican President?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:43 PM
Mar 2016

The Party establishment that is shoehorning Hillary into the nomination.

If the Party wants votes, then they should nominate a candidate that will earn them.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
34. You are wrong...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:23 PM
Mar 2016

I voted for President Obama TWICE. You are wrong. President Obama has not endorsed Hillary Clinton so your point it silly.

kaleckim

(651 posts)
182. So, naturally
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:07 PM
Mar 2016

mock them and don't give them a coherent argument about why Clinton will improve their lives. That's a way to grow your party and to clean out the corrupt crooks running it. Does the left in the US give a damn anymore about providing a true alternative to the right? I'm not talking about the "we're less bad than Republicans" type of alternative. The trade model that Democrats like Clinton have supported has been horrible in practice, same with her hawkish foreign policy, her corruption, etc. Do Democrats care anymore to provide, for example, a radically different trade model? Democrats like the Clintons and Obama don't, and most in the Democratic Party don't seem to give a damn. Maybe it is turning into the party of a relatively well off group of people that could largely give a damn about the poor (or avoiding ecological collapse, since that would necessitate radical changes), that maybe have a gay friend and are pro-choice.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
163. I know I didn't.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

I unfortunately, turned out to be right about him.

Another center right politician.

Although, TBH he does gain a title formerly held by Bill Clinton. The best republican president of my lifetime.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
4. A lot of Bernie's supporters are independents or not regular voters who Bernie has motivated.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:20 PM
Mar 2016

It doesn't surprise me at all that a large number of them won't vote for Hillary. She doesn't do well with independents and she won't inspire the discouraged people to vote. On the left of the Democratic party, she'll lose a smaller percentage of the Bernie voters, but it will still be a considerable number.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
10. We're supposed to give in to those that
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:23 PM
Mar 2016

Suppress our vote? Those who call us Teabaggers just because we want honesty in a candidate, we are called right wing nuts. We are showing people MONTHS ahead of this election the outcome if Hillary is the nominee. There's time to change that. Or you can let FBI investigations not bother you. They bother me. You may not want to see how she speaks of the 99% behind closed doors, but I do. Is she going to show us? No she is not.

musicblind

(4,484 posts)
122. By "change that" you mean "vote your way or else" ...?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:30 PM
Mar 2016

And for the record, I voted for Bernie my NC primary. However, I am also a Hillary supporter. So do not think that all Bernie voters are the same. You can love Bernie and like Hillary. So don't buy into the B.S.

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
13. 1) the BERNIE OR BUST gang will end up voting for Clinton, despite what an internet video says
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:24 PM
Mar 2016

2) there are many Democrats, Independents and even Republicans who will vote for Clinton, despite not voting in the Primary at all.

In 2008, Obama got 18 M votes in the Primary...and 65 M vote sin the General Election.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
18. That number will drop ...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:32 PM
Mar 2016

... otherwise, it's the end of Bernie's movement. Hillary will move to the center if she can't get the left. But, I think in the end most Sanders supporters will back the nominee. Ultimately, reason will prevail over passion. They are not going to allow a fascist to be elected, unless they really don't care about the day to day lives of those who struggle against the inequities of our society.

strategery blunder

(4,225 posts)
28. Hillary's going to move to the center regardless.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:37 PM
Mar 2016

Her supporters are trying to push "Bernie can't win so he should just drop out" so she can do it sooner.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
172. Should be changed to read,
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:30 PM
Mar 2016
Hillary WILL move further to the conservative Right regardless of what happens.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
184. Yep
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:43 PM
Mar 2016

I never know which way the wind's gonna blow. But I know one thing, Hillary is no progressive. And Rightward Ho is always on the table on any issue. She has proven that.

"Camp Weathervane" is really appropriate nick for her campaign.

cloudythescribbler

(2,586 posts)
19. As a Bernie supporter, I doubt these numbers will hold up ...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:34 PM
Mar 2016

and it is one thing that people like me need to do to insist that, if Hillary is the nominee, as many Sanderistas support her as possible

I would say that all the snark and trashing of Bernie and of Sanderistas on DU doesn't make the abovementioned task any easier should it become necessary

If Hillary is the nominee, it is very important that a LOT of specific and concrete concessions be made at the Convention to Bernie's views on many issues. The rhetoric in the campaign of trying to coopt Bernie counts for zilch. That does not mean that she will embrace "MediCare for All", but at least the Democratic platform should have measures (in addition to the positive steps Hillary already is committed to) to insist on a public option EVERYWHERE, and also to insist on legislation that would specifically allow states -- or groups of states joining together in a single plan -- to adopt single-payer WITHOUT negatively prejudicing federal health dollars to the state. Probably the Democrats should call for a return to a revamped and updated version of Glass-Steagall, recognizing that abandoning it was a mistake.

There are a lot of absolute demands that should be made regarding election process, including NO "closed" primaries or caucuses, not only ditch Debbie Wasserman Schultz but ALL those in the leadership of the Democratic Party who are similarly tilted towards the neoliberals beyond strict limits of fairness and balance. And the progressive wing of the party should demand equal representation as the neoliberals. The debates issue has to be decided upon in a more democratic way in form and content.

This could go on and on, but the point is that there are very concrete measures that Hillary -- and her supporters on DU -- could take to minimize any defection. Likewise if Bernie gets the nomination, key concerns of Hillary and her supporters would also have to be adequately addressed.

This is NOT like in 08, because unlike then, there were many more major differences in the ideology and platform of the competing Democratic candidates (and eg, on the health insurance mandate, Obama ended up doing what Hillary argued for and he against in the debates). Obama, to my disappointment, turned out to be another neoliberal rather than at least straddling the two wings of the Democratic Party and being a cagey progressive at heart. Perhaps it was delusion even to hope that that degree of progressivism would be allowed in the White House, but anyhow ...

This election year is very different, and the split between the two wings of the Democratic Party is much clearer -- and needs to be addressed at every level so we don't end up with ANYONE like Trump in the White House
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As I am doing on EVERY thread where I post on the primary race b/t Hillary and Bernie, my reminder that DUers should devote at least 20% of the time and money devoted to the presidential primary fight to Congressional concerns, getting a Democratic senate and as close to a Democratic House as possible -- no more GOP House "gerrymandority".

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
35. Hillary and Her Supporters Don't
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:27 PM
Mar 2016

want us or respect us...so why would we want to join her club. I don't go where I am needed.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
62. Believe me, we want you. I was a McGovern supporter so I can certainly relate to you.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:57 PM
Mar 2016

Always followed Bernie, made sure to watch any time he was on a show before this. I just don't like the fact he is saying he may not support Hillary. I thought he was better than that.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
20. In my opinion, it'll be closer to 40-45% which will be plenty enough to sink her in the general.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:46 PM
Mar 2016

I don't think she can win anyway given her historically high negatives across the country.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
26. Res ipsa loquitur
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016
Mrs. Clinton won the hard-fought Democratic race in California, where both she and Mr. Obama had sought the state's wealth of 370 delegates to be chosen on Tuesday. According to early returns, Mrs. Clinton had strong showings in Los Angeles, Santa Clara and San Diego. Early exit polls showed Mr. Obama running strongly among African-Americans, white men, younger voters and liberals. Mrs. Clinton did well among Hispanics, white women, moderates and those who described themselves as "somewhat conservative." Those who identified themselves as Democrats tended to choose Mrs. Clinton; "independents or something else" overwhelmingly voted for Mr. Obama. A majority of Californians who were surveyed said they made up their minds in the last month. The economy was ranked most often as the top issue facing the nation, followed by the war in Iraq and health care. There were signs that both Democratic camps were growing polarized; only half of the voters said they would be satisfied if either candidate became the nominee.

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/CA.html


California -General Election

Barack Obama John McCain
Percentage 61.01% 36.95%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_California,_2008
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
27. Sow the wind... harvest the whirlwing
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:36 PM
Mar 2016

and I blame a lot of HRC supporters who have created a very toxic environment, and continue to do so, for this. I even had an OP a few months ago predicting this very issue.

Try to win that GE without the progressive vote. I dare you... in two two four presidential cycles it might be over, but the realignment is far from complete.

In comparison, only 7 percent of HRC supporters would stay home at this moment in time.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
94. Daring Hillary to win?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:05 AM
Mar 2016

Bwaaah haa haa haa

What a fucking joke, these continued threats. It seems to be fine and dandy when Bernie woos Republicans for votes, but you and your cohorts would fucking freak out if Hillary does the same.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
99. It is not a threat
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:16 AM
Mar 2016

And it is folks like you who have created this environment.

Political realignments are fun, especially in the middle. You need those voters, but you despise them. And the GOP dissolution is not over either. For the record, it is them who will replace the left you despise. (Whatever remains). By the way, I am addressing the fucking OP and current polling, not your imagined threats.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
102. For months BS supporters flooded this board, badgered alert stalked and swarmed with comments like:
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:30 AM
Mar 2016

of Stockholm syndrome, nasty on going insults to AA persons being too stupid to know that Bernie should be their guy, and the famous:

On second thought I take that big FUCK YOU back. I wouldn't fuck you even with someone else's dog's cock. You have proven yourself to be utterly and irretrievably morally repugnant. You have stooped to depths that are lower than whale shit in the fucking Marianas trench. There's a lot of pressure down there for anyone with a shred of fucking decency but once your balls are shriveled to the obvious pinhead size it affects the brain and there's little left than to attempt to smear the shit on the walls when it didn't stick whilst you were flinging it.


And you say Hillary supporters created a climate?
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
120. And Hillary Clinton supporters questioned my
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:56 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:37 PM - Edit history (1)



Minority status. By the way, some continue to do it. The same fans have denied that minorities have voted for BS. And it gets worst, the memes and false narratives are to the point that people have had it. By the way who your party nominates is your business. My vote is none of your business. But I am an independent voter in California. Guess what, you need me too in November. It's not a threat, it is reality. You and Republicans are the minority of voters in this country. And CA has an open democratic primary as well m'kay.

There is more, the aggressive hate and antisemitic smears from HRC supporters are not limited to DU. Truly I wish they were They are all over social media. There is a mirror over there, take a good look.

And no, I will never ever forget having my self identity questioned by HRC supporters m'kay. You ran in general terms, I talk personal.

Oh and alert stalking, you are telling that to me who has been bullied and harassed and alert stalked for more than a decade. We are close to 16 years now actually, I think. You realize how funny that sounds right?
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
125. so that is the same level of nasty as what was in the quote I gave you?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:35 PM
Mar 2016

don't.make.me.laugh.

Anti semetism is often manufactured at the hands of Sanders supports such as was recently thrown out, and one that you jumped on for a person using the Irish Cross. Yes, that was your personal Nazi attack on a fellow DUer just in the last day or so.

And while you are upset that your heritage was called into question, your cohorts have also stated that I was antisemitic. That is a level of nasty I never thought I'd see on this BB. There is personal for you. You don't have a corner on the market.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
126. Having my self identity questioned is not nasty?????
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:38 PM
Mar 2016

and personally having been attacked on and off site is not nasty? Cry me a fucking river at this point

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
128. You are a textbook example
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:40 PM
Mar 2016

of why you guys will suppress the vote. The lack of self awareness is just great.

I am just going to enjoy the show.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
130. So I made it up that people queationed my self identity?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:44 PM
Mar 2016

and that they were HRC supporters? How is that? You were on that site, and you know it.

Or I made it up that one of you guys followed to RSD with lovely feeling to spread about a dead parrot? Really? As I said. that lack of self awareness is great. I will enjoy the show, The anger is not feigned at these racist tactics anymore. And it is the HRC supporters doing it. Variations on the Southern Strategy are not playing well anymore.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
131. this is exactly the making up shit I was talking about.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:50 PM
Mar 2016

My post was responding to your post #128.

I already responded to your post about your heritage. It is completely disingenious to parse out a line from an unrelated post and apply it as if it were a direct response elsewhere. You do not score brownie points for such actions.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
135. This is not making up shit
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:52 PM
Mar 2016

this is questioning what you are saying, This actually is actually real. People are tired of this racist shit,

It is exactly that, racist shit. Get it now? STOP!

#berniemademewhiate. Go fucking read it and perhaps buy a clue while you are at it.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
136. oh dear, not only am I a nazi and antisemitic, but a racist too?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:54 PM
Mar 2016

How does work when you have no idea about my heritage?....what it means is that you are making up shit.

I have not posted on the thread you are referencing...Why should I care what is said there...I already gave you a fine example of what was posted in the HRC Group by one of your finest.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
138. I have told you what is going on
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:02 PM
Mar 2016

it was the choice of the HRC campaign (and the media) to use dog whistles. The anger is quite real now.

GO buy a clue. I am not making this up. People will NOT FUCKING COME OUT FOR HER in NOVEMBER because of this shit. GET IT NOW?

And some followers are indeed racists and antisemite. One actually got her cover blown at DKOS in the recent past by her own fucking posting. Now her avatar is one used by well known antisemites as well. Yes the celtic cross is what it is these days.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
139. your escalating rage seems too manufactured
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:19 PM
Mar 2016

you get all worked up when you make all sorts of presumption and assumptions that you feel offended you alone, but ignore the reality of your cohorts actions. you really need to chill out.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
159. Well those who are blind to what is going on
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:38 PM
Mar 2016

I am certainly positive you cannot see it

So here are some facts.

To the celtic cross as as symbol of white supremacy groups, take that with the ADL

http://www.adl.org/combating-hate/hate-on-display/c/celtic-cross.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/#.VvmjIRIrKRs

As to the anger among PoC over this... well you might want to go correct these folks

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23BernieMadeMeWhite&src=tyah

Let me know if you do, because it will be humorous, Some choice tweets

Raw Story ‏@RawStory 9h9 hours ago
#BernieMadeMeWhite: Meet the writer who called out the media for erasing people of color http://ow.ly/ZZprU



He is a white guy as you can see

Then there is this white washing happening

https://twitter.com/i/moments/714209875191054338

They are also white as you can see

:large

Then there is this, toon is fantastic

Latinos for Bernie ‏@Latinos4Bernie 22h22 hours ago
When #BernieMadeMeWhite, my neighbor could vouch for me at the voting booth, no ID required.

:large

See, you ignore this at your peril. Myself. I am real tired of this shit... and no longer consider HRC supporters allies in the fight, we are to that point, You are an example of why. You continue to ignore this at your peril. But this racism will be rather unhelpful in the end.

Oh and tell your fiend, I ain't escalating a thing. I know that this will not make a dickens of sense to you, Partisans are usually blind. Myself... well party realignments, I consider this racist shit part of that party realignment.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
160. I suppose I could post before and after pics of crystal meth users, and a bunch of tweets
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:53 PM
Mar 2016

....but it has nothing to do with this sub thread...just as this ridiculous post you just made has nothing to do with you, your claims of ethnic status being questioned and this sub thread.

These posts are not only escalating in anger and frustration, but heading into the absurd.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
161. It has all to do with it
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:55 PM
Mar 2016

as I said, you are blind. That is fine with me. Have an excellent day. I can only do this,

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
166. Yup I find the erasing of minorities ridicolous
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:11 PM
Mar 2016

we agree



I find it to be... what is word I am looking for rrr... rrraaa... racist

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
167. Oh, did you make another ASSumption? Another shit stirring attempt
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:17 PM
Mar 2016

another fine example of taking one reply and applying it incorrectly. Your are not any better at it this time, than you were the first time to your tried to do it.

this stinking pile is a perfect example of your MO.




 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
169. My MO I showed evidence
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:20 PM
Mar 2016

you are the one still denying this is hurting YOUR CANDIDATE. I don't care what you think. It is what it is. And it is not funny. The anger is real, Live with it, or not, I really don't give two shits about it.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
145. why would you not vote in November
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:01 PM
Mar 2016

according to your own self interests? Why would you take actions not in your own interests because of what some people said a few months back especially on a message board?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
147. I will, who I vote for
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:04 PM
Mar 2016

Have you heard of secret ballots? They are kind of a standard. Even in our pretend elections. Who I vote for is between me, my pillow and my husband maybe the conure, but she does not tell. Or if she does, she is not talking English, just conure.

Trust me on this. I tend to vote my values, even in these pretend times. At least I can complaint since I pretended to vote in a pretend election.

Oh and this shit will depress turnout.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
149. everyone would do what is best for themselves
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:10 PM
Mar 2016

regardless of what shit was said on message boards months before. I would hope no one gets in their own way by doing what is against their own interests simply due to someone they did not like saying something they did not like, especially on a message board.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
152. DO you understand how hurtful it is what HRC supporters have done
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:13 PM
Mar 2016

and how their actions will depress the vote? And how the actions of the campaign itself (and the media) are leading to real anger? Do you even pretend to get it?

By the way, just like the anti Obama feelings of the 2008 campaign were bad, the antisemitism is actually just as bad. I guess spots cannot be changed when running a modified southern strategy race, and it should be intolerable in the US,


Trump gets the lion's share of the rising antisemitism and other forms of racism, but she does share some of it. The dog whistles are what they are... hell, they left the dog whistle stage already.

Bad Dog

(2,025 posts)
29. Why not have a forum just for polls.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:46 PM
Mar 2016

Everybody argues on partisan lines and none of them mean anything anyway.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
32. I guess Hillary and her Supporters...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:15 PM
Mar 2016

better figure out a way to win them over. That is HER job - not Bernie supporters job.

And HINT - the way Hillary Supporters talk about and to us will not win us over.

Just saying.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
36. 33% of sanders supporters who are in the end supporting trump are NO
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:28 PM
Mar 2016

Supporters of sanders or can call themselves democrats..liberals .....or progressives..

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
39. Let me ask you, using your logic ...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:40 PM
Mar 2016

would the Cruz or Kasich supporters who refuse to vote for Trump in the general, be guilty of supporting the Democratic nominee?

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
53. There's supposedly many Repubs who will vote Dem instead of Trump. Esp. women for Hillary.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:42 PM
Mar 2016

They had a poll saying that a large number of Republican women (and suburban women) really dislike Trump I think either candidate would get a pretty good number of them.

TBF

(32,047 posts)
38. The question is whether Hillary supporters will back Bernie -
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:35 PM
Mar 2016

why are you assuming Hillary will be the candidate? After the blow out this weekend I wouldn't count my chickens before they are hatched.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
49. It tells me Bernie is not as reviled as Hillary.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:35 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary voters could support him. And they'd be smart if they did.

What does it tell you?

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
52. I stand by what I said.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:39 PM
Mar 2016

I will absolutely vote for the Democratic nominee. You will do as you choose.

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
58. I'm a Democrat, you see.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:54 PM
Mar 2016

I have been all my adult life. I campaigned for JFK in 1960, and for every Democratic presidential candidate since. I'll be doing the same this year. It's what I do.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
64. Looks like we both started
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:03 PM
Mar 2016

with JFK. This is the first time in my life I'm going to vote for America and the 99%. It feels good to vote for rather than against.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
174. Tells me exactly what everone already knew to be true.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:37 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie is picking up Independents in the primaries. Hillary has ZERO appeal outside the Democratic Party. Those are just facts.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
180. The Democratic rank-and-file have demonstrated a consistent pattern:
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:54 PM
Mar 2016

When a Republican is in the White House they fight against war, corporate campaign financing, and civil rights abuses.

When a Democrat is in the White House, they defend and justify all these things. Since the Republicans are in favor of these things, there is no resistance to them.

One benefit of a Republican Presidency is that rank-and-file Democrats will at least go through the motions of opposing this shit, rather than cheering it.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
51. I wonder what percentage of Hillary supporter won't support Bernie in the GE?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:38 PM
Mar 2016

Especially after much of mud that's come from his campaign and his devoted at her and her supporters.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
61. I'll be voting for a candidate that I prefer.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:57 PM
Mar 2016
Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost. John Quincy Adams

LowOiL

(16 posts)
87. Yep
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:39 PM
Mar 2016

If you don't stand firm on principle then people (and party) take you for granted the next election.

Time to take a stand, and show that your vote is worthy of being respected.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
100. If you don't want to go along with what the party decides
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:19 AM
Mar 2016

then you shouldn't participate in the primaries. You aren't taking a stand if you are participating now but won't vote later. You are dishonestly trying to take advantage of those who will honestly support the nominee if your guy wins, but then deciding you aren't going to reciprocate because you are brave or something. I have no respect for your vote at all.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
106. A vote against the Democratic candidate is a vote against gay rights, women, POC, Muslims, etc
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:10 AM
Mar 2016

Anyone who helps Trump get elected is not a liberal.

I don't care which Democrat wins, we need to beat Trump.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
111. I'm not voting for Trump.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:13 AM
Mar 2016

I'll be voting for the candidate I prefer. Who isn't against gay rights, women, POC, Muslims, etc.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
65. The Naderites thought they might change things but instead we got Bush policies. No-one revolted
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:04 PM
Mar 2016

except us lefties. We were allowed to protest behind fences several blocks away from Bush. So if you think it's the noble thing to allow a Republican in look at the Bush-Cheney years.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
83. Calling Bullshit
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:21 PM
Mar 2016

Nader was not responsible for Bush. His voters were not responsible for Bush.
Al Gore and the Democratic party lost that election. Did the Democratic party move left to capture progressive voters. Noooooo! The Democratic party moved even further right and put DWS at the head of the DNC.
So why on earth would we support a candidate and party that treats us with derision and scorn?

Democat

(11,617 posts)
105. If Nader had endorsed Gore there would have been no Iraq War
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:04 AM
Mar 2016

Tell your Nader excuses to the families of the dead.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
142. If tens of thousands of conservadems voted for Gore
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:40 PM
Mar 2016

In Florida we would not have had an Iraq war. What about them? They crossed for Bush, and Reagan too. I don't thnk you should play that game Amirite?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
67. There's a couple of Hillary talking points that are particularly stupid
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

1) Bernie is a candidate that whites will vote for!
2) They won't vote for Hillary in the general!

Both of these arguments only make sense if maintaining purity through losing the general election is the point of this whole exercise.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
70. Does this surprise anyone? I'm sure 95% of DU's Sanders supporters in key states would pinch their
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:33 PM
Mar 2016

nose and vote Hillary if worst comes to worst, but the "d" in DU is Democratic (put me in this camp).

Sanders has huge support among those without our fondness for the Democratic party (liberal libertarians, progressive independents, Greens, etc.).

Why would they support Hillary who they see (with some justification) as an architect and apologist for the broken status quo?

Also, think of the Progressive Democratics in deep blue or deep red states: their vote will not turn the statewide outcome either way. Why would they NOT vote Green in protest against a status quo establishment conservative Democratic nominee? What's the harm in their protest vote so long as they vote for the progressive Democrats down ballot?

Let's focus on making sure that ALL Democrats in ALL battleground states vote for Sanders or (gods forbid) Hillary no matter who is our nominee?

Why lament that Hillary cannot possibly win Sanders' liberal libertarian supporters, his progressive independent supporters, his Green party supporters, his Regan ex-Democrat Republican supporters, his *gasp* socialist supporters? Hillary has written off these voters off so she needs to win without them or we need to nominate Sanders (and you know where I lie down on that issue).

Why fret about these votes? If we want them, they are within our grasp - just nominate Sanders! If we don't want these votes, surely Jill Stein and Donald Trump and "stay at home" are the alternatives these people will choose.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
71. So we should stop supporting Hillary
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:33 PM
Mar 2016

because a third of Bernie voters are too immature...err "politically pure" to support Hillary in the GE?

What a load of bovine excrement. Why should we bow before blackmail?

Let them support whom they want, and let the chips fall where they may. I won't be blackmailed.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
72. pros and cons aside, this is a TREMENDOUS red flag for her strength in the GE
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:34 PM
Mar 2016

not just that she's disliked but that every deck has been stacked to prevent any challenge once the DNC finally comprehended the concept that anyone could be defeating such a "strong candidate"

many of them are indeed "not Democrats"--because they've been squeezed out of the party because their needs interfered with the donors' desires; so between the choice of being listened to or ignored, they're going to pick one and not show up for the other

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511587567

Corey_Baker08

(2,157 posts)
78. That 33% Will Be Responsible For A President Trump...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:13 PM
Mar 2016

That 33% Will Be The Reason We Will Have A 6-3 Tea Party Majority Supreme Court Of The United States.

That 33% Will Be The Reason Roe V Wade Is Overturned

That 33% Will Be The Reason The LGBT Community Will Lose Their Civil Rights

I Could Go On & On But Pretty Sure You Get The Point...

Corey_Baker08

(2,157 posts)
88. No That's The Reality Of The Situation
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:41 PM
Mar 2016

I've Read So Much About Bernie Or Bust Voters, However I Haven't Seen One Post From A Hillary Supporter(S) Pledging Not To Vote For Sanders If He Is The Democratic Nominee...

Bernie Or Bust Supporters Are Not Real Democrats, Real Democrats Vote For The Democratic Nominee For The Sake Of The Country & The Consequences Of A Republican President...

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
89. You have it backwards...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:50 PM
Mar 2016

The democratic candidate has to earn people's vote; they don't automatically get many people's vote just because they have a D next to their name. I and many others do not respond well to attempt to use fear to force us in line; fact of the matter for me is that without Bernie Sanders I would never have gotten invested in politics finally, including paying attention, donating, and phonebanking.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
92. No
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:56 PM
Mar 2016

When you participate in the party you are part of a deal where everybody pledges to support the winner. Your candidate participated in the party to take advantage of that strength. Not supporting the nominee is dishonest.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
107. Wrong, liberals need to vote for the Democratic candidate over Trump
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:13 AM
Mar 2016

You can't claim that you support liberal policies if you help elect a right wing racist. If you help elect a right wing racist, then you are part of the problem.

I don't care which Democratic candidate wins, we all need to work together to beat Trump.

Stop thinking only about yourself and start thinking about people who would suffer under a Trump presidency.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
116. Do we have to vote for someone to the right of Reagan and Bush.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:35 AM
Mar 2016

I won't. I don't agree with anything she is selling.

Meteor Man

(385 posts)
84. Wrong!
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:29 PM
Mar 2016

G Nobody will be responsible for losing the election besides the candidate and the Democratic party.
After blaming Naderites for Gore's loss the Democratic party moved right. Good job Rahm and DWS! The party has treated progressives with scorn and derision for a couple of decades.
ALL OF A SUDDEN you are shocked that Berniacs won't fall in line? Really?

 

Rass

(112 posts)
98. Bernie is more electable
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:14 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary is gonna need to cheat with her super-delegates to win. She also needs to avoid FBI criminal prosecution. Then there is the poor decision making on Iraq. You don't find these qualities repulsive as a democrat? She has too much baggage. The republicans are gonna eat her alive in the debates.

Why not just support a true progressive candidate with less baggage and avoid all of this mess? Shaming Bernie supporters will get you nowhere. Bernie's campaign wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the failures of the Obama administration. The people are sending Bernie to finish the job to get real change. We are tired of the corruption which Hillary has been more than happy to be a part of.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
171. ^This^
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

She's been cheating and playing dirty all along. It's a turn-off but the real reason people are against her is because she has too much baggage and no principles. Hillary is for Hillary.

Republicans hate her, Independents won't vote for her and her own party is deeply divided over her. It's not D vs. R this time around, it's the corrupt system vs. American citizens. Bernie is the only chance for real change.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
81. No if Hillary gets the nomination, Bernie Sanders will go out and campaign for her.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:17 PM
Mar 2016

There is way too much at stake in this country in terms of the direction it will go if the right wing nuts take over. Yeah, Hillary has some negatives, and so does Obama. But the bottom line is we can work with Hillary, the Republicans will work for the MIC and Wallstreet. No, Hillary Clinton is a very qualified candidate and will get my vote if nominated. It's too early to be putting this kind of garbage out there.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
90. Other polls show different numbers
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:54 PM
Mar 2016

"And each side's supporters say they would support the other candidate: among Sanders' supporters, 19 percent say they would not support Clinton, while just 11 percent of Clinton's supporters would not support Sanders."

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-leads-bernie-sanders-in-national-cbsnyt-poll/

Plus we would get some of those people back.

After this, any far left candidate should not receive consideration from the voters in primaries. This is like if you and a coworker decided to play poker with your whole paychecks. You win, but as soon as you do, you coworker grabs his stake back out of the pot and says he doesn't believe in poker. The people who won't support the nominee are liars and cheaters of the system they took part in.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
95. A third? I question that estimate.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:08 AM
Mar 2016

Where did that number come from? How can we be sure they will not change their minds when confronted by the possibility of President Donny Shortfingers?

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
97. Sour grapes don't stick around for long, no worry
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:12 AM
Mar 2016

When Sanders concedes, endorses Hillary, and calls on his followers to do the same, most will follow.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
103. If Hillary gets the nomination, most Bernie supporters will end up voting for her
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:35 AM
Mar 2016

They might not like her, and they probably won't give money or work for her campaign, but most aren't going to sit out the election or vote third party, or ffs vote for Trump.

I'm sure some will not vote for her no matter what, but no way do I believe that number is 33%. I don't doubt a lot of them feel that way now.

OTOH he's gaining steam and still has as shot at this so maybe we'll end up talking about Hillary voters supporting Bernie.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
104. Most children, by the time they go to high school, get over the ...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:52 AM
Mar 2016

... If I don't get my way, I'm taking my ball and going home temper tantrums.

We had a faction (PUMAs) that said that's how they would act back in 2008 ... it never materialized.

My guess is that then and now, it's mostly just Republican ratf--king. Anyone that truly is that stupid, I'd just tell them fine, go away and go crawl back under your rock, we don't need you. If they're too blind to see the selfishness of what they're doing, they're not worth it anyways.

This election is about the Supreme Court as much as anything else is. And if another Republican is elected President, the court could continue to swing to the right for another generation. If you like seeing woman's health clinics disappearing like they are in Texas; For Profit Companies telling you they have religious objections to woman's health, gays and who knows what next; more money in politics; less power for workers; more power for corporations; more pollution; etc. ... then go ahead vote for tRump or write in Bernie's name. But when things continue to get worse here in the United States because of YOUR actions ... don't come crying to me about why things are as bad as they are ... because you've been part of the problem not part of the solution.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
109. If they want to Naderize themselves and give us a fascist GOP POS to occupy the WH.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:08 AM
Mar 2016

They can go fuck themselves. Just like the PUMAs they're emulating.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
115. Ask Hillary Clinton whether she would accept the VP slot...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:30 AM
Mar 2016

...and see if you don't get a similarly upsetting answer.

The political landscape of the general will be very different, made so by the endorsement of one candidate of the other. It's silly to assign much weight to polling on an unspecified hypothetical.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
121. 33% of Bernie's supporters are disaffected libertarians with no one from the Paul family to vote for
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:56 AM
Mar 2016

this time around. They were never going to vote for Hillary anyway.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
123. Ratchet that number upwards after today's disgusting, Rovian, right-wing flavored attack.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:32 PM
Mar 2016

She's laid down with dogs, and we're seeing the fleas bounce off at record rate.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
155. I won't be getting over the piece of sleazy shit that Brock introduced today.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:16 PM
Mar 2016

It puts Hillary's campaign down in the bottom of the trough with Trump.

G_j

(40,366 posts)
153. I just dont believe that
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:16 PM
Mar 2016

It doesn't hold to my real life experience, and I know lots of Bernie supporters. I don"t see it.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
164. Sounds awfully similar to 2008
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:00 PM
Mar 2016

I'm sure a lot of people here remember the PUMA's (Party Unity My Ass) Clinton supporters back in 2008. I guess this may be a case of karma, what goes around comes around.

In the end, most Hillary supporters wound up supporting Obama in '08, and I'm sure that many Sanders supporters would also support Clinton over Trump, Cruz, or whomever the GOP puts up. Egos will be bruised, and I'm sure that many votes will be cast with teeth tightly clenched, but most of us do not want to hand the election over to the GOP

 

Califonz

(465 posts)
176. Fortunately I live in one of the bluest of the blue states
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:41 PM
Mar 2016

So I won't have to hold my nose and vote for HRC in the general to keep the GOP from winning our electoral votes.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
185. So many posts from a new person in their first few days on DU are suspicious...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

GeorgiaPeanuts; what is your motivation? How did you get so familiar with DU so quickly?

Just curious....

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
186. I lurked... since before the Iowa caucus
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:02 PM
Mar 2016

My first time being linked here was to an image thread CoffeeCat posted of a Hillary rally in Iowa that was half empty.

How rude of you to call into question my motives.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
189. Really...it's not rude to ask..
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:23 PM
Mar 2016

rude might be to alert to MIRT without asking.

200 + posts in 10 days is prolific...especially with such a charged up purpose.

I'm sure you are aware that there are trolls, socks, paid operatives, etc. that create disruptions.

If you are experienced with sites like DU, you might have said, "thanks for asking, but I'm a big Bernie fan" and "I just discovered DU after all these years" or something logical. It's suspicious that you "lurked" as you say, because that means you may be familiar with the post count and MIRT rules.

Your motives are obvious from the posts (it's what I call "trash and bash&quot . I don't mind the cadre of similarly-minded folks, since it won't change any minds here on this site. Questioning motives on DU is par for the course.

It's easy enough to ignore people and threads. I figure the time wasted posting so much junk is not time spent on GOTV for a candidate that I don't support!

Oh, well. Have a nice day no matter what your motives may be.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
190. I didn't join and start spamming non-stop...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:33 PM
Mar 2016

And I've been a part of the Sanders reddit since back in August when I first started supporting Sanders. Even have one of those SuperPack Founding Member stickers.

I'm not familiar with all the rules... All forums work generally the same way... to act like knowing how to use a forum means I'm a troll is crazy. Maybe your older, but for us Millenials it is easy to pick up forums like that.

Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #190)

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
195. You arrived instantly snarky, argumentative, rude and demeaning to many DUers
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:37 PM
Mar 2016

Very different from other new persons, that arrive first learning the ropes and figuring out the lay of the land, the tenor of posters. It's like you know who you want to attack, from day one. That kind of action is very reminiscent of past DUers. You picked up some poor posting habits from them.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
196. I did not...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:45 PM
Mar 2016

I joined March 14th... made 10 comments so I could share a Sanders video I wanted to from Reddit. Stuck around a bit more then dropped off from the site because of the Sanders losses on the 15th as I knew if I stayed I would probably say something bad faced with all the anti-Sanders vibe after that happened. I didn't come back around until Saturday to cheer on Bernie's great wins and have stuck around since. I am critical of Clinton, but I didn't think I was violating any rules, if I am let me know and I will avoid doing so in the future.

0rganism

(23,940 posts)
187. i think that number is over by at least 25 points
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016

if Bernie loses in the primary but goes to the convention and gets a few planks into the Democratic platform, i think he endorses Hillary and calls for unification. he'll probably campaign for her too. that's going to change a lot of minds right there.

but the real unity enforcer is going to be the assclown who emerges from the GOP primary. unless the establishment finds some kind of juju to push Kasich or Graham into the driver's seat, we're going to have built-in GOTV action like none of us have seen before. people will stand in line for hours -- maybe days -- to vote against Trump or Cruz.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
191. Considering that over half of Bernie's supporters are independents, they very well could go to Trump
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:46 PM
Mar 2016

0rganism

(23,940 posts)
192. could, but they won't
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:52 PM
Mar 2016

they're Bernie supporters, if he says voting for Clinton is a good idea most of them are going to listen.

which kind of brings us back to the first reply, try that poll again in October and see how it looks then.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»33% of Bernie Sanders Sup...