Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:18 PM Mar 2016

Countless Failings of the DNC|Shamelessly breaking their own rules and regulations to get Clinton in

http://observer.com/2016/03/the-countless-failings-of-the-dnc/

The Countless Failings of the DNC
The Democratic Establishment is shamelessly breaking their own rules and regulations to get Clinton into office


The Democratic National Committee rigged the Democratic primaries to ensure Hillary Clinton would win the presidential nomination. Evidence suggesting this claim is overwhelming and, as the primaries progress, the DNC’s collusion with the Clinton campaign has become more apparent.

Hillary Clinton has known for years she would be running for president in 2016. Fundraisers were held on her behalf as early as 2014, before she announced her campaign, as it was well known throughout the Democratic establishment that she would run for president. Unlike Jeb Bush, also an establishment-backed Republican candidate with very wealthy donors, no Democrats in office dared to run against Ms. Clinton. The DNC did not suspect an Independent and three virtually unknown former politicians would contend for the nomination. Aside from clearing out her competition in the primaries, the co-chair to Ms. Clinton’s failed 2008 campaign—Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is currently the DNC Chair—scheduled only six debates compared to the eight scheduled for Republican candidates, and enacted a new rule effectively banning Democratic presidential candidates from participating in any unsanctioned debates.

In addition to a limited debate schedule strategically presented at times when viewership would be low, super delegates overwhelmingly came out to support Ms. Clinton—many before the primary elections even began. The DNC helped the Clinton campaign lure super delegate support through the Hillary Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee that received thousands of dollars in donations from wealthy and corporate interests. With the maximum allowable donation of $2,700 going to the Clinton campaign, after the DNC took their cut the Clinton campaign could choose which state Democratic Parties received which funding. In New Hampshire, for example, Senator Bernie Sanders won over 60 percent of the popular vote in the primary—yet Ms. Clinton received the support of all six of the state’s super delegates after the New Hampshire Democratic Party accepted over $100,000 in donations from the Hillary Victory Fund. The fund has allowed Ms. Clinton to significantly outraise Mr. Sanders, despite Mr. Sanders having nearly double the amount of campaign donors.


‘She and the political machine are not going to invest the time or money to beat the drums for voter registration because they know full well those are primarily votes she won’t receive.’

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Countless Failings of the DNC|Shamelessly breaking their own rules and regulations to get Clinton in (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 OP
K & R AzDar Mar 2016 #1
Nice Job! Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #2
Rigged, how did the DNC or the Clintons rig anything, what rules did any of them break? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #3
C'min TA! You're smart enough to figure it out. floriduck Mar 2016 #10
The difference between "thinking" and "thought," one is still a work in progress. nt TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #20
I was just going to post this...brutal takedown of DNC. GOOD READ! FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #4
Mr. President - please replace DWS. jwirr Mar 2016 #5
The worst thing is that these are not the best actions for the Democratic Party. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #6
According to the paper owned by Trump's son-in-law DesertRat Mar 2016 #7
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #8
Hmmmm - I have a Mercedes and a Lincoln of my own! n/t RKP5637 Mar 2016 #11
Sorry dude, the bro meme just ain't working anymore elias7 Mar 2016 #12
What does it mean when his account says flagged for review? nt GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #14
The 2016 election well might not go the way the DNC/DWS are planning. Millions don't like her and RKP5637 Mar 2016 #9
Trump is not a set in stone politician PATRICK Mar 2016 #18
The Observer is owned by Trump's son-in-law... SidDithers Mar 2016 #13
That's all you got? ljm2002 Mar 2016 #15
kill the messenger---david brock amborin Mar 2016 #16
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #17
K&R for ugly truth. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #19
Evidence of "breaking the rules" please. Jitter65 Mar 2016 #21
 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
10. C'min TA! You're smart enough to figure it out.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:34 PM
Mar 2016

And why are you wondering off the Hillary Clinton reservation? You're much better at agreeing with your own common supporters than being here.

Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Original post)

elias7

(3,991 posts)
12. Sorry dude, the bro meme just ain't working anymore
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:41 PM
Mar 2016

Ad hominemize all you want, but you clearly have no idea off the breadth of people, male and female, old and young, white and non-white, who are preferring Sanders to Clinton. It's growing and those who support Clinton are sounding more and more desperate.... And mean.

RKP5637

(67,086 posts)
9. The 2016 election well might not go the way the DNC/DWS are planning. Millions don't like her and
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:34 PM
Mar 2016

republicans are likely not going to dump Trump and vote for Hillary. Just my hunch, and yes, I might certainly and hopefully be wrong. Hillary carries a lot of baggage and millions upon millions literally hate the establishment. And, I am not a Trump fan in the least, just calling it as I see it right now. Question is, what happens if Trump moves moderate now he's captured his base. They likely will not leave him. Trump is smart and he knows how to place the game with his showmanship.




PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
18. Trump is not a set in stone politician
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:09 AM
Mar 2016

He seems to have one of those blank checks to rewrite the script as a total outsider(albeit a conceited ignoramus). He is likely to fail, likely unable to transition to sanity- but it is a possibility. Hillary has peaked and set, actually a sitting duck, who could still look good by comparison, but then it will be war of dislikes. The people doing the tantrums about their loss of control over the nomination now should not be taken at their hypocritical word they will dump Trump in the fall. They too can and may do one of those incredible about faces or evn succeed in getting rid of their "nemesis". Maybe this will all look like smoke and mirrors contrived to do the impossible- to saddle us with a totally unwanted GOP president because they just want their WH back- never an issue faced or acted upon.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Countless Failings of the...