2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCountless Failings of the DNC|Shamelessly breaking their own rules and regulations to get Clinton in
http://observer.com/2016/03/the-countless-failings-of-the-dnc/The Countless Failings of the DNC
The Democratic Establishment is shamelessly breaking their own rules and regulations to get Clinton into office
Hillary Clinton has known for years she would be running for president in 2016. Fundraisers were held on her behalf as early as 2014, before she announced her campaign, as it was well known throughout the Democratic establishment that she would run for president. Unlike Jeb Bush, also an establishment-backed Republican candidate with very wealthy donors, no Democrats in office dared to run against Ms. Clinton. The DNC did not suspect an Independent and three virtually unknown former politicians would contend for the nomination. Aside from clearing out her competition in the primaries, the co-chair to Ms. Clintons failed 2008 campaignDebbie Wasserman Schultz, who is currently the DNC Chairscheduled only six debates compared to the eight scheduled for Republican candidates, and enacted a new rule effectively banning Democratic presidential candidates from participating in any unsanctioned debates.
In addition to a limited debate schedule strategically presented at times when viewership would be low, super delegates overwhelmingly came out to support Ms. Clintonmany before the primary elections even began. The DNC helped the Clinton campaign lure super delegate support through the Hillary Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee that received thousands of dollars in donations from wealthy and corporate interests. With the maximum allowable donation of $2,700 going to the Clinton campaign, after the DNC took their cut the Clinton campaign could choose which state Democratic Parties received which funding. In New Hampshire, for example, Senator Bernie Sanders won over 60 percent of the popular vote in the primaryyet Ms. Clinton received the support of all six of the states super delegates after the New Hampshire Democratic Party accepted over $100,000 in donations from the Hillary Victory Fund. The fund has allowed Ms. Clinton to significantly outraise Mr. Sanders, despite Mr. Sanders having nearly double the amount of campaign donors.
She and the political machine are not going to invest the time or money to beat the drums for voter registration because they know full well those are primarily votes she wont receive.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)And why are you wondering off the Hillary Clinton reservation? You're much better at agreeing with your own common supporters than being here.
TheBlackAdder
(28,167 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Original post)
Post removed
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)elias7
(3,991 posts)Ad hominemize all you want, but you clearly have no idea off the breadth of people, male and female, old and young, white and non-white, who are preferring Sanders to Clinton. It's growing and those who support Clinton are sounding more and more desperate.... And mean.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)republicans are likely not going to dump Trump and vote for Hillary. Just my hunch, and yes, I might certainly and hopefully be wrong. Hillary carries a lot of baggage and millions upon millions literally hate the establishment. And, I am not a Trump fan in the least, just calling it as I see it right now. Question is, what happens if Trump moves moderate now he's captured his base. They likely will not leave him. Trump is smart and he knows how to place the game with his showmanship.
PATRICK
(12,228 posts)He seems to have one of those blank checks to rewrite the script as a total outsider(albeit a conceited ignoramus). He is likely to fail, likely unable to transition to sanity- but it is a possibility. Hillary has peaked and set, actually a sitting duck, who could still look good by comparison, but then it will be war of dislikes. The people doing the tantrums about their loss of control over the nomination now should not be taken at their hypocritical word they will dump Trump in the fall. They too can and may do one of those incredible about faces or evn succeed in getting rid of their "nemesis". Maybe this will all look like smoke and mirrors contrived to do the impossible- to saddle us with a totally unwanted GOP president because they just want their WH back- never an issue faced or acted upon.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Any port in a storm, eh?
Sid
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,284 posts)Thanks for the thread, GeorgiaPeanuts.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Shame on DWS.
Shame on Clinton
Shame on all her enablers.