2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"The shameful Bernie race smear: Hillary supporters have played a dirty, dangerous game"
The toxicity -- and falseness -- of the "Bernie so white" narrative is a real stain on Democrats and the left
Nothing this primary season in the Democratic presidential race will come close to the sheer lunacy of behavior transpiring in a Republican Party on the verge of self-implosion. But unfortunately, in the non-Trump dominated side of the U.S. political world there also has been some alarming behavior on the left that cant be ignored. And while Hillary Clinton has received the usual share of sexist and misogynistic comments, it has been Bernie Sanders and, in particular, his supporters who have endured a lot of ridiculous things.
The constant drumbeat of Bernies plans arent realistic, Bernies plans arent passable and the BernieBro have reached their own level of online fame. Although all three of those have their own major flaws, a discussion has been made extensively about them that has created sustained negatives around the septuagenarian candidate and his fans.
One key aspect that has been bubbling for a while now, spun off from the BernieBro label and not discussed like it needs to be, is the opponents or most acerbic critics of Sanders, intentionally or unintentionally, implying that his supporters have no noticeable racial diversity or that his campaign doesnt appeal to minority voters.
Whats so troubling about this enduring narrative is the disturbing insistence on completely ignoring or aggressively dismissing any of Bernies minority supporters who arent famous. Its a focused and determined echo on painting Sanders as truly representing only young or old white liberals, and that Sanders and his backers are unable to acknowledge or express white systemic privilege. And in either their strong support for Clinton or their unwillingness to fully analyze Sanders fairly or comprehensively on race, one of this elections deleterious aspects on the left can no longer be dismissed.
The toxicity of the Bernie is white and for whites only drive has become even more glaring over the last month, with cleverly crafted smears at Sanders hitting exactly the sustained narrative they wanted to hit and fueled by Clintons legacy domination of the black vote.
...
About the writer: https://twitter.com/sluggahjells
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)feel erased and marginalized by the dominant narrative which asserts no such people exist.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)You are no innocents.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Or latinos? Don't you find that whole conversation dismissive toward the millions of people who are making that connection?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)POC. That can not be denied.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)When it becomes the central theme of your campaign to just constantly repeat that your opponent does not connect with a certain ethnic group, that's offensive.
Hillary fans are not repeating that simply to spread information. They are repeating it hoping to make sure it stays that way. And to discourage people of color from checking out Bernie as an option because their ethnic identity doesn't line up. Basically they are making an appeal based on ethnic identity. They might as well just take out a huge billboard that says "Bernie Sanders is No Friend of Blacks". That might even be ok if he deserved it. But he doesn't.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)This conversation is at an end.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)The number one topic for Hillary supporters, for almost a year now, has been that Bernie Sanders can't connect to certain ethnic groups.
Don't you guys have like, you know, any other issues that you care about in this campaign besides Bernie Sanders poll numbers with different groups of people?
Do you care about issues effecting the country or no?
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)Or they wouldn't be trying to rip the country in half because of race.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)That's not the point here.
The point is calling out the toxicity of the Bernie is white and for whites only messaging campaign.
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)And race baiting is racist.
Bernie is for everyone!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Sheesh. And Hillary supporters have the nerve to criticize Bernie supporters over race. You guys just care about them if they support Hillary. Hillary and her supporters have been bullying and ridiculing black Bernie supporters since Bernie announced. Racism is being used as a political ploy. It's astounding that even black Hillary supporters put Hillary before racism since they are exploiting race in an attempt to help her.
.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)So spare me your fake outrage.
dchill
(38,436 posts)But you are gleeful that the smear exists, and you water it like a valuable crop.
Where is the difference? Oh, and you ARE implying with every post that you believe, or agree with the smear.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Be specific in your allegation. Back it up.
dchill
(38,436 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)dchill
(38,436 posts)And to prove it, you just replied to yourself.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"When called out for his interesting array of tweets that would leave the impression that Sanders passively insulted black voters, Smith predictably hid behind the wall of the vague I didnt specifically say that, so you cant prove it response, giving off some level of guilt. The Sanders too smart bit, especially after the SC loss, was a bad look, Smith tweet chided. But folks, if I wanted to call him racist, Id have done that.
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/12/the_shameful_bernie_race_smear_hillary_supporters_have_played_a_dirty_dangerous_game/
It's almost like we've all heard the same excuses and evasions for months on end.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Basically Hillary insiders fomenting a false racist meme against Bernie who does not have a racist bone in his body...
Hillbots might check out THIS video and then look themselves in the mirror... or at least Try...
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)It isn't a central theme of the Clinton campaign. It's a central fact of the primaries that on average, Clinton has done substantially better with black and Hispanic voters. Nowhere does that mean not a single black or Hispanic voter votes for Sanders. Nor does it mean that Sanders is incapable of connecting with a majority of minorities. It means that in this campaign, he hasn't done so yet.
The exact same argument could be made about young voters who choose Clinton. We're constantly seeing claims that because Sanders voters are younger, that he represents the future of the Democratic party. Does that mean that no younger voters support Clinton or that Sanders supporters are "erasing" younger Clinton supporters? No, and claiming such would be silly hyperbole. So is claiming that Clinton supporters are "erasing" minority voters who opt for Sanders.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)When that's your #1 topic then that's your #1 topic.
Rockyj
(538 posts)I am Native American and attended my caucus in WA state and there were just as many white supporters as there is brown. Hillary doesn't have a better hold on Hispanics and blacks in the west. Its a myth probably created by Hillary's camp. Actually, he's doing very well with Native American's & even better then Obama. http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/03/21/bernie-sanders-expands-native-inclusion-163829
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Blacks? Sure...although Bernie's starting to break through a bit. Latinos? Not nearly so cut-and-dried. Asians? While there are states with large Asian populations still to vote, Sanders destroyed Clinton in WA and HI (the latter being majority Asian). Native Americans? Not even close, as Alaska showed (and Alaska is 14% Native).
So it kinda depends, doesn't it?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)on DU constantly say it is 'homogeneous and largely white'. It is a bit less white than Illinois, far less white than Texas and less white than the US as a whole. One quarter of Oklahoma's voters, erased for a false narrative.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)LOL.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)So why misframe and wind up inflaming division. This is awful.
The whole "southern states don't matter" is simply based on the prospect of a General Election win. How in the world is it justified to claim that it means Southerners don't matter?
It's irresponsible.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)them. It was the fucking stupidest thing, and many here recced those psycho threads.
This is a primary- and it is designed to include Dems in every state- via delegates. There is not valid rationalization for that crap. None.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)And what about the white and independent vote?
So "people posted" and that's a rationalization for the dust up including made up claims about 3/5 votes?
"It was the fucking stupidest thing, and many here recced those psycho threads. There is not valid rationalization for that crap. None."
You see how that works.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)voters who have "Stockholm syndrome" was pretty fucked up too- yet both were pretty popular threads. Granted one of those posters was dumped for being a rat fucker, but he was still way too popular here.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)That's why DU exists. And you'd acknowledge the media's avoidance of Sander's.
I wasn't happy with the article that framed "Stockholm Syndrome". And I think that frame was suggested by a poster prior to the article.
But all that is no excuse for calling Sanders or the majority of his supporters racist. And we've not even discussed Sanders treatment regarding his civil rights background and intent. You'd agree. Damned stupid. And you think no one supporting HRC here hasn't acted in a way to get tagged a rat?? Be honest. A lot of "up in your face" posts went down.
So I'm all, what, we're going to have race divisions resulting from a food fight?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)"white supremacy" in Washington. When people here said he was ignoring black people (back when he was) people here immediately reacted AS IF he was called racist. Those are two different things. People jumped the fucking shark on that.
You're right, it should no the a food fight. But there was a lot of nastiness and overreaction.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)He's fighting for the 85% who are getting walloped, he's asking the 85-95% to chip in, and he's telling the 5%..."hey look". Color has nothing to do with that.
I see how it comes off as "ignoring" but he thinks, and I agree, that the messed up economic scene is driving black poverty and white poverty and every other color. And it's the best way to take a serious bite out of racism.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)are pretending these are phony issues and we are inconvenient wedges. We women do notice when we are ignored, as do most POC.
I do appreciate the changes Sanders made in his campaign a great deal. I truly do think he is a great guy. I also refuse to demonize Hillary, so that garners me loads of hatred here. Been called a lot of names for not participating in their five months of hate. Which sucks for Bernie, because I decided not to do any campaigning in the primary because I don't love either campaign now. It will all be over by the time my primary comes in- I can well afford to be dispassionate. (and am by nature very cynical)
I plan to save my energy for the general. Th USSC matters more to me than either candidate.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)thoughts on this before. LOL.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Divide and fail
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)all faking it. For a dozen years of more- all faking it for this moment.
Yeah, that depth of knowledge into the issues sure has scored you loads of points with us. LOL.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)To divide the electorate in the Democratic primaries.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Amazing that you assume this is news to anyone. Been seeing this silly crap about "social issues" cut and pasted here for more than six months here. We all have.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"Growing up in the Bible Belt of Texas, I thought for sure there was no way - if I'm 100 percent true to myself and come out as a gay, African-American person in 2015 - that people are going to be able to accept that and understand it. Todrick Hall
"For me the greatest revenge of all is having a happy adulthood, waking up in my gorgeous turquoise bedroom in the morning beside a person who really inspires me. That's the best revenge a girl-loving girl from the Bible belt could possibly have. And, importantly, it's healthy."-Beth Ditto
"I just think Texas and that whole Bible Belt section is so, like, corporate. And I don't agree with organized religion in that respect."- Author: Hunter Parrish
Maybe "Bible Belt" refers not so much to the popularity of the Good Book in these parts, but to the biblical-plague level of insects.― Paul Jury
I could go on and on because 'The Bible Belt' is an extremely common idiom, used by Americans in and from all walks of life and regions of the country. To suddenly claim it is some nasty vorbotten phrase is insane. Not rational.
I mean I can grab hold of verbiage used by virtually anyone and turn it against them. It's a tactic, a set of ploys. I don't do that because it is a cheap, petty, ploy, a tawdry tactic.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)What is with the pretense? Why pretend my comment had no context- and could "mean anything".
You know better.
840high
(17,196 posts)supporters ever have is to blast the source.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Why mock them?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You still see it here, we're all Bernie Bros because they refuse to acknowledge our existence.
Watch the usual suspects try to blow this off too.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I hope he wins....it is my hope.
villager
(26,001 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)So I try to do the down low.
villager
(26,001 posts)Evidently that takes a particular talent...
Tanuki
(14,914 posts)who vote for Clinton, whose credentials include having been both Secretary of State and U S Senator, as voting with our vaginas or voting for her because she has a uterus, and you"re talking about marginalizing women?
djean111
(14,255 posts)because she is a woman. Like breaking that glass ceiling is more important than issues, or what she actually did when she held those positions. That was, and is, insulting. As was being informed that if I, as a woman, did not vote for Hillary, I must have mommy issues or resent strong women. What absolute rubbish. That is what drew the criticism.
Personally, I am dismissive because I find her deeds, like voting for Iraq and sending those children back to die as a warning, shilling for fracking and the TPP - reprehensible. And her proclivity for war disgusting. I would not admire those things in a male politician. Not for one second. And I am dismissive of any woman OR man who does not find those things objectionable.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Oh wait, that was your candidate's surrogate.
Or telling women there's a special place in hell for us if we don't support Hillary?
Nope, that was you guys again!
The fact is that some women are voting for the lesser candidate because they want a woman in the white house. They admit Bernie has better policies, is more progressive and aligns with them politically but still support Hillary because it's "time for a woman president".
That is what is meant by voting with a vagina and it's not marginalizing women, it's telling it like it is.
Truth hurts.
Otoh we've been called faux feminists, traitors to our sex and even accused of lying about our gender because we don't support the woman. We've been told that our vote for Bernie is a vote for "white male rule" and that we're just afraid of strong women.
Tanuki
(14,914 posts)It is disgusting to have you defend the marginalization of Clinton supporters to their genital organs and it takes a special kind of gall to call that kind of insult "telling it like it is." If it were any other context, you would be honest enough to call it out.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They apologized because they were wrong, I don't have to defend anyone because Bernie's spokespeople never marginalized women.
jillan
(39,451 posts)It's really tongue and cheek. #BernieMadeMeWhite
Bernie supporters of all different cultures & ethnicities having a little fun at the media's expense.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Vote2016
(1,198 posts)uponit7771
(90,301 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)uponit7771
(90,301 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Or Clinton's belief about black superpredators? Or the damage done ti black people by welfare reform, the war on drugs and mass incarceration? Yeah...saying their are people who are black who live is ghettos is by far more important. Pathetic.
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)... and unless you think blacks are super predators or fit in the description that she was mentioning that's not her fault that's yours.
Most blacks aren't on welfare, so no.. .most blacks don't care about welfare and around 80% of blacks aren't poor
Black being mostly poor or caring about things like welfare and shit is just another negative stereotype that people who aren't exposed to a wide swath of people of color adhere too because they don't know any better.
Yes, a presidential candidate who claims what Sanders did about blacks and ghettos is pathetic... he should know better and in this campaign he's shown that his exposure to blacks ended around the 1980s...
around the time the blacks = poor bullshit started
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)we've seen here on DU.
K & R
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)... the fact that some don't know which black person is random is more a testament of where some on the left are when it comes to their exposure to different types of Americans.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Asians, Islanders, Native Americans, Latinos, Alaskan Natives, Native Hawaiians and many others, not to mention the large population of those of us who are a mixture of two ethnicities.
We are a diverse nation and Bernie supporters are being tired of being called ALL White!
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)... with someone who at one time called Obama niggerizzed then what the hell do you expect?
People NOT to start to look at this guy through raciallized glass's when he has someone stump for him who've said some of the most vile raciallized shit about America's first black president?
Either way, few if any said all minorities... people have been saying all along it's blacks and Hispanics and his supporters are mostly white...
All that's true..
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it is the center and it is the Clinton campaign and allies. and I am tired of this shit
cui bono
(19,926 posts)They are centrists. They are championing a moderate Republican in terms of policy.
.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)You got it.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)From the top down.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)There are so many issues that need addressed in the Black Community and we engage in this type of b.s.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And clearly a ridiculous tactic. The Clintons are not exact clean when it comes to race...that makes it even more disgusting.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)I think people are really angry at the math. Before the primaries started lots of Sanders people assumed that he had completely locked up every demographic with his message, but when the actual numbers came in it was a rude shock. What made the whole thing divisive was the Stockholm Syndrome comments, the Confederacy comments and the overall dismissive attitude.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)certain ethics groups, you don't have a message, you have a smear campaign.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)They did this with venomous accusations while they masqueraded as true liberals and progressives.
eridani
(51,907 posts)--behind Clinton in every demographic. What demographic, in your opinion, was Sanders supposed to have locked up?
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)She wants it so, so bad and in some part it seems like she feels it is reserved for her, it approaches creepy a bit IMHO.
840high
(17,196 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)divide and conquer and win at all costs. Lie, cheat, steal and smear, whatever it takes to achieve the nomination. Shameful.
Tarc
(10,472 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Remember Bill in the 1992 primaries working for black support. Then after he had locked up the nomination: Sister Souljah! He smacked down Jesse Jackson and set that black woman straight and won needed red neck support in the GE.
See welfare reform and crime bill. More redneck support.
Then there was Hillary in 2008 subtly going after Obama on race. That didn't work out so well for her, so this time around she's taken the other side against Bernie. It is disgusting, it's what the Clintons do to win.
840high
(17,196 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)I don't doubt that the pro-Clinton forces played the race card, then and now.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)I remember all the shit Bill pulled, plus welfare reform, war on drugs, and the crap they pulled with Obama. No wonder they played the race card with Bernie
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)"Clinton aides claim Obama photo wasn't intended as a smear"
And they blamed Obama of course:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/25/barackobama.hillaryclinton
senz
(11,945 posts)from knowing who Bernie Sanders is and what he stands for so that they will not vote for him.
Those who push these lies are shameless political operatives who do not deserve any respect whatsoever, either before or after the primaries.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)at least as tough and Progressive on this important healing issue as Hillary.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)supporters name it so and plant yet another negative meme against Hillary Clinton. Remember, it was Bernie who shouted that he would do better outside the south...not Hillary Clinton or her supporters. It was Bernie and his media pals that played up this issue. And like so many other unsavory things Bernie does he takes no responsibility for it and then tries to blame Hillary for it.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)The only stats that matter are the ones that make Hillary look great.
vintx
(1,748 posts)that's more like it
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Bringing up extremely isolated statements over her long career and extremely isolated votes to portray as some sort of right wing racist corporate shill and to regularly use the same tired Republican attacks against her are far more shameful than anything she has done. If she wanted to do something shameful, she would be playing up Sanders Castro comments far more and making a big national ad out of his ghetto remarks and his rape fantasy.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)insulting. She has yet to make amends for it and her supporters here seemed to agree with her Reaganite bullshit:
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And welfare reform. The CDF considered it a betrayal to children, and three people resigned from the Clinton administration because of it. To hear some tell the story, everything was just rosy.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)To vote for Clinton. This one will vote for Sanders.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)about some of his plans, some days his "health care for everyone" statements sound as bad as trumps "bring back the jobs" babble. is he really going to repeal obamacare so he can bring up universal healthcare. lol, that is too damn funny, does anyone really think any democrat in congress is going through that mess again. LOL.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Hillary and Chelsea were the ones claiming that.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)Duppers
(28,117 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:27 PM - Edit history (1)
they make it about the target's response rather than the facts
if Clinton's protested by BLM or wins after Latinos were disenfranchised, now they can twist the situation around entirely, saying that these Berniebros only cared about race when their candidate failed to benefit: if you defend yourself that only confirms your guilt once and for all
you can't fight them on their own terms, you have to point out the game they're playing