Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:28 PM Mar 2016

Arizona Sec of State admits voter party registrations were switched

Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan (R) just admitted to the AZ House elections committee that some voters' party affiliations were changed, which led to them not being able to cast normal votes on the presidential preference election day last week. Some of those voters cast provisional ballots as a result. Reagan says this happened to someone in her own office.

She says her staff are now reviewing paper registration forms to try to pinpoint where the problems occurred. She also said that they have made counting the provisional ballots a top priority.

http://www.abc15.com/live

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arizona Sec of State admits voter party registrations were switched (Original Post) TheDormouse Mar 2016 OP
And not a word from Hillary ibegurpard Mar 2016 #1
Clinton won AZ, there's no need for scare quotes, and she's not the one geek tragedy Mar 2016 #5
Quote marks are used in lieu of the term "so-called". pacalo Mar 2016 #14
Clinton won AZ. People on the Internet irrationally deny all kinds of facts. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #16
Maybe she didn't win. We'll never know how many Sanders voters were disenfranchised. I would bet ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #21
She should be screaming. PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #49
The term "scare quotes" doesn't make sense. pacalo Mar 2016 #18
. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #19
DU is the only place I see it. pacalo Mar 2016 #26
you are incorrect, it is not an uncommon phrase geek tragedy Mar 2016 #28
Like launching a cheap husband to the polls Politicalboi Mar 2016 #27
lol, Clenis Interreptus nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #29
How do you know she won? They just held a thoroughly corrupt election. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #41
We know who won. Clinton did. Period. That some Sanders dead enders choose to wallow in absurd geek tragedy Mar 2016 #43
That's not a truthful claim. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #44
You are free to deny reality if you want. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #45
Its in all caps, it must be true! bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #55
Vote suppression occurred, and as a matter of legal fact Hillary Clinton geek tragedy Mar 2016 #60
So you think voter suppression occured without it being a conspiracy? bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #61
yes, Republicans are capable of vote supression and running a poor records geek tragedy Mar 2016 #62
Ok, but you did see how Sanders supporters were disproportionately effected, right? bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #63
no I haven't seen any evidence that there was a targeting of Sanders geek tragedy Mar 2016 #64
The more Bernie supporters accuse Clinton, when it is the GOP responsible, the easier Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #51
I'm not implying Clinton is responsible ibegurpard Mar 2016 #56
Exactly, she is a POLITICIAN, look at what I just told someone else Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #59
Would you expect anything different? This is how she has become so hated. / FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #34
Lol Dem2 Mar 2016 #36
No, she in no way sets the tone for her minions by circumventing rules and ethical standards. Nt JudyM Mar 2016 #39
Does she? Dem2 Mar 2016 #50
It is pure fiction to think Hillary had anything to do with this. apnu Mar 2016 #37
Why oh why SheenaR Mar 2016 #42
Because the GOP are racist, bigoted pricks in AZ. apnu Mar 2016 #46
Winners usually grin, it's losers who usually want a new deal n/t HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #38
Ooooo Doggie GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #2
Yea odd the open primaries where fine Gwhittey Mar 2016 #6
I think deadlines and mistaken memories plague closed primaries more than people want to admit. LonePirate Mar 2016 #12
Well AZ Gwhittey Mar 2016 #15
Our local Board of elections here in rural (red area) Karma13612 Mar 2016 #31
Any registration postmarked or received before the deadline should be accepted. LonePirate Mar 2016 #33
check your registration NOW; why wait until election day? TheDormouse Mar 2016 #47
Oh, you can be sure I will. Karma13612 Mar 2016 #57
Michigan too. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #7
Sounds like a hearty helping of crow deserves to be eaten to me. nt VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #9
Those who trash whistle blowers are usually guilty ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #22
that's some rare candor nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #3
Sec of State also said the state did not tell the counties TheDormouse Mar 2016 #4
Huh? NV Whino Mar 2016 #24
I'm confused; how do I blame this on HC and DWS? brooklynite Mar 2016 #8
cite something by some anonymous bloggers nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #10
You don't need a reason. DURHAM D Mar 2016 #11
Well if it wasn't someone elses fault then it must be HC and DWS. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #13
Who has blamed HRC or DWS for this? We were told that... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #17
Hillary Clinton's Election Fraud in Arizona Exposed brooklynite Mar 2016 #20
you don't have to blame them ibegurpard Mar 2016 #58
Wow! Provisional ballots will actually be counted! (nt) pat_k Mar 2016 #23
I didn't quote her verbatim; there was some wiggle room in there TheDormouse Mar 2016 #25
Checking registration paper trail... pat_k Mar 2016 #30
so the provisional ballots will be added in? amborin Mar 2016 #32
Hillary's silence places her on the other side of democracy. ViseGrip Mar 2016 #35
She should suspend her campaign, or she hates America!!! JoePhilly Mar 2016 #48
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #40
She needs to spend time in Tent City. EyeOnLife Mar 2016 #52
"It happens sometimes. People just explode." Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #53
They already acknowledged they were hacked! FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #54
This is why I don't want Trump in the General Peachhead22 Mar 2016 #65
Link does not work for me---just commercials...is there text? nt Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #66
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. Clinton won AZ, there's no need for scare quotes, and she's not the one
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:32 PM
Mar 2016

at fault.

If people care about vote suppression, they'll stop using it as an excuse to launch cheap shots in the primary contest.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
14. Quote marks are used in lieu of the term "so-called".
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:50 PM
Mar 2016

Nothing "scary" about that. See how that works?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
16. Clinton won AZ. People on the Internet irrationally deny all kinds of facts.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:54 PM
Mar 2016

I know how scare quotes and 'so-called' works. Republicans use it when they refer to "Obama's so-called birth certificate."

The meaning is crystal clear, even though the thought process behind it is not.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
21. Maybe she didn't win. We'll never know how many Sanders voters were disenfranchised. I would bet
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:07 PM
Mar 2016

there were many more than Hillary voters. Explains Hillary's bizarre silence on what should be a slam dunk issue for a true progressive to address. Gives the appearance of hiding something.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
49. She should be screaming.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:08 PM
Mar 2016

There's a chance this type of bs could bite her in the butt come election day. If she thinks that Republicans won't try to commit fraud on voting machines she's sorely mistaken.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
28. you are incorrect, it is not an uncommon phrase
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:20 PM
Mar 2016

this is usually the case when a phrase has its own Wikipedia entry

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
27. Like launching a cheap husband to the polls
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:20 PM
Mar 2016

That's voter suppression too. But to some, we just need to get over it.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
41. How do you know she won? They just held a thoroughly corrupt election.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:59 PM
Mar 2016

You know, the one you're not interested in doing anything about. I think we should see who actually won the state.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
43. We know who won. Clinton did. Period. That some Sanders dead enders choose to wallow in absurd
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:06 PM
Mar 2016

conspiracy theories when he lost by 70,000 votes--15% margin-- doesn't change that fact.

There was vote suppression, but there's no evidence of any kind of fraud. And the vote suppression that occurred did not single out Sanders supporters, it affected Sanders supporters, Clinton supporters, and also Trump supporters and Cruz supporters.

That's the scandal, not some Infowars nonsense about Clinton stealing an election.

No one outside the Bernie Bubble is disputing that Clinton won Arizona.

We know she won the same way we know Sanders won Michigan and Oklahoma. They counted the votes and one candidate had more than the other, in this case by a WIDE margin that was picked up in polls.

Sore loserism is not a good look.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
45. You are free to deny reality if you want.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:09 PM
Mar 2016

But do not blame those who live outside the Bernie Bubble for not taking sore loser conspiracy theories seriously.

The vote suppression is a very real problem.

Sanders supporters whining about losing, not so much.

There is ZERO evidence that Clinton didn't win the state.

ALL EVIDENCE AND FACTS SHOW SHE WON THE STATE.

Sore loser temper tantrums are not a substitute for evidence and facts.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
55. Its in all caps, it must be true!
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:01 PM
Mar 2016

The fact is voter suppression occurred, and until it is investigated to know how much, your claims are null and void.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
60. Vote suppression occurred, and as a matter of legal fact Hillary Clinton
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:05 PM
Mar 2016

won the state of Arizona and a majority of its pledged delegates, according to the official count of ballots.

You can dwell in your alternate reality where some evil conspiracy you can't even imagine let alone describe stole it from Bernie (who was massively behind in the polls), but that has about as much relevance as King Canute ordering the sea back.

TL; DR: Hillary is getting the majority of delegates from AZ, regardless of any sour grapes thrown her way.



bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
61. So you think voter suppression occured without it being a conspiracy?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:19 PM
Mar 2016

How did it happen then? Some fat fingered intern just hit the wrong keys a few times? Bernie outperforms polling, so him being behind in the polling wouldn't stop them from suppressing the vote, they wouldn't want another Michigan.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
62. yes, Republicans are capable of vote supression and running a poor records
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

organization without help from Hillary Clinton.

Here's a hint: Hillary Clinton is not the root of all evil. Maybe y'all will realize this.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
63. Ok, but you did see how Sanders supporters were disproportionately effected, right?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:41 PM
Mar 2016

So this was a republican conspiracy against him? I'm not sure what it is you're claiming anymore.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
64. no I haven't seen any evidence that there was a targeting of Sanders
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:43 PM
Mar 2016

I've seen lots of online speculation to that effect. But nothing showing that there was any systemic or systematic bias against Sanders.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
51. The more Bernie supporters accuse Clinton, when it is the GOP responsible, the easier
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:56 PM
Mar 2016

it is for the GOP to do it.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
56. I'm not implying Clinton is responsible
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:02 PM
Mar 2016

I'm stating it's fucking disgusting for her to sit on her "win" (and I use the quotes because the entire fucking election was a farce) rather than forcefully advocate something be done a out it. This is just further evidence of what kind of politician she is.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
59. Exactly, she is a POLITICIAN, look at what I just told someone else
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

as regard Hillary not wanting to debate now



You are obviously intelligent and have been around, you know the game they all play.

Would Bernie now not want to debate if he was ahead? Who knows, he is a unique duck, for sure.

But comparing Hillary to him is ridiculous when Bernie is one of a kind when compared to ALL other politicians.

That is what is so untenable about the Bernie or Bust idea, to hold the Bernie ideal up makes no sense when ALL (just about all anyway) others are typical politicians.

Which is why I support Bernie but will support Hillary if I have to.

Makes perfect sense, if you are able to admit it.


Can you admit this?

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
36. Lol
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

Any opportunity to kick Hillary!

It's her fault that Republicans fucked up some people's registrations and her, being pragmatic, is wait and see until they can investigate, like most normal people.

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
39. No, she in no way sets the tone for her minions by circumventing rules and ethical standards. Nt
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:55 PM
Mar 2016

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
50. Does she?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:54 PM
Mar 2016

Fact checkers seem to say otherwise?

I need help here because I like both candidates.

apnu

(8,756 posts)
37. It is pure fiction to think Hillary had anything to do with this.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:50 PM
Mar 2016

The fuckup in AZ has been done by Republicans. There is no chance in hell they are working with Hillary on anything. They hate her and they fear her, more so than Bernie. They actually want Bernie in the GE, not Hillary.

Arizona is a deep red state, an ex-slave state, and a place with a history of suppression of minorities. It was directly affected by the Voting Rights Act which prevented the state from doing exactly what it did this year. But since the SCOTUS gutted the Voting Rights Act, the number of polling places in Maricopia County alone was less than half of what they had in 2012. (was 200, down to 60). The reduction was done under the auspices of "cost". Which is exactly one of the things the South did under Jim Crow.

There is zero chance Hillary is involved in that also.

Voter suppression happened in AZ, and its all at the Republican's feet. They did this, no one from the Democratic side has anything to do here.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
42. Why oh why
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:02 PM
Mar 2016

are Republicans trying to get Dems not to vote in the Dem Primary? GE I understand. This was deliberately done at the highest level of computer clearance.

Who stood to gain more from this... AZ Republicans or Sec. Clinton?


Edit: I am not accusing Sec Clinton. But it's a fair question as to who would stand to gain more and to counter your "zero chance" comment. It's America. There is always a chance something crappy went down.

apnu

(8,756 posts)
46. Because the GOP are racist, bigoted pricks in AZ.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

It is what they do. Its their own incompetence and hatred of the "other" resulted in this mess.

Making it hard to get to the polling place in poor and non-white areas solidifies the majority's grip on power. It stuff's down change and progress.

Any Democratic gain in AZ would be progress, and the Republicans can't have that. So to answer your question, the Republicans have more to gain than Hillary at suppression of the vote. Are they sitting around some smoke filled back room cackling about their plan to suppress the vote? Probably not. But their disinterest the plight of non-whites, and the poor, leads them to say "fuck those guys, I don't want to pay for polling places for them in Phoenix" There's the racism and bigotry.

Hillary is good at her job as a politician. She believes keeping her trap shut in this situation is the smartest play. Might not be the play we, the liberal, the progressive, and the Left, want her to play, but its the smart typical political way to go. By being quiet, she gives the Republicans all the rope they need to hang themselves on this issue. And hang themselves they are.

Now Bernie disagrees with that. He's a full throated roar guy, and so are his followers. They shake trees and rage at the storm. That's also right and good to do, but gives the R's less rope to hang themselves. They'll still hang themselves, because they're so inept in Arizona they can't help but do so. And through Bernie's tactic we, on the left, get to have fun shouting about it too. Because if Bernie does it (or any other pol for that matter), that gives us implied permission to do the same.

Consider this, who owns this "computer clearance"? Who has to keep track of party affiliation for Arizona's closed primary system? Who prints the ballots? Who buys and administers the voting machines? The polling places are neutral, its not like the caucus system where parties meet in different locations, these are the actual polling places that are used in every election, be it primary or general.

The answer to that question is the State and the county after that. Since AZ is deep red and Democrats have the smallest of toe-holds there, the systems are controlled by the Republicans. There is no way Hillary Clinton has anything to do with those systems. She or her national staff can't have touched them in any way. As for local Democrats, keep in mind that in Maricopia county out of five board supervisors, four are Republicans. You don't seriously think they are in cahoots with Hillary Clinton do you?

I'm not saying shenanigans didn't occur in Arizona, they did. I'm saying there's "zero chance" Hillary had anything to do with it. It was the Republican controlled government that closed the polling places in the past 4 years. It was the Republican controlled government that holds the computer system that tracks party affiliation, this is all on them.

Conservatives have a history of doing this stuff, one of the ironies of American politics is the Republican's spend a lot of time and energy crowing about how broken our election system is and why we need road blocks to register voters and also to have voter IDs and all that neo-Jim Crow stuff they yammer about, but they're the ones caught when the system goes pear shaped.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
2. Ooooo Doggie
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:30 PM
Mar 2016

All these Hillary supporters were calling people conspiracy theorists. Turns out it was all true.

We need to abolish closed primaries; In GA we have open primaries and it works fine.

 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
6. Yea odd the open primaries where fine
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:32 PM
Mar 2016

when it was SC. But now it is a problem. I voted in SC and it seems better to not worry about who or what party it has me listed under.

LonePirate

(13,417 posts)
12. I think deadlines and mistaken memories plague closed primaries more than people want to admit.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:43 PM
Mar 2016

I'm sure plenty of people did change their party affiliation. Yet, did all of them do so before the necessary deadlines? Were they aware of any such deadlines, if they existed? Are they misremembering when they changed affiliations? Or did they meet all of the deadlines but some bureaucrat or some form taker screw up, either intentionally or accidentally?

I fully expect to hear numerous reports of people not being allowed to vote in NY's upcoming primary despite changing their affiliation months ago (Nov. - Jan.) even though you had to change it by the Oct. deadline.

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
31. Our local Board of elections here in rural (red area)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:24 PM
Mar 2016

NY has already stated that due to a high volume of registrations, they were overwhelmed.

Ooops might happen.....

Can't wait to see what happens on April 19th, our NY Closed Primary day.

THERE.WILL.BE.TEARS.

And I am already worried that my Democratic affiliation might mysteriously switch and when I show up at my polling place, they tell me I can't vote.

I will be livid.

And that doesn't even cover the fact that we have the most remote/longest deadline between switching affiliation, and primary day :

six months

The deadline to switch affiliation from XXX to Democratic in order to vote in the Democratic primary was back on the First Friday in October.

Yes, you are right, that was BEFORE the first Democratic debate.

So, you are blank-out-of-luck if you watch a few debates, and decided it might be nice to switch from the Independent or Green party to the Dem party to vote for Either Hillary or Bernie.

Nope, the Dem party won't get your vote.

Yea, I just love closed Primaries.

LonePirate

(13,417 posts)
33. Any registration postmarked or received before the deadline should be accepted.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:28 PM
Mar 2016

At the very least, the names of these voters should be added to a list that automatically accepts provisional ballots if their registrations cannot be processed in time for the actual election.

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
47. check your registration NOW; why wait until election day?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:02 PM
Mar 2016

You can check online.
(And if for some reason you can't, you can go to the office of elections and check in person.)

This goes for everybody.

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
57. Oh, you can be sure I will.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:02 PM
Mar 2016

I haven't figured out how to do it on line, but I have a day off coming up soon, before the primary, so I am going to visit the local BOE and just double-check.

I also have a little postcard I got before the last opportunity vote, and it clear states I am registered as a Democrat. So, there's that proof at least!

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
4. Sec of State also said the state did not tell the counties
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:31 PM
Mar 2016

not to post any vote tallies until all the polls were closed, even though it is illegal for the state to release tallies before the polls are closed, because, according to her, the state did not have statutory authority to tell the counties not to.

LiberalFighter

(50,905 posts)
13. Well if it wasn't someone elses fault then it must be HC and DWS.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:48 PM
Mar 2016

Does that work? It usually works for those that don't want to know the facts.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
17. Who has blamed HRC or DWS for this? We were told that...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:57 PM
Mar 2016

All of this talk of voter registrations being switched was a lie and Sanders' supporters were just too lazy to register in time to vote... Nice try on the baiting though

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
58. you don't have to blame them
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

To wonder why the hell they aren't raising the roof about it...because she doesn't want to taint her "win." She is the type of disgusting politician that us wrong with our entire aystem.

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
25. I didn't quote her verbatim; there was some wiggle room in there
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:13 PM
Mar 2016

about focusing on provisional ballots. Not sure she meant they will all be counted.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
30. Checking registration paper trail...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

...and making provisional ballots a "top priority" sounded pretty promising. Of course, I could be reading it too optimistically.

I guess we just need to wait and see.

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
35. Hillary's silence places her on the other side of democracy.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:40 PM
Mar 2016

This goes beyond Bernie getting a few more AZ delegates, as they are going to count the provisional ballots. There should be no member on DU against counting the votes, and applying them correctly. No one.

Peachhead22

(1,078 posts)
65. This is why I don't want Trump in the General
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:43 PM
Mar 2016

Because 'shit happens'. And when it's an election 'shady shit happens'.

Even though either of our candidates would beat Trump like a drum if it was a totally honest election. That dangerous idiot on the ballot means he's just one step from the White House. And in elections, shit happens. Often shady shit happens.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Arizona Sec of State admi...