Here’s the Bad News and the Good News for Hillary in the Washington Post’s Big Email Story

[NWCorona]

"The Washington Post has published a long story about when and how Hillary Clinton used her private email account during her tenure as Secretary of State, a subject that has been dogging her presidential campaign for more than a year. There's not much breaking news in the piece besides a somewhat vague section on State Department officials not being aware that Clinton used a private server and the revelation that the FBI has 147(!) agents investigating whether Clinton or her staffers were involved in any illegal security breaches. But it's still useful as a comprehensive timeline of just how many times Clinton ignored security and transparency concerns in order to exclusively use her private server.

Here's the bad news for Hillary (all of which, besides the first item, has been previously reported elsewhere):"

This is a pretty good catch up article.


http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/03/28/hillary_clinton_email_scandal_washington_post_s_story_isn_t_flattering_but.html

[dragonfly301]

1. at the very least she shows extremely poor judgement

not exactly presidential material...

[Barack_America]

2. That WaPo article was absolutely scathing.

Actual investigative journalism. I didn't realize they still had that in them.

They might consider doing it more often, and maybe with some Republicans in the crosshairs.