Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:07 AM Mar 2016

Hillary demonstrates her weakness by not committing to NY debate with Sanders

"Hillary Clinton refuses to commit to a debate against Bernie Sanders in New York according to what a top Hillary advisor told CNN’s Kate Bolduan. Hillary is allegedly concerned with the tone Sanders is using in his campaign ads.

“This is a man who said he’d never run a negative ad ever. He’s now running them. They’re planning to run more,” Joel Benenson, Clinton’s top aide, said. “Let’s see the tone of the campaign he wants to run before we get to any other questions,” Benenson continued when asked if Hillary would agree to a debate in New York.


Benenson failed to specify what was mentioned in the Sanders ads that could be considered an attack, or why a veteran politician like Hillary wouldn’t have the ability to defend herself during a debate against her Democratic opponent. One would think a debate would be the perfect platform to repudiate claims made in a 30-second spot. Honest politicians, should love the opportunity to defend themselves in a public forum, right?

The truth is, Benenson has been whining about Bernie’s “negative” ads since January. Are the ads low-brow and Trump-esque in mocking the way Hillary looks?

No.

Is Sanders putting out deceptive ads that lie to voters about Hillary’s voting record?

Not even close."


http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/hillary-demonstrates-her-weakness-by-not-committing-to-ny-debate-with-sanders/

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary demonstrates her weakness by not committing to NY debate with Sanders (Original Post) NWCorona Mar 2016 OP
How many debate threads do we need ? This is the 5th or 6th by now. Can they be merged ? Trust Buster Mar 2016 #1
Yea I agree Gwhittey Mar 2016 #2
Thread win. nt revbones Mar 2016 #37
I'm not sure how many there are at the moment NWCorona Mar 2016 #4
Are you the hall monitor? n/t ljm2002 Mar 2016 #42
Of all the words that could be used to describe Hillary, "weak" should be at the Arkansas Granny Mar 2016 #3
I think it does make her look weak, but I would think that about anyone who won't debate. Punkingal Mar 2016 #7
I think it's sexist. I know I'm not supposed to think that, but I do. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #41
"why a veteran politician like Hillary wouldn’t have the ability to defend herself during a debate" thereismore Mar 2016 #5
I think the Clinton campaign is making a mistake. Punkingal Mar 2016 #6
I don't know, but maybe... dchill Mar 2016 #8
For $$ and ratings, a network is going to offer him. Then she'll come ViseGrip Mar 2016 #40
I agree, she's investing a great deal of CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #10
Did people skip the previous 500 debates and town halls? LonePirate Mar 2016 #9
I disagree NWCorona Mar 2016 #12
NY is an expensive state for running ads (Bernie's M.O. so far) and he needs free airtime. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #14
she's scared amborin Mar 2016 #11
NY is 63-28 for Clinton as of recent polling. Yeah, so "weak." ROFL nt CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #13
Maybe that's why she doesn't want to debate? NWCorona Mar 2016 #16
Clinton, strong, doesn't need debate. Sanders, weak, needs debate desperately. nt CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #18
... NWCorona Mar 2016 #22
Can't see videos because of a work filter, but your concession is otherwise accepted. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #25
So in other words you are giving up and blaming filters NWCorona Mar 2016 #30
Now *that* is WEAK!!!!! n/t ljm2002 Mar 2016 #43
Here's my take on the Bernie request for another debate. ladjf Mar 2016 #15
It's not a request by Bernie NWCorona Mar 2016 #19
I must be uninformed. I was under the assumption that Bernie wanted another ladjf Mar 2016 #23
The issue is that there's supposed to be one in April and one in May NWCorona Mar 2016 #27
Thanks of straightening me out on this point. nt ladjf Mar 2016 #29
No problem! NWCorona Mar 2016 #31
All agreed to one debate "in April" and one debate "in May." Sanders is acting like he sets the date CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #28
You are right about one thing... ljm2002 Mar 2016 #44
How tired did Benenson look in that clip ?? GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #17
Why isn't Bernie retaining more of Obama's coalition then? He's the one bleeding support, apparently CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #21
Not according to recent results EyeOnLife Mar 2016 #39
LIES and broken promises. Disgusting woman. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #20
if Sanders were distorting Hillary's record... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #24
I make no secret of my support for Sanders SheenaR Mar 2016 #26
If she thinks her positions are strong... SHRED Mar 2016 #33
In theory yes, SheenaR Mar 2016 #35
No. The only goal is to win the nomination hack89 Mar 2016 #36
I definitely understand that line of thinking NWCorona Mar 2016 #34
Sarandon Sarandon Sarandon SHRED Mar 2016 #32
Possibly her most Queen-ly proclamation yet. Marr Mar 2016 #38

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
4. I'm not sure how many there are at the moment
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:12 AM
Mar 2016

But this is new material and besides how many "Bernie so rude to Jane" threads were there until it was debunked?

Arkansas Granny

(31,507 posts)
3. Of all the words that could be used to describe Hillary, "weak" should be at the
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:12 AM
Mar 2016

very bottom of the list.

This kind of thinking is delusional.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
7. I think it does make her look weak, but I would think that about anyone who won't debate.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:15 AM
Mar 2016

Not just Hillary. Debates are a good thing. It's disappointing to me, and not because I'm a Bernie supporter, but because I'm a voter.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
5. "why a veteran politician like Hillary wouldn’t have the ability to defend herself during a debate"
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:13 AM
Mar 2016

That says it all. She is not up to it. How can she possibly be President.

dchill

(38,447 posts)
8. I don't know, but maybe...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:21 AM
Mar 2016

The problem for Hillary is that the public always benefits from being informed.

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
40. For $$ and ratings, a network is going to offer him. Then she'll come
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:03 PM
Mar 2016

weakened. So be it. She broke her word, here. Not good in a campaign, where all we have is your word and record. This is why she cannot win in Nov.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
10. I agree, she's investing a great deal of
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:23 AM
Mar 2016

energy into avoiding a NY debate.

She looks weak and bratty.

And the excuses are hilarious. She doesn't like Bernie's "tone." He's doing negative ads. This is a political campaign, is it not?

You can't employ that dirty dog Brock who spends most waking hours smearing Bernie for being racist, sexist and a monster--and then get all haughty when Bernie does a negative ad.

Grow up Hillary. Quit making excuses and work together to make these previously agreed upon debates happen. No one is interested in your feelings about Bernie's "tone".

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
9. Did people skip the previous 500 debates and town halls?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:22 AM
Mar 2016

Both candidates say the same things time and time again. They have become repetitive and uninformative.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
14. NY is an expensive state for running ads (Bernie's M.O. so far) and he needs free airtime.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:26 AM
Mar 2016

Thinks he can get it through a Dem debate, even though he literally has nothing new to say that hasn't already been said at every debate so far.

He's losing and he knows it.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
25. Can't see videos because of a work filter, but your concession is otherwise accepted.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:40 AM
Mar 2016

I'm sure whatever it was, it's was snarky and basically just an admission that your argument has no merit.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
43. Now *that* is WEAK!!!!! n/t
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:34 PM
Mar 2016

"I'm sure whatever it was, it's was snarky and basically just an admission that your argument has no merit."

Okay, okay, if you insist: your candidate's own words were snarky.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
15. Here's my take on the Bernie request for another debate.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:28 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary probably feels that she currently has the upper hand. But, Bernie is highly charismatic in most of his public appearances and there is no doubt that there is some upward momentum for Bernie's campaign. Hillary might think , "why risk another public appearance together when I'm already in the lead". That makes sense.

However, Bernie needs some dramatic events to try to move ahead. So, he challenges. If she accepts, he'll try to out debate her and he figures "what do I have to lose"? But, if she declines, which is what she will do and what Bernie thought she would , Bernie might gain a little just by the fact that Hillary
was "afraid to debate him", which probably isn't the case.

This was a gambit by Bernie.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
19. It's not a request by Bernie
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:36 AM
Mar 2016

There's two more official debates scheduled. Bernie's not asking for an additional debate.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
23. I must be uninformed. I was under the assumption that Bernie wanted another
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:38 AM
Mar 2016

debate but that Hillary did not. So, you are saying that the debate was already scheduled?
Doe that mean Hillary want sot back out of a planned debate? Hard to keep up with all these bits and pieces.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
27. The issue is that there's supposed to be one in April and one in May
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:42 AM
Mar 2016

But there's no date set.

Bernie wants it before the NY primary. Understandable but not guaranteed.

Hillary is refusing to commit to any more debates. Period.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
28. All agreed to one debate "in April" and one debate "in May." Sanders is acting like he sets the date
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:43 AM
Mar 2016

which seems kind of unilateral to me, but hey, I'm not the flailing, failing candidate who needs free media attention ahead of a primary he seems poised to lose, badly.

I also find it ridiculous that Sanders fans are whining about a debate not happening in a month that hasn't even fucking started yet.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
44. You are right about one thing...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:44 PM
Mar 2016

...Hillary does not want another debate and she never wanted another debate -- well, except for the extra one in NH, which she wanted badly. She only agreed to more debates than that because Bernie played hardball (as he should have) when her campaign asked for the extra debate in NH.

Now she is trying to avoid having another debate before NY, because she figures she's got nothing to gain from it.

Her campaign can correctly point out that although they agreed to a debate in April, they never set a date for it, and therefore they can decline to have it before the NY primary without breaking their word. But it still makes her look weak, and it still betrays a dismissive attitude to voters IMO, and it breaks the spirit of their agreement if not the letter of it.

Also her campaign manager's statements really sounded like they are going to avoid any more debates at all until Bernie's campaign changes its "tone" and starts to "behave". Talk about tone! Childish, condescending and authoritarian all rolled into one.

But as we all know, politics ain't beanbag. If her campaign decides she has less to lose by avoiding a debate and appearing to go back on her word, than she does by agreeing to the debate, that is what they will do.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
17. How tired did Benenson look in that clip ??
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:34 AM
Mar 2016

Benenson was part of the team that did Obama's 2008 primaries and GE. He looked a lot better during Obama's streak of wins that he does right now.

Hillary bought Benenson thinking that he would bring the magic that defeated her in 2008. Problem is Hillary just isn't Obama. The things that worked for Obama and his campaign won't work for Hillary. She is still the baggage-heavy, legacy insider that small donors and voters reject:

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
21. Why isn't Bernie retaining more of Obama's coalition then? He's the one bleeding support, apparently
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:36 AM
Mar 2016
 

EyeOnLife

(37 posts)
39. Not according to recent results
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:03 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie has won PoC in AK, HI and WA. Three of the top 10 states that are the most diverse.

California happens to be one of the top 10 states, and Bernie will net 70-75%.

Know what's another? New York and PA.

Good luck.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
20. LIES and broken promises. Disgusting woman.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:36 AM
Mar 2016

(to the jury: if she were a man, I'd have said "disgusting man", because lies and broken promises are pretty disgusting. This is about character, not overies.)

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
24. if Sanders were distorting Hillary's record...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:40 AM
Mar 2016

a debate is the perfect opportunity to set the record straight.

Of course Sanders is not the one distorting her record - it is Hillary who is hiding her own record and distorting Sanders' - so setting the record straight is "off the table."

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
26. I make no secret of my support for Sanders
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:42 AM
Mar 2016

but while I want a debate, she stands to gain nothing from debating. Only negatives could come of it.

Without a debate she can continue to try and run out the clock on the remaining states and keep the lead..

I don't love it, but it's the right strategy if I am her.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
33. If she thinks her positions are strong...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:48 AM
Mar 2016

...then she'd want as many debates as possible to share them with as many people as possible.



SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
35. In theory yes,
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:54 AM
Mar 2016

But if I am trying to win, I stay away from Bernie.

Granted, I want a debate. I am just putting myself on that side of things.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
36. No. The only goal is to win the nomination
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:56 AM
Mar 2016

another debate doesn't help her do that. All it would do is potentially give Bernie a lift - that is not her job.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
34. I definitely understand that line of thinking
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:50 AM
Mar 2016

And I'd except that strategy if there wasn't two more official debates scheduled. It's not really Hillary's place to say no and not come off looking like she's dodging Bernie.

Also if she thinks this will go over well in NY, she's mistaken.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
38. Possibly her most Queen-ly proclamation yet.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:02 PM
Mar 2016

My lady, I'm afraid you can't just refuse to engage people as President because you do not like their tone.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary demonstrates her ...