Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:52 PM Mar 2016

This Obama Endorsement Is a Sign Pro-Corporate Democrats Are Getting Nervous

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/29/this-obama-endorsement-is-a-sign-pro-corporate-democrats-are-getting-nervous/

This Obama Endorsement Is a Sign Pro-Corporate Democrats Are Getting Nervous

President Obama on Monday endorsed Debbie Wasserman Schultz, his handpicked Democratic National Committee chair, in her congressional race. What’s stunning about that is that Obama felt the need to endorse a six-term congresswoman running in a heavily Democratic district at all.

Tim Canova, a law professor and Federal Reserve expert, jumped into the Democratic primary in January, challenging Wasserman Schultz from the left. At that time, my Intercept colleague Glenn Greenwald interviewed Canova, revealing multiple contrasts between his opposition to bank bailouts, corporate-written free trade agreements and the Patriot Act and Wasserman Schultz’s support of those policies.

Populist primaries of entrenched incumbents don’t usually get the attention of the White House, because success for the challenger is so remote. Obama very rarely involves himself in House primaries. That he felt the need to endorse Wasserman Schultz suggests that Canova’s message is gaining traction in her district.

The endorsement comes fully five months before the primary– and days before the end-of-the-quarter deadline for Federal Election Commission reporting. While Wasserman Schultz has never needed help soliciting campaign contributions from wealthy donors, the presidential endorsement has the appearance of a vote of confidence to ensure the continued flow of money.


We welcome the hatred of the pro-corporate Democrats.
51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Obama Endorsement Is a Sign Pro-Corporate Democrats Are Getting Nervous (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 OP
We do indeed. haikugal Mar 2016 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #6
lol PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #9
There are no mods, yo PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #12
There are no moderators here any more. greatauntoftriplets Mar 2016 #11
A disposable handle. bvf Mar 2016 #13
I knew that. greatauntoftriplets Mar 2016 #35
Sorry--didn't mean to presume! bvf Mar 2016 #44
Exactly. Didn't want to say too much at that point. greatauntoftriplets Mar 2016 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #14
We're not scared. You'll vote for "rump" regardless. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #23
Sop crying. No one ook your leer away. randome Mar 2016 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #5
Classic. DanTex Mar 2016 #8
try signing up again, and don't threaten to vote for drumpf Kali Mar 2016 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #18
it is all automatic so it has to be your typo Kali Mar 2016 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #30
you had potential Kali Mar 2016 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #34
Hey MIRT - can you take care of this guy?[n/t] Maedhros Mar 2016 #17
While we're waiting, let's enjoy some hot, fresh tacos from Aco Bell. randome Mar 2016 #19
When you can't make something look appetizing in PhotoShop... zappaman Mar 2016 #21
Would you, could you in a box? randome Mar 2016 #29
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #24
Meanwhile... randome Mar 2016 #25
I think Taco Bell was taken as a username in 2009.... Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #27
Survived two juries already, that I know of Babel_17 Mar 2016 #22
Thanks for that! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2016 #36
My pleasure! Babel_17 Mar 2016 #39
LOL! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2016 #40
He finally got his T cyberswede Mar 2016 #38
lol, thanks! Babel_17 Mar 2016 #41
You Nailed It, Friend! n/t corbettkroehler Mar 2016 #3
so you think obama hates you because he endorses a person who supports him? nice nt msongs Mar 2016 #4
Not everyone is shallow so please don't judge by what you may be used to. haikugal Mar 2016 #10
Posts with the words 'are getting nervous' or 'desperate', if printed out, could reach the Moon. randome Mar 2016 #16
Or, you know, politics as usual Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #26
Keep running on this anti-Obama shit....please, please, please. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #28
Obama inserted himself into this. The vast majority of Democrats don't want him to interfere. (nt) w4rma Mar 2016 #42
Says who? And who is this 'vast majority" you claim? riversedge Mar 2016 #50
What saddens me is the fact that Obama is willing to stand alongside DWS and get dirty off her. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #33
I'd welcome people who recognize that it's standard to endorse a sitting member mythology Mar 2016 #37
No it's not. It's just a neoliberal who bailed out Wall Street protecting another pro-corporate Dem. w4rma Mar 2016 #43
This beltanefauve Mar 2016 #46
Fuck DINOs! PowerToThePeople Mar 2016 #47
Here would an even better way. (Satire) Trump Derailed by Obama’s Endorsement pampango Mar 2016 #48
"We welcome the hatred of the pro-corporate Democrats". There is not need to be divisive and riversedge Mar 2016 #49
Tell FDR not to be divisive! Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #51

Response to haikugal (Reply #1)

Response to PeaceNikki (Reply #7)

Response to greatauntoftriplets (Reply #11)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
31. Sop crying. No one ook your leer away.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:31 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Original post)

Response to Name removed (Reply #2)

Kali

(55,007 posts)
15. try signing up again, and don't threaten to vote for drumpf
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:18 PM
Mar 2016

that will get you banned faster than making demands to fix YOUR typo.

Response to Kali (Reply #15)

Kali

(55,007 posts)
20. it is all automatic so it has to be your typo
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:22 PM
Mar 2016

fix it yourself or you are going to get banned for disrupting.

Response to Kali (Reply #20)

Response to Kali (Reply #32)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. While we're waiting, let's enjoy some hot, fresh tacos from Aco Bell.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:21 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
29. Would you, could you in a box?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:29 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

Response to randome (Reply #19)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
25. Meanwhile...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:26 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

Avalon Sparks

(2,565 posts)
27. I think Taco Bell was taken as a username in 2009....
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:28 PM
Mar 2016

Trump won't get the mom anyway.....not enough delegates

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
22. Survived two juries already, that I know of
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:24 PM
Mar 2016

I voted to hide one, and I was the alerter on another. I am not complaining, merely noting, and I observed that it could be performance art. Still voted to hide though.

How to notify MIRT about a potential MI, troll

Last edited Fri May 29, 2015, 02:54 PM - Edit history (1)
If you see a troll, a MI, or serve on a jury and think MIRT should get notice you have a couple options to let them know.

1. If a post is hidden by 4/3 or more of a jury and the poster has under 100 posts, MIRT will get notice. If a post is not hidden, they will not. If the vote is Leave, MIRT will NOT get notice.

Simply writing in the comments things like this and leaving will not necessarily get notice to MIRT unless enough others vote to hide or someone sends a team member a pm.
"If it's a troll leaving then the troll will be dealt with by MIRT."

2. Send a MIR team member a message. There is always a link to the current team in Announcements forum.

Thank you.

ETA, MIRT takes care of those under 100 posts so for those worried about trying to get rid of long term DUers, that is up to Admin.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026746582

Rhiannon12866

(205,161 posts)
36. Thanks for that!
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:38 PM
Mar 2016

At least this is more entertaining than most of the notices that MIRT has to deal with these days!

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
38. He finally got his T
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:45 PM
Mar 2016


MIR Team banned ACO BELL
Mail Message
Reason:
(T)ROLL

http://www.democraticunderground.com?com=profile&uid=332342&sub=trans

Real name:
DU Member for:
Posts: 9
Recommendations: 0
Star member: No

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
16. Posts with the words 'are getting nervous' or 'desperate', if printed out, could reach the Moon.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:18 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

Blue_Adept

(6,397 posts)
26. Or, you know, politics as usual
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:27 PM
Mar 2016

DWS gets lots of attention because of a lot of legitimate reasons, but a lot of what people are going on in this particular instance feels like CT kind of stuff.

I mean, really, is it shocking - no matter the time - that the President endorses the person he put in charge of the DNC? It's a no-brainer. And if he waited until later in the primary to do it, it would look even worse in the eyes of some in that he's not backing his own horse.

I swear, it's like political newbies rule the day lately.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
42. Obama inserted himself into this. The vast majority of Democrats don't want him to interfere. (nt)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:57 PM
Mar 2016
 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
37. I'd welcome people who recognize that it's standard to endorse a sitting member
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:40 PM
Mar 2016

Of Congress when there is a primary challenger(s).

It's hard to take this article as anything other than the blind grasping at straws it is.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
43. No it's not. It's just a neoliberal who bailed out Wall Street protecting another pro-corporate Dem.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:59 PM
Mar 2016

Obama has been great on a lot of issues, but on economics he's, frankly, sucked. The guy prioritized bailing out Wall Street and then sold out the entire Democratic Party to push his authoritarian 'free' trade agreement - i.e. corporate governance agreement.

His pro-Wall Street politics is why we are very close to a Presdient-elect Trump. We are either going to get economic populism or authoritarian populism. This kind of crap is going to backlash.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
48. Here would an even better way. (Satire) Trump Derailed by Obama’s Endorsement
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:01 AM
Mar 2016

Adding a new wrinkle in an already unpredictable election year, Donald Trump saw his poll numbers plummet on Monday after receiving a surprise endorsement from President Barack Obama. The long-awaited downfall of the abrasive billionaire came in startling fashion, as few had expected the President to offer a full-throated endorsement of Trump ...

Praising the Republican front-runner during a nationally televised address, the President said that, despite media reports to the contrary, Trump shared his views on such important issues as immigration and religious tolerance. “In every way that matters, Donald and I are on exactly the same page,” Obama said, pointing to a framed picture of the billionaire on his Oval Office desk.

Concluding his endorsement with an emphatic closing argument, Obama said, “If you love me, vote for Trump.”

In several G.O.P. polls taken after the President’s stunning endorsement, Trump sank from first to fifth place ... As news of the President’s endorsement spread, former Trump supporters across the nation gathered to vent their anger, with some burning signs, trucker hats, and other campaign paraphernalia at impromptu bonfires.

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-derailed-by-obamas-endorsement

riversedge

(70,185 posts)
49. "We welcome the hatred of the pro-corporate Democrats". There is not need to be divisive and
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:32 AM
Mar 2016

condensing in your personal comment. Many of us have a sincere difference of opinion. Labeling it as 'hatred' is over the top.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This Obama Endorsement Is...