Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2115 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
bernie was against the superdelegates before he was for them (Original Post)
saturnsring
Mar 2016
OP
TDale313
(7,820 posts)1. Pretty sure he's always been against the concept.
Making the case that since we're stuck with them it would be most fair if they followed the will of the people (i.e. Pledged Delegates) is not exactly endorsing the concept.
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)2. love the rationalization
TDale313
(7,820 posts)5. Happens to be true.
The supers are there whether we like it or not this cycle. What's he supposed to do- spot her 700 delegates? Of course he's gonna make his case.
Editing to add that saying the Supers should support whoever got the most pledged delegates is completely consistent with arguing that the power of the Superdelegates is unfair and that the will of the people should be listened to.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)4. Over 3 million more voters have chosen Hillary Clinton n/t
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)3. Flip-Flop ... weathervane? uh oh