Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,236 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 09:10 AM Feb 2012

In South Carolina, New Report Finds No Evidence Of 'Dead' Voters

02:13 pm
February 23, 2012
by Pam Fessler

The South Carolina State Election Commission has just released its initial review of allegations from the state's Department of Motor Vehicles that more than 950 deceased voters appeared to have ballots cast in their names after they died. The commission found that of the 207 cases reviewed, there was no evidence in 197 of them that fraudulent votes had been cast. The commission said that records in the other 10 cases were "insufficient to make a determination."

The findings are not a big surprise because what often appears to be "dead" people voting usually involves something else — such as clerical errors — once officials investigate.

But in South Carolina, the issue is highly charged because the state is currently battling the Justice Department's decision to block implementation of its new voter ID law. The allegations of "dead" people voting have fueled arguments that photo ID is needed to stop fraud at the polls. The Justice Department argues that the law is unnecessary and would discriminate against African-American voters who are less likely to have the required photo ID.

In its review, the election commission found 106 cases of clerical errors by poll managers — such as marking that John Doe Sr. had voted when it was really John Doe Jr. There were another 56 cases of what the commission called "bad data matching." It said that the DMV used only a voter's Social Security number to match their names against death files, and that produced incorrect matches. The commission says there's no evidence that the voters are in fact dead ...

https://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/02/23/147295537/in-south-carolina-new-report-finds-no-evidence-of-dead-voters

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In South Carolina, New Report Finds No Evidence Of 'Dead' Voters (Original Post) struggle4progress Feb 2012 OP
K&R'd. snot Feb 2012 #1
Spam deleted by greyl (MIR Team) City Stink Feb 2012 #2
However, Dembearpig Feb 2012 #3
when Republican are completely incapable of monitoring themselves Supersedeas Feb 2012 #4

Supersedeas

(20,630 posts)
4. when Republican are completely incapable of monitoring themselves
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 04:44 PM
Feb 2012

Competence? The evidence is "insufficient to make a determination."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»In South Carolina, New Re...