Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:35 PM Apr 2016

Independent voters could make polling sites a nightmare

Independent voters could make polling sites a nightmare
By Marisa Schultz April 13, 2016

WASHINGTON — New York election officials are bracing for a mess at the polls because they expect many Bernie Sanders voters will show up who can’t vote.

“I’m going to predict that a lot of Sanders people who come from the ranks of independent voters are not actually registered Democrats and they will cause lines and waits at the poll sites while they attempt to vote affidavit ballots or obtain court orders to vote,” said John Conklin, a spokesman for the state Board of Elections.

http://nypost.com/2016/04/13/independent-voters-could-make-polling-sites-a-nightmare/

Are independent voters going to cause havoc and disrupt democrats right to vote next week?
89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Independent voters could make polling sites a nightmare (Original Post) workinclasszero Apr 2016 OP
Probably HassleCat Apr 2016 #1
They've been around for awhile CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #4
Oh I think they understand well workinclasszero Apr 2016 #6
Yes, damn "the people" for wanting to vote in America. NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #29
The democratic party has the right to choose its candidate workinclasszero Apr 2016 #31
Sometimes, regime change is painful. artislife Apr 2016 #38
Gee thats deep workinclasszero Apr 2016 #40
It is just a flesh wound..for now. artislife Apr 2016 #43
Until April 19. Then it rapidly becomes fatal for Bernie. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #49
But hill won't be sworn into office in January artislife Apr 2016 #58
You can hope, but I doubt it's going to do you COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #59
There are a lot of repubs artislife Apr 2016 #75
Until April 19. Then, after that date, it becomes COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #76
Not wasted at all. artislife Apr 2016 #81
Boy Scout leader is not an elected public servant. nt NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #82
70% of 'independent' voters range from 'moderate' to conservative. onehandle Apr 2016 #2
+1 CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #7
Let's put it this way, I consider myself a moderate. ScreamingMeemie Apr 2016 #8
DNC embrace of Corporati$ m is creating some Independent registrations Jackilope Apr 2016 #37
absafuckinglutely! Phlem Apr 2016 #42
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2016 #53
Or will Bill Clinton disrupt voters' rights AGAIN? polichick Apr 2016 #3
Of course he will, Hillary is losing. What about voters who were switched erroneously? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #32
God I hate the Independants... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #5
This is not an election. Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #9
Nope. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #14
Nope. It's just a primary. It's not an election. nt Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #39
In that case can you update a few places. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #45
They just want their taxes to pay for it. Kittycat Apr 2016 #44
Yeah, perhaps independants can sue. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #48
About the same case that someone suing because the COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #54
Good point. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #56
Voting rights for Independents! Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #10
They can vote in the general, nobody is stopping them but workinclasszero Apr 2016 #11
So much for the democratic in Democratic Party. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #13
They are crazy about that now. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #15
Caucuses are the most unfair primary process of all workinclasszero Apr 2016 #17
Opinions differ. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #19
I expect Sanders campaign to encourage this Trenzalore Apr 2016 #12
I wonder how many registered Dem. Voters were purged from the voters lists who will vote for Bernie awake Apr 2016 #16
Any proof of that? workinclasszero Apr 2016 #18
It has been post on this site for days awake Apr 2016 #21
Well that's certainly proof conclusive. Stop the presses - COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #50
Non it is a law suit awake Apr 2016 #87
It is more than an story awake Apr 2016 #88
The change of registrations could be a problem both parties unc70 Apr 2016 #22
Don't vote ,people Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #20
I don't wonder that anymore... ScreamingMeemie Apr 2016 #23
I do too. Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #26
No one is embracing right wing tactics (but thanks for COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #51
No problem. Anytime you feel the need for snark then come find me. Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #60
Maybe. Doubtful, but maybe. nt COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #72
That is likely what the strategy is KingFlorez Apr 2016 #24
I think that's the plan workinclasszero Apr 2016 #36
They need to volunteer at a phone bank and not clog up the lines nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #25
The Democratic Party has become very undemocratic. Vinca Apr 2016 #27
You mean when they set the rules more than a year ago COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #52
They knew Hillary would be the 2016 candidate in 2008. Vinca Apr 2016 #62
I wish I could see the future 8 years out. I'd be a millionaire. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #71
I thought talking politics was verboten for Freemasons. Vinca Apr 2016 #85
Nope. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #86
I think the rules about party membership were in place way before that Retrograde Apr 2016 #74
Don't know either. I suspect you're right. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #78
... and those voters will be screaming "fraud" and "suppression" until hell freezes over. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #28
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #30
What about Hillary voters who have been mistakenly switched? "Sanders suppporters"??? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #33
Ineligible voters for Sanders will turn out just to make headlines suggesting voter fraud. Jitter65 Apr 2016 #34
if some are willing to threaten physical harm, then some will not stop at havoc and disruption DrDan Apr 2016 #35
Damn Independent Voters. Phlem Apr 2016 #41
So could radioactive lizards on the loose. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #46
Don't knock radioactive lizards. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #55
Open primary = problem solved. agracie Apr 2016 #47
Get your own party = problem solved workinclasszero Apr 2016 #61
Pay for it your own primary = problem solved? Kittycat Apr 2016 #65
Independents seem to think they should be treated as superdelegates and vote in any primary. randome Apr 2016 #57
How very Republican of you. Phlem Apr 2016 #63
I don't get that connection but whatever. randome Apr 2016 #66
Of course not. Phlem Apr 2016 #68
Just so we are straight, you guys want us in the GE but want we should fuck off in the Primary? Autumn Apr 2016 #64
The other alternative CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #67
Nope not a secret, but dems sure do complain their asses off when Independents stay home. nt Autumn Apr 2016 #70
Not if you're a Republican. Phlem Apr 2016 #69
I saw people being encouraged to show up even if their party registration was not Dem. bettyellen Apr 2016 #73
I'm sure Bullhorn Bill will stop them from showing up. RepubliCON-Watch Apr 2016 #77
You want closed primaries fine then don't expect everyone in the state to pay for them. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #79
People did not know much about Bernie Sanders last October...Come on it's pathetic. bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #80
Post #30 Jury Results Blue_Adept Apr 2016 #83
So Berniebros TMontoya Apr 2016 #84
Go for it, Indys. The nomination process is riddled with problems. morningfog Apr 2016 #89
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
6. Oh I think they understand well
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:40 PM
Apr 2016

and will try to stop the election on purpose.

Its being organized right now I bet.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
31. The democratic party has the right to choose its candidate
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

What part of this don't you understand?

I can't vote for the local Boy Scout leader either cause I'm not in their club! HORRORS!!!

If "independents" had their own nominating process they would not allow ME to pick their candidate either, and rightfully so!

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
59. You can hope, but I doubt it's going to do you
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:30 PM
Apr 2016

any good. She's a hell of a lot more likeable than Trump or Cruz.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
75. There are a lot of repubs
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:02 PM
Apr 2016

and the left has another option to actually vote for the issues that matter to them.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. 70% of 'independent' voters range from 'moderate' to conservative.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:39 PM
Apr 2016

I do not want them picking our Democratic candidate.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
7. +1
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:41 PM
Apr 2016

Most lean right. That's a fact. It's also become fashionable to identify as an I. Of course people don't drop their world view when they re-classify themselves that way.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
8. Let's put it this way, I consider myself a moderate.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:42 PM
Apr 2016

Always have. 10 years ago, people hated me for being moderate on this very site. I still hold the same views, and now, I'm considered a far-left commie. Let that sit there for a minute. I am being sincere here. I'm an Independent who votes wholly Democratic. If I had to register to vote in a closed primary, I would register Democratic. The media's moderate is often DU's Bernie supporter.

Jackilope

(819 posts)
37. DNC embrace of Corporati$ m is creating some Independent registrations
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:24 PM
Apr 2016

People of both parties are angry at what their parties are morphing into. New Democrats or Third Way isn't what I'd brand as Democratic Party.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
5. God I hate the Independants...
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:40 PM
Apr 2016

Always trying to vote in an election!

Are independent voters going to cause havoc and disrupt democrats right to vote next week?

Are you serious? Holy sh!t how can you in one short distance got from the fact they can not vote to disrupting the right to vote.


v
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
9. This is not an election.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:42 PM
Apr 2016

The election is in November.

This is a primary to pick a nominee for the DEMOCRATIC party.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
14. Nope.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:50 PM
Apr 2016

This is an election, look at the definition. That is why they call it the primary election. For a group that thinks that a certain word beside corporate has the exact same meaning, you quickly pivot.

You do know states are challenging the closed elections because they are paid for my tax payers...something about taxation and represent something or other? I always forget that line. I had something to do with the US and the east coast...can't recall. I would love to see an article on how so many HRC people are in favor of the closed system, but claim to care about voting rights.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
45. In that case can you update a few places.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:56 PM
Apr 2016

Websters

Definition of primary
3e : of or relating to a primary election <a primary candidate>


Encyclopædia Britannica
Primary election, in the United States, an election to select candidates to run for public office. Primaries may be closed (partisan), allowing only declared party members to vote, or open (nonpartisan), enabling all voters to choose which party’s primary they wish to vote in without declaring any party affiliation.

http://www.britannica.com/topic/primary-election

Wikipedia
Primary Election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_election

The US
Primary Election
https://www.fvap.gov/vao/vag/appendix/state-elections

etc...

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
44. They just want their taxes to pay for it.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:56 PM
Apr 2016

But step aside. You don't count.

As screwed up as IL is, at least we give voters the right to declare until it's time to cast their votes. Anything can happen until then. Voters deserve the right to decide.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
48. Yeah, perhaps independants can sue.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:03 PM
Apr 2016

I wonder if they can have a case that they are unduly kept from s system they pay for?

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
54. About the same case that someone suing because the
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:18 PM
Apr 2016

government participates in a war that they don't agree with. And the probabilities of success are about the same. As we say in the trade, 'any idiot with $100 can sue'. The trick is winning, not suing.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
56. Good point.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:22 PM
Apr 2016

I know some entities have protection from litigation, but since the DNC and RNC are not quite governmental, they may be more liable. The most depressing thing thus far is finding I agreed with both Utah and Arizona on the state defunding the elections for them not being open. I know they were using that as an excuse, but it was a decent one. I think we are more OK in WA since we allow registration at the door and absentee ballots.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
11. They can vote in the general, nobody is stopping them but
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:44 PM
Apr 2016

they have no right to tell democrats who their party candidate should be.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
13. So much for the democratic in Democratic Party.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:50 PM
Apr 2016

We don't register by party in my state and anybody can party caucuses. Works well.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
15. They are crazy about that now.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:52 PM
Apr 2016

I have never seen a group this adamant about not letting voters vote, they should do part time work for the local RNCs, they are always looking for some help in voter repression.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
19. Opinions differ.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016
There are no facts, only interpretations. Friedrich Nietzsche

I find open caucuses a helluva lot more democratic than closed primaries.

awake

(3,226 posts)
16. I wonder how many registered Dem. Voters were purged from the voters lists who will vote for Bernie
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:52 PM
Apr 2016

It seem like I keep hearing about long time Dem. Voters who have said that they want to vote for Bernie have found out (or will find out) that someone reregistered them as "independent". It seem the only way Hillary can win is to rig the vote.

unc70

(6,110 posts)
22. The change of registrations could be a problem both parties
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:09 PM
Apr 2016

For whatever reasons, there appear to be significant problems with party affiliations being changed that are affecting voters on all sides.

There are always a lot of issues from address changes, precinct changes, clerical errors, and voter mistakes. To this outsider, NY doesn't make it easy to resolve such things.

The voters I think most likely to have issues in NY could be for Trump. I don't see any organized protests by Sanders non-voters as being an issue. I think that is mostly a Clinton campaign scare story.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
20. Don't vote ,people
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

Even if you are legally registered correctly because you might be in line with a person who wants to vote but our partys big tent door is zipped closed.
I wonder if winning is so important to some that they would sell their souls and embrace right wing tactics to win than letting people who want to vote and are registered voters, to vote.
I never thought I would see shit like this here.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
51. No one is embracing right wing tactics (but thanks for
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:09 PM
Apr 2016

the snark). If the person next to you is a REGISTERED DEMOCRAT, then (s)he will be able to vote in the DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY. Anyone who is not - INDEPENDENT, REPUBLICAN, GREEN or Undefined won't. Those people will vote in THEIR party's primary. That's not a particularly difficult idea to understand.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
60. No problem. Anytime you feel the need for snark then come find me.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:31 PM
Apr 2016

The right-wing tactics are dropping little bullshit articles like this that pretty much are supposed to make people not want to stand in line because of all of these stupid independent voters didn't swap parties fast enough that I won't feel like standing in line.
Truth be known it's just bullshit political fantasy porn for those who are bored and need something to spam.
I understand why the Hillary supporters are mucho concerned right now. It's because they know Hillary does better with democrats and everyone else doesn't much care for her. So I get your concern/outrage.
MAYBE if I do RANDOM CAPITALIZED WORDS that YOU would UNDERstand ME better.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
24. That is likely what the strategy is
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:11 PM
Apr 2016

If enough Clinton voters can be blocked from the polls by protesters and doors being blocked, Sanders would actually have a chance. The key to him winning is to keep Clinton voters away from the polls.

Vinca

(50,261 posts)
27. The Democratic Party has become very undemocratic.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:14 PM
Apr 2016

Voters had to change their registration last October to vote on Tuesday. Christmas shopping hadn't even started. It works out well for Hillary, though. Suppress the vote to win. It sounds eerily Republican.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
52. You mean when they set the rules more than a year ago
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:14 PM
Apr 2016

and set the deadline for registering for October 2015 they already knew that Hillary would be the candidate? You are clarivoyant after all.

Retrograde

(10,133 posts)
74. I think the rules about party membership were in place way before that
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:01 PM
Apr 2016

but my Google-fu isn't strong enough to find the relevant court case (I think from the 60s but can't swear to it) that upheld the long lead time.

Response to workinclasszero (Original post)

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
34. Ineligible voters for Sanders will turn out just to make headlines suggesting voter fraud.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:22 PM
Apr 2016

It happened in other states already.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
41. Damn Independent Voters.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:41 PM
Apr 2016

How dare they screw up the Queen's coronation! They are not worthy!

I know, ya'll can fix it so Independent voters can't vote! You can purge voter rolls, you can close voting establishments, plenty of tricks out their just ask you Republican neighbors.

Fucking pathetic.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
65. Pay for it your own primary = problem solved?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:45 PM
Apr 2016

Again LOL.

In IL we even have same day voter registration. Again, we had problems, but I always viewed NY as more liberal than us. You all suck. Holy crap!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
57. Independents seem to think they should be treated as superdelegates and vote in any primary.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:24 PM
Apr 2016

They should be treated differently from everyone else.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font][hr]

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
63. How very Republican of you.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:43 PM
Apr 2016

I thought we were the big tent? It seems to me the *Democratic* has changed.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
66. I don't get that connection but whatever.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:46 PM
Apr 2016

If I could vote in a Republican primary, I'd vote for Ted Cruz, the weakest candidate they have. Actually, it's sort of a toss-up as to whether Trump or Cruz is worse. But since pretty much everyone in Congress hates Cruz, I think that would be the safest route.

But I don't get to vote in Republican primaries and I should not be allowed to unless I want to declare myself a Republican. Which I don't want to do.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font][hr]

Autumn

(45,055 posts)
64. Just so we are straight, you guys want us in the GE but want we should fuck off in the Primary?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:45 PM
Apr 2016

I think that's ass backwards.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
67. The other alternative
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:46 PM
Apr 2016

Be an informed voter. Are these policies individual states have for voting kept secret?

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
69. Not if you're a Republican.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:48 PM
Apr 2016

They play shit like that all the fucking time. What did Trump say, "I don't care about rules." And what did a Hillary supporter tell me the other day, "Whatever it takes".

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
73. I saw people being encouraged to show up even if their party registration was not Dem.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:53 PM
Apr 2016

That they should demand provisional ballots. This planned disruption inside the polling place will cause voter disenfranchisement of people who cared enough to sort out their shit on time. Sour grapes.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
79. You want closed primaries fine then don't expect everyone in the state to pay for them.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:11 PM
Apr 2016

Other than that I dunno what to say to people who hadn't made their minds up 6 months ago before all the debates started, I guess they should have known ahead of time they were gonna like Bernie.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
80. People did not know much about Bernie Sanders last October...Come on it's pathetic.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:35 PM
Apr 2016

DWS said the Supers are there to STOP any GRASSROOTS candidates. The party is failing the people.

One person one vote is what people want. All those that want to vote for Bernie are not just Independents. They are people who have never voted before now, because they had no reason to until they learned about Bernie and his stances.

The rules were made last year on purpose to discourage any new voters who would not vote for the ptb's choice Hillary. So they have the rules and they have the Supers as back up. It's disgusting and not fair play. The primaries are rigged.

Every person who wants to vote should be able to vote. Bernie would have won if people had known about him more, including those southern red states. Bernie Sanders is running as a democrat and anyone who wants to vote for him should not be shut out. It should be an open primary and same day registration period! This is disenfranchisement at it's highest point. The rules my ass. Everyone has a right to vote for who they want.

The primary's are to make sure only the elite and the ptb get their choice for the nomination. Fairness is not involved nor is a right to vote.

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
83. Post #30 Jury Results
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:06 PM
Apr 2016

On Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:48 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

the sanders mob out to commit voter fraud because they arent smart enough to know how to register nt
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1754057

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Calling Sanders supporters a "mob" intending to commit a crime and too stupid? Yes I think this qualifies for hiding. It is an outrage.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:58 PM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is GDrimaries. It is an opinion. If you disagree, then debate it. This is not a TOS violation
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Enough.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Can't quite say I find the outrage. Debate it instead of stifling it. Seriously, it's a discussion board. Hides should be few and far between.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

TMontoya

(369 posts)
84. So Berniebros
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:13 PM
Apr 2016

Are going to illegally block polling places because they were either too lazy or too uninformed of their own states primaries?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
89. Go for it, Indys. The nomination process is riddled with problems.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:02 PM
Apr 2016

Shutting out would be party supporters is one.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Independent voters could ...