Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

StayFrosty

(237 posts)
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:11 AM May 2016

The myth that Hillary is a conservative.

[img][/img]

I do not believe Senator Sanders is a progressive, but I do believe that he's a socialist.

Hillary seems the most progressive to me.

Also why aren't we hearing more about Sanders' vote to dump Vermont's Radioactive nuclear waste in a Latino community in Texas?

Or his support of the F-35 program?

When asked about it, this was his response.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

But my view is that given the reality of the damn plane, I’d rather it come to Vermont than to South Carolina. And that’s what the Vermont National Guard wants, and that means hundreds of jobs in my city. That’s it.”


The fact that all of this stuff has been swept under the rug by the media and especially the Right's propaganda machine, is even more supportive of the theory that the Right is salivating at having to face a Socialist in the General Election.

88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The myth that Hillary is a conservative. (Original Post) StayFrosty May 2016 OP
Cherry Picked Legislation To Foster Candidate Propaganda cantbeserious May 2016 #1
And another puppet thread can mercifully die . . . nt Depaysement May 2016 #36
The internet propaganda machine is getting it's trial run during this campaign Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #58
Truth Depaysement May 2016 #71
Cherry-picked from the profoundly conservative business of the Senate, moreover. Orsino May 2016 #75
Ex-Im helps "small business"? AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #2
If Hillary is a neocon Arneoker May 2016 #9
93% my hindquarters AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #10
They never talk about that 7% pengu May 2016 #29
Neocons are defined by their interventionist foreign policy. The areas of agreement between Hillary Vote2016 May 2016 #39
We have 90% or more identical DNA to pigs. We are pretty much pigs. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #59
... libdem4life May 2016 #82
Fortunately, we won't have to watch the right wing Hortensis May 2016 #3
You're right, it will be incredibly nasty, and for that I'm glad they are preparing accordingly Native May 2016 #66
The myth that she's a Progressive. hobbit709 May 2016 #4
Another brand spanking new poster engaged in hillogical arguments Android3.14 May 2016 #5
"Hillogical"? Oh that is GOOD! Jester Messiah May 2016 #61
Be my guest. I'm rather pleased with the term Android3.14 May 2016 #73
There has been some really good terminology coined this season. frylock May 2016 #76
Extending Bush's tax cuts is a good thing now? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #6
Who wants to extend Bush tax cuts? Thinkingabout May 2016 #27
HR 4853 was to extend Bush's tax cuts. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #31
Good for Sanders. Thinkingabout May 2016 #37
K&R NCTraveler May 2016 #7
I think we had an argument about this months ago Armstead May 2016 #15
It was blatantly obvious it was a favor. NCTraveler May 2016 #16
What were the benefits to the Sanders? Armstead May 2016 #17
I edited my post after your reply. NCTraveler May 2016 #19
Bernie Sanders doesn't need that either.... Armstead May 2016 #21
I disagree. It was clearly a political favor. NCTraveler May 2016 #23
That's all I'm saying Armstead May 2016 #28
I've always said the Party that Clinton and Rahm Emanuel built is fiscally conservative but WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #8
Exactly. They are neoliberals - economic "free" traders not much different from Paul Ryan, but very Vote2016 May 2016 #42
All the points addressed ARE RELATIVELY TRIVIAL Herman4747 May 2016 #11
^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^ John Poet May 2016 #12
Or the candidate who voted against WMD inspections Thinkingabout May 2016 #32
Except for the Brady Bill, all points either untrue or trivial Herman4747 May 2016 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author Thinkingabout May 2016 #53
Oh, really, trivial, we have 80 people a day on average dying from gun violence and it Thinkingabout May 2016 #55
And I said "Except for the Brady Bill" Herman4747 May 2016 #60
He should have a F rating, he doesn't. Thinkingabout May 2016 #74
More importantly, Hillary shouldn't be... Herman4747 May 2016 #80
Criticizing Hillary for talking to Kissinger about foreign policy, i am more concerned about Thinkingabout May 2016 #83
It isn't so much merely talking to Kissinger... Herman4747 May 2016 #84
Sanders does not have a foreign policy, has been making decisions without the Thinkingabout May 2016 #85
I strongly dispute your contention. BUT.... Herman4747 May 2016 #87
In today's global world is not a choice and Hillary has foreign policy knowledge, not wicked. Thinkingabout May 2016 #88
I haven't heard much from Hillary on gun control since the campaign came out West. frylock May 2016 #77
What about her weapons deals? If she's so anti gun why did she sell weapons to authoritarian JRLeft May 2016 #86
Perfect propaganda...This supplied by the Brock Shop? Armstead May 2016 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #14
How about supporting paid trolls on the Internet? Is that progressive? Broward May 2016 #18
The problem with Hillary is she needs to take more progressive ideas and fight aggressively for them UCmeNdc May 2016 #20
Hillary Clinton is rated a Hard-Core Liberal. workinclasszero May 2016 #22
Does that include super predators that must be brought to heel and welfare reform? hobbit709 May 2016 #24
How about dumping toxic nuclear waste on poor Hispanic folks that couldn't fight back? workinclasszero May 2016 #30
On the issues defines "liberal" based largely in Democratic Party votes and "conservative" based on Vote2016 May 2016 #44
Your spin changes nothing workinclasszero May 2016 #46
Just look for yourself on how On The Issues charts politicians. It is not based on the type of issue Vote2016 May 2016 #50
Your spin changes nothing pt. 2 workinclasszero May 2016 #51
On second thought, your argument works better without the facts so DON'T look at the facts. Vote2016 May 2016 #56
The facts are right here but you seem to have a problem with them workinclasszero May 2016 #57
Cherry pick the issues and I could be anywhere on there TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 #62
If Sanders reps you more than Hillary, fine. I got no problem with that workinclasszero May 2016 #63
She's liberal on social issues. TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 #70
Its hard to find a person I agree with 100% on every issue workinclasszero May 2016 #72
Yeah, right. And Obama is a Muslim Socialist RufusTFirefly May 2016 #67
And Blink-182 is hard-core punk. frylock May 2016 #78
Those Bernie votes/statements are more liberal or progressive when you look at the details. aikoaiko May 2016 #25
Anyone that thinks Hillary is conservative, apcalc May 2016 #26
Of course Hillary is a neocon. How can you square her foreign policy with any other conclusion? Vote2016 May 2016 #34
Neocons don't back the Iran deal. Hillary Clinton does. Recursion May 2016 #38
Hillary is just (appopriately) supporting Obama's policy. You cannot believe she would enter into a Vote2016 May 2016 #47
Sure I can. The interesting question is why you can't. What's the epistemological block there? Recursion May 2016 #48
It isn't a matter of soul searching; it's a matter of comparing her attitude toward Israel and Vote2016 May 2016 #54
KAGAN & KISSINGER enough said Cosmic Kitten May 2016 #41
You have a non-dictionary-based understanding of the words "progressive" and "socialist." Vote2016 May 2016 #33
Hillary is proud of her Goldwater girl conservativism Cosmic Kitten May 2016 #35
Yes Hillary is progressive, and so is Bernie. They only aren't if you want to see them that way. CrowCityDem May 2016 #40
But your picture doesn't have bold-faced fonts and pretty colors. baldguy May 2016 #43
Humans and rhesus monkeys share 93% of their DNA. QC May 2016 #45
Not this crap again RufusTFirefly May 2016 #52
Recycling is normally a good thing, but not always. n/t QC May 2016 #64
You just proved that HRC is a freaking conservative! d_legendary1 May 2016 #65
Really. Reading that list makes me like Hillary LESS hollowdweller May 2016 #68
I think that was Brock's plan all along d_legendary1 May 2016 #69
In 2008, her last year in the Senate jamese777 May 2016 #79
Propaganda AgingAmerican May 2016 #81

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
75. Cherry-picked from the profoundly conservative business of the Senate, moreover.
Thu May 19, 2016, 02:59 PM
May 2016

Any Democrat can be made to look like a liberal, and when nuanced stated positions are ignored, hell, they can be Che Guevara.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
2. Ex-Im helps "small business"?
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:18 AM
May 2016

Who are you kidding? Ex-Im primarily helps Boeing.

Clinton isn't a conservative - she's a neocon. They're the same on corporatism and war, but the latter will make as many false promises on social issues as necessary to pose as an electable moderate.

Arneoker

(375 posts)
9. If Hillary is a neocon
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:02 AM
May 2016

Then what would someone with a record that is same as 93% of hers, like Bernie Sanders, be?

Yes they have some real differences. But up against the Republicans, especially that nutjob Trumpo, they aren't all that much

pengu

(462 posts)
29. They never talk about that 7%
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:36 AM
May 2016

That 7% is things like Iraq, the Patriot Act, the 2001 bankruptcy bill, free trade, and other disgusting shit.

Who cares how many highways and post offices they agreed to name.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
39. Neocons are defined by their interventionist foreign policy. The areas of agreement between Hillary
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:47 AM
May 2016

and Sanders are generally on domestic issues.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
3. Fortunately, we won't have to watch the right wing
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:25 AM
May 2016

character assassination industry tear Bernie apart.

And Hillary is a battle-scarred warrior they have never been able to take down. Most people have become bored and irritated with the usual attacks. Only the fools and nasties who love to hate her greedily suck them up, and there's nothing to be done about them. I actually feel about as good as I can about her taking the right on yet again. It is going to be incredibly nasty, though.

Native

(5,942 posts)
66. You're right, it will be incredibly nasty, and for that I'm glad they are preparing accordingly
Thu May 19, 2016, 11:24 AM
May 2016

....Brock.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
5. Another brand spanking new poster engaged in hillogical arguments
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:44 AM
May 2016

She;s a weak candidate and we need Sanders to beat Trump.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
31. HR 4853 was to extend Bush's tax cuts.
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:41 AM
May 2016

Its being framed here as a negative for Bernie, yet he voted against it.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
7. K&R
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:47 AM
May 2016

Right after Sanders stumped for Schumlin Jane was appointed to the Vermont Commission dealing with the nuclear waste. It was a blatant payback for help on the trail. Some of that cronyism Sanders rails against.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
15. I think we had an argument about this months ago
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:51 AM
May 2016

She gets a very small stipend for being an alternate, I can't find the specific figure but it's not enough to be worth mentioning.

Otherwise there is no personal benefit from serving on a commission with the rather humdrum job of managing the logistics of solid waste disposal. If the Sanders operated a hauling firm or something, it might be called corruption.

More importantly, as I pointed out then, this is in no way nefarious. Is Mrs. Sanders precluded from ever dong public service because her husband is a Senator?

Criticizing "cronyism" and using connections and "favoritism" is a VERY slippery slope for the Clintons as an issue. A couple who have earned a combined $190 million (depending on source) after a career of "public service" and getting big bucks for short speeches by Corporations and the Banksters before another run for the WH, and all of the entanglements of the Clinton Foundation.......

And, no I'm not going to get into another back-and-forth over it. Just suggesting some perspective might be helpful in this.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
16. It was blatantly obvious it was a favor.
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:53 AM
May 2016

You really just highlighted that while not attempting to do so.

The Clintons often hook up those in their circle. Never said they didn't. You are arguing that cronyism is justifiable, the scale is what matters. Of course Sanders cronyism is on a smaller scale, he has played small ball his whole career.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
17. What were the benefits to the Sanders?
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:55 AM
May 2016

What do they gain from her being an alternate on a relatively obscure state board with a very focused purpose?



 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
19. I edited my post after your reply.
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:59 AM
May 2016

My apologies. When I hit update your post was there. I didn't change my direction.

Benefits: political relationships. As you yourself mentioned monetary. Access to socialites and the more powerful. Influence.

Cronyism isn't just monetary. Never has been.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
21. Bernie Sanders doesn't need that either....
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:14 AM
May 2016

Yes politics is about relationships and interaction. That's the nature of it, and the grease that allows the wheels to turn. But that fact is not the same as bad cronyism or political corruption.

There is no unseemly benefit for the Sanders in this. He doesn't need an entree to establish political relationships by having his wife serve on an obscure board.

He has been a formidable political leader in Vermont since the early 90's. He was the state's only Congressman for decades -- usually elected by huge margins. He is now one of their Senators, also elected by a huge margin.

He is also, as you may have noticed, his own person and somewhat cantankerous. If he campaigned for Schumlin, it was because he thought he was the best person for the job -- not because he would benefit politically from having his wife serve on some unsexy board.


 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
23. I disagree. It was clearly a political favor.
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:21 AM
May 2016

Look at the timeline. And Sanders has made deals with the "establishment" early in his career an often. I know you are educated about Sanders and are well aware of it. His first five years in public service and the deals he made with the party knocks your argument out of the water.

I don't see it as awful. It's what career politicians do. Clinton does it on a much larger scale. To the point I do occasionally take issue with it.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
28. That's all I'm saying
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:33 AM
May 2016

The system operates in a certain way. That can be good or bad. The devil is always in the details.

Relationships and favors, etc. can simply help the wheels to turn....The problem is when that congeals into a corrupt system, where cronyism becomes too entrenched and -- more importantly -- when it twists the operations into outcomes to close it off, and that benefits certain segments unfairly and in ways that harm the majority.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
8. I've always said the Party that Clinton and Rahm Emanuel built is fiscally conservative but
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:58 AM
May 2016

socially liberal. To paraphrase Thomas Frank, we're all Kansas now. The Party that overseas the distribution of wealth to the top 10% is held hostage by wage issues. It was a brilliant coup!

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
42. Exactly. They are neoliberals - economic "free" traders not much different from Paul Ryan, but very
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:49 AM
May 2016

different on social issues

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
11. All the points addressed ARE RELATIVELY TRIVIAL
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:10 AM
May 2016

DAMN IT, TRIVIAL!!

Which candidate voted with ALL the Republicans AND AGAINST OBAMA in support of cluster bombs?

Which candidate has HENRY KISSINGER as a mentor for foreign policy advice?

Which candidate, having Henry Kissinger as a mentor, took actions in favor of the overthrow of the democratically elected president of Honduras?

Which candidate sought to export FRACKING (GLOBAL WARMING INDUCING FRACKING) to Europe?

Which candidate voted to give George W. Bush the right to invade Iraq? REPEAT: GEORGE W. BUSH!!

Which candidate calls 78 million Iranians "enemies"?

Which candidate WILL REFUSE TO BREAK UP THE TOO BIG TO FAIL BANKS SINCE THEY ARE THE ONES PAYING HER OFF?

Which candidate was firmly against GAY MARRIAGE for years, and only changed her position when she thought it might cost her the presidency?

Which candidate LIES WITH A FREQUENCY THAT WOULD MAKE RICHARD NIXON PROUD?

Which candidate actually voted with the Republicans for the Patriot Act, and which candidate voted against the Patriot Act?

Which candidate sat on the WalMart Board of Directors and DID NOTHING TO PROMOTE UNIONIZATION WITHIN THAT COMPANY FOR SIX LONG YEARS? Indeed, actually praised the company & had stock in the company!!!

Which candidate declared that Republican John McCain had more relevant experience than did Democrat Barack Obama?

Which candidate was a "Goldwater Girl" as a teenager, THEN AS AN ADULT DECADES LATER DECLARES SHE WAS "PROUD TO HAVE BEEN A GOLDWATER GIRL"? (NOT ASHAMED, MIND YOU, BUT PROUD, GOLDWATER HAVING STRONGLY OPPOSED CIVIL RIGHTS LEGISLATION)

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
32. Or the candidate who voted against WMD inspections
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:43 AM
May 2016

the candidate who does not have a foreign policy
the candidate who did not know Dodd Frank would break up failing banks
the candidate who was for Civil Unions and later evolved for gay marriage
the candidate who ran as a Liberty Union candidate
the candidate who did not become a Democrat until a year ago
What board of directors has Sanders served on
the same candidate who voted five times against the Brady Bill after the NRA had donated $18,000 to defeat his opponent (influenced)


This same candidate who has been in congress for twenty five years and still thinks of himself as an outsider

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
49. Except for the Brady Bill, all points either untrue or trivial
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:58 AM
May 2016

Here, learn something: https://berniesanders.com/issues/war-and-peace/

Whoever Bernie's foreign policy advisor is, we can say with certainty that he does not choose to be guided by the guy on the right:



[link:http://www.thenation.com/article/henry-kissinger-hillary-clintons-tutor-in-war-and-peace/|Henry Kissinger, Hillary Clinton’s Tutor in War and Peace

] "Last night, Clinton once again praised a man with a lot of blood on his hands."

Ouch! That's got to sting, doesn't it, Thinkingabout? Stings real bad.

Deal with it.

Response to Herman4747 (Reply #49)

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
55. Oh, really, trivial, we have 80 people a day on average dying from gun violence and it
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:10 AM
May 2016

is trivial? No, don't think so.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
80. More importantly, Hillary shouldn't be...
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:16 PM
May 2016

...getting foreign policy advice from the guy on the right:

?quality=90&strip=all&w=664&h=441&crop=1

Yet she does.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
83. Criticizing Hillary for talking to Kissinger about foreign policy, i am more concerned about
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:25 PM
May 2016

A candidate running for President of the US in a global world who has not displayed an understanding of foreign affairs, he would be very lucky to have someone with the foreign affairs to even talk to him about a subject he is lacking. And to think Sanders has been in Congress for twenty five years making decisions and is not able to display his foreign policy, he isn't interested in being the president, he doesn't want the responsibility of the position.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
84. It isn't so much merely talking to Kissinger...
Fri May 20, 2016, 06:58 AM
May 2016

...about foreign policy, BUT BEING GUIDED BY HIM!

In 2012, as Honduras descended into social and political chaos in the wake of a US-sanctioned military coup

When Clinton was secretary of state the U.S. helped overthrow Honduras' elected government.

Hillary Clinton needs to answer for her actions in Honduras and Haiti

Kissinger pressed Nixon to overthrow the democratically elected Allende government

****************************************
Bernie is willing to cooperate with other countries, in such matters as the fight against global warming, the fight against the Islamic State, and (possibly) the resettling of refugees. He simply does not want the United States to be the world's sole police.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
85. Sanders does not have a foreign policy, has been making decisions without the
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:08 AM
May 2016

Proper knowledge. Whatever you want to post it would have been a good move to have gotten good strong counsel about foreign policy, he did not.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
87. I strongly dispute your contention. BUT....
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:10 AM
May 2016

if for the sake of argument we maintain your contention is true, then I think we both can agree that it is better to have no foreign policy at all, than to have a wicked foreign policy.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
77. I haven't heard much from Hillary on gun control since the campaign came out West.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:07 PM
May 2016

What's up with that?

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
86. What about her weapons deals? If she's so anti gun why did she sell weapons to authoritarian
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:08 AM
May 2016

governments?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
13. Perfect propaganda...This supplied by the Brock Shop?
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:23 AM
May 2016

Every one of those points lacks any context, and thus bends reality.

It's so fucking wrong it's not even worth the time to provide that context, because provides of propaganda just want to put shit out there with no interest in refutation.

Response to StayFrosty (Original post)

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
20. The problem with Hillary is she needs to take more progressive ideas and fight aggressively for them
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:06 AM
May 2016

When she takes a progressive issue she argues so passively for that issue. It makes her seem insincere. If she means to bring jobs back to the United States then argue aggressive manner and give solutions in that argument.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
24. Does that include super predators that must be brought to heel and welfare reform?
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:26 AM
May 2016

How about her hawkishness, big banking buddies, etc.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
30. How about dumping toxic nuclear waste on poor Hispanic folks that couldn't fight back?
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:36 AM
May 2016

How about protecting Big Gun manufacturers from lawsuits from grieving families who's loved ones were gunned down with their murderous weapons?

How about voting against the Brady bill 5 times?

How about helping the MIC waste billions on the F-35 boondoggle?

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
44. On the issues defines "liberal" based largely in Democratic Party votes and "conservative" based on
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:52 AM
May 2016

Republican Party votes.

If you accept that definition, Hillary is a liberal. Of course, that is not the definition of liberalism.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
50. Just look for yourself on how On The Issues charts politicians. It is not based on the type of issue
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:02 AM
May 2016

that you or I would take on the website, but is based mainly on votes for or against partisan legislation.

This essentially redefines ideology as party loyalty. No one disputes that Hillary voted regularly with the Democrats.

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
62. Cherry pick the issues and I could be anywhere on there
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:26 AM
May 2016

when in fact I'm a left leaning moderate.

And what does it say that Sanders represents the things that are important to me better than Hillary?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
63. If Sanders reps you more than Hillary, fine. I got no problem with that
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:38 AM
May 2016

But don't tell me she is not a hardcore liberal, that is pure hogwash.

That's as stupid as me claiming Sanders is a religious right dominionist!

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
70. She's liberal on social issues.
Thu May 19, 2016, 12:17 PM
May 2016

The military, war, Wall Street, banks, corporate cronies - No WAY is she liberal.

But you just keep thinking that and if you agree with her on those issues, then you'll be happy. If you don't, well - you'll be a bit surprised.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
72. Its hard to find a person I agree with 100% on every issue
Thu May 19, 2016, 12:45 PM
May 2016

But any democrat is better than any republican and that's the bottom line for me.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
25. Those Bernie votes/statements are more liberal or progressive when you look at the details.
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:28 AM
May 2016


But you just don't know it.

apcalc

(4,463 posts)
26. Anyone that thinks Hillary is conservative,
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:32 AM
May 2016

Or a neo-con is deluded, or seriously misinformed.
There is absolutely no basis whatsoever for that claim.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
34. Of course Hillary is a neocon. How can you square her foreign policy with any other conclusion?
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:44 AM
May 2016

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
38. Neocons don't back the Iran deal. Hillary Clinton does.
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:46 AM
May 2016

For that matter, if there's a sine qua non of neoconservatism today, it's that question.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
47. Hillary is just (appopriately) supporting Obama's policy. You cannot believe she would enter into a
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:56 AM
May 2016

similar agreement if she were at the helm.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
48. Sure I can. The interesting question is why you can't. What's the epistemological block there?
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:58 AM
May 2016

I'd do some soul-searching, if I were you.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
54. It isn't a matter of soul searching; it's a matter of comparing her attitude toward Israel and
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:07 AM
May 2016

Israeli opposition to the agreement. Hillary rarely defies Netanyahu; Obama regularly does. On what basis do you think Hillary would originate an agreement with Iran that Israel opposes?

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
33. You have a non-dictionary-based understanding of the words "progressive" and "socialist."
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:43 AM
May 2016

Saying you don't believe someone is progressive but you do believe he or she is a socialist is like saying you don't believe Nyquist is a mammal but you do believe he is a horse.

In America, Hillary is more progressive than the mid-point if you were to list all elected officials from most progressive to least progressive. If you were to list all elected officials from all NATO countries, she would be less progressive than the mid-point. Sanders would be well to her left on such lists.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
43. But your picture doesn't have bold-faced fonts and pretty colors.
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:51 AM
May 2016

And a little bird landed on Bernie's lectern, so must be a liberal!

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
65. You just proved that HRC is a freaking conservative!
Thu May 19, 2016, 11:13 AM
May 2016

1. S.1348: Establishes a temporary guest worker program (H-2C visa). Provides: (1) that the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall determine H-2C eligibility; (2) for a three-year admission with one additional three-year extension; (3) issuance of H-4 nonimmigrant visas for accompanying or following spouse and children; (4) for U.S. worker protection; (5) for implementation of an alien employment management system; and (6) establishment of a Temporary Worker Task Force.

Authorizes cancellation of removal and adjustment to conditional permanent resident status of certain alien students who are long-term U.S. residents.

Sets forth the conditions for a six-year conditional permanent resident status.

States that English is the national language of the United States. Requires the government to preserve and enhance the role of English as the national language of the United States.

2. Most of the undocumented immigrants in this country overstay their visa allotted time. Half a million people did that in 2015. WTF would want to expand visas? Oh wait...

3. Ex-Im has categorized large multinationals like Bechtel as small businesses. How the hell is this actually beneficial to small businesses?

4. AKA the Bush Tax cuts! They should have expired but instead they were passed along with cuts to Social Security and Medicare. I know for a fact Sanders didn't vote for that shit.

5. Pro Gun Bernie! Pro Gun Bernie! Pro Gun Bernie! Pro Gun Bernie! /Sarc off

6. You know who else signed that into law? Obama. And you know what else that law says? The weapon has to be unloaded and it has to ride in a special compartment. Once again from the top: Pro Gun Bernie! Pro Gun Bernie!

7. The article in question is a statement from Tim Murphy who said that Sanders wants to legalize all drugs. But of course there is no evidence that Sanders has pushed such a message along his time in politics, let alone his campaign.

8. You know who else voted for that Bill? Hillary's husband. And three states also agreed to do it including Texas.

9. Utter Rubbish. The real quote is, "What you got is an African-American president, and the African-American community is very, very proud that this country has overcome racism and voted for him for president. And that's kind of natural. You've got a situation where the Republican Party has been strongly anti-immigration, and you've got a Hispanic community which is looking to the Democrats for help." Read the interview: http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2014/11/19/365024592/sen-bernie-sanders-on-how-democrats-lost-white-voters

10. We're off the deep end here and quite frankly, not worth going over. I should have stopped at #9.

So how exactly is HRC a progressive?

jamese777

(546 posts)
79. In 2008, her last year in the Senate
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:14 PM
May 2016

the American Conservative Union (the sponsors of CPAC) gave Hillary Clinton a lifetime (8 years in the Senate) rating of 8.13 out of 100 for her votes on issues of primary concern to conservatives.
In the year 2007, her ACU rating was 0.

http://acuratings.conservative.org/acu-federal-legislative-ratings/?year1=2008&chamber=13&state1=45&sortable=1

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The myth that Hillary is ...