Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 11:12 AM Jun 2016

Judge orders Obama administration to release new Clinton emails

"A federal judge has ordered the Obama administration to release new emails connected to Hillary Clinton before Democratic convention in July.

In an order late on Wednesday, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson told the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to hand over to the Republican National Committee (RNC) whatever records it could as part of an RNC’s open records lawsuit on July 11.

After that, USAID will need to consult with the State Department about hundreds of other pages of documents, which could be released at some point in the future.


The RNC sued the aid agency in March, seeking two sets of communications: those between USAID officials and key former aides at the State Department, as well as those between USAID and private domain names associated with Hillary Clinton, former President Bill Clinton and others including the Clinton Foundation. The effort appeared to be investigating allegations that the former secretary of State’s family foundation had undue influence on USAID.
The RNC lawsuit was one of several it has filed seeking records connected to Clinton, in a preview of a battle sure to last throughout the general election.

Before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, USAID has claimed that it has discovered approximately 3,300 pages of records that it might be able to hand over to the Republican Party organization. But roughly 2,600 of those reportedly need to be cleared with the State Department before they can be released.

In her order on Wednesday, Jackson said that USAID should release to the RNC what it can by July 11, and determine a schedule for releasing the rest."


http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/281973-new-clinton-emails-due-out-in-days-before-convention

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge orders Obama administration to release new Clinton emails (Original Post) NWCorona Jun 2016 OP
re: "a preview of a battle sure to last throughout the general election. " thesquanderer Jun 2016 #1
Nah, really, This isn't an RNC operation. seabeyond Jun 2016 #2
This isn't the FBI, btw. Fawke Em Jun 2016 #8
It is also clear who is feeding it, or we can pretend it is Kerry and Obama. seabeyond Jun 2016 #9
Actually, the Intelligence Community is feeding it on the criminal side. Fawke Em Jun 2016 #14
I don't think so. seabeyond Jun 2016 #15
I have donated to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton campaign. DURHAM D Jun 2016 #3
Probably not NWCorona Jun 2016 #10
Well isn't this just perfectly timed. vintx Jun 2016 #4
The deadline is exactly 2 weeks before the convention. JudyM Jun 2016 #5
Huh. Never saw that coming. And coming. And coming. And coming. progressoid Jun 2016 #6
USAID!?! Wilms Jun 2016 #7
I don't get it. n/t FourScore Jun 2016 #12
The picture of Nuland is with this article dreamnightwind Jun 2016 #13
Drip, drip, drip... FourScore Jun 2016 #11
None of HIllary's emails at USAID should need to be reviewed by State. morningfog Jun 2016 #16
Why is this news only showing up on conservative sites? passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #17

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
1. re: "a preview of a battle sure to last throughout the general election. "
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jun 2016

and beyond, if Hillary wins the election.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
8. This isn't the FBI, btw.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jun 2016

This is a CIVIL lawsuit.

What the FBI is investigating is on CRIMINAL matters.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
14. Actually, the Intelligence Community is feeding it on the criminal side.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 01:11 PM
Jun 2016

They are more than fed up with political poobahs getting away with worse shit than they would get fired or prosecuted for.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
3. I have donated to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton campaign.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jun 2016

Would the RNC like to have all of my personal emails dating back to 2001?

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
4. Well isn't this just perfectly timed.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 11:30 AM
Jun 2016

Wonder how long it'll take them to sift through all that ans issue some kind of press release or scathing ad?

About a week, maybe two?

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
5. The deadline is exactly 2 weeks before the convention.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 11:32 AM
Jun 2016

They need to "release what they can" by this date. So the State Dept has control over what they approve for release. Hmm. Wondering how much screening will happen... This isn't the State Dept's independent IG making the call, as with that report.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
13. The picture of Nuland is with this article
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:40 PM
Jun 2016
http://journal-neo.org/2015/03/04/victoria-nuland-s-secret-coup-d-etat-in-georgia/

I don't know the exact point of the photo re this OP, but the article is about Victoria Nuland at State, and her and her husband (neocon and HRC friend Robert Kagan)'s involvement in the Ukrainian coup.
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
16. None of HIllary's emails at USAID should need to be reviewed by State.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jun 2016

If HIllary was being honest (cough, cough) when she said she turned over all State business emails before destroying what was left, any State documents have already been released and any remaining with USAID are Hillary's personal business.

Of course, we know what she said isn't true. Most bad news for HIllary and Dems.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
17. Why is this news only showing up on conservative sites?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 05:13 PM
Jun 2016

I'm not saying it isn't true, but maybe it's not really an issue to democrats...only republicans who are determined to find a way to attack Hillary, even if they are farting in the wind.

I mean, yeah, I'm not sorry they will have access to these e-mails if they can glean anything of value from them (reveal any real wrong doings of Hillary or the foundation), but until they do, is this really something to bring here?

To me it's just wishful thinking at this point. The republicans have already shown they will drag anything through the dirt (like Benghazi) over nothing valid.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Judge orders Obama admini...