Can anyone provide me a link to Clinton's Wall St. Speech transcripts?

[NorthCarolina]

I figure they surely must have been released by now someplace. I tried Google AND Yahoo but no luck. Thanks in advance for your assistance.

[amborin]

1. #ReleaseTheTranscripts

[SFnomad]

2. They are in the same place that BS released his taxes n/t

[Tal Vez]

3. That ought to be some very exciting reading.

What a joke. I wouldn't have sat through a speech that mundane.

[WhiteTara]

4. I know what you mean. I've been looking all over for

Bernie's tax returns (which have been a part of the process for 40 years) and still he hasn't provided them. Transcripts have never been part of the process and now they are the most important thing is the world. But really, what is there in Bernie's taxes that are so damning that he can't release them? He says he is for transparency and then cloaks his personal information behind a dark veil. Interesting.

[ebayfool]

14. Dayum. The FULL return was released April 15th ... 12 days after he said he would do so.

https://go.berniesanders.com/page/-/Bernie%20Taxes%20Full.pdf

And looky there! NO pay for play foundations listed.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/apr/06/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-has-released-few-tax-returns-compar/


"UPDATE: As he had promised, Sanders released his full 2014 tax return on April 15, 2016."


So where's those speech transcripts? She still "looking into it"?

[WhiteTara]

34. Only one year. Hillary released 8. What's Bernie go

To hide?

[Fuddnik]

5. They are classified and on her private server.

So expect Edward Snowden or Julian Assange to release them any day now.

[floriduck]

8. Where is Anonymous when we need them?

[pdsimdars]

15. Or in pictoral form . . . ..

.

[findrskeep]

24. Well, when you're looking out for number one...

The above graphic pretty much says it all.

[tonyt53]

6. Ah, somebody asks about those tax returns, which presidential candidates usually do release,

and the Bernie-ites, instead of asking Bernie for them, attempt to deflect the question by asking an unrelated question. Speech transcripts have never been released.

[NorthCarolina]

7. "Speech transcripts have never been released"

and for good reason...because that would be the end of the campaign. By the way, your claim of speeches not being released, apparently you forget the Romney 47% snippet from one of his speeches.

[lagomorph777]

21. Oops - nice try at deflection, but quickly squashed

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512115424#post14

[LizetteWest]

9. If there is nothing to hide, why not release them?

Then Bernie supporters may vote for her.

[Ohioblue22]

10. If you have nothing hide why object to nsa spying

[Exilednight]

12. none of us are running for POTUS.

[Ohioblue22]

16. Convenient comeback but irrelevant

[lagomorph777]

22. No, voters are not the NSA. Voters have a legitimate need to evaluate the candidate.

If the candidate is taking large sums of money from a group who recently trashed the world economy, voters have not only a right, but a responsibility, to know what she has done, or promised to do for said group in return for said money.

[findrskeep]

28. EXACTLY.

[Exilednight]

25. it's completely relevant. what policy did she tell them? those speeches

Contain information about her philosophy on leadership, business practices and economics.

It would be pretty naive to think she gave speeches about how to grow a beautiful garden.

[Ohioblue22]

11. You have no right to see her transcripts. You'll need to look elsewhere for your ammo

[JesterCS]

20. We have EVERY right to know

Especially when deciding who to entrust the country to.

[cherokeeprogressive]

32. Correct. We have no right to know what a presidential candidate says in private to rich people.

It is, after all, the new way. Lies are truth. War is peace. Obfuscation is transparency.

[Lizzie Poppet]

37. Duh. If it was an actual right, that simple request would instead be a lawsuit.

Princess Weathervane's refusal to release them is sufficient, really. It's not as if anyone with an IQ higher than their shoe size doesn't already know whose side she's on...

[lagomorph777]

38. We have the right and the RESPONSIBILITY to see the transcripts.

Ignoring her promises to the people who destroyed the world economy would be insanely irresponsible.

[NCTraveler]

13. We will consider releasing them if Sanders equals Clintons transparency with his taxes. nt.

[Marr]

19. "We"?

It's sad that you think you're part of Hillary Clinton's "we".

[lagomorph777]

23. I don't think it's hubris.

The poster has revealed their actual status.

[NCTraveler]

31. I started saying we when my check started to arrive. Nt

[Tarc]

17. This was last a viable issue in early March or so

But the primary has realistically been over since New York, and will certainly be over by June 7th.

[Marr]

18. Just wait. I expect they'll be available in October. /nt

[lagomorph777]

26. ^^^You betcha. Probably not just transcripts but videos, receipts, cancelled checks...

and the whole cornucopia of missing emails. Trump is a psychopath, but no fool.

[Duval]

27. Good luck with that! nt

[EndElectoral]

29. Check her server, or contact Guccifer.

[itsrobert]

30. The standard has been to release tax returns

I guess Hillary has to go above and beyond while Bernie gets a pass?

[anotherproletariat]

33. She spoke for hundreds, possibly thousands of people during these speeches.

If anything controversial was said, we would have heard about it by now. I've been to many such speeches, and my guess is that they were just as boring and 'cookie cutter' as any other talk made to large groups, which is why they never made waves.

If you really want a smoking gun, look for small, private meetings with Wall Street executives.

[Surya Gayatri]

35. Funny you should bring that up...lots of us have been asking the same question about

Sen. and Ms. Sanders' tax returns.

Their release was promised over two months ago, but we can find no trace.

Got any ideas? Hummm?

[beachbum bob]

36. Right next to sanders and trumps tax returns..

[nichomachus]

39. So you're saying we shouldn't vote for any of them

Cool.