Here’s where Hillary Clinton is giving her nomination victory speech on Tuesday night

[Henhouse]

Here’s where Hillary Clinton is giving her nomination victory speech on Tuesday night

By Bill Palmer | June 4, 2016 |

Hillary Clinton will officially clinch the Democratic Party 2016 nomination for President on Tuesday June 7th when the polls close in New Jersey, whether she wins the state or not, based on proportional delegates — but she won’t be giving her victory speech there. She’ll also be looking to win the California primary later that night, but she won’t be speaking from the west coast either. Instead, Hillary has revealed an intriguing home base for the evening....

Hillary will be holding an official event at the Brooklyn Navy Yard from 6:00 to 10:00pm eastern time on Tuesday night, meaning that when the polls close in New Jersey and she officially becomes the democratic nominee, she’ll be celebrating just across the Hudson River and East River. It represents an opportunity to bring her campaign back to its starting point.

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/news/heres-where-hillary-clinton-is-giving-her-nomination-clinching-speech-on-tuesday-night/24922/

[Live and Learn]

1. Because she thinks rules don't apply to her? nt

[Doctor Jack]

3. Shes following the same rules democrats have been following for a generation

But the rules don't apply to Sanders, right? Most votes, most delegates, superdelegate counts, popular opinion. Fuck all of that! Give Sanders special treatment because he is a raging asshole

[Samantha]

7. The DNC runs the primaries and it is their rules in place

Three times now recently the DNC has dispatched a spokesperson to inform the networks not to include the superdelegates in with pledged delegates when reporting primary voting results. These are not Sanders' rules but those of the DNC.

As far as calling Senator Sanders "a raging asshole" you are beyond appalling. Off to Ignore with you.

Sam

[Doctor Jack]

8. How dare I?! Sanders is infallible!

Just keep shrinking your world until almost no one is left to listen to. That is the best way to live your life.

[Snotcicles]

38. I will shrink mine by one in about one minute. nt

[geek tragedy]

9. On June 8 the people from the DNC will take orders from

Hillary's campaign. They won't be neutral because we will have a winner.

Bernie can complain all he wants, but he is powerless to stop it. Because he lost.

[Samantha]

15. If she does not have 2383 in pledged delegates and Bernie is still in the race, she does not win

[geek tragedy]

16. So says no one who has any say in the matter.

This is how it has always worked. When a candidate has both a pledged delegate majority and an overall delegate majority--they get declared the presumptive nominee.

The first woman to become a presumptive nominee is not going to get treated differently than all the male nominees just because the self-entitled man whose ass she beat refuses to acknowledge her victory.

Bernie and his people can say whatever they want about her not being the winner. He's the loser, so his opinion doesn't count. Ain't shit he can do to stop it. All he can do is whine.

[Live and Learn]

28. The truth does not matter to some here. It is sad. nt

[Demsrule86]

32. Yeah well that was before the times they are a changin...

On Tuesday, it all changes. Clinton has a majority of the delegates and supers vote for the candidate with the most delegates...thus, she is the presumptive nominee as Obama was in 08 under similar circumstances with the number of votes and all. At the convention, she becomes the nominee ...and the word presumptive is no longer used.

[MyNameGoesHere]

35. If the system was so unfair why did Sanders agree

To become part of it? Why did he betray the movement and participate in something he loathes? To become a well known shit stirrer? To try and dismantle Democrats from winning? He had a choice to be true to his beliefs and he chose to be a participant in what he hated, now he needs to be a grownup and admit it was a flawed gambit from the beginning.

[msanthrope]

4. Brooklyn....her house, her rules. nt

[geek tragedy]

6. The rules do apply. She won the voting, she will clinch the nomination,

and anyone who doesn't like it is shit out of luck, as well as out of excuses.

As of Tuesday she will have won, she can declare victory, and all Bernie can do about it is whine and get made fun of.

[rjsquirrel]

22. Lol whut

No because she will have clinched it by longstanding rules.

Can't wait.

[Skink]

2. I was thinking Flint

[Jack Bone]

5. Seems fitting...LOL

Given that she's not from Brooklyn, nor has she ever been in the Navy!

[bjo59]

11. She loves militarism, though, and likes to identify herself with raw power.

[BreakfastClub]

13. She wil be the Commander-in-chief of the Navy, so it's very fitting. nt

[Jack Bone]

14. I think Trump's gonna beat her...

She's a horribly flawed candidate that offers no vision.

She's Walter Mondale in a pantsuit.

[rjsquirrel]

23. Walter Mondale was a fine person

And the pantsuit remark is misogynist bulllshit.

[Henhouse]

37. +1

[bjo59]

10. Is the idea that the superdelegates will be too embarrassed not to vote for her at the convention in

July after she's already had a big victory party? Interesting strategy.

[geek tragedy]

12. No, she won the voting and already has a bunch of

superdelegates supporting her. She won. Doesn't matter if you and Bernie and Jane and Weaver refuse to acknowledge it. Reality will go forward without you.

[MFM008]

26. This is worse than trying to explain

climate change to James Inhofe.
Facts and science are behind you
and all you get is a snowball for an answer...........

[rjsquirrel]

24. No they would be embarrassed

to vote for a guy with several million fewer votes and several hundred fewer PDs.

What part of democracy is so hard for you people?

[jillan]

17. How is she going to win the nomination without 2383 pledged delegates? Hillary cannot make up

her own rules.

She has 1776 delegates, according to the AP.

She needs 607 to clinch the nomination.

This is insane.

[geek tragedy]

19. They are going to apply the same standards to her that they

did to Obama.

When he clinched with superdelegates he declared victory and was universally regarded as the presumptive nominee.

It's Team Bernie that's trying to rewrite the rules.

This garbage about needing 2383 pledged delegates to become the presumptive nominee is delusional Calvinball.

No one cares what the guy who lost the voting thinks. Because he lost, his opinion is ultimately irreievant.

[jillan]

20. It's not Bernie's opinion - it is a fact. 2383 is the number of PLEDGED delegates to win.

This is from the DNC themselves, and yes they are the ones that set the rules.

[Live and Learn]

29. There you go with your damn rules again.

[Nonhlanhla]

34. Nonsense

2383 is the number of pledged AND superdelegates needed to win. To reach a majority of the pledged delegates, you need only 2026. The superdelegates always support the winner of the pledged delegates. Game over.

http://www.vox.com/2016/5/6/11597550/superdelegates-bernie-sanders-clinton

To win the Democratic nomination, a candidate needs a simple majority of 2,383 delegates (pledged or superdelegates) at the convention floor.

About 85 percent of the convention's delegates are chosen by the voters, and about 15 percent are superdelegates. So it takes a pretty huge pledged delegate margin of victory — a win of 59 to 41 percent — to take the nomination outright. Otherwise, the superdelegates have to push someone over the finish line.

This is what happened in 2008. Barack Obama did not take enough of the pledged delegates to win the nomination alone. But because Obama had narrowly beaten Clinton among the pledged delegates, the superdelegates followed the will of the voters — and gave him the nomination.

You could look at that and say that Obama won "because of" the superdelegates. And in the most literal sense possible, it'd be true. But, again, superdelegates did not make Obama the nominee — the voters did. The same dynamic is now playing out with Clinton and Sanders in 2016.

[Aerows]

18. For a person that names themself Henhouse

you sure are counting a whole bunch of chickens before they've hatched.

[jillan]

21. Zing!

[B Calm]

25. She can say whatever she wants, it will still be a contested convention! The

more she blabs about winning, the more angry her opposition will get. Totally up to her if she wants peace or war.

[Fuddnik]

27. Alcatraz or Leavenworth ain't in Brooklyn.

Maybe Rikers Island.

[cui bono]

30. So she'll be lying yet another time?

[Demsrule86]

31. I love it!!!!

I am so excited like a kid at Christmas.

[Surya Gayatri]

33. Yippeeeee! K & R. Thanks for posting.

[Rob H.]

36. LOL, The Daily 'News' Bin again?

http://beingbutmen.blogspot.com/2015/11/today-tim-martyn-from-web-site-daily.html

No one knows who owns the domain, because it was registered secretly using the company Domains By Proxy. Rather obviously, Daily News Bin has something to hide. Daily News Bin claims to be run by Bill Palmer, its "Senior Editor". There is, apparently, a "Bill Palmer". He's written all of two articles for BeatWeek, a music magazine. He claims to be the magazine's editor-in-chief, but if you go to BeatWeek's Web site and try to verify that -- you discover that the "About" page is an attack-page full of viruses that attempts to take over your computer. In fact, that's true of almost every page on BeatWeek's Web site, except for their "Contact Us" page.

There are four "reporters" at Daily News Bin: Cara Harris, Tim Martyn, Christy Bishop Cricow, Reggie Smith, and Anita Finlay Harris, Martyn, and Smith seem not to exist. The only "Christy Bishop Cricow" I can find with a Google search is an interior designer and sticker manufacturer who lives in Eugene, Oregon. Anita Finlay Harris is a real person, who hold right-wing/libertarian views (she's a regular contributor to the right-wing The Jerry Doyle Show, the right-wing Americans Talk Radio Network, the right-wing Midpoint With Ed Berliner, the right-wing Talk Radio Network, and more). But if you search Daily News Bin for anything she's written, nothing comes up. Nor does a Google search of her name and Daily News Bin.

If you read the articles on Daily News Bin, it's clear the site is a poorly written pro-Hillary Clinton site. It does nothing but promote Hillary Clinton. It talks as if Hillary Clinton already won the Democratic nomination for president. Now, Daily News Bin pretends to have Tech, Music, and Entertainment sections. But if you go to them, you discover them either empty or full of pro-Hillary Clinton articles.

I'm all for political Web sites. But this is a joke. It's so poorly done, I'm shocked anyone believes it.