2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFirst time in history, a woman wins a major party nomination?! Nah. Give it to a white dude.
That is essentially the mantra of the Bernie Sanders campaign right now. Despite all Bernie's earlier complaints that the Superdelegate process is undemocratic, he is now arguing that, for the first time in history, Superdelegates should overturn the will of the popular vote and the pledged delegate lead.
And it should strip away the nomination from the first woman nominee of a major party ever -- a woman who in all likelihood will have rightfully come out ahead by 3 million in the popular vote and ~300 in pledged delegates.
Historic female nominee who overwhelmingly won among the voters? Nah. Strip it from her and give it to the white dude.
And Bernie really thinks that Hillary supporters and women will be cool with that? It's one thing to eventually support the candidate who won fair and square against yours. But if Bernie thinks Hillary supporters would accept this and get behind him, he's nuts. What arrogance.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)looks like we saved sanders from himself too!!!
The Wielding Truth
(11,411 posts)He has been and will probably continue to work for the betterment of this (our) country. Win or lose he has always been a proponent of fairness and social justice and public welfare. I thought that that is what all democrats really were.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,411 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)uponit7771
(90,301 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Last edited Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:44 PM - Edit history (1)
There are at least 25 million Constitutionally eligible women in this country that I would vote for before I would ever vote for Clinton.
I would have voted for Warren if she was running.
Response to ashtonelijah (Reply #14)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
ecstatic
(32,653 posts)Nothing is being taken from him, contrary to the lie Sanders keeps pushing.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Matt_R
(456 posts)Feathery Scout
(218 posts)Response to Feathery Scout (Reply #104)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Feathery Scout
(218 posts)They have some Angel and speak directly to God/Angel through their anointed leader on Earth.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)The argument was specific to one woman, not all. Obviously.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)a lie.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)The data is there chief.
Pull yer head out.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)President of the United States of America. Tuesday will be a great day, a progressive day.
rickford66
(5,521 posts)I've read they were created to overrule the popular primary vote and run the candidate most likely to win the GE. Can anyone set me straight?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)They were created to make sure only someone favored by the inside the beltway establishment got it.They didn't want any outsider that they didn't own going anywhere.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Maybe they were chastened by the fact a candidate won the nomination with < 30% of the delegates and went on to lose > 97% of the states in the general election.
Any way, they better have a damn good reason to steal the nomination from the person with the most votes and pledged delegates.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to steal the nomination?
Henhouse
(646 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,783 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Democracy is just so quaint.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Carter entered the convention as a plurality candidate. The supers were invented in a time when 3+ contesting campaigns showing up was commonplace.
brush
(53,742 posts)McGovern.
The repugs hope they had super delegates now.
djean111
(14,255 posts)What delusional arrogance, to think that gender matters more than issues. That is, actually, insulting to women.
Response to djean111 (Reply #5)
ashtonelijah This message was self-deleted by its author.
A Little Weird
(1,754 posts)When a woman becomes president, it should be because she's the best choice, not because she's a woman. Clinton is very obviously not the best choice.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)So deal with it.
A Little Weird
(1,754 posts)It happens sometimes.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Silly me
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)And you vote for the candidate whith the approved genitallia...
And we wonder why so few people in the US bother to vote
Hydra
(14,459 posts)While saying that was her biggest qualification and made her not part of the establishment.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)why they are allergic to issues. We get what we deserve in this theater of manufactured consent.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Next year there will be a vagina in the Oval Office. She won it fair and square.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Most women don't support Hillary. They support Bernie.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Most women certainly do not support Sanders.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)or is that they don't count?
I'll tell you how much they count. Did you know Black women are the most reliable voters? That they are the biggest voting block?
You can count on them to show up to vote. And they are, millions and millions of them, supporting Hillary
brush
(53,742 posts)That has a bogus ring to it if I ever heard one.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,167 posts)and it's only Sunday morning.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)vote this cycle. according to many analysts. Here's a fun game to play from one of Hillary's favs Nate Silver. http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-swing-the-election/
He suggests the big thing to focus on is education, not ethnicity. How well does Hillary do with the working class male? And yes, I am suggesting that the working class probably doesn't have the majority of PhD's
elljay
(1,178 posts)Nah, let's give it to another Christian. You know, the very large religion that has exterminated tens of millions of people who refused to join it. The religion that destroyed hundreds, maybe thousands of cultures everywhere it has gone. The religion that many Americans believe should be superior in this county. Why make history by electing a Jew, a member of a faith that has not yet recovered from having more than one third of its members exterminated by Christians in WW2, while Christians in the US refused them sanctuary?
And you really think that non-Christians would be cool with this? With once again electing a member of a majority oppressive faith instead of a minority?
So many things one can do with your ridiculous and insulting argument......
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)"Coming this far" isn't far enough, as Hillary learned in 2008.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Thanks for the reveal, and buh bye
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)that liberals are supposed to think counts.
Feathery Scout
(218 posts)elljay
(1,178 posts)Is that the poster made bigoted comments. I'm not going to get into a theological discussion of whether the Church of Jesus Christ of LDS is Christian enough for you. Those of us who support Bernie are not doing so because we are opposed to a woman president. And, his being white is also irrelevant. We just don't support her positions and I'm sick and tired of being insulted by disrespectful people who cannot accept that other people simply disagree with her politics. Many Bernie supporters have voted for Jill Stein in the past and were involved in trying to draft Elizabeth Warren and it is ludicrous to make sweeping accusations that they are sexist (and many of us happen to also be women.) I haven't seen arguments of. DU that Hillary supporters are antisemite voting against Bernie's religion, but many Hillary supporters accusing us of being sexist. You are perfectly entitled to agree with Hillary's positions. I respect your right to do so and I disagree because I am much more progressive than she is in all ways. I expect Hillary supporters to accord me the same amount of respect without the stupid and counterproductive insults to my motivations.
Feathery Scout
(218 posts)A non-Chrisitian has already been nominated by a major party for the Presidential nomination.
Whatever else you wish to read into it, is your choice.
Peace.
elljay
(1,178 posts)and should have known better than to answer while trying to shop at the Farmers' Market! BTW, Bing cherries are very early this year, not that there is such a thing as climate change......
And, not to disparage the wonderful progressive parties, the Green Party's candidate for the past two elections has been Jill Stein, who is Jewish (their prior candidate was an African American woman, Cynthia McKinney) and the Peace and Freedom candidate for 2012 was another Jewish woman, Rosanne Barr. The Democrats and Rwpublicans are far behind the curve, as usual.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Pathetic OP.
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)And some still cannot accept the fact that anyone not white and male could beat them -- especially not a woman.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)It has everything to do with policies (where Bernie is FAR superior) and character (where Hillary is dishonest and corrupt). I would eagerly support a black, Hispanic, or Asian woman over Hillary, but one is not available in the race.
Response to ashtonelijah (Reply #18)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)A decades long history of monumental poor judgement.
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)..is rigged
TheCowsCameHome
(40,167 posts)Hmmm?
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)And you wonder why you couldn't gain more traction with minorities and relied so heavily on white men?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And many Sanders supporters are going to vote for Jill Stein. Too bad that doesn't fit the sexist propaganda you're trying to spread.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,167 posts)Just &^%*^# stop.
You have no clue. None.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)a neo-liberal Clinton may win the party nomination.
Nah, give it to the Democratic-socialist. Much better choice imo.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Sanders supporters would be fine with Warren...in fact most were Warren supporters. Too bad that doesn't fit your 'BernieBros so sexist' script.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)Does the same woman have a history of being on the wrong side of history until it polls well against a guy who has been on the right side of the issues since 4 ever?
Because if you are talking about a person born as a woman in a generic sense being replaced by a person born as a generic male than your argument might hold a little weight without examining the positions of the generic two.
Hopefully we can get past race and gender and focus on character over characterizations.
Also, she hasn't won yet. That happens at the convention.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)All that matters is whether Sanders respects the votes of those who chose her.
If not, he doesn't deserve any respect
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... have nothing to do with their genitals. But if you have to fantasize that it's so, go right ahead and live in delusion. Don't mean shit to a tree.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Transgender individuals might well find that offensive.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)You got a fucking problem with that, take it up with the OP.
Mmmmmmmmmmmmm punkin'?
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)Pass the smelling salts.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Fucking strawman much?
Welcome to Ignore.
Bub bye.
Response to ashtonelijah (Reply #74)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Does this not register? Is there some reason why you can't understand this is a big deal?
It matters. It's not ok. It will likely ruin this whole election for Dems.
And guess who did it, without any help, and covered it up until it was too late to fix it?
Different Drummer
(7,603 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)to overturn the will of the people.
But, that's not what's happening.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)And, she's going to be the nominee, so irrelevant. And though I dislike her I will certainly vote for her over Trump.
For many reasons, including that women's rights would certainly suffer with a Trump Supreme Court.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)but it's still a fact that for the first time in history, a woman is winning a major party nomination and some people want to stop that.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)I hope to see a woman president before the end of my life.
Hillary Rodham Clinton is not that woman. I have known that about her since the '90s. I'm not going to vote for, nor support in any way, a candidate based on gender when she fails most or all of my actual criteria for earning my vote, which is based on issues, not identity.
I'll be upfront: my support for Sanders has less to do with Sanders and everything to do with issues. In the spring of '15, all I wanted was a non-neo-liberal to run against HRC in the primaries. I didn't care who; any candidate who was not a neo-liberal would have done. I think Sanders stepped forward because he saw that need, and nobody else came forward. I embraced his candidacy with relief.
He's done so much better than I ever thought he could. I am inspired and energized by his campaign. I will continue to support him until the convention is over, and then I'll support him on whatever path he finds himself. I want him there until the end.
The bottom line: Hillary Clinton never had my support, is never going to get my support, and as a woman I find the whole effort to use her gender as a reason to nominate her or put her in the WH despite her many, many flaws when it comes to issues and record to be repugnant and a betrayal of what feminism should be about. It should not be about entitlement because of gender.
And speaking of arrogance...Hillary Rodham Clinton is the most arrogant Democratic candidate I can remember since the other Clinton. That arrogance, and the arrogance of the party establishment, and the extreme arrogance of her supporters, doesn't win any support from those who aren't already "with" her.
Well stated. Thanks.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)how many times does it have to be said that a lot of us DO NOT SUPPORT HRC ON THE ISSUES.
does it really come down to that if hrc was a male that a lot of "her" supporters would not BE supporters?
djean111
(14,255 posts)Hillary supporters are desperately trying to make this about Bernie, when it is about the issues.
And there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that, if Warren had run, instead of Bernie - which would have rendered all of their sexist fucking bullshit useless - Hillary's campaign would have been dragging out the Pocahontas stuff. Issues mean absolutely nothing to them.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)I too agree with what you wrote. Thank you.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Different Drummer
(7,603 posts)You expressed it much better than I ever could have.
ncliberal
(185 posts)I'm a woman also and agree with everything you said.
indigoth
(135 posts)"
First time in history, a woman wins a major party nomination?! Nah. Give it to a white dude.
That is essentially the mantra of the Bernie Sanders campaign right now."
Not true. Her being a woman has NOTHING to do with it. Nor has it EVER had anything to do with it. Any, and just about every, Bernie support knows that.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Why bring race into it when both candidates in question are the same race?
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)"Anything to win."
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)That would be exclusively a Clinton supporter thing.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)electing the nations first female president.
If Hillary Clinton had not run, and governors Nikki Haley, from South Carolina, or Susana Martinez, from New Mexico, would have done so
would you have voted for either of them?
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Opposition to Hillary's candidacy is based, overwhelmingly, on her (piss-poor) record of warmongering and catering to corporate interests, and her well-demonstrated lack of character. Claiming it has racist roots is simple-minded slander.
Different Drummer
(7,603 posts)that opposition to Hillary was based on character issues. I learn something new here every day!
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)protecting the social safety net for all Americans, then bring on the dominance. Hillary was wrong on Iraq, is in the pocket of Wall Street, and can't be trusted on protecting the social safety net.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)expanding social security or actually doing something to get us off fossil fuels. No Dammit, the important thing is penis vs vagina! That plus I'm pretty sure only white males between the ages of 20-40 will benefit from any of this free stuff paid for by taxing people like me, which is why Bernie is a racist.
This is why I am a sensible centrist for Clinton.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)ecstatic
(32,653 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)se these divisive tactics
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Got anything real to discuss?
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)You must be ready to jump on the Trump train if you've already begun to use his rhetoric.
Response to ashtonelijah (Original post)
Post removed
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Someone's been brought back to life!
There's been talk of the new system once we're in GE mode. Wonder if that includes elimination of socks?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,587 posts)Do I need to continue?
SDJay
(1,089 posts)Trotting out the 'if you don't support HRC you're a sexist' crap is no different than saying that if you don't support Bernie then you're an anti-Semite. It's stupid and completely counterproductive.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)the best person for the job.
He's also secular and jewish, those are firsts as well (I'm not jewish, just secular)
Gothmog
(144,919 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)- a warmonger in the White House
- a Wall St loyalist in the White House
- an energy company loyalist in the White House
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)yourout
(7,524 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)rickford66
(5,521 posts)Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)No, sorry to disappoint you...the "mantra" is not "Give it to a white dude."
White dude?
Not even going to touch that one.
Just a really low level of discourse all around.
And she doesn't earn the nomination because she's a woman. She earns the nomination because she earns the nomination.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I don't vote based on gender, I vote based on ideas
Seeinghope
(786 posts)President of the United States.
The unknown Jewish white man has captured the hearts and spirits of so many of the voters. Bringing in new voters and Independents alike: showing a strong appeal against the politically backed heavyweight. Lasting their whole contest, even though many want him to just give up because he is trailing behind, he still valiantly remains standing against all of the brutal attacks by the heavy weight and her backers. He is not a quitter will not fold over to the "mighty" establishment he will stand for the hope of giving the people a voice for as long as he can and to maybe give a final knockout punch.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)with the massive voter fraud commited by clintons,DNC,and Dem establishment.
CLinton is first presidential candiate subject to fbi investigation with massive disapproval numbers.
your racist attacks on bernie and his supporters show why many bernie supporters won't support her.
onecaliberal
(32,777 posts)When the truth comes out she'll need a pardon.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)coyote
(1,561 posts)Instead of someone who would really fight for the people's best interest.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)Electing Hillary won't solve the gender issue.
Gay rights were achieved by hard work at all levels (and not with Hillary's help); not by electing some figurehead. The same goes for every major and minor achievement in civil rights. The demographics of the people in office never matter. Their policies do.
So giving up policy for the sake of demographics is putting the cart before the horse and therefore useless. I'm supporting Sanders because he's pushing good policy, not because I hate women.
Turin_C3PO
(13,909 posts)Gender minority or ethnic and religious minority, either would be historic.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)hand Clinton her victory. He refuses.
First woman to become the nominee of a major party to run in GE, shattering another glass ceiling. And it is all about Sanders.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Did ya vote for her?
TheKentuckian
(25,020 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Take the gender out of it. The candidate has the worst favorablilty of any candidate in Democratic history. The candidate is under FBI criminal investigation.
Opposes single payer
Opposes Glass-Steagall
Opposes $15 minimum wage
In favor of death penalty
Wants to send special forces into Syria and have a no-fly zone
Opposes legalization of marijuana
Opposes free tuition universities
Supports Clinton-Gingrich welfare reform
Supports fracking
Supports Patriot act and thinks Snowden is a criminal
Wants to make flag burning a Felony.
to all this bull shit, you say, "yea, but she's a girl."
to which I and every THINKING Democrat say, "How shallow are you?"
Matt_R
(456 posts)Elvis never did no drugs.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)are you discounting her?
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)LexVegas
(6,031 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)both??!!
apcalc
(4,462 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The funny thing is though that the Hillary supporters would be fine with it while the Bernie supporters would squeal like pigs.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Those who don't agree can whine all they want, but it doesn't change facts.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)it's what's inside that counts, to think otherwise IS sexism.