2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow should Superdelegates decide who to vote for?
What criterion should they use?
.
5 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Whoever wins the most pledged candidates. | |
5 (100%) |
|
Whoever wins the popular vote nationwide. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Whoever wins the most contests (states and territories). | |
0 (0%) |
|
Whoever has won the superdelegate's state, allocated proportionally. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Whoever has won the superdelegate's state, allocated winner-take-all. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Other, because democracy sucks. | |
0 (0%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)the same.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Anyway I was told they had already decided
Many of them decided before any vote was cast.
Furthermore I was told by several Hillary defenders on DU that even if Sanders won the popular vote the superdelegates would still be voting for Hillary, and that's probably true.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)not because she won the popular vote, but because they don't need a reason. Many of them they decided before any vote was cast and even before other candidates were announced.
Hillary has been lobbying them for years.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)To vote for who they think is the best nominee.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Chichiri
(4,667 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Right from the start when he didn't bother building support for his run. Unless his Senate colleagues told him, "Sure, Bernie, I think you should run." And then snickered around the water cooler, "Watch this, guys, it's going to be epic."
He acts like he just arrived on the scene instead of 25 years ago.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Stallion
(6,473 posts)nm
MADem
(135,425 posts)They should vote the way they are charged to vote--for the GOOD OF THE PARTY.
They don't represent YOU, they don't represent ME, they represent the DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Their vote is supposed to represent their best view of what is BEST for THE PARTY.
smh.
Ask Tad Devine if you're genuinely "unclear"--he helped design the system so we didn't end up with another 1972.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)Or at least they did until a few weeks ago, when they finally realized they weren't going to win the pledged delegates. *shrug*
tandem5
(2,072 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)The superdelegates were set up to stop a weak candidate from getting the nomination unless the weak candidate was able to win enough pledged delegates to secure the nomination.
We may not like that but that was a major reason along with stopping a liberal from winning the nomination, the Democratic Party leadership decided to have unelected superdelegates.
So both Hillary and Bernie are counting on the superdelegates votes to win the nomination.
Period.
jamese777
(546 posts)That is the purpose of having "Party Leader and Elected Officials" as unbound delegates.
Primaries popular vote as of June 4th
Hillary Clinton: 13,259,842 (55.4%) *
Bernie Sanders: 10,225,032 (42.7%)
Clinton over Sanders: 3,034,811 *
Hillary Clinton: 1,770 pledged delegates *
Bernie Sanders: 1,502 pledged delegates
Hillary Clinton: 522 superdelegates *
Bernie Sanders: 43 superdelegates
Hillary Clinton: 2,298 total delegates *
Bernie Sanders: 1,543 total delegates
Hillary Clinton: 28 contests won *
Bernie Sanders: 21 contests won
Hillary Clinton still needs 85 delegates. *
Bernie Sanders still needs 840 delegates.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)They exist in order to rip the power from the people if need be. They exist to guarantee The Party gets ITS nominee.
Fuck them.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)In their state. And then SDs should be eliminated forever.