Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
are we really debating which criminal charges apply to her presumptiveness? (Original Post) reddread Jun 2016 OP
No you guys are arguing this! hrmjustin Jun 2016 #1
no we aren't Peacetrain Jun 2016 #2
Your post doesn't make sense Renew Deal Jun 2016 #3
Set up re: Trump...and Billy boy asking him to run bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #4
I see no way she can or will avoid being indicted yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #5
lol...I see no way sanders will not face huge FEC fines and DOJ presecutions beachbum bob Jun 2016 #6
Please share your insights PJMcK Jun 2016 #10
You need to begin your due diligence on this yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #11
Respectfully, you don't know all the facts or the laws PJMcK Jun 2016 #13
I see no way she can or will BE indicted. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #15
This new haiku series needs some workshopping. Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #7
I love the schoolyard taunts of names like presumptiveness Blue_Adept Jun 2016 #8
>.> Hiraeth Jun 2016 #12
It's summertime...I'd recommend a nice white whine for tomorrow's Primary coverage. brooklynite Jun 2016 #9
... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #14

Renew Deal

(81,846 posts)
3. Your post doesn't make sense
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary won because more people voted for her. It didn't matter who the party chair was. If you remember, Hillary "won" all of the debates. It is widely accepted that more debates would have been good for Hillary.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
6. lol...I see no way sanders will not face huge FEC fines and DOJ presecutions
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jun 2016

and my prediction has way more chance to happen than yours

PJMcK

(21,996 posts)
10. Please share your insights
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:43 AM
Jun 2016

Your blanket statement seems to be based on specific knowledge of the FBI's investigation. If your views are based on press reports, you know less than you think you do.

I have no idea if Secretary Clinton committed prosecutable crimes. I'll let the professionals do their jobs.

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
11. You need to begin your due diligence on this
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:49 AM
Jun 2016

She deserves a long prison sentence.
I am not here to do your research for you.
Open your eyes and your mind.
The facts are springing up all around you.

PJMcK

(21,996 posts)
13. Respectfully, you don't know all the facts or the laws
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:05 AM
Jun 2016

Unless you are part of the investigative team, all you can know came from the media.

I've followed the story and have heard conflicting and confusing information. Your comment that I should do my own due diligence seems snide and unnecessary.

You say Secretary Clinton "deserves a long prison sentence." This is premature hyperbole as I'm certain that you have an understanding of our judicial system. Specifically, a citizen must be charged, tried and convicted before being sentenced to jail time. None of that has happened yet.

So, I repeat my original request that you share the specific insights that you're privy to.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
15. I see no way she can or will BE indicted.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jun 2016

Fantasizing that the indictment fairy will reverse the outcome of the election is sickening.

Blue_Adept

(6,393 posts)
8. I love the schoolyard taunts of names like presumptiveness
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:36 AM
Jun 2016

or her royal highness and so forth.

It's what I love about liberals. So mature. So unlike conservatives.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»are we really debating wh...