2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas Bernie Congratulated the Firsts Woman Candidate Nomination? No, Why?
Has Bernie Congratulated the Firsts Woman Candidate Nomination?
No, Why? I know this is off topic or some dang thing wrong with my question. I never thought this website that I have been reading and posting on for 16 years has become so touchy or afraid of a second opinion that people have been censored for a position against Bernie Sanders and that are for the leader Hillary Clinton. Go ahead and remove my thoughts, par for the course.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)When/if that happens I'm sure he will congratulate her.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)He might as well stay in Vermont. That is not how it is done. However, I think Bernie will do the right thing in the end...couple of days maybe.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)And they especially can't do it by polling anonymous superdelegates who haven't voted yet. Will she be the nominee? Most likely. On July 25. She isn't yet.
mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Unless they are favorable to him.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)but that would mean you have to wait until every one has voted !
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)But there are times when the outcome is pretty much locked in and nothing will change.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The rest has been a formality.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Math is often a merciless predictor of locks.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Even after that, she wrote a letter to the superdelegates asking them to switch to her and was threatening to go to the convention to plead with Obama's pledged delegates to switch to her.
It took being offered the SOS position for her to concede (while it's against the law to do a quid pro quo like that, everyone knows that's what happened but neither party to the offer can ever admit it)
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)If and when Hillary is actually elected, by an actual vote, at the convention, I am sure Bernie will congratulate.
Until then, this is just the corporate press pushing the result they want and trying to suppress the vote.
LisaM
(27,800 posts)he has done every thing he can to shred the joy that should be attached to this historic nomination. Unforgivable.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Deserves special treatment? Doesn't sound very feminist to me.
This is still a contested primary, and there will not be an official nominee until the first vote is cast at the convention in July. If you can't stand the heat and reality of politics, then...
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)He is treating Hil differently, and honestly as a woman that is unforgivable.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Sanders was not running against Clinton in 2008
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)He made that decision to. Now people have decided he has lost. Must be a little weird for him.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)The calling. He may not approve of the way things have been done for years but it takes more than complaining to actually effect change.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)As have his supporters.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And it will take years of work to make them run smoother. It is doubtful they will align to anyone process. Dems have been working to get disenfranchised voters back on the rolls in many states- Florida and Tx in particular for years without his help. It takes all of us. Not going to happen overnight.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Bernie declared the race was over in 08 before Clinton conceded and before the convention supers voted...now somehow this year we are supposed to wait until the 25th? Why? There is no difference...the primary is over.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Pretty simple really.
Jeezeee....come on people. Give it a rest.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)four days after the last primary she conceded and endorsed...she nominated Obama by acclamation at the convention.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Well ,rules are rules ...you don't get to pick because you candidate lost and even if he never concedes she will be the nominee...he will just look like a fool.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Bernie declared the race over before the supers voted at the convention and before Clinton had even conceded...makes him look really bad.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Their specialty is gifs of people rolling their eyes, rolling smiley faces, snark, condescension and bridge burning. Logic didn't make their list.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)wearing "H" tee shirts.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)for a hell of a lot of us.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 8, 2016, 01:32 AM - Edit history (1)
That is beyond sad.
Try not to let others affect you so.
Matt_R
(456 posts)her supporters decided on a pity party with a lot of whining about Sanders not conceding before the ballots were counted.
Oh well life moves on.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)They turn everything Bernie does or says, or doesn't do or say, into an issue about sexism.
So Brockian...such utter bullshit.
QC
(26,371 posts)DUer A: I am troubled by Obama's inclusion of the individual mandate in his health care proposal.
DUer B (Superfan): Of course you would say that about the First Black President!!!11!!
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)There was nothing in my post about race at all but yet they tried to paint me as racist. Quite ridiculous.
QC
(26,371 posts)with supporting evidence and a bit of logic.
That's the biggest change since the early days of DU, I think--we've always been an argumentative bunch but we used to argue over issues and principles and such more. Now the discussions tend to be more like something from a fansite.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)It is going to turn into a competition of "Yo momma" jokes followed by whining about sexism/racism/any other ism they can think of. Everyone lauded Hillary's "foreign policy" speech last week but it was mostly spent trying to insult Trump. I miss the days of speeches that covered actual issues and had substance.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)I think it's wonderful we have the first black president and great that the Dems may have the first woman candidate for POTUS (although I wish it were a different woman), but to use skin color or gender as a crutch to call out legitimate dissenting views in a democracy as racist or sexist is just despicable.
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Matt_R
(456 posts)Or so I've read on here today.
LexVegas
(6,050 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)There's no nominee until the convention. Clinton supporters must be smoking something.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)So there's no need for him to congratulate her until he concedes the race
Time for change
(13,714 posts)Our corporate "news" media is nothing but a large conglomerate of highly paid shills, with no interest whatsoever in reporting on the things that are important to the people of this country. Now we're supposed to let them decide the outcome of a major election before it's over?
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Pledged delegates Hillary 1,812 Sanders 1,521
Super-delegates 571 48
571 to 48 I don't think hundreds of Super-delegates are going to change there minds, back to the Reality Check. Bernie will do as he pleases but I wonder about the sanity or some alternative motive he is going to pop at the last minute!
Matt_R
(456 posts)Clinton 92.2% super delegates, vs Sanders 7.7% super delegates
#clintonmath
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Their RULES are that you cannot count the SDs until the convention. So it's just myth. But we hope you feel good, after all, isn't that all that matters, that you can feel good?
Neither candidate can get the 59% of PLEDGED delegates before the convention. This means that neither candidate can become the nominee until the contested convention. Those are their rules. So as far as the Democratic Party, she is NOT the candidate. As far as the misleading MSM. .. they made it up so they could get eyes on their stories.
Be uninformed, it's a free country.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Reality is upon you...no matter what you say or do.
onenote
(42,684 posts)How does one enforce such a rule? Sue the news media?
Inquiring minds want to know.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)the media can say anything it wants but that doesn't make it true. The Democratic Party is the one who chooses the nominee and those are their rules and their spokesman has come out on several occassions and said so.
Believe any fantasy you want, but those are the rules by the people who make the nomination.
TwilightZone
(25,456 posts)A candidate doesn't need 59%. A candidate needs 50% + 1.
"Be uninformed, it's a free country."
Clearly, you've taken your own advice.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)now you have to get half plus one of all 'prospective' delegates, which means half of pledged plus one, and half of supers, meaning a total of 2383 pledged to 'clinch' the nomination...meaning that even at the convention, nobody can beat you, no matter how the supers vote. They can all go to the other side and you've still won.
Sorry, but you guys keep trying to perpetuate this myth and that's all it is. A myth.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Likely after all the primaries have been contested. That would be my guess.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...when he's still campaigning.
July isn't far off, folks. Trump's not getting any more popular, nor the GOP any less flustered. Clinton supporters are welcome to support what looks like another milestone; what more is necessary now?
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:59 PM - Edit history (1)
Also, she will not be the first woman nominated. Other women have run for president on a national ballot, including Jill Stein in 2012 as well this year.
Clinton is the first in one of the two parties that together form a cartel controlling elections in this country, yes.
Since she is an establishment politician with a big machine behind her (which has been running the Democratic party (into the ground) since 1992), it's not exactly astonishing.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)What was the precise time and date she was due this congratulation, and do you consistently apply that same time frame of congratulatory adulation to all past elections?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...reminds me of the Republicans that attempted to deny Obama any kudos for finally getting Osama Bin Laden. They wanted to give all the credit to Bush...no siree no credit to Obama. Feels exactly the same to me.
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Kumbaya Kumbaya Kumbaya
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)#neverhillary
#bernieorbust
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Not only is he a misogynist, he's also a racist and a homophobe and he hates the rich because he envies them. That's why he wants to impose a Stalinist dictatorship on America--to punish the job creators. Also, lazy young people who just want free stuff.
There, I think I've summed up the primary campaign so far. It will be interesting to see if this sort of thing works on Trump. I have a hard time imagining him backing off if someone calls him a big ole meanie, but you never know.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Or would you like to proceed directly to the Coronation?
Sorry, I meant Oath of Office.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)incapable of.
The RULES say that you have to get 59% of the pledged delegates to be the nominee. Neither candidate has that. Therefore, it will be decided at the convention by the superdelegates. That is how it works.
Apparently many Hillary supporters, just like their candidate, find it doesn't suit them to follow the rules.
demwing
(16,916 posts)1. Hillary will not be the first. There have been females nominated by their parties since the late 1800s.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_United_States_presidential_and_vice-presidential_candidates
2. Clinton does not have the pledged delegates needed to win before the convention, which is July 25th. What's your rush?
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)like president Obama he is the First Black President and Hillary is the First Woman Presidential Nominee. ("both as vice-presidential" and ("considered"
(Two women have won the nominations of major parties, ("both as vice-presidential" candidates: Geraldine Ferraro for the Democratic Party in the 1984 election and Sarah Palin for the Republican Party in the 2008 election. As of now, no woman has ever won the presidential nomination of a major party, and no woman has ever become President or Vice President of the United States.[1] The only woman who was ("considered" for a presidential candidacy by an incumbent President was Oveta Hobby by Dwight D. Eisenhower.[2]
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)/just kidding
GeorgeGist
(25,318 posts)Member since: Wed Nov 20, 2013, 10:38 AM
Number of posts: 546
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Questioning my veracity, My wife past away so did her name we both used thanks for reminding me.
ancianita
(36,017 posts)snort
(2,334 posts)mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)NY Daily News Headline Clinton Makes History as 1st Female Prez nominee
To all Sanders fans,, Keep on Trucking the world as heard your voice and will not be forgotten but praised in the history books.
http://www.nydailynews.com/
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I guess it's because he's a sexist old asshole who hates women and a crazy old communist who's running entirely because of his ego. That's the answer you wanted from people, right?
ancianita
(36,017 posts)All this online fudging around a democratic voting system is exactly we lose it.
All this casting shade on those who don't fudge around about it should get canned.
NOW.
Respectfully win. Think you can do that?
Let the man and his supporters finish.
Knock off the disingenuous parting shots. Think the Hillary people can do that?
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Oh that's special, the definition of condescending/sour grapes, I hope you feel better in the morning, I am Not disingenuous, Thank You.
con·de·scend·ing adjective having or showing a feeling of patronizing superiority,
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)So stop.
onecaliberal
(32,813 posts)Released the TRUE tax returns for the foundation?