2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSome FACTS brought to you by David Shuster:
https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidShuster/status/740186865198870528?cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%3D&refsrc=emailGomez163
(2,039 posts)Now that it works against her you're all for it. That is out and out sexism.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)They haven't even interviewed Hillary.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Jeez Gomez.....
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)They have been investigating for a year. They could have wrapped it up last fall.
panader0
(25,816 posts)The investigation is NON- partisan.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)You are getting boring, bye...
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)We dont even know for sure what Comey is doing. We do know he donated to Bush and Romney and that he is a republican.
She made a speech the final night of voting where she said she was going to continue to fight on as she felt she was the stronger candidate. But after several meetings with DNC and Obama she finally dropped out 4 days after the last vote was cast. So why is it different in 2008? do hold her to special rules because she is a women?
Response to TimPlo (Reply #22)
Gomez163 This message was self-deleted by its author.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)TwilightZone
(25,342 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Seriously you need help.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)But if you knew anything you would know that's not true. But you really want it to be.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Tell me exactly what "make nice" means because I don't think you really know.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Especially those facts that put your candidate in unfavorable light.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)"If you are criticizing Hillary Clinton because you want to help her succeed, then you'll be fine. But if you are criticizing Hillary Clinton because you want to tear her down, then you won't be fine."
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Posting court documents from the criminal investigations of Hillary without comment -- yes? no?
Posting news stories from reputable sources -- yes? no?
If you live in a world where Hillary's own known history is something not flattering, then everything is "tearing her down."
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)"Now, I'm not a mind reader and I can't know for certain what everyone's intentions are. But I think that if the criticism is coming from a place of "wanting her to succeed" then that will be reflected in the tone and substance of the post. If the criticism is coming from a place of "wanting to tear her down" then that will be reflected in the tone and substance of the post. If you are here on DU then you are supposed to be supporting the Democratic nominee against the Republican nominee in the general election -- it shouldn't be very hard to write a post in a way that sounds like it. "
If you bring up the email investigation, Goldman Sachs, or any other anti-Clinton meme, you are tearing her down.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Plain and simple.
TwilightZone
(25,342 posts)The corollary exists only in your mind. If you insist that Clinton should be held to a different standard than Obama in the same situation, you might want to think about why.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Desperation is sad and pathetic, and that post displays both.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)We will still go through all of the procedures to confirm that for you.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Jarqui
(10,110 posts)It was widely recognized as a monumental, historic achievement, especially coming immediately after the nation's first black president. The Republican Party's last two presidential nominees have also been historic choices, giving the nod first to a Mormon in 2012 and this year to an actual caveman.
TimPlo
(443 posts)Who hell does he think he is to insult someone so and compare them to a being with a much smaller brain. This poor caveman never did anything wrong to be compared to Trump
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Just watch. And for the record I enjoy your posts.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)If you are claiming to read minds you'd realize that's not true (if you really can read minds that is)
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)But, you're free to deny if you wish. No skin off my nose. I'm just sharing my opinions. Time will tell if I'm correct, or if you're being completely honest. Besides, none of this matters much anyway. It's just a bunch of silly sparring on an entertaining political web site. This back-and-forth isn't going to change anything.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)(I'm smarter than you think I am ... but if that's the game you want to play, it's fine. None of this matters and none of this will change the outcome. Have fun!)
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)I'm concerned for the democratic candidate for the 2016 election. That is my motive. Period.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Whatever you say.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Response to berni_mccoy (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
baldguy
(36,649 posts)when they voice their preferences.