2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'm getting pissed at Bernie again.
His interview with Lester Holt he says he is not suspending and he will fight againt is the 1% by begging the establishment to give him the nomination.
And Hillary can't claim victory and celebrate what every fucking thinking human being knows and what has been reported in the press. That she will be the first women nominee of a major party. All so Bernie can throw some little fits for two months.
Fuck this shit.
And the media says she needs to be careful.
I can guaranfuckingtee you this would not happen if she were a male in the same position.
How do I know this? Because in 2008 she was expected to suspend even though she had a stronger case than Bernie ever had to continue. But she got different treatment.
This is sexism is plain and simple.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Sheesh!
Or is that exclamation too sexist? Maybe I'm expected to say "Heesh!" or "Himsh!"???
The rules say that superdelegates do not vote until 7/25. Bernie is playing by the rules. What is the problem, again? But certain Hillary fans will still act like Bernie personally pissed in their cornflakes. That sure makes for an inspiring campaign.
I challenge any DU'er to find a post by the OP where she is anything but pissed at Bernie. It's been a pretty consistent theme.
-app
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)doubt her sex has anything to do with it, although he may have a real problem with her failure to commit an indictable crime. If this article is at all accurate, Sanders is currently a very angry, resentful, and vengeful man who feels every colleague who didn't support him is corrupt, and he could easily explode on the party. Note where his staff are saying his priorities currently are--not exactly on his progressive reforms.
...
Every time Sanders got into a knife fight, aides say, they ended up losing. But they could never stop Sanders when he got his back up.
...
Aides say Sanders thinks that progressives who picked Clinton are cynical, power-chasing chickens like Sen. Sherrod Brown, one of his most consistent allies in the Senate before endorsing Clinton and campaigning hard for her ahead of the Ohio primary. Sanders is so bitter about it that hed be ready to nix Brown as an acceptable VP choice, if Clinton ever asked his advice on whod be a good progressive champion.
...
They debate whether Sanders role in the fall should be a full vote-for-Clinton campaign, or whether he should just campaign hard against Trump without signing up to do much for her directly. They havent been able to get Sanders focused on any of that, or on the real questions about what kind of long term organization to build out of his email list.
...
Theres also the issue of payback. Campaign aides say that whatever else happens, Sanders wants former Congressman Barney Frank and Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy out of their spots as co-chairs of the convention rules committee. Its become a priority fight for him.
Sanders, the aides say, believes Frank has hated him for years, but the former Massachusetts congressmans calling him a McCarthyite pushed him over the edge. He never really registered who Malloy was, despite his being from a neighboring home state and his status as one of the most liberal governors in the country, but Sanders was enraged to hear the governor say he had blood on his hands for not supporting the gun manufacturer liability law.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/bernie-sanders-campaign-last-days-224041
Hopefully, President Obama will be able to make him feel respected and hopeful that it's not all over. Obama will have been extensively briefed long before this on his personality quirks by those who know him, of course.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)But I've tried to read some of your slightly clearer posts and I know you are not /s
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)GoldenThunder
(300 posts)...she can't beat Trump.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)The Clintons are worth probably around TWO TO THREE HUNDRED TIMES THAT ($110 MILLION plus)
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/bernie-sanders-wife-accounts-for-reported-assets-120261
Bernie Sanders on Thursday reported less than $750,000 in assets all of it in his wifes name according to his presidential personal financial disclosure form.
According to the disclosure, Sanders and his wife Jane reported between $194,026-$741,030 in assets, a broad combination of investment funds.
The relatively modest disclosure is another indication that Sanders a populist and self-described democratic socialist who rails against the billionaire class and has called income inequality the great moral issue of our time is far less wealthy than many of his Senate colleagues
WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)for his family trip to Rome.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)Until he's got another vacation under his belt.
WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)which is a very cool place.
apcalc
(4,463 posts)Where are the only tax returns...
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)smdh
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)She's winner bigger than Obama did in 2008. She did the right thing.
Sanders is doing the asshole idiot thing now.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)She gave a speech that sounded more like a victory speech and expressly refused to concede.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Elizabeth Warren. Oh wait. She's a women. How embarrassing.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)When people scream "sexism" over every single thing that women don't like, the meaning of the term is diluted so that real sexism is not taken seriously.
You have zero evidence that this is sexism. And BTW, I am an older feminist, who learned from Gloria Steinem what feminism is, so don't lecture me.
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)niyad
(113,265 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Misogynists go crazy, climb the walls, yell and scream that you're wrong when you call them on it. It's more than a tic. The stronger the reaction, the bigger the ... er, misogynist.
Addendum. Right after I posted what should I see but an egregious example. Can you find it?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)You're pissed?
I call that good.
Response to boston bean (Original post)
Post removed
Armstead
(47,803 posts)and basked in the glory of the gratitude of the Democratic Establishment praising him for quitting and letting her take it all over.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)in her speeches..."I did this..."I led the effort on that..." etc. And often she had next to nothing do with the acts she is taking credit for. She's not as bad as Trump, who is clearly a full-blown narcissist, but she certainly has some of the traits and acts very entitled and over-confident of her abilities, especially when you look closely at her record and experience.
Bernie doesn't act like that. He didn't even want to run for president, and held out for Elizabeth Warren or another progressive to run. And he talks always about what "we can do together..." He says he can do these things by himself. What a contrast and personalities and you see a "big ego." It's may sound like a good line, but it's doesn't explain his behavior at all.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)evidence.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Matt_R
(456 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)What the hell is his end game? I mean he obviously isn't flipping the superdelegates against the results of the election. And even if he did that would be completely fucked up. I mean I hope he gets his shit in the platform... but if he never makes nice then he's going to have less say in that also. I really don't think he's hurting Clinton with his criticism at this point, but the longer he holds on to this bullshit the harder it is to bring the party together and the weaker we will be in November. So if it isn't ego then wtf?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)He wants leverage....and he wants the Democratic party to know that they has to stop taking certain things for granted.
This is not just a personality thing.H e also feels an obligation torepresent the voice of the 40-45 percent of the people who voted for him and worked for him.
They DO care about what happens after the nomination and the election.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Bernie will never have more leverage than he does right now, today. Staying in and saying he'll "continue the fight" means he's fighting against the Democratic Party itself, rather than fighting for it. That doesn't give him leverage in the party.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)This has been so difficult for the Clinton camp to understand even though it's been repeated often enough. It's the issues. By staying in, the issues he cares most about stay in the spotlight. He keeps some leverage over how the platform comes together. Most importantly, it helps create and sustain a base for the future. My god, he's 74 years old. If he was so ego driven, so thirsty for power, he would have made several runs by now. This run's end game was leaving something lasting, something to build on in two, four and more years. He's shown that people are hungry for what he's offering. He's also shown that without a well-established organization, it's impossible to be successful in the long term against the establishment.
We are in for an interesting summer. Bernie will continue to push his issues. How the streets play out in Philadelphia is perhaps as much of a wild card as what ultimately happens with the FBI investigation.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Good points.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)whirlygigspin
(3,803 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)It will be clear to everyone that cannot be done
opiate69
(10,129 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Instead, she gave a speech that, upon rewatch last night, sounded more like a victory speech on the night of the last primaries.
I am not in favor of Bernie "taking it to the convention", so to speak (though I think he should not release his delegates and there should be a proper rollcall), but you getting pissed at him for not conceding before the polls even close in California is just stupid.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Couldn't quite follow.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)brooklynite
(94,503 posts)PepperHarlan
(124 posts)Beginning tonight the narrative switches to the GE. Bernie won't be talked about much until the convention. Hopefully by then tempers will have cooled for everybody.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Matt_R
(456 posts)Bernie Sanders ran for president in 2012? Not sure of your message here.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)When children are worried about how they're going to eat now that School is out..
As Iraqi vets can't get the medical attention they need
THERE IS STILL A FIERCE URGENCY OF NOW!!
Your legislators and Obama.
I agree that these are issues, but they will not be fixed with what we're talking about tonight.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)She has to constantly worry about the FEELINGS of men and women who expect perfection from her, and he never has to worry about how sad and desperate he looks by keeping this losing battle going. The media would jump all over anybody else who did this. They were all over Cruz until he dropped out. This is bullshit, period.
I expect sexism to have a resurgence to the worst level since we were property.
TimPlo
(443 posts)həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2008/05/clintons-closing-argument-to-superdelegates/53314/
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/05/21/hillary-wrote-this-letter-to-superdelegates-in-2008-that-bernie-fans-may-find-interesting/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/clinton-in-2008-opposed-e_b_10245288.html
bravenak
(34,648 posts)TimPlo
(443 posts)And then cry about Sanders saying he might do the same thing.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Democratic nominee for POTUS to not be under federal criminal investigation.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Some of her closest aides have already been interviewed.
Charges will not be filed until after the FBI submits its findings to the DoJ. The Justice Department will take action based on those findings.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Some very obvious connection of dots.
But, hey, live in the world you choose.b I just prefer the Dem Party not crash and burn in Nov.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Matt_R
(456 posts)Clinton will not answer questions... OK... Sure... If you say so... Please inform the FBI I'm sure they would get a kick out of wasting our tax dollar money on an investigation that isn't really happening because Clinton won't interview with them. Well I guess a subpoena can fix that.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)What they will recommend and when is anyone's guess at this point.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm thirty five, and she still aint been arrested!
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Then you truly cannot be helped.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)They are the criminal investigation branch. They investigate the breaking of laws...you know, crimes.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)apcalc
(4,463 posts)Look it up . NOTHING criminal whatsoever.
chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)If your expectation of sexism resurgence is a concern (keep in mind, I am against sexism & racism & ageism, etc.), then maybe Hillary picked the wrong position to run for. Just think what those mean misogynist world leaders might say to her.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)And when you pretend that things that are not sexism are sexism, you weaken the term and also denigrate real sexism.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)because of all the terrible, horrible sexist things Bernie did to her.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)I've already bumped heads with bravenak last week. I'm guilty of having white male privilege so I'll never know what it's like to grow up as a black woman, according to her. Yes, Hillary will no doubt face sexism, which is always bad, but to have someone say she ' can never do anything right'? A bit too dramatic, I think.
"If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." - Harry S Truman quote
adigal
(7,581 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)As for sexism, sooooo lame you be.
If it was Elizabeth Warren in Bernie's place THE EXACT SAME DYNAMIC WOULD BE GOING ON.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)GREAT as well. She is miles beyond Clinton in terms of positions and integrity.
The Clinton camp is the sexist one, alwaying whinging on about gender, using it as a weapon. That dog don't hunt, it's a Brockian fallacy, malicious and shameful.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)the wind blows her weathervane to the right on.
Pick a side, ANY side, of tonnes of issues, she has been on it.
Dont come crying to us when TPP, Chained CPI, and more empric wars are rammed down our throats, whilst her banskter funders run fucking riot on what's left of democracy and fairplay in economics.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Center right in YOUR nation but center left in AMERICA
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I live in a red state and she is world apart from a republican, they literally want to starve babies.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)and just so you know, I am an American citizen, I just happened to have lived in 8 different countries, currently Sweden
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Matt_R
(456 posts)Against personal freedoms make you a conservative, Clinton's is against late term abortions and gutting all abortion rights.
Against affordable healthcare for all americans makes you a conservative, Clinton has stated in the past that single payer is off the table.
Supporting free trade agreements with countries that have legalized slave labor, come on $1.35 an hour is slave wages. Guess what Clinton supports... TPP... TA DA
At this point I've wasted too much time doing your homework for you, and I don't see changing your mind on how bad a Clinton presidency would damage our country. Don't start with me on how Trump would be worse, I'm well aware what a Trump presidency would harm our country as well. And saying Clinton is better than Trump just shows how out of touch you are with the rest of us living paycheck to paycheck.
Good luck and don't bother replying if you don't have substance it just makes you look foolish... Just pointing out the obvious jury.
adigal
(7,581 posts)The problem with the parties as I see it is that the Republicans are so horrible, the Democrats can get away with being kind of horrible and we will all fall in line and vote for them. Sigh.
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Pure Brockian bs
Many including me are nervous about having Clinton as the nominee, and it has nothing to do with gender.
TimPlo
(443 posts)həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2008/05/clintons-closing-argument-to-superdelegates/53314/
^Clinton Writes letter to SD trying to flip them away from Obama 2 days after the final vote was cast.
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/05/21/hillary-wrote-this-letter-to-superdelegates-in-2008-that-bernie-fans-may-find-interesting/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/clinton-in-2008-opposed-e_b_10245288.html
hy·poc·ri·sy so obviously on display is so sad.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)TimPlo
(443 posts)I am sorry I am not as gifted as you and can honestly say Sanders did it all the summer up to the convention. hy·poc·ri·sy is showing big time now.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)I listen to bernie and what he says.
TimPlo
(443 posts)So you are not sure he is going to do it? You never said that in your reply to me. You never said you thought he was going to do it, you made a claim that Clinton was special because she did not do it all Summer and yet Neither has Sanders. Is that because she is a women and you hate men so give her a pass for trying to flip the SD?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)TimPlo
(443 posts)But I not going to state a future event as fact by something someone said. More so as I have no proof was even said. But claiming Sanders did something when that event has not even come to pass is dishonest. You can talk about he should not do it but can not claim he did it, and give Clinton pass because she did it for some made up fake time period.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)against the voters voice. He said this. This is all that we have to go on. To challenge someone being pissed at what he states repeatedly, is bullshit. If he changes his mind, then we deal with that. Now all we have is the words he says.
TimPlo
(443 posts)Then can bitch about him doing it. Clinton tried to flip the SD in 2008, plain and simple. No one said or complained about it on her till now and holding Sanders to a different set of rules. Then when this fact was brought up people start moving goal posts and claiming Sanders has done this till the convention and Clinton did not. So until Sanders goes past the last vote complete next week + 4 days He has done nothing worse than Clinton did in 2008.
BTW I do not think he should fight for SD as Clinton was wrong in 2008 doing it and I feel he is wrong this year. I just not going to call him names when he is doing exact same thing Clinton did in 2008. I just take issue with fools crying about him doing it but Clinton did same thing in 2008. It is dishonest and only being done because people are so team biased and let things slide.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)what the man says today.
TimPlo
(443 posts)As you claim on Sanders? Because she felt she could flip the SD in 2008.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)TimPlo
(443 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)TimPlo
(443 posts)Because we don't accurately count ever individual vote in ever state, so that can not be used as a yard stick for anything.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)significantly, over Sanders. This has simply become a tediously silly comparison you are making.
TimPlo
(443 posts)trying to flip SD a bad thing and other way makes it a good thing.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)[link:
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Sanders has to be working on a good 30 Pinnochios
Loudestlib
(980 posts)n/t I'm putting you on ignore.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Clinton doesn't answer questions up against Sanders is an hoot.
dchill
(38,472 posts)Presumptuous nominee.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Glad the first stage is won--she fought hard, we all did.
Women throughout history led up to this moment. I think of them and am grateful
Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)She didn't end her campaign until the convention, and before the Convention she wrote to every superdelegate making her case that she was the stronger candidate. Her campaign was also discussing going after Obama's pledged delegates, but I don't think they went through with that. Bernie is just planning to go to the Convention to make his case.
I don't see the sexism any more than I think anti-semitism it at play in the way Bernie has been treated. But I can say that he certainly has not been treated as well as she was in 2008.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)so same time last year. whatever. Its like me looking at last years tide chart and expecting to launch a boat at high tide
boston bean
(36,221 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Last primary june 3, convention aug25, but you knew that.
TimPlo
(443 posts)In case you don't know today is not July 25 so can't say Sanders did xyz up to the convention. Doing that is kinda dishonest.
TwilightZone
(25,467 posts)mcar
(42,302 posts)Sour grapes much?
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)TimPlo
(443 posts)həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2008/05/clintons-closing-argument-to-superdelegates/53314/
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/05/21/hillary-wrote-this-letter-to-superdelegates-in-2008-that-bernie-fans-may-find-interesting/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/clinton-in-2008-opposed-e_b_10245288.html
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)Although I'm going to vote for her over Trump. The fact that Bernie isn't conceding tonight doesn't make him sexist. But every time a Hills supporter casts stupid slurs it makes it that much harder to support Hills.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)She did. And I'll vote for her. Doesn't mean she's a good candidate. President Obama, Gore, Bill Clinton, Biden, Liz Warren, etc. are all better politicians, candidates and people, but we vote for those we are stuck with, and this time we are stuck with Hills.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seen enough of her to convince me yet, though I think maybe she is better than Clinton. Obama is special. Clinton might out do him in policy, but Obama is damn good.
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)Obama is a really good politician. And a solid president. He accomplished a ton even though he had to deal with constant obstruction.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)I don't get it. To me Bernie was a very flawed candidate, much more so than Hillary. There are no Obamas running this time.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Response to boston bean (Original post)
Bonobo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)betsuni
(25,472 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)This is not a night to gloat. This is a night to celebrate Hillary's achievement and commend Senator Sanders for far outperforming everyone's initial expectations. This should be a night of humanitarian understanding and not more bitter division.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)that has control of our government. We are fighting for the 2.5 million homeless American children and not fighting for bigger profits for corporations. Unlike some, we are not going to grovel at the feet of the Big Corporations, we will fight them forever if necessary.
Our founders would be ashamed of those that are so willing to give up their freedoms and the freedoms of the disadvantaged for some kind of promise of security.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Two candidates in Dem primary. One weaker, one stronger against Trump.
What logic would tell us to send the weaker candidate to fight the ogre?
That would be considered crazy, in any kind of contest.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)You've been whining incessantly about him for weeks.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)The sexism card is ridiculous.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)and not the name recognition/branding mega machine of her asshole HUSBAND who was also lemme think, president. Huh.
*golf clap*
grasswire
(50,130 posts)that's gotta bern.
Response to yodermon (Reply #81)
Post removed
D_Master81
(1,822 posts)I dont think Bernie actually goes through w/ it and takes it to the convention. My guess is he will give it a day or 2 and will concede by the end of the week when party pressure become overwhelming.
senseandsensibility
(17,000 posts)Really...I'm really sorry. My heart aches for you and your pissedness.
adigal
(7,581 posts)NPR just went on about how her numbers have gone down since this email server issue and that the Republicans think that Trump can really win if he just stays on message.
I wish we could at least talk realistically about her.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Sarah Palin was VP nominee BTW.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Sort of says it all.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)That and your history of always being pissed at Bernie accounts for it.
--imm
bloom
(11,635 posts)That he claims to be fighting against.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...but don't wait too long to observe seeing this.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)thinks he's entitled to something he hasn't earned. Sickening!
G_j
(40,366 posts)you the time of day. I'll hear you out on complaints of Bernie staying in the race.
But this "sexism" meme is pure intellectual dishonesty. It's unadulterated sleaze with no basis in reality. I can't respect that in any way.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Response to boston bean (Original post)
aikoaiko This message was self-deleted by its author.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)He has the funds to continue, she can't really give him anything to bow out, and Bernie wants to fights to the end.
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)Good
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)as the reason why he won't suspend his zombie campaign yet, but I suspect that he's doing it for more publicity and money. This is beyond ridiculous.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 8, 2016, 03:17 AM - Edit history (1)
His campaign is broke and there are no more states to run in. Whether he suspends his campaign or not, his campaign is suspended.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Perhaps we should just coronate her now on forego any more of these pesky elections.
Gothmog
(145,130 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You never stopped being pissed at him, did you?
boston bean
(36,221 posts)But just for you... It's a process. I try and then I hear he is taking it to the convention again and YES, that does piss me off.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Really, it's more of a burden, than anything else. Omniscience. Big old pain in the ass. Anyone who says they want to see all hasn't seen it all. Most peoples' private, secret innermost lives are booooooooring as fuck. Shh! Don't tell.
But my keen third eye perception also tells me that Sanders is probably going to do the right thing and concede and endorse, in the next week or two.
I think geek tragedy is correct in his assessment that Sanders's last speech was more about him landing the plane than refueling it.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)will dry up pretty fast now. It's a shame that it looks like he'd rather go out with a whimper and keep his campaign on life support.
bvf
(6,604 posts)You're pissed?
I think that's great.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)KPN
(15,642 posts)I applaud Bernie for standing up against a corrupt system and having the courage to use every tool available to him for doing so.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...by invisible sniper fire.
JohnnyRingo
(18,627 posts)The news outlets will put him on ignore and he'll quietly fade away.
"If a tree falls in the woods and no one hears it..."
Orsino
(37,428 posts)He wants to bring Sanders delegates to pack the convention, so he must say he's campaigning for the nomination, even if all he really expects is a platform and ticket that honors something of what he's fought for throughout his career.
We want change, and a nominee that promises it and means it will unify the convention and party. The alternative is no change.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)It is what every single candidate does. It allows them to retain their delegates.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)I wouldn't blame supers for abandoning a candidate who'd suspended.
Sanders is still trying to win--much more than the primary. He's trying to save the party and American politics in general from the toxicity of Big Money.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)ones he has if he doesn't suspend.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...and your mindless profanity does not advance your case.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Or did his remarks today make you feel better?