2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTo all the people trying to shit on this: Hill is who the people voted for.
Yeah, conspiracy this, conspiracy that. The people voted for Hillary. By a big margin. The first female major party nominee ever. Odds are, favorite to be the first woman president. It's not "rigged," it's not a conspiracy, it's the people who voted.
Don't look back on this day and think "I was still talking about idiotic conspiracy theories." And don't look back and think "I was really hoping superdelegates would override the democratic will of voters and deny her the nomination."
It's been a great campaign. Time to smash the orange orangutan.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)Sparkly
(24,149 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Sparkly
(24,149 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)that primaries are more democratic and inclusive than caucuses.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)That certainly helps.
Response to BlueStater (Reply #6)
metroins This message was self-deleted by its author.
annavictorious
(934 posts)that after 26 years in Congress, nobody knew who Sanders was. If only he had used that two and a half decades to actually get things done...
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)It doesn't quite raise your national profile like being a FLOTUS or SOS does. Hillary didn't earn either of those titles through her own work or from people voting for her, by the way.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)than Clinton?
What is it she "got done" in her 1 1/3 terms in elected office that gave her this viability and brand strength?
Who are the members of Congress that have "got stuff done"? Compare their recognition with Hillary Clinton.
What you got is a silly bullshit meme that has no bearing on reality.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)If she is cleared of the morass she got herself into, I'll be back to supporting her. But if not, I will not vote for her. Period. The End.
katmille
(213 posts)But keep convincing yourself. She won the most votes!!!! That's how you win!!!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)As I said...I will wait. I'm not convinced of anything. Kind of goes together.
And I don't call people names. Lacks class.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Just saying...
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)tandot
(6,671 posts)I am very happy that Clinton won, but I truly want her to work with Sanders and his supporters
Don't rub it in, please
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Bernie built a YUGE coalition of independents and progressives. She can't win without them against Trump.
But it is not our responsibility to bail her out, considering the shenanigans of the election. Let her find the votes.
We voted for the candidate who will be stronger against Trump. We good.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)what good would that do?
atomingai
(71 posts)so horribly. I think the Sanders supporters are going to make her reap what she sow. You don't badmouth the supporters and play nice after you get what you'd wanted. Doesn't work that way.
senz
(11,945 posts)Somehow it would mean more if she hadn't required deliberate voter suppression and various "irregularities."
Last night's trickery will stay with her.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)YOU people go fight for her, and leave everyone else out of it.
pressbox69
(2,252 posts)Now is the time to peel the smelly orange.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)This is a historic moment. The first female nominee of a major party. It IS a big deal.
Hillary got the majority of the votes. There's no denying that. I, for one, am proud to have been a Hillary supporter for many years. She's worked hard for this and she's earned the right to be the nominee.
I can't wait until she is "Madam President"!!!!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)IMO, she is not a model for young women. I was a supporter early, but having a better (to me) choice and the Elephant in the Living Room and her handling of that matter...led me to change my support.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)I cannot imagine how she would NOT be a role model for young women, but obviously you disagree, and are entitled to that disagreement.
She is the nominee, and I've waited a long time for a woman to be the nominee, and I'm going to enjoy this moment in time.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)FBI et al investigation. To me, that trumps (no pun intended) gender. My decision will be made the day before the GE as it gives plenty of time to get over with it...one way or the other.
So, we can agree to disagree. Works for me.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)Thank you. I enjoy civil exchanges.
My litmus test is very simple. Innocent until proven guilty.
I wish you a great day.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Just sayin'.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)Just sayin'.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)She is not foolish enough to try to erase Sanders voters.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,640 posts)If the popular vote qualifies her as the people's best representative, the same must be said for fRump.
Her name recognition alone put her over the top, but informed voters know Bernie actually is the advocate for our country's highest impulses for integrity, honesty, and democracy. He's the far better people's representative.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)I like the second paragraph.
mythology
(9,527 posts)defines one as informed. It's a rather circular argument.
I'm not sure that name calling (ie fRump) qualifies as showing integrity, but maybe that's just from having grown up with a last name that was easy to make fun of.
But yes, by definition, a candidate receiving a majority of votes from their party means that person is the best representative of where the majority of the party is based on the available candidates to choose from.
lindysalsagal
(20,640 posts)By your definition, Hitler was Germany's hero.
drray23
(7,627 posts)Indeed, I can see how insane this will look in the future when reflecting back. Some people are going to ask themselves what the heck was i thinking, how out of touch could i have been.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)We ALL KNOW...
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)In their minds, votes don't matter. The only thing that matters is rhetoric and ideology. Voters should be dismissed if they vote for anyone but Sanders, because anyone who doesn't vote for Sanders is supposedly corrupt. It's a confusing train of thought, but it's very real.
atomingai
(71 posts)I'm beginning to believe that the Hillary supporters doesn't give a hoot on how she wins, as long as she wins. Integrity or fairness be damned.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)atomingai
(71 posts)I understand your loyalty, but let's be real. The Democratic turnout this year is.....pathetic. The lowest in years. To make things worse, your nominee was pushing away a lot of Sanders supporters and disrespecting them to boot. No candidate should push away potential votes.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)atomingai
(71 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)atomingai
(71 posts)Sorry dig, but I don't nor the time nor patience to play with you or any blind Hillary supporter. I understand that she won, but I won't let you gloat on my expense. I heard how you Hillary supporters abuse your privileges. I believe you're just another defect in Democracy. Consider yourself silenced. So long!!!
YouDig
(2,280 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Establishment being defined as those who didn't vote for Sanders.
lindysalsagal
(20,640 posts)Totally the opposite of past precsedent.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)We dont care if she won the nomination fairly or unfairly. She doesnt need to convince us that she won the nomination fairly
we just dont care.
Shes an unacceptable candidate unworthy of our support and unlikely to receive it. I don't need conspiracy theories...I just need sane people who are now empowered to deny her the nomination, to deny her the nomination as being in the best interests of the nation and the party. I, in turn, need to start preparing for 2020 and the campaign to either primary Clinton out of office or defeat Trump. (Frankly, I don't actually care which...they're equally-shitty choices. Dolores Umbridge vs. Voldemort.)
YouDig
(2,280 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)as neither passes the bar into acceptable or decent territory.
Much like a 59 and a 31 are both Fs. Both Clinton and Trump are unacceptable...below the threshold where it makes a difference which is better.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)Go down the issues if you want, see for yourself. On almost all, there's a huge difference. Trump thinks global warming is a hoax, Clinton wants to tackle it aggressively. Trump things wages are too high, Clinton thinks too low. And so on. And then there's the fact that Trump is totally racist. And also he's crazy.
The country will be much better off with Hillary than with Trump.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)TSIAS
(14,689 posts)People get elected all the time who are odious and have no place in public office. Just because the people vote for them doesn't mean that they are the best candidates (see Reagan and Bush).