Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:22 PM Jun 2016

To all the people trying to shit on this: Hill is who the people voted for.

Yeah, conspiracy this, conspiracy that. The people voted for Hillary. By a big margin. The first female major party nominee ever. Odds are, favorite to be the first woman president. It's not "rigged," it's not a conspiracy, it's the people who voted.

Don't look back on this day and think "I was still talking about idiotic conspiracy theories." And don't look back and think "I was really hoping superdelegates would override the democratic will of voters and deny her the nomination."

It's been a great campaign. Time to smash the orange orangutan.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To all the people trying to shit on this: Hill is who the people voted for. (Original Post) YouDig Jun 2016 OP
lol! we all know how she won. wendylaroux Jun 2016 #1
By getting more votes. YouDig Jun 2016 #2
Damn democracy!! Sparkly Jun 2016 #3
democracy!!? omg! wendylaroux Jun 2016 #8
Like voting?! omg!! Sparkly Jun 2016 #10
like a carefully coordinated primary,so democratic, omg! wendylaroux Jun 2016 #54
She won primaries--Bernie won caucuses and most everybody thinks book_worm Jun 2016 #50
Against *two* rival candidates with nowhere near her name recognition or support from the party. BlueStater Jun 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author metroins Jun 2016 #52
It wasn't Hillary's fault annavictorious Jun 2016 #53
Most senators and representatives aren't that well known by the majority of the public. BlueStater Jun 2016 #56
Which Senators (much less house reps) would you estimate have higher brand recognition TheKentuckian Jun 2016 #59
bought and paid for!!! the rich will be even richer!!!!! wendylaroux Jun 2016 #7
I am waiting until the FBI Lady Sings. Thanks, anyway. libdem4life Jun 2016 #4
You are so sad! katmille Jun 2016 #11
Sad? Please worry not...reread my post. Has nothing to do with the Primary. libdem4life Jun 2016 #15
You don't have to call people names to lack class. JTFrog Jun 2016 #17
Of course not. There are a myriad of ways. That's just one. libdem4life Jun 2016 #18
Can you give them a break? tandot Jun 2016 #5
It's not the responsibility of the Bernie voters to bail HRC out. grasswire Jun 2016 #28
to stop this momentum by going to the right? I don't think so. wendylaroux Jun 2016 #55
Hillary, the media, the establishment, and the press, had done the Berners and Sanders himself atomingai Jun 2016 #43
That's what her buddy Dubya told us in 2000. senz Jun 2016 #9
Branding, name recognition and influence do go a long way. n/t yodermon Jun 2016 #12
Great. When she starts her wars, John Poet Jun 2016 #13
They call it sour grapes. pressbox69 Jun 2016 #14
There will always be those who insist on being spoilers. hamsterjill Jun 2016 #16
If it were not so shrouded in, um, events...I would agree. libdem4life Jun 2016 #19
That's fine. You are entitled to your opinion. hamsterjill Jun 2016 #20
Here's my litmus test...when she's cleared and no longer under libdem4life Jun 2016 #21
It works for me, as well. hamsterjill Jun 2016 #22
Well, Jill Stein DID garner the nomination of a major party first. grasswire Jun 2016 #29
Most people don't even know who Jill Stein is. hamsterjill Jun 2016 #48
Well, most of them. Orsino Jun 2016 #23
K & R Scurrilous Jun 2016 #24
fRump won the popular vote, too. It doesn't validate her as deserving, or honorable. lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #25
Trump is the people's representative of the GOP. That's where they are. YouDig Jun 2016 #27
that was well said, lindysalsagal grasswire Jun 2016 #30
It seems rather arrogant to presume that voting for your preferred candidate mythology Jun 2016 #35
Not when they lack critical thinking skills, information, or comprehension. lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #57
that is a powerfull comment. drray23 Jun 2016 #26
It's A 2-4% Deviation That The U.N. Says Makes Results Invalid....Isn't It? AzDar Jun 2016 #31
The mentality of Sanders and is supporters is one of entitlement KingFlorez Jun 2016 #32
I'm sorry to say, but the establishment decides their nominee, not the voters. atomingai Jun 2016 #33
Hillary got 3 million more votes. Did you know that? YouDig Jun 2016 #34
I heard, but unfortunately, that's a lie. atomingai Jun 2016 #36
#berniemath YouDig Jun 2016 #38
I can careless about your hashtag. A lie is a lie period. atomingai Jun 2016 #39
And I couldn't care less about your #berniemath. YouDig Jun 2016 #40
I doesn't take a math major to see the lie in this. A little research would due just find. atomingai Jun 2016 #41
3 million plus vote margin. No math major needed. No #berniemath. Hill wins by a mile. YouDig Jun 2016 #42
Obviously all of those votes were from the establishment* mythology Jun 2016 #37
The dem establishment drove this, but the GOP lost control. lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #58
K&R baldguy Jun 2016 #44
You seem to not grasp a fundimental issue. Chan790 Jun 2016 #45
There are no sane people who can't tell that Hillary is much better than Trump. YouDig Jun 2016 #47
I prefer to think of it... Chan790 Jun 2016 #49
Your bar is totally arbitrary. It makes a huge difference that Clinton is better than Trump. YouDig Jun 2016 #51
Fuck Trump. Nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #46
Your point? TSIAS Jun 2016 #60

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
50. She won primaries--Bernie won caucuses and most everybody thinks
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jun 2016

that primaries are more democratic and inclusive than caucuses.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
6. Against *two* rival candidates with nowhere near her name recognition or support from the party.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:29 PM
Jun 2016

That certainly helps.

Response to BlueStater (Reply #6)

 

annavictorious

(934 posts)
53. It wasn't Hillary's fault
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jun 2016

that after 26 years in Congress, nobody knew who Sanders was. If only he had used that two and a half decades to actually get things done...

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
56. Most senators and representatives aren't that well known by the majority of the public.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jun 2016

It doesn't quite raise your national profile like being a FLOTUS or SOS does. Hillary didn't earn either of those titles through her own work or from people voting for her, by the way.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
59. Which Senators (much less house reps) would you estimate have higher brand recognition
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:27 PM
Jun 2016

than Clinton?

What is it she "got done" in her 1 1/3 terms in elected office that gave her this viability and brand strength?

Who are the members of Congress that have "got stuff done"? Compare their recognition with Hillary Clinton.

What you got is a silly bullshit meme that has no bearing on reality.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
4. I am waiting until the FBI Lady Sings. Thanks, anyway.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:27 PM
Jun 2016

If she is cleared of the morass she got herself into, I'll be back to supporting her. But if not, I will not vote for her. Period. The End.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
15. Sad? Please worry not...reread my post. Has nothing to do with the Primary.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jun 2016

As I said...I will wait. I'm not convinced of anything. Kind of goes together.

And I don't call people names. Lacks class.

tandot

(6,671 posts)
5. Can you give them a break?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:27 PM
Jun 2016

I am very happy that Clinton won, but I truly want her to work with Sanders and his supporters

Don't rub it in, please

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
28. It's not the responsibility of the Bernie voters to bail HRC out.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:03 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie built a YUGE coalition of independents and progressives. She can't win without them against Trump.

But it is not our responsibility to bail her out, considering the shenanigans of the election. Let her find the votes.

We voted for the candidate who will be stronger against Trump. We good.

 

atomingai

(71 posts)
43. Hillary, the media, the establishment, and the press, had done the Berners and Sanders himself
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:46 PM
Jun 2016

so horribly. I think the Sanders supporters are going to make her reap what she sow. You don't badmouth the supporters and play nice after you get what you'd wanted. Doesn't work that way.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
9. That's what her buddy Dubya told us in 2000.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:31 PM
Jun 2016

Somehow it would mean more if she hadn't required deliberate voter suppression and various "irregularities."

Last night's trickery will stay with her.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
16. There will always be those who insist on being spoilers.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:29 AM
Jun 2016

This is a historic moment. The first female nominee of a major party. It IS a big deal.

Hillary got the majority of the votes. There's no denying that. I, for one, am proud to have been a Hillary supporter for many years. She's worked hard for this and she's earned the right to be the nominee.

I can't wait until she is "Madam President"!!!!

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
19. If it were not so shrouded in, um, events...I would agree.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jun 2016

IMO, she is not a model for young women. I was a supporter early, but having a better (to me) choice and the Elephant in the Living Room and her handling of that matter...led me to change my support.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
20. That's fine. You are entitled to your opinion.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jun 2016

I cannot imagine how she would NOT be a role model for young women, but obviously you disagree, and are entitled to that disagreement.

She is the nominee, and I've waited a long time for a woman to be the nominee, and I'm going to enjoy this moment in time.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
21. Here's my litmus test...when she's cleared and no longer under
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jun 2016

FBI et al investigation. To me, that trumps (no pun intended) gender. My decision will be made the day before the GE as it gives plenty of time to get over with it...one way or the other.

So, we can agree to disagree. Works for me.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
22. It works for me, as well.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 01:02 PM
Jun 2016

Thank you. I enjoy civil exchanges.

My litmus test is very simple. Innocent until proven guilty.

I wish you a great day.

lindysalsagal

(20,640 posts)
25. fRump won the popular vote, too. It doesn't validate her as deserving, or honorable.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:57 PM
Jun 2016

If the popular vote qualifies her as the people's best representative, the same must be said for fRump.

Her name recognition alone put her over the top, but informed voters know Bernie actually is the advocate for our country's highest impulses for integrity, honesty, and democracy. He's the far better people's representative.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
35. It seems rather arrogant to presume that voting for your preferred candidate
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:23 PM
Jun 2016

defines one as informed. It's a rather circular argument.

I'm not sure that name calling (ie fRump) qualifies as showing integrity, but maybe that's just from having grown up with a last name that was easy to make fun of.

But yes, by definition, a candidate receiving a majority of votes from their party means that person is the best representative of where the majority of the party is based on the available candidates to choose from.

lindysalsagal

(20,640 posts)
57. Not when they lack critical thinking skills, information, or comprehension.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:14 PM
Jun 2016

By your definition, Hitler was Germany's hero.

drray23

(7,627 posts)
26. that is a powerfull comment.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:02 PM
Jun 2016

Indeed, I can see how insane this will look in the future when reflecting back. Some people are going to ask themselves what the heck was i thinking, how out of touch could i have been.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
32. The mentality of Sanders and is supporters is one of entitlement
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:16 PM
Jun 2016

In their minds, votes don't matter. The only thing that matters is rhetoric and ideology. Voters should be dismissed if they vote for anyone but Sanders, because anyone who doesn't vote for Sanders is supposedly corrupt. It's a confusing train of thought, but it's very real.

 

atomingai

(71 posts)
33. I'm sorry to say, but the establishment decides their nominee, not the voters.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:21 PM
Jun 2016

I'm beginning to believe that the Hillary supporters doesn't give a hoot on how she wins, as long as she wins. Integrity or fairness be damned.

 

atomingai

(71 posts)
36. I heard, but unfortunately, that's a lie.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:23 PM
Jun 2016

I understand your loyalty, but let's be real. The Democratic turnout this year is.....pathetic. The lowest in years. To make things worse, your nominee was pushing away a lot of Sanders supporters and disrespecting them to boot. No candidate should push away potential votes.

 

atomingai

(71 posts)
41. I doesn't take a math major to see the lie in this. A little research would due just find.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:37 PM
Jun 2016

Sorry dig, but I don't nor the time nor patience to play with you or any blind Hillary supporter. I understand that she won, but I won't let you gloat on my expense. I heard how you Hillary supporters abuse your privileges. I believe you're just another defect in Democracy. Consider yourself silenced. So long!!!

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
37. Obviously all of those votes were from the establishment*
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jun 2016

Establishment being defined as those who didn't vote for Sanders.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
45. You seem to not grasp a fundimental issue.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:02 AM
Jun 2016

We don’t care if she won the nomination fairly or unfairly. She doesn’t need to convince us that she won the nomination fairly…we just don’t care.

She’s an unacceptable candidate unworthy of our support and unlikely to receive it. I don't need conspiracy theories...I just need sane people who are now empowered to deny her the nomination, to deny her the nomination as being in the best interests of the nation and the party. I, in turn, need to start preparing for 2020 and the campaign to either primary Clinton out of office or defeat Trump. (Frankly, I don't actually care which...they're equally-shitty choices. Dolores Umbridge vs. Voldemort.)

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
49. I prefer to think of it...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:17 PM
Jun 2016

as neither passes the bar into acceptable or decent territory.

Much like a 59 and a 31 are both Fs. Both Clinton and Trump are unacceptable...below the threshold where it makes a difference which is better.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
51. Your bar is totally arbitrary. It makes a huge difference that Clinton is better than Trump.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jun 2016

Go down the issues if you want, see for yourself. On almost all, there's a huge difference. Trump thinks global warming is a hoax, Clinton wants to tackle it aggressively. Trump things wages are too high, Clinton thinks too low. And so on. And then there's the fact that Trump is totally racist. And also he's crazy.

The country will be much better off with Hillary than with Trump.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
60. Your point?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:34 AM
Jun 2016

People get elected all the time who are odious and have no place in public office. Just because the people vote for them doesn't mean that they are the best candidates (see Reagan and Bush).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»To all the people trying ...