2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDemocratic voters watched. They listened.
They voted. As usual, it's a primary, so turnouts were relatively low. But, state after state, people caucused and voted in primaries. The results are clear. They decided that they wanted Hillary Clinton as the candidate. The numbers tell the story:
Clinton, Hillary Diane Rodham 15,992,580 55.62% 2,184 53.91%
Sanders, Bernard "Bernie" 12,270,603 42.68% 1,801 44.46%
In popular votes, Hillary has 3.7 million more than Bernie. In pledged delegates, who were allocated according to the voting results in each state, she has almost 56% compared to Bernie's almost 43%. In both, Hillary has a 2-digit lead.
The number that represents the majority of pledged delegates is 2026. Hillary now has 2184. That's more than 150 more than she needed, and there are only 20 more outstanding in the DC, primary, where she will get at least 14 of those delegates.
The voters who participated in the primaries and caucuses have spoken, in 50 states and several territories. They have expressed their opinion and voted for the candidate they preferred.
The numbers are clear. There is no getting away from looking at the numbers. They are what determine who the nominee will be. Enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders didn't result in enough votes to gain the majority of pledged delegates or of the popular vote.
To get a majority of ALL delegates, including the super delegates, Clinton needs just 200 super delegates to vote for her. Over 500 have already stated their intentions to do that.
Democrats have spoken. The answer is clear. Bernie Sanders did a remarkable job of competing, but he simply didn't succeed. He's a good guy, and I'd have voted for him and campaigned for him, had he become the nominee. He didn't do that. So, I"ll be voting for and campaigning for the Democratic nominee who did.
I am a Democrat. That's why.
Hillary 2016!
msongs
(67,361 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)context. He is not here to comment on the US Democratic primary race. Isolated quotes from him are not directed at the present situation, I'm afraid.
Sivart
(325 posts)pnwmom
(108,955 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 8, 2016, 08:56 PM - Edit history (1)
You decide only for yourself, not for others. Sorry, but people and their experiences and priorities differ. Vote you conscience and leave others to vote theirs. You only got to decide what you will do.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Happy! Happy! Bouncy! Bouncy!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)Truly.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)What that is fails the clarity test, though. I'm not in the mood for puzzles today, though, so...
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)attempts to say something. I don't have time for subtle games just now. If you have something to say, say it plainly, and I will respond plainly.
MH1
(17,573 posts)I'm glad that Bernie and Martin (mostly Bernie) prevented it from being an outright coronation like the DNC seemed to want.
Props to Bernie and his supporters for influencing the conversation.
I'm still pissed about the debates and how they shut out the others. But that said, I'll certainly be voting for the Democratic nominee in November (and expect that will be Hillary). Because a) I'm not an idiot and b) that Gandhi quote about matters of conscience. My vote matters and I damn sure am not going to give it to that racist misogynistic scumbag on the Republican ticket.