Something is going on with Elizabeth Warren

[jzodda]

So I am just speculating but when i got home at 730pm and turned on the TV she was on multiple channels giving a great speech.

It made me wonder if there has been some movement from the white house, the Sanders campaign and the Clinton campaign to get her on the ticket.

Then I read that Harry Reid was pushing for her on politico....

So what do you think?

[senseandsensibility]

1. I'm not against it,

but it would be a very out of the box move for Hillary. So I doubt it will happen.

[longship]

2. No.

[Metric System]

3. I hope so.

[CrowCityDem]

4. I think that was the best application ever.

She just savaged Trump and the Republicans in cold, calculated fashion. She killed them.

Sorry, but I don't see how Bernie, or any other Democrats on the list, could do that.

[Happyhippychick]

5. I hope so!

[PeaceNikki]

6. She's endorsing Clinton and gave an amazing speech

[JoePhilly]

7. Would work for me.

[Florencenj2point0]

8. she has more power in the senate don't tie her hands

[3hummingbirds]

9. Elizabeth Warren

I hope not. We need her in the Senate.

[Chasstev365]

10. Isn't she more valuable in the Senate as a liberal voice?

Also, would two women on a national.ticket be a risky move? I'm just asking the question, so please don't accuse me of being sexist!

[PeaceNikki]

11. No more risky then two men.

Anyone who wouldn't vote for two women wouldn't vote for one.

[Lizzie Poppet]

12. Much more.

Marginalized in a ceremonial position as the token progressive in a corporate-friendly Administration? Oh, hell no.

Unless it really looks like the inevitable impeachment actually has a chance of being sustained in the Senate...

[Chasstev365]

15. Great Point!

How would someone who wants to reign in Wall Street work with such a Pro Corporate administration?

[Hestia]

20. Exactly. Teddy Roosevelt said that the VP was where politicians went to die.

[PufPuf23]

13. Warren has more power as a Senator than as VP.

A key cabinet position would likely have more gravitas than VP.

The Democratic party is in rapid consolidation mode and this is good regards Trump and GOP.

[TheKentuckian]

14. I believe she is needed in the Senate not attending state funerals and waiting for a rare tie

in the Senate.

President? Sure.

Secretary of the Treasury? Could be worth it.

Head of the FED? Worth consideration.

Vice President? For what, to do what? It's like having a 20 million dollar a year veteran back up quarterback in the twilight of their career.

I think the whole push is the get a liberal with juice out of the Senate and on a leash.

[okasha]

16. I think she's a terrific Senator whose vote we need

until we have a Senate majority.

I'm opposed to taking any Democrat out of Congress at this point.

[Mz Pip]

18. I agree

We need all the seats we currently hold and then some in the House and Senate.

I still think Perez, the current Secretary of Labor would be a good pick. He's very progressive.

[okasha]

19. I like him,

but I'd rather place him as AG until a SCOTUS slot comes open.

[firebrand80]

17. It's very possible

Hillary's pollsters might be telling her that the biggest threat to her losing is not uniting the party. Warren may go a long way toward accomplishing that.

[tonyt53]

21. She too has been waiting for Hillary to get those delegates. She is ready to kick some GOP ass.

Senate majority leader may very well be in her near future.

[DCBob]

22. Very possible... she would make a great VP.

I wish she was from a one of the battleground states but regardless she could help bring the Bernie folks in. I think she is certainly on the very short list.