Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:49 AM Jun 2016

Nina Turner bitterly slams Elizabeth Warren.

Nina Turner said she didn’t think Warren could woo Sanders supporters if Hillary Clinton chose her as running mate, saying the Massachusetts senator hadn’t done enough to help her colleague from Vermont during his primary campaign, reported The Hill.

“It’s easy for Democrats to attack Mr. Trump,” said Nina Turner, the former state senator from Ohio. “You don’t get any brownie points from me and other progressives for getting into a Twitter war with Mr. Donald Trump. That’s easy. But when the fight was hard for Sen. Bernie Sanders, where was Sen. Warren?”

Turner said she and other Sanders supporters were disappointed that Warren, as one of the most high-profile progressive lawmakers, didn’t campaign for the Democratic challenger.

“They’re gonna attack me for saying this, but I’m a truth-teller at this point,” Turner said.


http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/sanders-surrogate-blasts-elizabeth-warren-she-doesnt-get-brownie-points-for-slamming-trump/#.V1rJUdytcB5.facebook







273 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nina Turner bitterly slams Elizabeth Warren. (Original Post) sufrommich Jun 2016 OP
She's very bitter and resentful, isn't she? Feel the unity, Nina ... #FeelTheUnity. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #1
#FleeTheBern Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #9
Bwaahaaaa! "#NinaNeedsAJob" Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #68
Just like the rest of us will if New Dems have their way. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #121
What a despicable attack on a true Democratic progressive. Kentonio Jun 2016 #149
#FleeTheBern !!!! Number23 Jun 2016 #199
And she's very accurate, like it or not. floriduck Jun 2016 #22
She is sowing and perpetuating discontent ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #52
! Phlem Jun 2016 #65
Sow greiner3 Jun 2016 #170
I think you meant sew. Phlem Jun 2016 #171
sow is correct-like sowing seeds redstateblues Jun 2016 #187
Math class, English class. . . . Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #247
So easily, you apparently mistook the usage of "sow." So unfortunate. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #273
Maybe so but she was accurately telling it like it is. Not like someone worried about repercussion. floriduck Jun 2016 #67
What does she hope to accomplish? What's her motivation? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #75
She's setting the stage for future election cycles when more and more progressive candidates floriduck Jun 2016 #84
If Trump ever got in Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #118
Oh, the pie in the Sky people versus the DINO - saurs. Whatever works to support ignorance. floriduck Jun 2016 #158
Or...the purists who can't compromise apcalc Jun 2016 #202
She's not "telling it like it is". She says Bernie was ENTITLED to Warren's endorsement, which is bs CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #80
That's a very narrow view of her intentions. She's sending a message to future super delegates if floriduck Jun 2016 #90
That waiting for the race to end isn't ok? Isn't that exactly what Bernie wanted? Get it straight. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #91
Nina seems angry Dem2 Jun 2016 #76
She plays-well to the folks who already supported Bernie, but she added nothing to his campaign ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #82
Worst surrogates ever! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #103
I sure was turned off by her. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #108
Really? The minute I heard her speek…. I was relieved that she was smart, thoughtful and sincere. midnight Jun 2016 #228
I think this applies to ALL of Sanders' surrogates... brooklynite Jun 2016 #142
Sanders supporters aren't like poor Claire McCaskill who couldn't explain appalachiablue Jun 2016 #256
I know Nina Turner and I respect her... brooklynite Jun 2016 #268
An angry, unreasonable black woman. Really, keep going. I want to see how low this gets. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #220
What? Dem2 Jun 2016 #224
That's brilliant, mature too. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #227
You made a ridiculous accusation Dem2 Jun 2016 #229
You made offensive, loaded comments and know it. Shame is yours, appalachiablue Jun 2016 #232
You brought race into this Dem2 Jun 2016 #233
I told you to lose the game flipping. Get help if you can't stop. Later. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #235
Exactly. She needs to see that sowing further division doesn't help anyone..... Sheepshank Jun 2016 #172
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #205
Clearly you are a mind reader. 840high Jun 2016 #214
Baloney Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #106
She is actually wrong. Flat out wrong. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #112
+1 n/t. okieinpain Jun 2016 #143
I suppose Hillary speaks for Progressives? Ha Ha Ha Awknid Jun 2016 #211
Sure. lol 840high Jun 2016 #215
Hillary never claimed to ha ha ha Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #248
In what way is she accurate? Nina Turner is speaking nonsense. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #180
Poor Nina's head is going to explode when Bernie endorses Hillary !!! OnDoutside Jun 2016 #51
Lock the rabbits up! She's really pissed off because she's berned all of her bridges and her Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #73
It will be interesting to see what she DOES do when Bernie endorses Hillary, if OnDoutside Jun 2016 #159
She was our state rep. Doremus Jun 2016 #163
Is there a reason that she is no longer your state rep.? Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #166
No TSIAS Jun 2016 #174
Agree her head will explode. Nina has gone off the rail this election FloridaBlues Jun 2016 #188
She is simply the first to state an observation that undoubtedly many JimDandy Jun 2016 #195
Nina Turner was a Clinton supporter who switched to Bernie. She knows politics, appalachiablue Jun 2016 #219
Truth to bought power. Sounds honest to me. Jackilope Jun 2016 #66
Wow. Did you really describe a woman as bitter and resentful Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #77
What's her role in the campaign? What are her motivations & goals? What does she hope to accomplish? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #99
I'm amazed by the double-standards that float around this website. Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #105
Are you trying to change the subject by making veiled accusations that I've said something "sexist"? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #113
"you guys" Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #115
Ha! That tells me all I need to know about you. :-P NurseJackie Jun 2016 #119
And you think this riposte raises your position? Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #123
It's unclear what you're trying to say. Can you elaborate? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #125
Where I am from in PA , "you guys" refers to a group - either sex apcalc Jun 2016 #203
You're sexist!!!!! NCTraveler Jun 2016 #116
Wait, wait! That's not all ... did you see the follow-up? :-P NurseJackie Jun 2016 #124
Thank you for this moment of levity. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #128
What double standard? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #152
Not for speaking her mind. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #191
Real anger, aggression, loss of control and shouting are at this awful outburst display. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #250
And that has what to do with Nina being an angry and bitter loud mouth? Lil Missy Jun 2016 #257
What you don't get I'll enumerate. It has everything to do with this thread appalachiablue Jun 2016 #267
you are so exaggerating Clintons reaction and trying to change the subject. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #269
If you don't understand the importance and relevance of how women leaders appalachiablue Jun 2016 #270
Also highly aggressive, vehement and bellicose. Angry and aggressive, another. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #222
Nina's days are over. leftofcool Jun 2016 #2
Because? I think she's just getting started Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #183
I'd happily vote for her to be the first woman president. nt LWolf Jun 2016 #261
She's a jerk. nt onehandle Jun 2016 #3
So instead of attacking Trump, she wants Warren to attack Hillary. Does she even care about winning YouDig Jun 2016 #4
No. Ace Rothstein Jun 2016 #46
UNDER THE DOUBLE DECKER BUS WITH YOU LIZ! Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #5
The bus needs monster truck wheels at this point metroins Jun 2016 #23
I'm thinking something more like this would be more efficient for the amount of people needing .... boston bean Jun 2016 #31
But they all have to think they are driving it. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #109
who? snooper2 Jun 2016 #6
She isn't a truth teller at this point. She's an irrelevant whiner. boston bean Jun 2016 #7
Turner sees her relevance disappearing quickly, along with her meal ticket. nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #8
I disagree with her too, but personal attacks are petty. Also, if she wanted a meal ticket... yurbud Jun 2016 #87
then that would make her a corporate whore. n/t. okieinpain Jun 2016 #144
if she had gone that route, which she didn't yurbud Jun 2016 #154
Nina Turner peddling some sour, sour grapes there geek tragedy Jun 2016 #10
lol nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #11
Truth telling kcjohn1 Jun 2016 #12
lolz you guys! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #17
Really? For many Sanders supporters, Warren would have been MineralMan Jun 2016 #24
Primaries real eye opening kcjohn1 Jun 2016 #42
Who is Warner? KingFlorez Jun 2016 #25
I Think He Played For The Rams Grassy Knoll Jun 2016 #70
Wasn't he married to Elizabeth Taylor? emulatorloo Jun 2016 #107
That doesn't exactly narrow it down much mythology Jun 2016 #134
Rep. senator from VA. Beacool Jun 2016 #164
... emulatorloo Jun 2016 #165
Corp. Dem. Sen. Mark Warner of VA seven years, considered for VP twice already. Wow. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #225
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #69
I hope Warner has little credibility with Sanders supporters. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #114
Warren was reluctant to book passage on the Titanic. Smart move. oasis Jun 2016 #135
Sure took her long enough to board the SS Minnow. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #240
This is absolutely ridiculous KingFlorez Jun 2016 #13
Dear Ms. Turner: Adrahil Jun 2016 #14
That's the problem with Idealogues, anyone who is less than idealogically pure is a traitor. OnDoutside Jun 2016 #55
Turner has been a poor surrogate for Bernie One of the 99 Jun 2016 #15
+1 JoePhilly Jun 2016 #18
Angry?? disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #26
Just an observation One of the 99 Jun 2016 #27
Yes, "the angry black woman"... glowing Jun 2016 #111
Sarandon gets the same treatment, you are way off base. nt oasis Jun 2016 #136
So, it's ok to be sexist and disgusting to a woman if they don't fit your mold? glowing Jun 2016 #138
"Sexism" "bigotry. You insist on making unsubstantiated claims. oasis Jun 2016 #145
Really, "angry woman", "off the rails", "Nina who" glowing Jun 2016 #150
Never said that. One of the 99 Jun 2016 #161
I think the entire post is attacking a strong, progressive Democratic woman glowing Jun 2016 #173
Again, not what I said One of the 99 Jun 2016 #186
I think dismissing my point of view of the entire posting thread glowing Jun 2016 #194
I think attacking me for the opinion of others is wrong. One of the 99 Jun 2016 #251
You are the only one mentioning her color. Trying to twist it into a racial issue. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #209
So she's an angry, arrogant woman? notadmblnd Jun 2016 #216
Sounds like you are. One of the 99 Jun 2016 #252
As far as females go- I can be a mans worst freaking nightmare. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #258
Good for you One of the 99 Jun 2016 #259
Those used to be considered fairly sexist comments. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #241
Why? One of the 99 Jun 2016 #253
playing into a stereotype. I agree with you. I'm just saying, is all. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #262
You were playing into a sterotype not me One of the 99 Jun 2016 #271
Wow, so she wants Warren to attack Hillary and not Trump obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #16
Where did you see this statement in Nina's words? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #34
There is no equivalence in clout between Nina Turner and Elizabeth Warren MineralMan Jun 2016 #19
Possibly so in this election cycle. But there will be many more like her in the cycles to come. So floriduck Jun 2016 #30
Possibly so in this election cycle. But there will be many more like her in the cycles to come. So floriduck Jun 2016 #38
Bernie doesn't seem to be in any hurry to rein her in either. grossproffit Jun 2016 #20
it isn't Bernie's job to rein anyone in, he's doing the right thing now nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #37
That is just not so. He has an absolute responsibility to rein in his campaign staff. boston bean Jun 2016 #44
she's not staff, she's a voluntary supporter geek tragedy Jun 2016 #49
There is no evidence that that was any more than one anonymous staffer. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #60
"Bring her to heel'..you know. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #230
How'd that work out for y'all? grossproffit Jun 2016 #236
Truth.. all points disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #21
Self-fulfilling prophecies are wonderfully validating. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #61
She is correct. Thank God someone has the guts to speak the truth. Skwmom Jun 2016 #28
She's a sore loser lashing out at a liberal giant. sufrommich Jun 2016 #33
Always these trite phases when people speak the truth. Skwmom Jun 2016 #41
"Speak the truth" is itself a trite phrase alcibiades_mystery Jun 2016 #160
Bingo! Nailed it. redstateblues Jun 2016 #190
THAT'S exactly what it is: passive aggressive! I couldn't put my finger on it. Thanks! AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #244
Thanks for this. peace13 Jun 2016 #39
Agree 100%. MelissaB Jun 2016 #47
Nina who? RandySF Jun 2016 #29
Exaggerate much? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #32
It's no exaggeration,it's pure unadulterated bitterness.nt sufrommich Jun 2016 #35
Thank god you got to use bitter on a woman . peace13 Jun 2016 #45
She sure acts bitter. And why are women immune to being bitter?? Lil Missy Jun 2016 #193
This is hysterical! Six months ago it was deemed that bitter was a sexist term not to be used... peace13 Jun 2016 #197
Got a link? Lil Missy Jun 2016 #207
You appear to be conflating 'truth' and 'simply her opinion.' LanternWaste Jun 2016 #64
Truth is also not what Nina Turner is speaking. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #178
Can someone explain... Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #36
No because Everybody Already Crossed the Bridge and Nina is on the Other Side and Can't Swim Stallion Jun 2016 #74
Anyone mad at someone who stayed neutral is bitter, petty, and thinking like Trump. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #40
That's what I said yesterday. FFS, Trump is low-hanging fruit. Who wouldn't attack him? valerief Jun 2016 #43
She's a political cannibal, eating her own for no discernible reason. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #86
Wow. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #117
Tell me; what did Warren do to deserve any attack from Bernie's side? CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #127
what did Warren do to deserve any attack from Bernie's side? DJ13 Jun 2016 #210
Actually, I think she is probably correct. -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #48
Oh so predictable. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #50
"Nina Turner, bitterly." You could have just stopped there and still been accurate. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #53
She's a half-truth teller BeyondGeography Jun 2016 #54
Turner's gratuitous trashing of Warren after that masterful speech tying Trump to the GOP Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #85
Tout à fait BeyondGeography Jun 2016 #120
Sans équivoque ! Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #122
Policy-wise I'm an enthusiastic supporter Beowulf Jun 2016 #56
There are a few Bernie supporters that are less than pleased with her as well Blue_Adept Jun 2016 #72
Obvious? She's saying Bernie was ENTITLED to Warren's endorsement. That's pure bs. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #88
I don't read her that way. Beowulf Jun 2016 #100
The only way you can be angry at neutrality is if you feel they were SUPPOSED to be with you. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #129
She's right, and that is how Sanders' supporters feel. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #57
No Nina is foolish Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #156
I don't think you know what Sanders supporters think. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #200
My dad taught me a valuable lesson... GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #226
A post can be read one of two ways: Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #246
I agree. Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #169
This slam simply wasn't necessary. hamsterjill Jun 2016 #58
The is getting to be like the French Revolution.. DCBob Jun 2016 #59
Warren stayed neutral. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #62
Nina, Warren didn't endorse any Democratic candidate for the nomination. No one still_one Jun 2016 #63
Warren wouldn't have swayed any HRC voters to Bernie. That's what Nina ecstatic Jun 2016 #71
I suspect she was torn between Hillary's tenacity and Bernie's stance on some issues... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #78
I think Nina was counting on being Bernie's VP Tarc Jun 2016 #79
Or, his press secretary? Yikes! Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #94
What makes her think that Bernie was entitled to Warren's endorsement? nt. Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #81
Warren was/is being strategic, just as Bernie was when he ran as a Dem instead of independent yurbud Jun 2016 #83
Agree. There has to be a strategy. Plan A. Plan B. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #242
Nine Turner: Dead Ender Renew Deal Jun 2016 #89
Did ANYONE in Congress campaign for Sanders? He had one -count it, ONE- Senate endorsement. randome Jun 2016 #92
"Does NOT play well with others..." Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #95
Right. Senate "Democrats" roll their eyes at him because he refuses to deal with lobbyists Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #185
Sometimes it's simply how you come across that turns people off. randome Jun 2016 #189
It wasn't Warren's job to prop up Bernie Sanders. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #93
"I’m a truth-teller" One of the 99 Jun 2016 #96
Bitter dead ender workinclasszero Jun 2016 #97
"Former" says it all. People evidently don't care for her. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #98
Senator Warren is going under the bus Gothmog Jun 2016 #101
Meh. Telling someone else who they HAVE to endorse/campaign for. Not cool. yellowcanine Jun 2016 #102
I guess... MrWendel Jun 2016 #104
This shows a great lack of intelligence. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #110
tina "truth teller" must never have researched bernie sanders history...probably wouldn't beachbum bob Jun 2016 #126
I don't get Turner at all. I don't care that she switched from Clinton to Sanders onenote Jun 2016 #130
Nina Turner, the so-called "national treasure" is through. nt oasis Jun 2016 #131
That's very sad, you know? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #132
It's very hard to take Ms. Turner seriously. OilemFirchen Jun 2016 #133
She endorsed in November 2015 TSIAS Jun 2016 #176
Turner attacked Obama yesterday. Not sure what this accomplishes. yardwork Jun 2016 #137
A person who has to declare "I'm a truth-teller" usually isn't. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #139
Nina Turner has a choice... brooklynite Jun 2016 #140
pretty stupid on mrs. turners part. she will end up regretting that n/t. okieinpain Jun 2016 #141
Nothing bitter said Lazy Daisy Jun 2016 #146
The slam was implying Warren was being weak by not endorsing Bernie, as though she owed it to him. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #153
Why was Liz Warren obligated to campaign for Sanders? Beacool Jun 2016 #167
If you can't walk away for truth, you can't stand for truth. mmonk Jun 2016 #147
Will she bitterly slam Sanders next week too when he endorses HRC? JCMach1 Jun 2016 #148
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Peacetrain Jun 2016 #168
Why would she have campained for Bernie? pandr32 Jun 2016 #151
She's a FORMER State Senator tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #155
Hillary was a FAILED presidential candidate TSIAS Jun 2016 #175
There's a difference between failed presidential candidate tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #181
Turner may be technically right, but Warren likely saw the writing anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #157
Warren remained neutral, why was she obligated to campaign for Sanders? Beacool Jun 2016 #162
Thank you Nina Turner. I couldn't have said it better Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #177
I would support whoever HRC puts on the ticket MFM008 Jun 2016 #179
Nina Turner has passion and is not afraid to speak the truth udbcrzy2 Jun 2016 #182
Nina Turner is still mad Bill Clinton didn't mention her at an Ohio state dinner...Very bitter lady. timlot Jun 2016 #184
Judging from the attitude that has permeated this board today Aerows Jun 2016 #192
Grow up, Nina ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #196
She always seemed way too zealous to take seriously MirrorAshes Jun 2016 #198
Messiah, where? appalachiablue Jun 2016 #231
that gif ... lol Hiraeth Jun 2016 #243
omg Hiraeth Jun 2016 #266
Priceless innit. Wonder if Angela Merkel, Indira Gandhi or Maggie Thatcher appalachiablue Jun 2016 #272
Warren endorsing Bernie would have been a game changer laserhaas Jun 2016 #201
She's right. Kall Jun 2016 #204
Turner is right. Trump-bashing is low-hanging fruit. Easy pickings. nt valerief Jun 2016 #206
Totally Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #208
Some Sanders supporters believe the Sanders base is monolithic Gman Jun 2016 #212
Maybe Warren has always preferred Clinton jaceaf Jun 2016 #213
She sure waited long enough to endorse. Although, I hear she agrees with a lot of HRC's foreign Hiraeth Jun 2016 #239
Warren encouraged Clinton to run. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #254
Nina who? sarae Jun 2016 #217
not really a bitter slam but ymmv aikoaiko Jun 2016 #218
Maybe Senator Warren just didn't think that Bernie had earned her endorsement. StevieM Jun 2016 #221
and It sure took Hillary long enough to earn it. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #245
Warren understands that a united front behind the presumptive nominee is more important than a temp TwilightZone Jun 2016 #255
temp bump = lol Hiraeth Jun 2016 #263
You think endorsements in the primary mean anything to anyone? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #264
odd followup reply. weird question. abort conversation. toodles. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #265
Wow. The level of delusion! What utter bullshit. AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #223
So Turner prefers Trump BainsBane Jun 2016 #234
She's right Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #237
Bitterly is a loaded term, senseandsensibility Jun 2016 #238
Go Nina Go!! Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #249
I really like Nina Turner. She doesn't sugar-coat her thoughts. -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #260
 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
149. What a despicable attack on a true Democratic progressive.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:55 PM
Jun 2016

Then again we should be used to that, considering the unbelievable attacks she got from so called Democrats when she came out for Bernie in the first place.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
52. She is sowing and perpetuating discontent ...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jun 2016

... And doing so for no other reason than for vanity and pride. As she stokes the dying embers of Bernie's campaign to inflame resentment and irrational fear, she's missing an opportunity to be a bigger person. Clearly, she's not ready to move forward. either that, or she's just not thinking for herself, and is following someone else's lead.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
171. I think you meant sew.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jun 2016

which is different from "sow" and "so" and "SOE".

Didn't mean it as sexist? If you think "so", that's on you.



 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
67. Maybe so but she was accurately telling it like it is. Not like someone worried about repercussion.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jun 2016
 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
84. She's setting the stage for future election cycles when more and more progressive candidates
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:51 AM
Jun 2016

begin running for offices. The Sanders movement is not ending, it will be growing into an increasingly powerful force. And Nina is setting expectations for the next election cycle by stating that establishment Dems will have a much harder time manipulating those who might support them.

Demsrule86

(68,471 posts)
118. If Trump ever got in
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jun 2016

There would be no reason to bother...that is what you pie in the sky folks don't get. The GOP would have three branches of government...and even if we got them all back, the courts would be stacked...five justices over 80.

apcalc

(4,462 posts)
202. Or...the purists who can't compromise
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:23 PM
Jun 2016

Will be the left's version of the Tea party....a fringe movement going nowhere...

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
80. She's not "telling it like it is". She says Bernie was ENTITLED to Warren's endorsement, which is bs
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:49 AM
Jun 2016
 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
90. That's a very narrow view of her intentions. She's sending a message to future super delegates if
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:53 AM
Jun 2016

they even exist after this years convention.

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
91. That waiting for the race to end isn't ok? Isn't that exactly what Bernie wanted? Get it straight.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jun 2016

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
76. Nina seems angry
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jun 2016

She needs to take a step back and re-evaluate, she isn't coming across as reasonable of late.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
82. She plays-well to the folks who already supported Bernie, but she added nothing to his campaign ...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:50 AM
Jun 2016

... when it came to being able to actually bring in new followers. My guess is that she (and other poorly-chosen surrogates) ended up solidifying the base, but turning off and driving away more people than were actually persuaded to join the flock.

Thank God for that! Good work, Nina ... and Killer Mike ... and Cornel ... and Susan. (As annoying and grating as they were, I suppose we all owe them a debt of gratitude.)

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
103. Worst surrogates ever!
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:01 PM
Jun 2016

Don't forget the "corporate whores" guy.

That was before Bernie needed the supers to win of course.

LiberalFighter

(50,789 posts)
108. I sure was turned off by her.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jun 2016

Never really cared for her when I saw her on the news during her election campaign in Ohio.

I suppose you are right that we should thank her and the others.

brooklynite

(94,363 posts)
142. I think this applies to ALL of Sanders' surrogates...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:15 PM
Jun 2016

...they all were hits with the voters who were already Bernie fans; they didn't expand his pool of support.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
256. Sanders supporters aren't like poor Claire McCaskill who couldn't explain
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jun 2016

on TV what socialism is after she said it, or rambling, veteran grouch and banker Barney Frank, Gloria 'where the boyz are' Steinem flop, or the Nevada performer Boxer, no not at all. Millions of people welcomed Sanders surrogates and team who are sharp and effectively behind him all the way on issues of vital importance to Americans. Bernie's remarkable qualities and resonating message, and his campaign's supporters like Turner drew millions into the populist, progressive Sanders political revolution. The impact and growth of this movement will last for generations and the histories written about the period will credit his campaign as the most influential in decades.

Much was added to Bernie's campaign and rallies by Nina Turner, and the people love her. A truly powerful and energetic speaker who's also highly intelligent, charming and personable Turner inspired and motivated thousands of Americans, a natural gift that few politicians possess. She's also a real survivor, innate since youth, a leader who sands tall and speaks the truth, and a woman who receives the respect and love of many including her large family and loving husband and son. She'll continue to fight with success for progressive goals in years to come, know it.



Nina Turner Rouses Crowd, Shares Grandmother's Wisdom on Success in Life, The Three Bones- Wish, Jaw, Back.

brooklynite

(94,363 posts)
268. I know Nina Turner and I respect her...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:11 PM
Jun 2016

...but if what she added wasn't voters, it doesn't matter much.

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
229. You made a ridiculous accusation
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:11 AM
Jun 2016

How the hell did you expect someone to react when you accuse them of racism while using a ridiculous stereotype in the process ? You should be ashamed.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
232. You made offensive, loaded comments and know it. Shame is yours,
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:23 AM
Jun 2016

and blatant. Don't try to game flip it on me. You need to get real.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
172. Exactly. She needs to see that sowing further division doesn't help anyone.....
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:10 PM
Jun 2016

least of all the credibility of the Bernie Campaign.

Response to NurseJackie (Reply #52)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
112. She is actually wrong. Flat out wrong.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:10 PM
Jun 2016

She arrogantly claims to speak for all progressives. Truly a fools game.

OnDoutside

(19,948 posts)
51. Poor Nina's head is going to explode when Bernie endorses Hillary !!!
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jun 2016

There's something of the Fatal Attraction about her, or should that be Fatal Distraction ?

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
73. Lock the rabbits up! She's really pissed off because she's berned all of her bridges and her
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jun 2016

political career is as good as over.

Who would want this highly aggressive, one-volume, one-note, loose cannon working on their campaign? Totally lacking in political savvy.

OnDoutside

(19,948 posts)
159. It will be interesting to see what she DOES do when Bernie endorses Hillary, if
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jun 2016

she blows up, you'd expect it based on what she said about Elizabeth Warren. If she DOESN'T blow up (Sanders made a special effort to thank her personally for her support), then she's a hypocrite.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
163. She was our state rep.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jun 2016

She stood up for the people of her district, mostly working class and poor and did a fine job in the blood red Ohio legislature. She spoke truth to power then as she does now.

It surprises and saddens me to hear Dems disparage her without knowing how she went to the mat for us.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
166. Is there a reason that she is no longer your state rep.?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jun 2016

I wonder if she displayed the same vehement manner and aggressive rhetoric back then?

Or, did her surrogacy for Sanders bring out an especially bellocose streak?

FloridaBlues

(4,007 posts)
188. Agree her head will explode. Nina has gone off the rail this election
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:24 PM
Jun 2016

Ever since she lost her election she has gotten rather negitive. At some point Bernie people need to realize bashing other progressives won't help his revolution. Or what ever soap box she hope to stand on from here out

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
195. She is simply the first to state an observation that undoubtedly many
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jun 2016

others, like me, were thinking. It's not bashing when it's a spot on fact.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
219. Nina Turner was a Clinton supporter who switched to Bernie. She knows politics,
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:30 PM
Jun 2016

was a state senator from Ohio and might run for mayor of Cleveland. She'll be just fine and doesn't have Fatal Anything. But others might.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
99. What's her role in the campaign? What are her motivations & goals? What does she hope to accomplish?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jun 2016

Or is she just some randomly chosen citizen-on-the-street giving an impromptu rant on camera?

She's a total self-absorbed amateur... completely unprofessional... with spokespersons like Nina (and the other high-profile ones that Bernie relied upon) it's little wonder that he had difficulty in attracting more support.

Based on her performance here (and throughout) it's clear to be that Bernie could have done better. She's was no asset to his active campaign, and she's doing nobody any favors (not even Bernie) with her current sour attitude.

You guys crack me up sometimes.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
113. Are you trying to change the subject by making veiled accusations that I've said something "sexist"?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:10 PM
Jun 2016

If I'd said "shrill" or "harpy" or "hag" any of the other words that have often been permitted by juries when used to describe Hillary, then perhaps you'd have a point.

Clearly you'd rather avoid talking about my observations and points... so perhaps it's best of you go ahead and alert on my comment. Maybe you'll get a sympathetic jury that agrees with you.

Oh brother ... you guys are something else!

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
123. And you think this riposte raises your position?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:25 PM
Jun 2016

Really? Trying to attach yourself to a popular icon, somehow makes you popular too?

Is that what you're aiming at?

apcalc

(4,462 posts)
203. Where I am from in PA , "you guys" refers to a group - either sex
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:30 PM
Jun 2016

A group of all men, all women, or mixed...don't get excited by the term!

" what have you guys been doing?"

" see you guys later"

It is a very common usage. Everyone says it.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
124. Wait, wait! That's not all ... did you see the follow-up? :-P
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:26 PM
Jun 2016

The poster "duly noted" that I wrote "you guys".

They really are petty and persnickety, aren't they? Here's what I imagine:


 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
128. Thank you for this moment of levity.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:30 PM
Jun 2016

And I will now join them in saying I "duly note" that you said "you guys".

I'm not sure why but I'll be damned if I'm not going to "duly note" it.

Demsrule86

(68,471 posts)
152. What double standard?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie has lost. Nina makes herself look foolish. What possible difference can it make if someone endorses Hillary Clinton? If Nina was considering what is best for this country and not her own disapointment, she would want to help Secretary Clinton win. The progressive movement is toast if Trump gets in and picks five justices for the Supreme Court. Time for folks to put on their big boy and big girl pants and move on.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
191. Not for speaking her mind.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:29 PM
Jun 2016

No. For her arrogant and bitter attitude.

I'll add - she also has a BIG and LOUD mouth!

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
250. Real anger, aggression, loss of control and shouting are at this awful outburst display.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:17 AM
Jun 2016

Clinton needs tightly controlled, protected and staged affairs with very limited people. It's obvious she's unable to greet and mix with groups, crowds or handle close up exchanges that are necessary for politicians.

At this atypical event how uncomfortable and fearful she is walking through a crowd with noise and music even before being asked a question. Not the person I recall and saw. Clearly only well prepared, safe occasions now and that's sad.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
267. What you don't get I'll enumerate. It has everything to do with this thread
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:10 PM
Jun 2016

where Nina Turner is falsely accused of numerous personally vile and loaded characteristics- 'angry, aggressive, arrogant, unreasonable, vehement, loud and big mouth, needs to be reined in'. Including vicious comparisons with the psychologically deranged, violent animal killer Glenn Close played in the movie 'Fatal Attraction', more. Way beyond malicious, it's impermissible.

Clinton's immediate reaction of shouting and hostility over a a question in a crowd was startling and intense, a complete emotional outburst, particularly forcing her hand and finger into the woman's chest. That kind of flash anger and public display of irrationality and aggression summons matters of cause, temperament and more.
Nina Turner has been scrutinized and smeared here for merely saying what others don't like or agree with. And the attacks on her profession, motives and background as a result are totally unjustified and reprehensible, all things considered.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
269. you are so exaggerating Clintons reaction and trying to change the subject.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jun 2016

Nina is bitter and hostile every single time I see her. Always shouting and whining about something. People are bound to notice.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
270. If you don't understand the importance and relevance of how women leaders
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jun 2016

in the same field and fight- politics, behave and carry themselves at public campaign events then I can't help you.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
183. Because? I think she's just getting started
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:54 PM
Jun 2016

Progressive voters are going to take over the next several election cycles and all the bullshit artists that have been selling us a bill of goods as candidates and then calling us "r**ards" the way Rahm Emanuel did go be put out to pasture where they belong. Nina Turner speaks truth to power and we, the working poor are truly thankful for her.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
4. So instead of attacking Trump, she wants Warren to attack Hillary. Does she even care about winning
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:52 AM
Jun 2016

in November?

Ace Rothstein

(3,144 posts)
46. No.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:14 AM
Jun 2016

It is obvious that many Sanders supporters want Clinton to lose in November, even if it results in a Trump presidency.

boston bean

(36,219 posts)
31. I'm thinking something more like this would be more efficient for the amount of people needing ....
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:04 AM
Jun 2016

to be tossed under:

boston bean

(36,219 posts)
7. She isn't a truth teller at this point. She's an irrelevant whiner.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:52 AM
Jun 2016

Wonder if Bernie feels like she does?? Doesnt she have some official capacity with his campaign?

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
87. I disagree with her too, but personal attacks are petty. Also, if she wanted a meal ticket...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:52 AM
Jun 2016

she'd go where the corporate cash is.

The GOP would probably trip all over themselves for a black woman to be their spokesperson.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. Nina Turner peddling some sour, sour grapes there
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:53 AM
Jun 2016

Oh well, Bernie's going to do the right thing even if some of his supporters are still stuck in the past

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
24. Really? For many Sanders supporters, Warren would have been
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jun 2016

their first choice to run. I think you are incorrect in your assessment.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
42. Primaries real eye opening
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:09 AM
Jun 2016

Many supposed progressives heroes showed their true colors and how they were all talk, but were in reality establishment hacks.

I wouldn't put her in that category because she at least stayed neutral. However my point is that many Sanders supporters rightly feel she was not in the trenches with them and as such she will not be a figure that is going to be able convince them how great Hillary is and get them onboard

Response to kcjohn1 (Reply #12)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
114. I hope Warner has little credibility with Sanders supporters.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jun 2016

He is a hard core religious conservative.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
13. This is absolutely ridiculous
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jun 2016

I guess losing a statewide race 65-35 makes you very bitter. Nina Turner needs to have several seats.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
14. Dear Ms. Turner:
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jun 2016

Sen Warren has done more to advance progressive causes than you ever thought of. Get the fuck off your high horse.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
111. Yes, "the angry black woman"...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:10 PM
Jun 2016

Post after post of Hillary supporters attacking s black woman for feeling the Warren should have helped to Bernie out. It's her feeling on the situation. But now, y'all are attacking a woman, a progressive, a Democrat, the only adult in the room in Nevada that calmed the crowd a bit after Boxer ruled everyone up... Sure, talk about busses and running people over. BTW, what do you say to people when they rant about Michelle Obama being an "angry black woman"? Do you realize you are all being sexist and racist at this point? Does it even relate that if someone mentions that they don't enjoy listening to Clintons voice or that her wardrobe stylist ought to be fired, they are sexist pigs. Does the word hypocrisy mean anything?

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
138. So, it's ok to be sexist and disgusting to a woman if they don't fit your mold?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jun 2016

It's ok to have opinions, as long as they are approved for "civil society" based on elite men who rule the world's expressed opinions and ideas of what is ok and what is not.

You may not agree with what they are saying, but to attack in a sexist or bigoted manner is simply disgusting. And you really didn't believe your own hype about supposed Bernie Bro's, you were just using sexism and a means to politic or shut down discussion... All of which many women who have supported Bernie have said since the beginning, attacking Bernie, who literally exclaims proudly he's a Feminist at his rallies and receives loud cheers for, is not the sexist. And the real sexist is Donald Trump... So, is the country going to believe you when you equated Bernie to Trump? Or will they just say, you're trying to play the "woman card" as a political meme?

oasis

(49,334 posts)
145. "Sexism" "bigotry. You insist on making unsubstantiated claims.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jun 2016

I've read every post on this thread and have seen nothing that measures up to your accusations.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
173. I think the entire post is attacking a strong, progressive Democratic woman
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jun 2016

because she believes that Warren should have stood up for the progressive candidate and rallied under the Progressive banner. I actually believe many of our "good progressives" were entirely too timid or acting politically "expedient" in coming out for the "establishment" candidate.

If anything, Bernie has shown that we really don't need those corporate donors. And if you stand with the people and try to make govt work for all the people, the people will support you. It's been extremely disheartening to see how many "progressive's" didn't trust the American People. Or that they couldn't see just how desperate Americans have become? The Republicans chose Donald Trump, a populist, anti-establishment ass hat that has absolutely no experience in anything political, as their presidential contender. On the "left", a 74 yr old Jewish man who describes his "independent" status as democratic socialist, and is wildly popular with 45 and younger.

It almost happened. (The establishment had the Clinton machine, dirty tricks, election fraud (and I'm not accusing directly Clinton, rather many people and systems in place that disenfranchises the voter along with unverifiable voting machines that didn't match very well with exit polls and the last few primaries refused to run those polls because people were catching on), and ultimately the dirty press influencing the CA race, and now Obama and the rest of the crew coming out to "finish" Sander's and the idea of political revolution off the stage... Couldn't wait another week. Had to press the American people into accepting the status quo, no matter how flawed that candidate is.

Seriously, I keep thinking, what happens if the Republicans continue building their negative narrative against Trump (because the elite cannot control his narrative and he's swinging to the populist left at the moment), they may actually replace him. They won't do it before the Dems have their convention and put Clinton in charge. If that happens, "Not Trump", doesn't have a lot of sway with the Independents that have NO party loyalty and make up 43% of all Americans at this point.

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
186. Again, not what I said
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:00 PM
Jun 2016

I voted for Bernie but thought she was a poor spokesperson for him. I thought Jeff Weaver was a poor spokesperson too. Just an opinion. But you obviously have some issues that you need to work out. Good luck with that.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
194. I think dismissing my point of view of the entire posting thread
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jun 2016

that is attacking a Democratic Party member is wrong. Many posts are directly making sexist and biggoted remarks. And saying I have "issues" is a personal attack... But I'll leave the hypocrisy alone. Let people judge the merits of the conversation. I haven't been keeping close attention to the entire thread, but at the beginning, no one said, "I think she was a poor surrogate for Bernie". And now, we throw in Weaver.

The original post attacked her for being "bitter" because she expressed her displeasure in Warren not endorsing Bernie or helping him out early on. Subsequently, Nina became the "angry female" (typically when someone calls a black female "angry", we call them out on a bigoted tone). Other posters used language that is sexist, in my view, to knock her down. However, the original intent on the posting thread was to make a dig at Nina. Called her "bitter". No one discussed how they felt she wasn't a good surrogate or gave details as to why (and I'm not sure why they would considering it was a post disparaging her remarks of disappointment in E. Warren).

But thanks for telling me I have "issues"... Guess it's a woman thing, since I'm just one of those stupid progressive types.

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
251. I think attacking me for the opinion of others is wrong.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:38 AM
Jun 2016

Again you seem to have some issues that you need help with. Good luck that.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
209. You are the only one mentioning her color. Trying to twist it into a racial issue.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:04 PM
Jun 2016

And BTW, NINA isn't immune from being angry just because she is a woman of color.

You are really weaving a long and tall tale - rambling on and on.

Are you angry and bitter too?

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
259. Good for you
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 11:35 AM
Jun 2016

But if you want to read real sexist comments, try Elizabeth Warren's facebook page and the comments from Bernie supporters.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
19. There is no equivalence in clout between Nina Turner and Elizabeth Warren
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:59 AM
Jun 2016

Not even close. This is a serious mistake on her part, I think.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
30. Possibly so in this election cycle. But there will be many more like her in the cycles to come. So
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:04 AM
Jun 2016

better get used to it. Clinton looks like a dinosaur to the candidates coming up through the ranks.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
38. Possibly so in this election cycle. But there will be many more like her in the cycles to come. So
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jun 2016

better get used to it. Clinton looks like a dinosaur to the candidates coming up through the ranks.

boston bean

(36,219 posts)
44. That is just not so. He has an absolute responsibility to rein in his campaign staff.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jun 2016

Sorry, but I 100% disagree with you on this.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
49. she's not staff, she's a voluntary supporter
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:15 AM
Jun 2016

his own staff tossed him under the bus for the Politico piece, so not clear that he can rein his staffers in.

 

disillusioned73

(2,872 posts)
21. Truth.. all points
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jun 2016

Last edited Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:54 AM - Edit history (1)

"“They’re gonna attack me for saying this, but I’m a truth-teller at this point,” Turner said."

clarification; not this part - "bitterly slams", any and all valid criticisms are painted as "bitter" & "angry"

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
61. Self-fulfilling prophecies are wonderfully validating.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jun 2016

Self-fulfilling prophecies are wonderfully validating.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
33. She's a sore loser lashing out at a liberal giant.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:06 AM
Jun 2016

Elizabeth Warren will still be going strong long after Nina Turner slinks back to obscurity.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
160. "Speak the truth" is itself a trite phrase
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:25 PM
Jun 2016

"Truth to power," "truth-teller," "telling it like it is" and other stupid little cliches. Notably, they're the same dumb shit a Trump says about himself - clear evidence for how the left is always outflanked and beaten by right wing rhetoric. God, how juvenile and annoying is somebody who says "I know this will be controversial, but I'm just a truth teller, you know?" PUKE. It's everybody's worst passive aggressive uncle spewing bullshit at the barbecue.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
32. Exaggerate much?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:04 AM
Jun 2016

Bitter really. Truth is not bitter. Truth is not attack. Truth is simply truth and Nina Turner is just stating truth. She did not "attack" Warren and it is perfectly okay to be "disappointed". Many are!

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
45. Thank god you got to use bitter on a woman .
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jun 2016

For a while there you only had Bernie to paint with the bitter brush. Bitter, bitter, bitter bitter, but do you know who is really bitter? Hill. Because she didn't think she needed to fight a real primary in order to named president! Bitter is not a word that I would use on Turner or Sanders. Committed or right minded, I can go with that!

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
193. She sure acts bitter. And why are women immune to being bitter??
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jun 2016

Are you trying to paint bitterness with a sexist brush now?

BITTER:


1. having a harsh, disagreeably acrid taste, like that of aspirin, quinine, wormwood, or aloes.


2. producing one of the four basic taste sensations; not sour, sweet, or salt.


3. hard to bear; grievous; distressful:
a bitter sorrow.


4. causing pain; piercing; stinging:
a bitter chill.


5. characterized by intense antagonism or hostility:
bitter hatred.


6. hard to admit or accept:
a bitter lesson.


7. resentful or cynical:
bitter words.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
197. This is hysterical! Six months ago it was deemed that bitter was a sexist term not to be used...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 07:36 PM
Jun 2016

...on Hill! I have truly lived long enough. Thank you!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
64. You appear to be conflating 'truth' and 'simply her opinion.'
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:26 AM
Jun 2016

You appear to be conflating 'truth' and 'simply her opinion.' Bias can do that-- part of the human condition.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
43. That's what I said yesterday. FFS, Trump is low-hanging fruit. Who wouldn't attack him?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:11 AM
Jun 2016

Now, attacking the warhawk policies of our govt is another story. That would get my applause.

BTW, Warren is my senator and I voted for her and will again. But it's simply no great feat to diss Trump. EVERY Dem should be doing that. Just like EVERY Dem should condemn institutionalized racism, militarized police, gun violence, offshoring of jobs, economic inequality, erosion of education, and our propaganda-only mainstream "news."

Turner is fantastic!

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
210. what did Warren do to deserve any attack from Bernie's side?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:09 PM
Jun 2016

Nothing.

Which is precisely the point.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
53. "Nina Turner, bitterly." You could have just stopped there and still been accurate.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:19 AM
Jun 2016

She seems intent on making it a real challenge to support her at any point in the future.

BeyondGeography

(39,351 posts)
54. She's a half-truth teller
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:19 AM
Jun 2016

Warren extended her takedown of Trump last night to the entire GOP in an incredibly powerful and effective way. From the standpoint of drawing distinctions between the parties, it was much better than anything Bernie said in a year's worth of campaigning.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
85. Turner's gratuitous trashing of Warren after that masterful speech tying Trump to the GOP
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:51 AM
Jun 2016

shows just what an amateur piker she is. Totally out of her league.

Sanders can only look on in envy, wishing he was capable of giving that speech.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
56. Policy-wise I'm an enthusiastic supporter
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:21 AM
Jun 2016

Politically, she's been very timid this primary season. Given the circumstances, staying neutral during the primary was just as helpful to Hillary as her endorsement would have been. I think Turner is stating the obvious and the vitriol from Clinton supporters towards her is just one more example of the seething hatred they have for anyone who dared to challenge the self annoyed one.

And Turner is not saying Warren should be attacking Hillary. Get real.

Blue_Adept

(6,393 posts)
72. There are a few Bernie supporters that are less than pleased with her as well
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:35 AM
Jun 2016

As a Bernie supporter and a Warren supporter, I preferred that she stayed out of it to let the two main personalities themselves engage in the primary.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
100. I don't read her that way.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jun 2016

And it's rich for a Hillary supporter to accuse a Bernie supporter of entitlement. And what's with the "angry black woman trope?"

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
57. She's right, and that is how Sanders' supporters feel.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:21 AM
Jun 2016

Who knows how many, but most from what I can tell.

I don't trust Warren much more than Hillary, if at all. Is Warren going to take back her criticism of Hillary flipflopping on the banckruptcy bill now? Now it's ok? All of a sudden it's aright because Trump is a boogie man? That's a little too convenient for me. He "just happened" to have Bill urge him to run. He "just happens" to drive voters to Hillary, and he "just happens" to provide an excuse for suspending ethics. I'll say again, how convenient!

I'm not buying any of it.

I see this as a trap for Bernie, and I hope he doesn't fall into it. Everybody who defends HRC is going to be tainted with her crimes when they come to light. The rest of them don't have much character to lose as it is, but Bernie does.

Nina Turner is right. Nina Turner is an excellent judge of character.

Demsrule86

(68,471 posts)
156. No Nina is foolish
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jun 2016

If she cared about any of the issues she would not use words that can only help Trump and hurt Hillary...and the same goes for you. What do you hope to accomplish by this bitter hatred? If you tell me Trump would not be the worst thing to happen to this country in anyone's lifetime...I will be forced to consider you a person who is blinded to the truth by bitterness and hate.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
200. I don't think you know what Sanders supporters think.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:19 PM
Jun 2016

That is the point in discussion. It's what Nina was talking about.

I think she's an expert on that subject. I think I'm an expert on that subject. I think other Sanders supporters are experts on that subject. But you, and most of the other posters in this thread, are NOT experts on this subject.

It's not for you to say what we think and how we feel, in precedence over what we say about it ourselves! I can't imagine what could possibly be more presumptuous than that.

And you have no business characterizing my state of mind. Expound on your own.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
226. My dad taught me a valuable lesson...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:52 PM
Jun 2016

An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less... Until they eventually know everything about nothing.

Especially if they call themselves one.

Have a nice evening.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
246. A post can be read one of two ways:
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:23 AM
Jun 2016

with an intention to get the point, or with an intention to not get the point. I think the latter is a waste of time.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
169. I agree.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jun 2016

I would have more respect if she endorsed either candidate earlier. Waiting on the sidelines and then backing the sure thing is well, weak sauce.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
58. This slam simply wasn't necessary.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:22 AM
Jun 2016

The fact that Nina Turner chose to say that about Elizabeth Warren shows the ineptitude of Bernie's campaign. Why burn bridges at this point?

Very petty comments. Very petty.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
59. The is getting to be like the French Revolution..
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jun 2016

The "revolution" has spun out of control and is beginning to devour itself.

sheshe2

(83,657 posts)
62. Warren stayed neutral.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:26 AM
Jun 2016
Turner said she and other Sanders supporters were disappointed that Warren, as one of the most high-profile progressive lawmakers, didn’t campaign for the Democratic challenger.


And Nina, Hillary was the Democratic challenger as well.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
63. Nina, Warren didn't endorse any Democratic candidate for the nomination. No one
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:26 AM
Jun 2016

"owned" her endorsement.

I wonder what Nina Turner is going to say when Bernie jumps on board and endorses Hillary?

ecstatic

(32,653 posts)
71. Warren wouldn't have swayed any HRC voters to Bernie. That's what Nina
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:31 AM
Jun 2016

and other bitter Bernie supporters fail to understand.

Nina is sounding more and more unhinged lately. What part of "You lost. Badly..." is so difficult to understand? They keep bringing up 2008... 2008 was nearly a tie in popular vote and pledged delegates. 2016 is not--Bernie got his ass kicked! He lost the popular vote by over 3.7 million votes!



DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
78. I suspect she was torn between Hillary's tenacity and Bernie's stance on some issues...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:47 AM
Jun 2016

I watched her on MSNBC with Rachel and what I took away was how in awe of Hillary's tenacity and persistence she is as am I

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
92. Did ANYONE in Congress campaign for Sanders? He had one -count it, ONE- Senate endorsement.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jun 2016

Face facts. For whatever reason, rightly or wrongly, Sanders is not well-liked among his colleagues. Oh, he's likable enough on an abstract level but when it comes to the personal...
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
185. Right. Senate "Democrats" roll their eyes at him because he refuses to deal with lobbyists
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jun 2016

What a dick, right? They roll their eyes when he goes on one of his tirades about helping the poor and creating universal health care and college. What a loon, amiright? Oh, but they need him to caucus with them to pass some watered down shitty bill? "He's a great Senate colleague." Bullshit artists all of them.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
189. Sometimes it's simply how you come across that turns people off.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:26 PM
Jun 2016

99.9% of us agree that we need to fund infrastructure, spend less on military, increase the minimum wage, expand Social Security, ensure women and minority rights, etc.

But the only way we will make progress is by working as a team, not by sitting on the floor listening to a guru lecture us. I sometimes think Sanders comes across like that to his colleagues, but that's just a guess on my part.

It should only be the message, not how it's delivered, but humans don't always act without emotion.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
104. I guess...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:02 PM
Jun 2016

it's an understandable reaction for someone with VP ambitions to see it go up in smoke. I'd give it a few weeks for her temper tantrum to play out.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
110. This shows a great lack of intelligence.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:07 PM
Jun 2016

“You don’t get any brownie points from me and other progressives for getting into a Twitter war with Mr. Donald Trump. That’s easy. But when the fight was hard for Sen. Bernie Sanders, where was Sen. Warren?”

Didn't Warren make many positive comments about Sanders throughout the primaries?

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
126. tina "truth teller" must never have researched bernie sanders history...probably wouldn't
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jun 2016

help her view of the "truth"

onenote

(42,602 posts)
130. I don't get Turner at all. I don't care that she switched from Clinton to Sanders
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:30 PM
Jun 2016

But I don't get the bitterness. Her views about Clinton weren't that negative, she just liked Sanders more.
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/11/nina_turner_changes_her_mind_o.html

And if anyone should understand that simply being the most progressive voice in a campaign doesn't mean you're the strongest candidate its should be Turner, who ran for Secretary of State in Ohio in 2014 and was clobbered by John Husted (a slimeball) by a 60 to 36 margin.

ismnotwasm

(41,967 posts)
132. That's very sad, you know?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jun 2016

It's so inconceivable that Warren prefers Hillary? Or, That by not endorsing anyone, she was giving Sanders all the strategic support she wanted to?

Those of us who followed the numbers knew the primary was decided a while back. I didn't think Sanders needed to drop out, but I knew Hillary was going to win. I had no fear about that--a lot of frustration--but no fear. Warren, who has a lot more information than I do, knew this as well. She shouldn't be chastised for wanting to defeat Republicans

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
133. It's very hard to take Ms. Turner seriously.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:44 PM
Jun 2016

After all, she, herself, waited until late in the primary to endorse Sanders - having been an avid Clinton supporter previously. Her new-found contempt for Clinton and, more so, for Warren is embarrassingly self-serving. Turner's only notable contribution since late last year has been to give birth to and accelerate her own irrelevancy.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
176. She endorsed in November 2015
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jun 2016

Months before the voting even started. She's not some Johnny come lately.

brooklynite

(94,363 posts)
140. Nina Turner has a choice...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jun 2016

(nb - I supported her campaign for Sec State in 2014 and have met with her twice)

She can drop the whining and have a future in Ohio politics...

Or, she cna stay a Berniecrat and disappear from people's radar.

 

Lazy Daisy

(928 posts)
146. Nothing bitter said
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jun 2016

And there was no slam. It is a statement of fact. Elizabeth Warren did not support Bernie.
I understand why she didn't, and on some points agree it was best she stay out of the fight.
I also understand why she just now gave her support to Hillary and agree it's what's best for Democrats fight to come.
But what Nina stated is the truth.


This constant whipping of Nina Turner is pathetic and wonder if she wasn't a black woman would you all be so venomous towards her? Is it because she's black and going against the majority of AA or because she's a woman and not supporting the female candidate?

Nina you're fantastic, don't let the harpies get you down.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
167. Why was Liz Warren obligated to campaign for Sanders?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jun 2016

I think that she liked both candidates and decided to stay neutral until the nominee was chosen. If the reverse had occurred, and Sanders had won the nomination, I don't think that any of Hillary's surrogates would have criticized Liz if she had endorsed him.


JCMach1

(27,553 posts)
148. Will she bitterly slam Sanders next week too when he endorses HRC?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:53 PM
Jun 2016

I think Sanders is next in line to be thrown under the bus.

pandr32

(11,562 posts)
151. Why would she have campained for Bernie?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jun 2016

Nina assumes a whole lot here and ignores much. For starters, Sen. Warren urged Hillary Clinton to run, not Bernie, and since when does Bernie own progress? The fact that Warren did not endorse Bernie, even after sustained heavy pressure speaks volumes.

tallahasseedem

(6,716 posts)
155. She's a FORMER State Senator
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:12 PM
Jun 2016

and a FAILED candidate for Secretary of State. We are supposed to care...why?

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
175. Hillary was a FAILED presidential candidate
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:43 PM
Jun 2016

Back in 2008. Just because one loses an election doesn't make their opinions irrelevant.

tallahasseedem

(6,716 posts)
181. There's a difference between failed presidential candidate
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jun 2016

and failed state secretary. The fact that you equate the two is sad.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
157. Turner may be technically right, but Warren likely saw the writing
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jun 2016

on the wall and knew her influence would be diminished by backing the loser.

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
179. I would support whoever HRC puts on the ticket
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders, Warren even Turner.
This is about Donald Trump or ANY and I say ANY republican the gop wants to throw at us.
They are pretty much all in the same sinking boat.



SALUTE THE GOP^^^^^

 

udbcrzy2

(891 posts)
182. Nina Turner has passion and is not afraid to speak the truth
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jun 2016

I have great respect for her. All of the negatives I hear about Trump could actually be said of the other opponent. Funny how that is working out.

 

timlot

(456 posts)
184. Nina Turner is still mad Bill Clinton didn't mention her at an Ohio state dinner...Very bitter lady.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:57 PM
Jun 2016

She was all ready to join "Ready for Hillary" and campaign for her, but Bill Clinton neglected to mention her name so now she all scorn.

[link:

?t=40|
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
192. Judging from the attitude that has permeated this board today
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:31 PM
Jun 2016

I have come to the conclusion that it is neither liberal nor democratic lately.

Go ahead and use it as a self-affirming "sounding-board".

When the lights go out, you can yell at the sun you see no more.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
196. Grow up, Nina
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 07:24 PM
Jun 2016

We all make choices as members of a party. You made yours, she made hers. When it's over you don't get to shame people for it.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
272. Priceless innit. Wonder if Angela Merkel, Indira Gandhi or Maggie Thatcher
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jun 2016

reacted like this. Doubt it. Whoa Nelly, Feel the Power! Payback time & final fulfillment? For what is anyone's guess.


 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
201. Warren endorsing Bernie would have been a game changer
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:22 PM
Jun 2016

Giving U.S. a real...perfect...female POTUS

and 16 years of similar...progressive... policy changes

Kall

(615 posts)
204. She's right.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:30 PM
Jun 2016

Do you have any idea how ridiculous it was to watch Elizabeth Warren rail against the evils of Wall Street, big donors & SuperPACs yesterday when she endorsed Hillary Clinton after her months-long silence? Sure missed the moment there.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
208. Totally
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jun 2016

And the constant barrage on him is going to make him the sympathetic figure to his voters and many others. Dems feel like they're being muscular with all of their bluster but it will likely serve to be the proverbial gun shot in the foot for them.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
212. Some Sanders supporters believe the Sanders base is monolithic
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:21 PM
Jun 2016

And it is by no means so united. When it's all done, upwards of 85% will support Hillary. But perceptions and group think are thick.

jaceaf

(89 posts)
213. Maybe Warren has always preferred Clinton
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:32 PM
Jun 2016

I don't think this is an impossible thought. Sanders isn't actually well liked by senators.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
239. She sure waited long enough to endorse. Although, I hear she agrees with a lot of HRC's foreign
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:04 AM
Jun 2016

policies and is for TPP with a few adjustments ...

aikoaiko

(34,163 posts)
218. not really a bitter slam but ymmv
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:29 PM
Jun 2016

sounded like a measured and reasonable critique given the hyperbolic love-fest of this week.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
221. Maybe Senator Warren just didn't think that Bernie had earned her endorsement.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:36 PM
Jun 2016

That doesn't mean that she hates him or that she doesn't agree with him on some issues.

Elizabeth Warren has earned the respect that she holds. And I have no doubt that she will be an outstanding surrogate for Secretary Clinton, just as she would have been for Senator Sanders if he had been our nominee.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
245. and It sure took Hillary long enough to earn it.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:25 AM
Jun 2016

about a day late and a dollar short. all three of them, imo.

TwilightZone

(25,428 posts)
255. Warren understands that a united front behind the presumptive nominee is more important than a temp
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jun 2016

bump in a primary that's effectively been over for months.

This isn't that complicated.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
263. temp bump = lol
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jun 2016

this isn't that complicated = another lol.

40 something years to disintegrate to this point is not that complicated.

TwilightZone

(25,428 posts)
264. You think endorsements in the primary mean anything to anyone?
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jun 2016

There is no doubt that Warren's decision to wait and then hammer the hell out of Trump will pay significantly more dividends come November. If you can't see that, you might want to come out from under your shell.

I know this may come as a shock, but some Democrats actually want the Democratic nominee to win the presidency.

Don't look now, genius, but you're the one living in the Twilight Zone.

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
223. Wow. The level of delusion! What utter bullshit.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:41 PM
Jun 2016

This Nina Turner woman oozes entitlement like she is 20. (Is she 20? I have no idea who she is. She could be 20 for all I know)

Since when is Sen. Warren obligated to support Bernie? Why is he entitled to her endorsement?

She did the right thing. She was neutral until it was a forgone conclusion. Duh. That was a no brainer.

Hillary is a colleague of hers too. You'd see that if you didn't have such blinders on.

Honestly, I hate this. I think this kind of delusion gives Bernie and his movement a bad name and I think there is much work to be done still.

BainsBane

(53,016 posts)
234. So Turner prefers Trump
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:32 AM
Jun 2016

That's her prerogative, but she shouldn't expect any Democrats to give a shit what she things. I'm sure the GOP is happy to have her on board.

It is interesting to see how little democracy or policy matters to people like her. It's not exactly a surprise, given the eagerness to abandon any semblance of principle during the campaign. I happen to think hatred of the a politician and the majority of voters who supported her a pretty ugly worldview, but some people need to hate in order to feel better about themselves. Those are problems outside the purview of any politician.

senseandsensibility

(16,933 posts)
238. Bitterly is a loaded term,
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:01 AM
Jun 2016

and it is subjective and unwarranted. A woman speaks her mind against Hillary? A woman of color? The horror.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
249. Go Nina Go!!
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:54 AM
Jun 2016

“They’re gonna attack me for saying this, but I’m a truth-teller at this point,” Turner said.

Right on, sister!

Let them attack you, it don't mean nothing!!

Just keep on keeping on!



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nina Turner bitterly slam...