2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNina Turner bitterly slams Elizabeth Warren.
Nina Turner said she didnt think Warren could woo Sanders supporters if Hillary Clinton chose her as running mate, saying the Massachusetts senator hadnt done enough to help her colleague from Vermont during his primary campaign, reported The Hill.
Its easy for Democrats to attack Mr. Trump, said Nina Turner, the former state senator from Ohio. You dont get any brownie points from me and other progressives for getting into a Twitter war with Mr. Donald Trump. Thats easy. But when the fight was hard for Sen. Bernie Sanders, where was Sen. Warren?
Turner said she and other Sanders supporters were disappointed that Warren, as one of the most high-profile progressive lawmakers, didnt campaign for the Democratic challenger.
Theyre gonna attack me for saying this, but Im a truth-teller at this point, Turner said.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/sanders-surrogate-blasts-elizabeth-warren-she-doesnt-get-brownie-points-for-slamming-trump/#.V1rJUdytcB5.facebook
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)#NinaNeedsAJob
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Then again we should be used to that, considering the unbelievable attacks she got from so called Democrats when she came out for Bernie in the first place.
Number23
(24,544 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... And doing so for no other reason than for vanity and pride. As she stokes the dying embers of Bernie's campaign to inflame resentment and irrational fear, she's missing an opportunity to be a bigger person. Clearly, she's not ready to move forward. either that, or she's just not thinking for herself, and is following someone else's lead.
Good one!
I guess ya'll know how to sow the discontent if you notice it "sow" easily.
Isn't that a very sexist attack. Just sayin
Phlem
(6,323 posts)which is different from "sow" and "so" and "SOE".
Didn't mean it as sexist? If you think "so", that's on you.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,323 posts)so exhausting.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)begin running for offices. The Sanders movement is not ending, it will be growing into an increasingly powerful force. And Nina is setting expectations for the next election cycle by stating that establishment Dems will have a much harder time manipulating those who might support them.
Demsrule86
(68,471 posts)There would be no reason to bother...that is what you pie in the sky folks don't get. The GOP would have three branches of government...and even if we got them all back, the courts would be stacked...five justices over 80.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)apcalc
(4,462 posts)Will be the left's version of the Tea party....a fringe movement going nowhere...
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)they even exist after this years convention.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Dem2
(8,166 posts)She needs to take a step back and re-evaluate, she isn't coming across as reasonable of late.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... when it came to being able to actually bring in new followers. My guess is that she (and other poorly-chosen surrogates) ended up solidifying the base, but turning off and driving away more people than were actually persuaded to join the flock.
Thank God for that! Good work, Nina ... and Killer Mike ... and Cornel ... and Susan. (As annoying and grating as they were, I suppose we all owe them a debt of gratitude.)
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Don't forget the "corporate whores" guy.
That was before Bernie needed the supers to win of course.
LiberalFighter
(50,789 posts)Never really cared for her when I saw her on the news during her election campaign in Ohio.
I suppose you are right that we should thank her and the others.
midnight
(26,624 posts)brooklynite
(94,363 posts)...they all were hits with the voters who were already Bernie fans; they didn't expand his pool of support.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)on TV what socialism is after she said it, or rambling, veteran grouch and banker Barney Frank, Gloria 'where the boyz are' Steinem flop, or the Nevada performer Boxer, no not at all. Millions of people welcomed Sanders surrogates and team who are sharp and effectively behind him all the way on issues of vital importance to Americans. Bernie's remarkable qualities and resonating message, and his campaign's supporters like Turner drew millions into the populist, progressive Sanders political revolution. The impact and growth of this movement will last for generations and the histories written about the period will credit his campaign as the most influential in decades.
Much was added to Bernie's campaign and rallies by Nina Turner, and the people love her. A truly powerful and energetic speaker who's also highly intelligent, charming and personable Turner inspired and motivated thousands of Americans, a natural gift that few politicians possess. She's also a real survivor, innate since youth, a leader who sands tall and speaks the truth, and a woman who receives the respect and love of many including her large family and loving husband and son. She'll continue to fight with success for progressive goals in years to come, know it.
Nina Turner Rouses Crowd, Shares Grandmother's Wisdom on Success in Life, The Three Bones- Wish, Jaw, Back.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)...but if what she added wasn't voters, it doesn't matter much.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Dem2
(8,166 posts)appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Dem2
(8,166 posts)How the hell did you expect someone to react when you accuse them of racism while using a ridiculous stereotype in the process ? You should be ashamed.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)and blatant. Don't try to game flip it on me. You need to get real.
Dem2
(8,166 posts)I see a person, you see race - pretty hypocritical if you ask me.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)least of all the credibility of the Bernie Campaign.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #52)
Post removed
840high
(17,196 posts)Demsrule86
(68,471 posts)BOB are not the majority. She will attract voters. Sour grapes much?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)She arrogantly claims to speak for all progressives. Truly a fools game.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)Awknid
(381 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,323 posts)But Turner did ha ha ha
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)There's something of the Fatal Attraction about her, or should that be Fatal Distraction ?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)political career is as good as over.
Who would want this highly aggressive, one-volume, one-note, loose cannon working on their campaign? Totally lacking in political savvy.
OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)she blows up, you'd expect it based on what she said about Elizabeth Warren. If she DOESN'T blow up (Sanders made a special effort to thank her personally for her support), then she's a hypocrite.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)She stood up for the people of her district, mostly working class and poor and did a fine job in the blood red Ohio legislature. She spoke truth to power then as she does now.
It surprises and saddens me to hear Dems disparage her without knowing how she went to the mat for us.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)I wonder if she displayed the same vehement manner and aggressive rhetoric back then?
Or, did her surrogacy for Sanders bring out an especially bellocose streak?
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)She decided to run for Secretary of State instead. Unfortunately, she fell short of victory.
FloridaBlues
(4,007 posts)Ever since she lost her election she has gotten rather negitive. At some point Bernie people need to realize bashing other progressives won't help his revolution. Or what ever soap box she hope to stand on from here out
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)others, like me, were thinking. It's not bashing when it's a spot on fact.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)was a state senator from Ohio and might run for mayor of Cleveland. She'll be just fine and doesn't have Fatal Anything. But others might.
Jackilope
(819 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)for speaking her mind?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Or is she just some randomly chosen citizen-on-the-street giving an impromptu rant on camera?
She's a total self-absorbed amateur... completely unprofessional... with spokespersons like Nina (and the other high-profile ones that Bernie relied upon) it's little wonder that he had difficulty in attracting more support.
Based on her performance here (and throughout) it's clear to be that Bernie could have done better. She's was no asset to his active campaign, and she's doing nobody any favors (not even Bernie) with her current sour attitude.
You guys crack me up sometimes.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)If I'd said "shrill" or "harpy" or "hag" any of the other words that have often been permitted by juries when used to describe Hillary, then perhaps you'd have a point.
Clearly you'd rather avoid talking about my observations and points... so perhaps it's best of you go ahead and alert on my comment. Maybe you'll get a sympathetic jury that agrees with you.
Oh brother ... you guys are something else!
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)Duly noted.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)Really? Trying to attach yourself to a popular icon, somehow makes you popular too?
Is that what you're aiming at?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)apcalc
(4,462 posts)A group of all men, all women, or mixed...don't get excited by the term!
" what have you guys been doing?"
" see you guys later"
It is a very common usage. Everyone says it.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)The poster "duly noted" that I wrote "you guys".
They really are petty and persnickety, aren't they? Here's what I imagine:
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And I will now join them in saying I "duly note" that you said "you guys".
I'm not sure why but I'll be damned if I'm not going to "duly note" it.
Demsrule86
(68,471 posts)Bernie has lost. Nina makes herself look foolish. What possible difference can it make if someone endorses Hillary Clinton? If Nina was considering what is best for this country and not her own disapointment, she would want to help Secretary Clinton win. The progressive movement is toast if Trump gets in and picks five justices for the Supreme Court. Time for folks to put on their big boy and big girl pants and move on.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)No. For her arrogant and bitter attitude.
I'll add - she also has a BIG and LOUD mouth!
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Clinton needs tightly controlled, protected and staged affairs with very limited people. It's obvious she's unable to greet and mix with groups, crowds or handle close up exchanges that are necessary for politicians.
At this atypical event how uncomfortable and fearful she is walking through a crowd with noise and music even before being asked a question. Not the person I recall and saw. Clearly only well prepared, safe occasions now and that's sad.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)where Nina Turner is falsely accused of numerous personally vile and loaded characteristics- 'angry, aggressive, arrogant, unreasonable, vehement, loud and big mouth, needs to be reined in'. Including vicious comparisons with the psychologically deranged, violent animal killer Glenn Close played in the movie 'Fatal Attraction', more. Way beyond malicious, it's impermissible.
Clinton's immediate reaction of shouting and hostility over a a question in a crowd was startling and intense, a complete emotional outburst, particularly forcing her hand and finger into the woman's chest. That kind of flash anger and public display of irrationality and aggression summons matters of cause, temperament and more.
Nina Turner has been scrutinized and smeared here for merely saying what others don't like or agree with. And the attacks on her profession, motives and background as a result are totally unjustified and reprehensible, all things considered.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Nina is bitter and hostile every single time I see her. Always shouting and whining about something. People are bound to notice.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)in the same field and fight- politics, behave and carry themselves at public campaign events then I can't help you.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Unbelievable.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Progressive voters are going to take over the next several election cycles and all the bullshit artists that have been selling us a bill of goods as candidates and then calling us "r**ards" the way Rahm Emanuel did go be put out to pasture where they belong. Nina Turner speaks truth to power and we, the working poor are truly thankful for her.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)in November?
It is obvious that many Sanders supporters want Clinton to lose in November, even if it results in a Trump presidency.
Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)oh lordy lordy lordy lordy!
metroins
(2,550 posts)boston bean
(36,219 posts)to be tossed under:
LiberalFighter
(50,789 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)boston bean
(36,219 posts)Wonder if Bernie feels like she does?? Doesnt she have some official capacity with his campaign?
LexVegas
(6,031 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)she'd go where the corporate cash is.
The GOP would probably trip all over themselves for a black woman to be their spokesperson.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Oh well, Bernie's going to do the right thing even if some of his supporters are still stuck in the past
BootinUp
(47,085 posts)kcjohn1
(751 posts)Warner has little credibility with Sanders supporters.
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)MineralMan
(146,262 posts)their first choice to run. I think you are incorrect in your assessment.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)Many supposed progressives heroes showed their true colors and how they were all talk, but were in reality establishment hacks.
I wouldn't put her in that category because she at least stayed neutral. However my point is that many Sanders supporters rightly feel she was not in the trenches with them and as such she will not be a figure that is going to be able convince them how great Hillary is and get them onboard
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)emulatorloo
(44,071 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)emulatorloo
(44,071 posts)appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Response to kcjohn1 (Reply #12)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He is a hard core religious conservative.
oasis
(49,334 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)I guess losing a statewide race 65-35 makes you very bitter. Nina Turner needs to have several seats.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Sen Warren has done more to advance progressive causes than you ever thought of. Get the fuck off your high horse.
OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)She comes off as way too angry and arrogant.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)You really wanna play that card??
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)No need to get your feathers ruffled.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Post after post of Hillary supporters attacking s black woman for feeling the Warren should have helped to Bernie out. It's her feeling on the situation. But now, y'all are attacking a woman, a progressive, a Democrat, the only adult in the room in Nevada that calmed the crowd a bit after Boxer ruled everyone up... Sure, talk about busses and running people over. BTW, what do you say to people when they rant about Michelle Obama being an "angry black woman"? Do you realize you are all being sexist and racist at this point? Does it even relate that if someone mentions that they don't enjoy listening to Clintons voice or that her wardrobe stylist ought to be fired, they are sexist pigs. Does the word hypocrisy mean anything?
oasis
(49,334 posts)glowing
(12,233 posts)It's ok to have opinions, as long as they are approved for "civil society" based on elite men who rule the world's expressed opinions and ideas of what is ok and what is not.
You may not agree with what they are saying, but to attack in a sexist or bigoted manner is simply disgusting. And you really didn't believe your own hype about supposed Bernie Bro's, you were just using sexism and a means to politic or shut down discussion... All of which many women who have supported Bernie have said since the beginning, attacking Bernie, who literally exclaims proudly he's a Feminist at his rallies and receives loud cheers for, is not the sexist. And the real sexist is Donald Trump... So, is the country going to believe you when you equated Bernie to Trump? Or will they just say, you're trying to play the "woman card" as a political meme?
oasis
(49,334 posts)I've read every post on this thread and have seen nothing that measures up to your accusations.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Dismissive, sexist, and bigoted..
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)So please don't try to put words in my mouth. It's intellectually dishonest.
glowing
(12,233 posts)because she believes that Warren should have stood up for the progressive candidate and rallied under the Progressive banner. I actually believe many of our "good progressives" were entirely too timid or acting politically "expedient" in coming out for the "establishment" candidate.
If anything, Bernie has shown that we really don't need those corporate donors. And if you stand with the people and try to make govt work for all the people, the people will support you. It's been extremely disheartening to see how many "progressive's" didn't trust the American People. Or that they couldn't see just how desperate Americans have become? The Republicans chose Donald Trump, a populist, anti-establishment ass hat that has absolutely no experience in anything political, as their presidential contender. On the "left", a 74 yr old Jewish man who describes his "independent" status as democratic socialist, and is wildly popular with 45 and younger.
It almost happened. (The establishment had the Clinton machine, dirty tricks, election fraud (and I'm not accusing directly Clinton, rather many people and systems in place that disenfranchises the voter along with unverifiable voting machines that didn't match very well with exit polls and the last few primaries refused to run those polls because people were catching on), and ultimately the dirty press influencing the CA race, and now Obama and the rest of the crew coming out to "finish" Sander's and the idea of political revolution off the stage... Couldn't wait another week. Had to press the American people into accepting the status quo, no matter how flawed that candidate is.
Seriously, I keep thinking, what happens if the Republicans continue building their negative narrative against Trump (because the elite cannot control his narrative and he's swinging to the populist left at the moment), they may actually replace him. They won't do it before the Dems have their convention and put Clinton in charge. If that happens, "Not Trump", doesn't have a lot of sway with the Independents that have NO party loyalty and make up 43% of all Americans at this point.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)I voted for Bernie but thought she was a poor spokesperson for him. I thought Jeff Weaver was a poor spokesperson too. Just an opinion. But you obviously have some issues that you need to work out. Good luck with that.
glowing
(12,233 posts)that is attacking a Democratic Party member is wrong. Many posts are directly making sexist and biggoted remarks. And saying I have "issues" is a personal attack... But I'll leave the hypocrisy alone. Let people judge the merits of the conversation. I haven't been keeping close attention to the entire thread, but at the beginning, no one said, "I think she was a poor surrogate for Bernie". And now, we throw in Weaver.
The original post attacked her for being "bitter" because she expressed her displeasure in Warren not endorsing Bernie or helping him out early on. Subsequently, Nina became the "angry female" (typically when someone calls a black female "angry", we call them out on a bigoted tone). Other posters used language that is sexist, in my view, to knock her down. However, the original intent on the posting thread was to make a dig at Nina. Called her "bitter". No one discussed how they felt she wasn't a good surrogate or gave details as to why (and I'm not sure why they would considering it was a post disparaging her remarks of disappointment in E. Warren).
But thanks for telling me I have "issues"... Guess it's a woman thing, since I'm just one of those stupid progressive types.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)Again you seem to have some issues that you need help with. Good luck that.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)And BTW, NINA isn't immune from being angry just because she is a woman of color.
You are really weaving a long and tall tale - rambling on and on.
Are you angry and bitter too?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Yeah, who is making sexist remarks now?
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)I never mentioned anything about her being a woman. You did.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)But if you want to read real sexist comments, try Elizabeth Warren's facebook page and the comments from Bernie supporters.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)Anyone regardless of sex can be angry and arrogant.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)I was just making an observation.
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)JFC.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)MineralMan
(146,262 posts)Not even close. This is a serious mistake on her part, I think.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)better get used to it. Clinton looks like a dinosaur to the candidates coming up through the ranks.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)better get used to it. Clinton looks like a dinosaur to the candidates coming up through the ranks.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)boston bean
(36,219 posts)Sorry, but I 100% disagree with you on this.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)his own staff tossed him under the bus for the Politico piece, so not clear that he can rein his staffers in.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)But you do you.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:54 AM - Edit history (1)
"Theyre gonna attack me for saying this, but Im a truth-teller at this point, Turner said."
clarification; not this part - "bitterly slams", any and all valid criticisms are painted as "bitter" & "angry"
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Self-fulfilling prophecies are wonderfully validating.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Elizabeth Warren will still be going strong long after Nina Turner slinks back to obscurity.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)"Truth to power," "truth-teller," "telling it like it is" and other stupid little cliches. Notably, they're the same dumb shit a Trump says about himself - clear evidence for how the left is always outflanked and beaten by right wing rhetoric. God, how juvenile and annoying is somebody who says "I know this will be controversial, but I'm just a truth teller, you know?" PUKE. It's everybody's worst passive aggressive uncle spewing bullshit at the barbecue.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)The depth of thought around here is frighteningly shallow. You are spot on!
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)RandySF
(58,511 posts)Sounds angry that her free ride is over. Back to obscurity she goes.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Bitter really. Truth is not bitter. Truth is not attack. Truth is simply truth and Nina Turner is just stating truth. She did not "attack" Warren and it is perfectly okay to be "disappointed". Many are!
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)For a while there you only had Bernie to paint with the bitter brush. Bitter, bitter, bitter bitter, but do you know who is really bitter? Hill. Because she didn't think she needed to fight a real primary in order to named president! Bitter is not a word that I would use on Turner or Sanders. Committed or right minded, I can go with that!
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Are you trying to paint bitterness with a sexist brush now?
BITTER:
1. having a harsh, disagreeably acrid taste, like that of aspirin, quinine, wormwood, or aloes.
2. producing one of the four basic taste sensations; not sour, sweet, or salt.
3. hard to bear; grievous; distressful:
a bitter sorrow.
4. causing pain; piercing; stinging:
a bitter chill.
5. characterized by intense antagonism or hostility:
bitter hatred.
6. hard to admit or accept:
a bitter lesson.
7. resentful or cynical:
bitter words.
peace13
(11,076 posts)...on Hill! I have truly lived long enough. Thank you!
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You appear to be conflating 'truth' and 'simply her opinion.' Bias can do that-- part of the human condition.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,944 posts)...now "burning bridges" works, to Nina?
Stallion
(6,473 posts)nm
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Now, attacking the warhawk policies of our govt is another story. That would get my applause.
BTW, Warren is my senator and I voted for her and will again. But it's simply no great feat to diss Trump. EVERY Dem should be doing that. Just like EVERY Dem should condemn institutionalized racism, militarized police, gun violence, offshoring of jobs, economic inequality, erosion of education, and our propaganda-only mainstream "news."
Turner is fantastic!
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I have to exit this thread and shower.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)DJ13
(23,671 posts)Nothing.
Which is precisely the point.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)She seems intent on making it a real challenge to support her at any point in the future.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)Warren extended her takedown of Trump last night to the entire GOP in an incredibly powerful and effective way. From the standpoint of drawing distinctions between the parties, it was much better than anything Bernie said in a year's worth of campaigning.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)shows just what an amateur piker she is. Totally out of her league.
Sanders can only look on in envy, wishing he was capable of giving that speech.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)Politically, she's been very timid this primary season. Given the circumstances, staying neutral during the primary was just as helpful to Hillary as her endorsement would have been. I think Turner is stating the obvious and the vitriol from Clinton supporters towards her is just one more example of the seething hatred they have for anyone who dared to challenge the self annoyed one.
And Turner is not saying Warren should be attacking Hillary. Get real.
Blue_Adept
(6,393 posts)As a Bernie supporter and a Warren supporter, I preferred that she stayed out of it to let the two main personalities themselves engage in the primary.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)And it's rich for a Hillary supporter to accuse a Bernie supporter of entitlement. And what's with the "angry black woman trope?"
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Who knows how many, but most from what I can tell.
I don't trust Warren much more than Hillary, if at all. Is Warren going to take back her criticism of Hillary flipflopping on the banckruptcy bill now? Now it's ok? All of a sudden it's aright because Trump is a boogie man? That's a little too convenient for me. He "just happened" to have Bill urge him to run. He "just happens" to drive voters to Hillary, and he "just happens" to provide an excuse for suspending ethics. I'll say again, how convenient!
I'm not buying any of it.
I see this as a trap for Bernie, and I hope he doesn't fall into it. Everybody who defends HRC is going to be tainted with her crimes when they come to light. The rest of them don't have much character to lose as it is, but Bernie does.
Nina Turner is right. Nina Turner is an excellent judge of character.
Demsrule86
(68,471 posts)If she cared about any of the issues she would not use words that can only help Trump and hurt Hillary...and the same goes for you. What do you hope to accomplish by this bitter hatred? If you tell me Trump would not be the worst thing to happen to this country in anyone's lifetime...I will be forced to consider you a person who is blinded to the truth by bitterness and hate.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)That is the point in discussion. It's what Nina was talking about.
I think she's an expert on that subject. I think I'm an expert on that subject. I think other Sanders supporters are experts on that subject. But you, and most of the other posters in this thread, are NOT experts on this subject.
It's not for you to say what we think and how we feel, in precedence over what we say about it ourselves! I can't imagine what could possibly be more presumptuous than that.
And you have no business characterizing my state of mind. Expound on your own.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less... Until they eventually know everything about nothing.
Especially if they call themselves one.
Have a nice evening.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)with an intention to get the point, or with an intention to not get the point. I think the latter is a waste of time.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)I would have more respect if she endorsed either candidate earlier. Waiting on the sidelines and then backing the sure thing is well, weak sauce.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)The fact that Nina Turner chose to say that about Elizabeth Warren shows the ineptitude of Bernie's campaign. Why burn bridges at this point?
Very petty comments. Very petty.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)The "revolution" has spun out of control and is beginning to devour itself.
sheshe2
(83,657 posts)And Nina, Hillary was the Democratic challenger as well.
still_one
(92,061 posts)"owned" her endorsement.
I wonder what Nina Turner is going to say when Bernie jumps on board and endorses Hillary?
ecstatic
(32,653 posts)and other bitter Bernie supporters fail to understand.
Nina is sounding more and more unhinged lately. What part of "You lost. Badly..." is so difficult to understand? They keep bringing up 2008... 2008 was nearly a tie in popular vote and pledged delegates. 2016 is not--Bernie got his ass kicked! He lost the popular vote by over 3.7 million votes!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)I watched her on MSNBC with Rachel and what I took away was how in awe of Hillary's tenacity and persistence she is as am I
Tarc
(10,472 posts)WHOOPS!
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Face facts. For whatever reason, rightly or wrongly, Sanders is not well-liked among his colleagues. Oh, he's likable enough on an abstract level but when it comes to the personal...
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)What a dick, right? They roll their eyes when he goes on one of his tirades about helping the poor and creating universal health care and college. What a loon, amiright? Oh, but they need him to caucus with them to pass some watered down shitty bill? "He's a great Senate colleague." Bullshit artists all of them.
randome
(34,845 posts)99.9% of us agree that we need to fund infrastructure, spend less on military, increase the minimum wage, expand Social Security, ensure women and minority rights, etc.
But the only way we will make progress is by working as a team, not by sitting on the floor listening to a guru lecture us. I sometimes think Sanders comes across like that to his colleagues, but that's just a guess on my part.
It should only be the message, not how it's delivered, but humans don't always act without emotion.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)These people really need to get over themselves.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)All demagogues claim they are truth-tellers. Trump does.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)yellowcanine
(35,694 posts)Spite, not truth telling.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)it's an understandable reaction for someone with VP ambitions to see it go up in smoke. I'd give it a few weeks for her temper tantrum to play out.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)You dont get any brownie points from me and other progressives for getting into a Twitter war with Mr. Donald Trump. Thats easy. But when the fight was hard for Sen. Bernie Sanders, where was Sen. Warren?
Didn't Warren make many positive comments about Sanders throughout the primaries?
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)help her view of the "truth"
onenote
(42,602 posts)But I don't get the bitterness. Her views about Clinton weren't that negative, she just liked Sanders more.
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/11/nina_turner_changes_her_mind_o.html
And if anyone should understand that simply being the most progressive voice in a campaign doesn't mean you're the strongest candidate its should be Turner, who ran for Secretary of State in Ohio in 2014 and was clobbered by John Husted (a slimeball) by a 60 to 36 margin.
oasis
(49,334 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,967 posts)It's so inconceivable that Warren prefers Hillary? Or, That by not endorsing anyone, she was giving Sanders all the strategic support she wanted to?
Those of us who followed the numbers knew the primary was decided a while back. I didn't think Sanders needed to drop out, but I knew Hillary was going to win. I had no fear about that--a lot of frustration--but no fear. Warren, who has a lot more information than I do, knew this as well. She shouldn't be chastised for wanting to defeat Republicans
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)After all, she, herself, waited until late in the primary to endorse Sanders - having been an avid Clinton supporter previously. Her new-found contempt for Clinton and, more so, for Warren is embarrassingly self-serving. Turner's only notable contribution since late last year has been to give birth to and accelerate her own irrelevancy.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)Months before the voting even started. She's not some Johnny come lately.
yardwork
(61,539 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)brooklynite
(94,363 posts)(nb - I supported her campaign for Sec State in 2014 and have met with her twice)
She can drop the whining and have a future in Ohio politics...
Or, she cna stay a Berniecrat and disappear from people's radar.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)And there was no slam. It is a statement of fact. Elizabeth Warren did not support Bernie.
I understand why she didn't, and on some points agree it was best she stay out of the fight.
I also understand why she just now gave her support to Hillary and agree it's what's best for Democrats fight to come.
But what Nina stated is the truth.
This constant whipping of Nina Turner is pathetic and wonder if she wasn't a black woman would you all be so venomous towards her? Is it because she's black and going against the majority of AA or because she's a woman and not supporting the female candidate?
Nina you're fantastic, don't let the harpies get you down.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)I think that she liked both candidates and decided to stay neutral until the nominee was chosen. If the reverse had occurred, and Sanders had won the nomination, I don't think that any of Hillary's surrogates would have criticized Liz if she had endorsed him.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)JCMach1
(27,553 posts)I think Sanders is next in line to be thrown under the bus.
Peacetrain
(22,872 posts)pandr32
(11,562 posts)Nina assumes a whole lot here and ignores much. For starters, Sen. Warren urged Hillary Clinton to run, not Bernie, and since when does Bernie own progress? The fact that Warren did not endorse Bernie, even after sustained heavy pressure speaks volumes.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)and a FAILED candidate for Secretary of State. We are supposed to care...why?
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)Back in 2008. Just because one loses an election doesn't make their opinions irrelevant.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)and failed state secretary. The fact that you equate the two is sad.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)on the wall and knew her influence would be diminished by backing the loser.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Turner just sounds bitter.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)MFM008
(19,803 posts)Sanders, Warren even Turner.
This is about Donald Trump or ANY and I say ANY republican the gop wants to throw at us.
They are pretty much all in the same sinking boat.
SALUTE THE GOP^^^^^
udbcrzy2
(891 posts)I have great respect for her. All of the negatives I hear about Trump could actually be said of the other opponent. Funny how that is working out.
timlot
(456 posts)She was all ready to join "Ready for Hillary" and campaign for her, but Bill Clinton neglected to mention her name so now she all scorn.
[link:
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I have come to the conclusion that it is neither liberal nor democratic lately.
Go ahead and use it as a self-affirming "sounding-board".
When the lights go out, you can yell at the sun you see no more.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)We all make choices as members of a party. You made yours, she made hers. When it's over you don't get to shame people for it.
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)We're electing a president here, not a messiah.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)reacted like this. Doubt it. Whoa Nelly, Feel the Power! Payback time & final fulfillment? For what is anyone's guess.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Giving U.S. a real...perfect...female POTUS
and 16 years of similar...progressive... policy changes
Kall
(615 posts)Do you have any idea how ridiculous it was to watch Elizabeth Warren rail against the evils of Wall Street, big donors & SuperPACs yesterday when she endorsed Hillary Clinton after her months-long silence? Sure missed the moment there.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)And the constant barrage on him is going to make him the sympathetic figure to his voters and many others. Dems feel like they're being muscular with all of their bluster but it will likely serve to be the proverbial gun shot in the foot for them.
Gman
(24,780 posts)And it is by no means so united. When it's all done, upwards of 85% will support Hillary. But perceptions and group think are thick.
jaceaf
(89 posts)I don't think this is an impossible thought. Sanders isn't actually well liked by senators.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)policies and is for TPP with a few adjustments ...
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)It would seem pretty clear.
sarae
(3,284 posts)aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)sounded like a measured and reasonable critique given the hyperbolic love-fest of this week.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)That doesn't mean that she hates him or that she doesn't agree with him on some issues.
Elizabeth Warren has earned the respect that she holds. And I have no doubt that she will be an outstanding surrogate for Secretary Clinton, just as she would have been for Senator Sanders if he had been our nominee.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)about a day late and a dollar short. all three of them, imo.
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)bump in a primary that's effectively been over for months.
This isn't that complicated.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)this isn't that complicated = another lol.
40 something years to disintegrate to this point is not that complicated.
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)There is no doubt that Warren's decision to wait and then hammer the hell out of Trump will pay significantly more dividends come November. If you can't see that, you might want to come out from under your shell.
I know this may come as a shock, but some Democrats actually want the Democratic nominee to win the presidency.
Don't look now, genius, but you're the one living in the Twilight Zone.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)This Nina Turner woman oozes entitlement like she is 20. (Is she 20? I have no idea who she is. She could be 20 for all I know)
Since when is Sen. Warren obligated to support Bernie? Why is he entitled to her endorsement?
She did the right thing. She was neutral until it was a forgone conclusion. Duh. That was a no brainer.
Hillary is a colleague of hers too. You'd see that if you didn't have such blinders on.
Honestly, I hate this. I think this kind of delusion gives Bernie and his movement a bad name and I think there is much work to be done still.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)That's her prerogative, but she shouldn't expect any Democrats to give a shit what she things. I'm sure the GOP is happy to have her on board.
It is interesting to see how little democracy or policy matters to people like her. It's not exactly a surprise, given the eagerness to abandon any semblance of principle during the campaign. I happen to think hatred of the a politician and the majority of voters who supported her a pretty ugly worldview, but some people need to hate in order to feel better about themselves. Those are problems outside the purview of any politician.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)senseandsensibility
(16,933 posts)and it is subjective and unwarranted. A woman speaks her mind against Hillary? A woman of color? The horror.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Theyre gonna attack me for saying this, but Im a truth-teller at this point, Turner said.
Right on, sister!
Let them attack you, it don't mean nothing!!
Just keep on keeping on!