2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA side note on Powell’s use of personal email
Snip
A side note on Powells use of personal email
Clinton has defended her behavior by explaining that Colin Powell also used a personal email address for State Department business. This is an incredibly misleading claim, as the IG report reveals. The secure system the State Department uses was put in place during Powells first year there. The system was so primitive that it only allowed users to correspond with people within the agency. To contact anyone outside the agency, one had to use a different medium of communication. Powell used personal email which is different than a personal server to communicate outside the agency. He had a laptop with a separate line on his desk that he referred to as the unclassified line. Sounds a bit more responsible, no?
By the time Clinton reached the State Department, the system and related policies protecting security were far more sophisticated. This was partially due to previous cyberattacks.
https://medium.com/soapbox-dc/12-red-flags-in-clintons-email-setup-da8966760f7d#.ic77m4azz
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Censorship is alive and well
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)are a much better place for this kind of opinion piece
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Facts are not left or right.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Some are above the laws of us mere normal people.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)from Breitbart would have realized by now
Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #15)
randome This message was self-deleted by its author.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,179 posts)Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)in a progressive-free zone.
Oh, I could stick around, but I'm not a big fan of suppression of progressive, liberal thought and activism. If I had wanted that I would have joined the freepers a long time ago.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)any related acts that occurred prior to 06/12/06.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)It will be a big Hillary group echo chamber
DCBob
(24,689 posts)because the FBI will be focusing on was there any criminal activity and criminal intent. She may have broken some rules and regs and may have mishandled some classified information by mistake but its becoming clear there was no crime committed.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)athena
(4,187 posts)People who focus on this e-mail controversy must be superhuman and never make any mistakes in anything they do.
randome
(34,845 posts)If I can't trust self-proclaimed 'experts' on DU, who can I trust?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
randome
(34,845 posts)Powell broke the rules. Clinton broke the rules differently. Do you see the similarity between them or are you solely focused on 'getting' Clinton on something?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)4-8 years ago, it probably really, really sucked.
jimw81
(111 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)for government work. He did use about 3 dozen business related emails from his personal address but NONE of them had any CLASSIFIED information in them.
Whereas Hillary did ALL her email from her personal SERVER and had at least 2200 emails with classified information in them and 22 of them were at the highest classification, meaning they were "born" classified. . . they were classified when written, and remain so now.
MUCH different.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)The system is still terrible. And let me add that Powell has turned over exactly none of his emails...June 16 can not come fast enough for me.
ismnotwasm
(41,971 posts)It's all innuendos, speculation and very selective analysis.
This all you got?
patsimp
(915 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)and putting us all in danger by intentionally deciding to break the law and use a third-party service.