Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalArkie

(15,705 posts)
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:56 AM Jun 2016

A side note on Powell’s use of personal email



Snip

A side note on Powell’s use of personal email

Clinton has defended her behavior by explaining that Colin Powell also used a personal email address for State Department business. This is an incredibly misleading claim, as the IG report reveals. The secure system the State Department uses was put in place during Powell’s first year there. The system was so primitive that it only allowed users to correspond with people within the agency. To contact anyone outside the agency, one had to use a different medium of communication. Powell used personal email — which is different than a personal server — to communicate outside the agency. He had a laptop with a separate line on his desk that he referred to as the “unclassified line.” Sounds a bit more responsible, no?

By the time Clinton reached the State Department, the system and related policies protecting security were far more sophisticated. This was partially due to previous cyberattacks.




https://medium.com/soapbox-dc/12-red-flags-in-clintons-email-setup-da8966760f7d#.ic77m4azz
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A side note on Powell’s use of personal email (Original Post) LiberalArkie Jun 2016 OP
I am sure this will be alerted on Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #1
Discussionist is up and running. This kind of material is perfect for that place, nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #4
You mean factual information Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #7
whatever folks in the Not Hillary Party want to call it, conservative-leaning boards geek tragedy Jun 2016 #9
What is proven not to be a fact? Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #15
that the Indictment Fairy is going to deliver triumph to the Hillary Haterz nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #17
She will not be indicted Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #25
well that and she didn't commit a crime, as those who don't get their news on the subject geek tragedy Jun 2016 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author randome Jun 2016 #23
4 days. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
Remember, in 3 days this site turns to PRAGMATIC INCREMENTALISM. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #22
I'm sure the corporatists will feel less threatened... Yurovsky Jun 2016 #28
nobody cares. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #3
If you really must know the biggest difference, it's the Statute of Limitations. Can't prosecute leveymg Jun 2016 #5
Will facts like these be allowed after Thursday? Scuba Jun 2016 #6
I doubt it, sadly Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #8
None of this really matters... DCBob Jun 2016 #10
We will hopefully find out soon enough. NWCorona Jun 2016 #12
Exactly. No crime was committed. athena Jun 2016 #13
But we've heard that this is EXACTLY LIKE WATERGATE! randome Jun 2016 #14
To say it was different is to ignore the crux of the matter. randome Jun 2016 #11
Personal email hosted on a 3rd party site is more secure than a personal server? itsrobert Jun 2016 #16
Yeah, but even today, it still really sucks, so I'm thinking all american girl Jun 2016 #18
was his laptop encrypted? jimw81 Jun 2016 #19
He also used his personal email address for personal email and his government email address pdsimdars Jun 2016 #20
Untrue Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #21
You know, if you "take the time" quoting the author to chase down the links in that blog ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #24
Maybe people should just get a life. patsimp Jun 2016 #26
Still doesn't justify him taking a crap on the law and ignoring it... scscholar Jun 2016 #29
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. whatever folks in the Not Hillary Party want to call it, conservative-leaning boards
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jun 2016

are a much better place for this kind of opinion piece

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
27. well that and she didn't commit a crime, as those who don't get their news on the subject
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jun 2016

from Breitbart would have realized by now

Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #15)

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
28. I'm sure the corporatists will feel less threatened...
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jun 2016

in a progressive-free zone.

Oh, I could stick around, but I'm not a big fan of suppression of progressive, liberal thought and activism. If I had wanted that I would have joined the freepers a long time ago.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. If you really must know the biggest difference, it's the Statute of Limitations. Can't prosecute
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:15 AM
Jun 2016

any related acts that occurred prior to 06/12/06.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
10. None of this really matters...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:26 AM
Jun 2016

because the FBI will be focusing on was there any criminal activity and criminal intent. She may have broken some rules and regs and may have mishandled some classified information by mistake but its becoming clear there was no crime committed.

athena

(4,187 posts)
13. Exactly. No crime was committed.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jun 2016

People who focus on this e-mail controversy must be superhuman and never make any mistakes in anything they do.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. But we've heard that this is EXACTLY LIKE WATERGATE!
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:42 AM
Jun 2016

If I can't trust self-proclaimed 'experts' on DU, who can I trust?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesn’t always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one you’re already in.
[/center][/font][hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
11. To say it was different is to ignore the crux of the matter.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:35 AM
Jun 2016

Powell broke the rules. Clinton broke the rules differently. Do you see the similarity between them or are you solely focused on 'getting' Clinton on something?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesn’t always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one you’re already in.
[/center][/font][hr]

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
18. Yeah, but even today, it still really sucks, so I'm thinking
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 03:59 PM
Jun 2016

4-8 years ago, it probably really, really sucked.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
20. He also used his personal email address for personal email and his government email address
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 08:38 PM
Jun 2016

for government work. He did use about 3 dozen business related emails from his personal address but NONE of them had any CLASSIFIED information in them.

Whereas Hillary did ALL her email from her personal SERVER and had at least 2200 emails with classified information in them and 22 of them were at the highest classification, meaning they were "born" classified. . . they were classified when written, and remain so now.

MUCH different.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
21. Untrue
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:49 AM
Jun 2016

The system is still terrible. And let me add that Powell has turned over exactly none of his emails...June 16 can not come fast enough for me.

ismnotwasm

(41,971 posts)
24. You know, if you "take the time" quoting the author to chase down the links in that blog
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 09:04 AM
Jun 2016

It's all innuendos, speculation and very selective analysis.

This all you got?

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
29. Still doesn't justify him taking a crap on the law and ignoring it...
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jun 2016

and putting us all in danger by intentionally deciding to break the law and use a third-party service.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A side note on Powell’s u...