Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:09 PM Jun 2016

Judge links Clinton aide's immunity to 'criminal investigation'

A former information technology aide to Hillary Clinton received immunity from the Justice Department in connection with a criminal investigation, a federal judge confirmed Tuesday.

Bryan Pagliano, a computer expert who worked at the State Department while Clinton was secretary of state and was also paid privately by her, was previously reported to have received immunity in connection with statements he gave to the FBI about Clinton's private server set-up.


However, there had been no explicit confirmation that the investigation—which Clinton has repeatedly referred to as a "security review"—is actually a criminal probe.

In the order, Sullivan declined to make Pagliano's immunity agreement public. The judge ordered the deal be submitted to the court so he could assess Pagliano's plan to assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during a planned deposition of Pagliano in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit related to Clinton's emails.

"In the Court's opinion, the need for public access to Mr. Pagliano's agreement with the government is minimal. Mr. Pagliano's immunity agreement has not previously been disclosed. Mr. Pagliano and the government object to disclosure of the immunity agreement" Sullivan wrote. "Mr. Pagliano's immunity agreement with the government was filed with the Court by Mr. Pagliano solely to enable the Court to assess the legitimacy of his intent to assert his Fifth Amendment rights in this civil proceeding."


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-judge-investigation-224314#ixzz4BZRF3U4r
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge links Clinton aide's immunity to 'criminal investigation' (Original Post) NWCorona Jun 2016 OP
... LexVegas Jun 2016 #1
I'm glad you find it funny . I don't. NWCorona Jun 2016 #2
1 Day and a wake up! nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #8
I'll be just fine. NWCorona Jun 2016 #10
I know. LexVegas Jun 2016 #11
Oh boy,here we go again. Wellstone ruled Jun 2016 #3
The jist is the judge refused to make Pagliano's immunity agreement public. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #4
Yup! Because it would harm an ongoing criminal investigation. NWCorona Jun 2016 #5
Well the FBI isn't conducting a "security review". n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #7
Judge misspoke. Nothing to see. Move along now. Bob41213 Jun 2016 #13
You'd better read that again. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #6
Why is that? NWCorona Jun 2016 #9
Wondering what the extent of his 5th Amendment immunity is, since is dep is going forward. JudyM Jun 2016 #12

JudyM

(29,204 posts)
12. Wondering what the extent of his 5th Amendment immunity is, since is dep is going forward.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jun 2016

And why did the judge decline his request to prohibit videotaping while he went along with the last one?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Judge links Clinton aide'...