Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

J_J_

(1,213 posts)
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:46 PM Jun 2016

“Call me crazy but, I’d say that this election was being ripped right out from under us"

Brian Lis of Los Angeles, a Bernie Sanders activist, argued that in L.A. County it seems to him that it actually was rigged. He said that reports that came in from the election from voters, poll inspectors and poll workers showed four consistent trends in L.A. County’s primary election, including voters forcibly switched to a “Vote-by-Mail” status, but never receiving ballots, machines that either miscounted ballots or “errored out on certain candidates,” young voters given provisional ballots, and older voters’ party affiliations forcibly changed.

“You can go through the testimonies yourself: bit.ly/1UPXrMQ,” Lis writes, “Call me crazy but, I’d say that this election was being ripped right out from under us — stolen, by those in power who have a lot to lose by letting regular Americans speak their minds.”

http://www.inquisitr.com/3213012/poll-inspectors-in-l-a-county-submit-testimonies-to-board-of-supervisors-regarding-california-primary-issues-video/

88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Call me crazy but, I’d say that this election was being ripped right out from under us" (Original Post) J_J_ Jun 2016 OP
good lord. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #1
So you've got the 2-min duty? LOL. How sad. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #23
Hi rhett o rick. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #31
"I'm calling him crazy" XRubicon Jun 2016 #2
What's crazy is... RobertEarl Jun 2016 #48
'stolen, by those in power who have a lot to lose by letting regular Americans speak their minds.”' elleng Jun 2016 #3
so everybody who voted for someone else besides bernie is not a regular american. got it nt msongs Jun 2016 #6
What a hurtful thing to say; those who disagree with us aren't real Americans. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #12
No one said that. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #24
They said we were not "regular American" which means what exactly? bettyellen Jun 2016 #33
No one said that. No one said you or anyone else weren't regular Americans. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #36
You Know, As WE Keep Trying To Make Them See Or Help Them Hear... ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #49
I agree. They are blinded by there devotion. They don't really care about those rhett o rick Jun 2016 #58
Results LiberalArkie Jun 2016 #81
It's in the OP Rick. bettyellen Jun 2016 #54
Is this like "people who don't support Hillary aren't real Democrats?" Beowulf Jun 2016 #76
Brilliant interpretation of the article. arikara Jun 2016 #79
And that is what is happening all over this country madokie Jun 2016 #15
and not just this year. 840high Jun 2016 #40
I like the way Debbie the sane progressive put it, she said we have lost the pdsimdars Jun 2016 #64
You lost by 400,000 votes in California. Get over it. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #4
Are you deliberately paraphrasing Jeb Bush from 2000? Fozzledick Jun 2016 #13
Cant wait for you to see what you're really supporting. kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #29
+ a gazillion. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #66
actual before fraud vote totals: bernie sanders 300 trillion, everybody else combined ZERO nt msongs Jun 2016 #5
+ 100 trillion brazillion with infinity too XRubicon Jun 2016 #7
LOL. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #26
Why doesn't any legitimate news source carry such stories? Oh yeah, they have been paid off or are eastwestdem Jun 2016 #8
According to the Guccifer 2 leaks yeah, they were. Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #38
There are no legitimate news 840high Jun 2016 #41
Not one! Lies, I tell you, lies! anigbrowl Jun 2016 #55
You've answered your own question -you dismiss any news source as illegitimate if they do talk about reformist2 Jun 2016 #78
Yep Brian Lis, I'm calling you crazy. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #9
... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #10
My lawyer friend told me alleging fraud where no fraud exists can get your license pulled. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #11
Well at least there are a few honorable lawyers willing to fight for free and fare elections. peace13 Jun 2016 #14
I'm not at all in favor of fare elections. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #16
Too much time on your hands? 840high Jun 2016 #42
My friend and I are very well educated but we appreciate your concern. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #17
This countries election process is worse than 23 other countries but plays into the hands rhett o rick Jun 2016 #27
Which is why no one in any official capacity is making these claims. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #22
Okay, you're crazy. nt WhiteTara Jun 2016 #18
Well ... the writer asked for it. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #19
And I couldn't resist. WhiteTara Jun 2016 #20
I heard there are up to 3,000,000 uncounted ballots... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #21
Only 1.2M as of COB today Retrograde Jun 2016 #47
I know about provisional ballots here in NY and... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #59
First, it's state law Retrograde Jun 2016 #83
We don't throw propositions into primary ballots, and we don't... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #84
CA ballot trutherism is getting fucking old. Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #25
Is "trutherism" the best you can do? What is getting old is the domination of our rhett o rick Jun 2016 #28
Your answering machine message needs a switch-up Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #30
Who knew? GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #39
If the shoe fits...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #63
And yet, here you are... kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #34
I'm sure you think you're adorable. Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #35
Yes, well... people do tell me that. kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #37
Stolen by whom? Monority voters and women outvoting them? Not fair to say stolen bravenak Jun 2016 #32
I stand firmly with Bernie Sanders... brooklynite Jun 2016 #43
You're crazy. mwrguy Jun 2016 #44
Nice, substantive response pdsimdars Jun 2016 #65
Anyone who takes the Inquistr seriously is crazy. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #45
I think the proper response should be that no one, regardless of party or candidate Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #46
Call me crazy LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #50
. RandySF Jun 2016 #51
Ripped out jcgoldie Jun 2016 #52
Heck,what is the thinking here! There were no sadoldgirl Jun 2016 #53
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #56
I know the system is rigged... Rockyj Jun 2016 #57
That is not a bad idea. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #68
wahhhh wahhh Cane4Dems Jun 2016 #60
Here is what you don't get. We are questioning whether Hillary's votes were actually real. Live and Learn Jun 2016 #69
She won by a pretty large margin. So what percentage of those do you think aren't real? brush Jun 2016 #77
It doesn't matter. It makes a mockery of democracy to pretend voting accuracy doesn't matter. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #85
K&R B Calm Jun 2016 #61
Oh FFS... SidDithers Jun 2016 #62
Yeah, it's crazy gollygee Jun 2016 #67
Just 'little mistakes,' right? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #70
Not enough to swing the election, and no reason to believe gollygee Jun 2016 #71
No use investigating to be sure since you already know, right? Live and Learn Jun 2016 #72
I think it's worth investigating gollygee Jun 2016 #73
Yep! We've seen throughout the campaign that there are only complaints in states Sanders loses. brush Jun 2016 #80
Geez, things are getting really nasty. kstewart33 Jun 2016 #74
Actually, it is just beginning. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #87
It is a power the establishment has to remain in control, and they used it; repeatedly. -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #75
Calling this crazy or deluded is EASIER than facing the truth felix_numinous Jun 2016 #82
Brian Lis of Los Angeles, Bernie Sanders activist, you are crazy. YouDig Jun 2016 #86
Isn't it time for you to move beyond name calling? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #88
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
48. What's crazy is...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:10 PM
Jun 2016

That we sit back and let them jack the vote. The real crazy people are the ones who look the other way at the signs of our votes being jacked.

elleng

(130,873 posts)
3. 'stolen, by those in power who have a lot to lose by letting regular Americans speak their minds.”'
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:48 PM
Jun 2016
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
36. No one said that. No one said you or anyone else weren't regular Americans.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jun 2016

The point is that the Wealthy and Powerful have shut out millions of regular Americans from the system. Those that side with the Rich and Powerful don't care. Hell, the DNC didn't want a lively primary. And what could be more Democratic than a lively primary. Some don't like democracy and want a Clinton Aristocracy and some of us will fight that all the way.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
49. You Know, As WE Keep Trying To Make Them See Or Help Them Hear...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:16 PM
Jun 2016

I've found out that I've heard some of the MOST Astounding and as much as I don't really want to say this... the STUPIDEST stuff posted here at DU!

Why keep feeding those whose bellies are so full of... OH, I'll keep it nice... full of STUFF! They only want to argue and belittle, disrupt and belittle anyone who disagrees with them. I guess some here have fun with it, but it really is sad and depressing to many of us who want this country to MOVE FORWARD and help those less fortunate.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
58. I agree. They are blinded by there devotion. They don't really care about those
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:57 PM
Jun 2016

among us that are struggling. They can somehow rationalize that corporate profits are more important than the 2,500,000 homeless American children.

There are only two sides to the class war and they ain't on the side of the 99%.

LiberalArkie

(15,715 posts)
81. Results
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jun 2016

On Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:47 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

You Know, As WE Keep Trying To Make Them See Or Help Them Hear...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2200445

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

insulting HRC supporters

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:54 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter, you only have 2 more days to wait until you have perfect nirvana
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Meh
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Funny. I don't see HRC or HRC supporters mentioned in the post.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
64. I like the way Debbie the sane progressive put it, she said we have lost the
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:21 AM
Jun 2016

ability to make our will be known at the ballot box, all that is left is the street.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
13. Are you deliberately paraphrasing Jeb Bush from 2000?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:12 PM
Jun 2016

Or have you wound up at the same position on your own?

kayakjohnny

(5,235 posts)
29. Cant wait for you to see what you're really supporting.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jun 2016

I would rub it in your face, like you're doing now.

But I won't be here for that.

Mark my words... you will regret your ignorance.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
8. Why doesn't any legitimate news source carry such stories? Oh yeah, they have been paid off or are
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:59 PM
Jun 2016

on the side of Hillary. Or maybe they know something you don't.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
11. My lawyer friend told me alleging fraud where no fraud exists can get your license pulled.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:04 PM
Jun 2016

He said it's called vexatious litigation.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
14. Well at least there are a few honorable lawyers willing to fight for free and fare elections.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:15 PM
Jun 2016

If you aren't aware of the problems with our system you should educate yourself! If your friend is unaware ....well there's nothing I can say about that.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
16. I'm not at all in favor of fare elections.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:17 PM
Jun 2016
peace13
14. Well at least there are a few honorable lawyers willing to fight for free and fare elections.


If you aren't aware of the problems with our system you should educate yourself! If your friend is unaware ....well there's nothing I can say about that.
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
27. This countries election process is worse than 23 other countries but plays into the hands
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:46 PM
Jun 2016

of the Corporate run Oligarchy. Those that choose to side with them must not like to fight for freedoms and liberties.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
21. I heard there are up to 3,000,000 uncounted ballots...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jun 2016

Really.

There could be 3,000,000 uncounted ballots in California. Maybe millions more in other states that have closed out their elections.

That means Bernie could have won in a landslide.

Somebody's got to lay off the weed.

Retrograde

(10,134 posts)
47. Only 1.2M as of COB today
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jun 2016

That's for all of California: more than half of those are provisional ballots, which have to be processed individually (why do you suppose a month of counting time is built into the process?)

Many people seem to have difficulties grasping the magnitude of the numbers in California. Los Angeles county itself has nearly 5 million registered voters, about a third of whom bothered to vote last week. Several dozen people complaining about possibly real problems does sound like a lot, but even just looking at the ~2M that bothered to vote an error rate of .01% in checking in voters, updating registrations, mistyping addresses, etc. means that there would be about 200 screwups. Throw in casual voters who haven't checked they're registration in years (since California went to an open primary system for everything other than president, the last time party mattered in a primary was in 2012) and didn't bother to read any of the information the state and counties sent out, or who thought that signing up for the American Independent Party was the same as not signing up for a party at all, and filter that throw websites looking for problems and it looks like a mess. A few hundred people encountering difficulties at the polls in a small state like Vermont (pop. 600K) is probably a sign of systemic problems: the same number of problems in a state of 40M people is noise in the system.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
59. I know about provisional ballots here in NY and...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:58 PM
Jun 2016

they rarely have any effect on the outcome, but they are a pain to verify. So, why would a stressed BoE bother with them if things aren't microscopically close...

There's a lot of tinfoil out there.

Retrograde

(10,134 posts)
83. First, it's state law
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jun 2016

all valid provisional ballots must be counted, which means they all have to be checked first to determine if they're valid. That's one reason why counties have about a month after the election to finalize their counts.

Second, we almost always have multiple races on our ballots, since we do all the primaries at once and we like to stick various propositions on as well. In this election some of the races for the 2nd place finisher for various Congressional seats (the top two finishers in each contest go on to the general in November) are within a couple hundred votes - less than the number of uncounted ballots for the district in some cases. And the more local the race the narrower the margins get: I'm paying an extra 0.25% county sales tax because it was approved by a margin of fewer than ~300 votes - in a county with 1.5 million people at the time. So while Sanders may be leading 80%-20% in the presidential race in a particular county, the race for county supervisor may well have a razor-thin margin and shift as each ballot is counted.

You can see a more or less recent tally of unprocessed California ballots here, along with more data from the June 7 election than most states provide. IMHO, the margin between Clinton and Sanders will narrow as more ballots are counted, but I don't expect any big swings in delegate counts.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
84. We don't throw propositions into primary ballots, and we don't...
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jun 2016

mix up races-- three or four separate primaries and all the props go into November's ballot. So we're not big on counting primary provisionals, even though our state law demands it, too.

I'm not saying this is a good way to do it, in fact many of us think it sucks and lowers turnout while costing too much.

NJ is even more fun, since the governor sets up the primaries, and Christie has been known to adjust them to his own ends.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
28. Is "trutherism" the best you can do? What is getting old is the domination of our
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:48 PM
Jun 2016

elections system and government by the Big Money Special Interests that choose Clinton. Strange that Democrats would side with the 1% over the 99%. I guess they like the comfort (perceived) of siding with the biggest bully (Big Corporations)

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
39. Who knew?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 08:02 PM
Jun 2016

I am big money special interest? Wish it came with a little more money!

Because it is this big money special interests and about 16 million more just like me that chose Clinton.

kayakjohnny

(5,235 posts)
34. And yet, here you are...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:53 PM
Jun 2016

still online reading about it and getting upset over it.

And posting about your upsettedness.

Instead of shelving it because of your extreme confidence in your choice.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
32. Stolen by whom? Monority voters and women outvoting them? Not fair to say stolen
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:51 PM
Jun 2016

2000 was stolen. This is called outvoting you

brooklynite

(94,512 posts)
43. I stand firmly with Bernie Sanders...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:17 PM
Jun 2016

...who hasn't complained once about the integrity of the California Primary.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
46. I think the proper response should be that no one, regardless of party or candidate
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:58 PM
Jun 2016

should tolerate even the slightest impropriety during the voting process, anything less is.... well, uncivilized.


sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
53. Heck,what is the thinking here! There were no
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jun 2016

"irregularities" in this primary/caucus on the Republican
side! The exit polls agreed very nicely with the results.

The other party? Oh, I think the PTB took care of their
system. I think that the Sanders campaign can wait till
eternity to get even the raw counts from the beginning
in IA.

However, let's see what happens in November. I wonder
by now which of the two parties is more successful in
cheating. What fun to watch that!

Rockyj

(538 posts)
57. I know the system is rigged...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 11:55 PM
Jun 2016

But can someone please let us know if we can file lawsuit against DNC because we contributed to #Bernie2016 campaign but DNC already RIGGED it for him to lose?

Cane4Dems

(305 posts)
60. wahhhh wahhh
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 07:51 AM
Jun 2016

you lost get over it. what a bunch of sore losers. Honestly you all should just join GOP because you fit their mold of "my way or the highway"

What strikes me odd is how you guys dismiss all of Hillary's votes- because as we have seen yall consistently want to undermine minorities as well. In numerous discussions on this board I have seen how most of you bernistas don't give a shit about protecting minorities rights- its all about that economic equality!

Well while the rest of us join together and work towards beating trump and electing the 1st female president...have fun spending your summer sending money to a guy who could care less about you- he's just focused on earning more cash for his retirement slush fund (and probably scouting the country for the next college that his wife can wreck)

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
69. Here is what you don't get. We are questioning whether Hillary's votes were actually real.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:30 AM
Jun 2016

I don't expect it will bother you even when they are proven false much like some of her recent memories.

brush

(53,771 posts)
77. She won by a pretty large margin. So what percentage of those do you think aren't real?
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:38 AM
Jun 2016

The African American votes, the Latino American votes, Asian American votes — which of these don't really count?

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
67. Yeah, it's crazy
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:25 AM
Jun 2016

There are always going to be clerical errors anywhere there's paperwork, but to assume every one, or even a majority, would have gone to Bernie is crazy enough. To assume Hillary or the DNC is behind it is a step crazier.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
71. Not enough to swing the election, and no reason to believe
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:34 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary wasn't hurt more by it than Bernie. These conspiracy theories are full of pointless and absurd speculation.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
72. No use investigating to be sure since you already know, right?
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:39 AM
Jun 2016

Ever heard the phrase where there is smoke there is fire? True in most cases, tin-foil hat or no.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
73. I think it's worth investigating
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:42 AM
Jun 2016

Only because any clerical problems should be cleared up. It was not done by Hillary. Bernie won my state (and I voted for him.) Does the DNC not care about Michigan? We have clerical problems too, but conspiracy theorists don't care about problems in states Bernie won. They assume every clerical issue was done by Hillary and benefited her.

I used to think every election was rigged and that Obama could never win because the Republicans wouldn't let him. I learned that elections aren't actually as unfair as I thought.

brush

(53,771 posts)
80. Yep! We've seen throughout the campaign that there are only complaints in states Sanders loses.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:54 AM
Jun 2016

In states where he won, no complaints at all.

And one thing that needs pointing out, in states where he won, there have been no complaints from the Clinton camp.

REPEAT, NO COMPLAINTS FROM THE CLINTON CAMP.

That says quite a lot right there. The veteran campaign workers on the Clinton side know you win some and you lose some. That's how it works. You just try to win more than you lose.

Maybe Sanders didn't have as many experienced campaign operatives as Clinton, after all, didn't one of Sanders' top people previously run a comic books store?

And even with all the rigging complaints and histrionics, this election has not been that close.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
74. Geez, things are getting really nasty.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:14 AM
Jun 2016

Less than 48 hours, guys and all this nastiness will be over.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
82. Calling this crazy or deluded is EASIER than facing the truth
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jun 2016

and facing that Americans have been betrayed. This country has been weaned on superheroes, it's human nature to want to have heroes and heroines, and to fight tooth and nail against having them knocked down.

But we have to grow up and face the HARD reality of requiring a government that will back us up in the coming years, not suppress the voices of millions of people. This cannot be the way forward, we need REPRESENTATION.

Americans have grown up past being forced down a destructive path.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»“Call me crazy but, I’d s...