Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:39 PM Jun 2016

I have decided I want Elizabeth Warren as Hillary's VP

I think she is probably better used in the Senate or a Cabinet post, and the Dems probably should have someone younger like Castro or Kaine, but what a ticket that would be! The more I think of it, the more I want it. She was also an earlier Hillary supporter, asking her in 2014 to run for President this year, so she isn't a coattail-rider. She is sincere.

And, to quote my BFF:

Two women, rolling like fucking Jedi. It gives me tingles. Warren has so much star power, they have to do something with her. I am falling in love with this election.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have decided I want Elizabeth Warren as Hillary's VP (Original Post) obamanut2012 Jun 2016 OP
It would muzzle one of the strongest truth-to-power Democrats we have loyalsister Jun 2016 #1
I really doubt that -- I have more confidence in Hillay and Warren obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #2
Rigght loyalsister Jun 2016 #7
Wow obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #8
I would love to believe in a Clinton... Orsino Jun 2016 #16
Well, you already know what I think. Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #3
ROLLING LIKE TEH EFFING JEDI! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #4
And while Massachusetts has a GOP governor TexasBushwhacker Jun 2016 #5
Yeah, as much as I like Brown, that was a worry for me obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #6
"used right" says it all loyalsister Jun 2016 #9
I think she could do more for the liberal cause as an outspoken Senator. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #10
Did picking Joe Biden MFM008 Jun 2016 #11
Not. A. Chance. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #12
You want her in a weaker position? SheilaT Jun 2016 #13
Josh Marshall at TPM thinks so, too. So do I. randome Jun 2016 #14
What group does Clinton really want to reach for support? HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #15
I would be surprised if she accepted. -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #17

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
1. It would muzzle one of the strongest truth-to-power Democrats we have
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jun 2016

It would completely temper her greatest strengths by turning her into a yes-woman. No thanks!

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
2. I really doubt that -- I have more confidence in Hillay and Warren
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jun 2016

Warren would never dilute her convictions -- there would be no reason to.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
7. Rigght
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jun 2016

You really think she would go against her POTUS boss? I don't see Warren becoming a cheerleader for wasting Tax dollars that could be spent on infrastructure, etc. on more military action. I don't see it happening.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
16. I would love to believe in a Clinton...
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:14 AM
Jun 2016

...who would join Warren's crusade against Wall Street and the banksters. We really, really need a president like that.

What seems more likely is that the Vice President would nearly vanish from the political discourse.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,174 posts)
5. And while Massachusetts has a GOP governor
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jun 2016

who would surely appoint a Republican senator as a temporary replacement, they have to have a special election for the permanent replacement. The temp could only serve 6 months. NJ and OH are just gubenatorial appointments, so Cory Booker or Sherrod Brown would definitely cost us a seat.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
6. Yeah, as much as I like Brown, that was a worry for me
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jun 2016

I'm not too worried about MA IF it is Warren. As Is aid, I love her in the Senate, and she would be great in the Cabinet, but if she was used right as VP, she could really change the office of Veep, and be a real help to an HRC Administration. I think about this every day when I go running! It's more interesting that thinking about how humid it is.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
9. "used right" says it all
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jun 2016

I don't think her style is to serve as window dressing to shore up progressive support. To waste her expertise going to funerals and speaking engagements would be a travesty.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
13. You want her in a weaker position?
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jun 2016

Why?

It's bad enough that from here it looks as if Hillary, her minions, and the DNC don't really give a flying fuck about electing more Dems outside the White House, but to want to take an incredibly effective Senator and put her in the totally ineffectual office of Vice President?

Yeah, it might be rather thrilling during the campaign, but after January 20, 2017, Elizabeth Warren will accomplish nothing at all. Hopefully, she's too smart to take the job if offered.

Although, I suspect that Hillary would not have enough self confidence to want a genuinely strong VP candidate by her side, let along as strong a woman as Elizabeth Warren.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. Josh Marshall at TPM thinks so, too. So do I.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jun 2016

Look at her remarks today: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/elizabeth-warren-trump-racist-bully

"Are you scared Donald? Well, you should be! We're coming," she said, according to NBC.

Jesus, she's brilliant! #ImWithHERandHER!

Marshall's take is that Warren would amplify Clinton's liberal tendencies. Now say anything derogatory that you want about Clinton but she IS a liberal, maybe not as pure as some would like but with Warren to 'balance her out'...I get chills, too, just thinking about the two of them. They would complement one another. Warren is no dupe, she would not be sidelined.

Harry Reid is in favor of this, too.

Sanders puts me asleep. Warren electrifies me. Do the revolutionaries among us REALLY want a revolution or do they only want Sanders? Warren can help us get what we need.

I say LET'S GO FOR IT!

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
15. What group does Clinton really want to reach for support?
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 07:08 AM
Jun 2016

It seems as if the plan is to move right and pick up disaffected R's who are in many ways philosophically more like New Dems than Warren and the progressive left.

The move right also can have lasting strategic impact as it organizes the disarray on the right to create a stronger moderate-right bloc. That could permanently cripple the christian right and tea-party factions in an attempt to go forward as the repubilcan party. Yes, it would also probably promote even stronger moves to discard/abandon the progressive left from the democratic party. But hey, a win is a win and winning is everything for a candidate seeking elected office.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I have decided I want Eli...