Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kgnu_fan

(3,021 posts)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:37 PM Jun 2016

DNC Tight-Lipped About Authenticity Of Documents From Guccifer 2.0 Hack

Whether the documents released by the Guccifer 2.0 hack are authentic, the fact remains: The DNC’s servers were compromised and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is now effectively no longer in charge. The big question Democratic Party leadership need to answer (but probably never will), is did Hillary Clinton and the DNC ensure Bernie Sanders would lose the nomination?


http://www.inquisitr.com/3212344/dnc-tight-lipped-about-authenticity-of-documents-from-guccifer-2-0-hack/?platform=hootsuite
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DNC Tight-Lipped About Authenticity Of Documents From Guccifer 2.0 Hack (Original Post) kgnu_fan Jun 2016 OP
Hmm... chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #1
Yeah... in other words, confirmed. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #7
Yep +1 coyote Jun 2016 #18
You know we'll never get a response from HRC or the DNC about these documents. ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #2
What questions will be asked? brooklynite Jun 2016 #4
It honestly doesn't matter at this point. ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #10
Already happening right on first page of GDP n/t JesterCS Jun 2016 #13
Do any of the E-mails mention Sanders? creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #3
I think there are other instances but here's an article on other DNC conflicts of interest: 2cannan Jun 2016 #25
Did anyone not know/think the DNC wanted Hillary? TDale313 Jun 2016 #5
It was very obvious. 840high Jun 2016 #11
One day left... brooklynite Jun 2016 #6
That's true, only one day left. chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #9
It will be a relief to read reality posts again. Take your conspiracies to upaloopa Jun 2016 #27
Well then I suggest you avoid reading the MSM because it will be all over it. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #15
I see...the INQUISITR is the "mainstream media". They must be very proud. brooklynite Jun 2016 #24
Comprehension? 'Will be' nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #32
This stuff i am reading is absolutely mind blowing. This election was a total farce. coyote Jun 2016 #8
Yes it was. I started 840high Jun 2016 #12
Definitely real then Ash_F Jun 2016 #14
The DNC is equally tight-lipped ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #16
Speaking of ET's... pinebox Jun 2016 #20
Kick for the day.... kgnu_fan Jun 2016 #17
Let's see who the latest Inquisitr "freelance journalist" is... Tarc Jun 2016 #19
Inquisitr is vert legit pinebox Jun 2016 #21
Reading helps Tarc Jun 2016 #33
Uh Tarc is that the best you got? pinebox Jun 2016 #35
It is a glorified blog, on par with examiner.com Tarc Jun 2016 #37
Is Guccifer 2.0 a Jew hater like Guccifer? grossproffit Jun 2016 #22
Try to understand how foolish this makes you look. randome Jun 2016 #23
I helped insure that Bernie did not get the nominstion. I voted for Hillary upaloopa Jun 2016 #26
Isn't Guccifer in jail somewhere? redstateblues Jun 2016 #28
He uploaded his consciousness into Clinton's server. Which is why he's now G2.0. He's that good. randome Jun 2016 #30
Keep it coming! Sunlight is the best disinfectant. nt nc4bo Jun 2016 #29
Let the sunshine in ~~~ kgnu_fan Jun 2016 #31
I have no doubt that if Hillary is elected, Schultz will have a cushy job waiting for her Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #34
thank you for your comment! kgnu_fan Jun 2016 #36
 

ThinkCritically

(241 posts)
2. You know we'll never get a response from HRC or the DNC about these documents.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jun 2016

They'll just change the rules to adjust and call anyone who questions them conspiracy theorists. Then they will close the discussion for good with another rule change.

 

ThinkCritically

(241 posts)
10. It honestly doesn't matter at this point.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:48 AM
Jun 2016

Whether or not anybody answers for it we will still most likely be voting for HRC in November. Its something that we just have to do unfortunately. The only way Bernie will get justice is if we change the nomination process. And I am behind that 100%.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
3. Do any of the E-mails mention Sanders?
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:52 PM
Jun 2016

The only ones I've seen are about strategies for the general election. They probably assumed the candidate would be Hillary because back in the middle of 2015 few thought Bernie could win the nomination. Even Bernie didn't seem to believe it. I'd have to see more evidence to believe there was a plot against Sanders.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
5. Did anyone not know/think the DNC wanted Hillary?
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 12:01 AM
Jun 2016

Is this news? I don't say this as a slam, but I find it hard to believe anyone- regardless of who they supported in the primaries- did not think they had a preference/rooting interest here.

chwaliszewski

(1,514 posts)
9. That's true, only one day left.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:25 AM
Jun 2016

Then you won't have to listen to us talk about how Hillary is cozying up to the Bushes (https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-invokes-unlikely-allies-000000292.html) because we don't want anything negative said about the presumptive Democratic candidate, even if it's true. The ends justify the means. No Trump, no matter what. Understood.

I wish they had a smiley that was either a horse with blinders on or an ostrich with its head in the sand. Those would come in handy starting tomorrow.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
16. The DNC is equally tight-lipped ...
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 04:42 AM
Jun 2016

... about allegations that they have been taken over by lizard-like extra-terrestrials posing as humans.

WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE?

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
20. Speaking of ET's...
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:46 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary said she's going to investigate UFO's so maybe we'll know. BWahahahahahahahah!

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
19. Let's see who the latest Inquisitr "freelance journalist" is...
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:43 AM
Jun 2016

Reno Berkeley

https://twitter.com/RenoBerkeley

Chock-full of screaming pro-Bernie and anti-Hillary tirades.

Please stop passing off the Inquisitr as legitimate journalism; the writers are not journalists, the site is not a actual news/media outlet. It is a glorified aggregation of blogs.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
33. Reading helps
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jun 2016

It is not actual news outlet, it is a glorified blog.

I'm sure they'd accept your submissions.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
35. Uh Tarc is that the best you got?
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jun 2016

It's a verified news outlet.

Inquisitr is an aggregate news and media website owned by Daniel Treisman, an Israeli businessman who relaunched the website in 2011. The site views itself as a 'multi-news aggregator' that publishes both trending news and original articles. The news website caters to a global audience, and its newly introduced slogan is "News Worth Sharing."

The website states that it is an "internationally recognized news website read by more than 40 million unique visitors each month."


This is a blog;

a regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by an individual or small group, that is written in an informal or conversational style.


You Hillarians really fail at new media don't you?

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
37. It is a glorified blog, on par with examiner.com
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 04:05 PM
Jun 2016

Freelance writers are not journalists, their "news" is not objective, fact-checked, or verified. It is just one person's lone opinion.

I know you're in the 11th hour and 59th minute here trying to save face for a lost election, piney, but this is kinda...sad.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
23. Try to understand how foolish this makes you look.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:07 AM
Jun 2016

You're talking about a memo to the DNC, not from them, with the From line deliberately removed.

The memo is likely from a super-pac discussing how they can work with the DNC. Every campaign works with the DNC, including the Sanders campaign!

Then there is the donor list, which reveals what, exactly? Do you understand that this is already publicly available information?

So tell us, please, why you are so worked up over this.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
26. I helped insure that Bernie did not get the nominstion. I voted for Hillary
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:55 AM
Jun 2016

I am sure there remains delusional Bernie fans need some conspiricy to believe in and may just carry it to their graves, but Bernie lost the nomination by over 4 million votes.

Uncle Joe

(58,336 posts)
34. I have no doubt that if Hillary is elected, Schultz will have a cushy job waiting for her
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

in government even if she loses her own primary or general election run.

Thanks for the thread, kgnu_fan.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC Tight-Lipped About Au...