Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brexit means Scotland will probably leave the UK. (Original Post) realmirage Jun 2016 OP
Yep ...unintended consequences...this is why the US was wise to have HOUSE and SENATE pkdu Jun 2016 #1
yeah, must silence the peoples voices swhisper1 Jun 2016 #2
maybe, when you play up to their worst fears and racial hatreds, right? That was how this was TeamPooka Jun 2016 #10
I'd say giving up control of sovereignty was the most pressing reason swhisper1 Jun 2016 #12
I didn't realize Angela Merkel was appointing British Parliamentary Ministers. TeamPooka Jun 2016 #13
dense swhisper1 Jun 2016 #14
I'd say that's naive. Adrahil Jun 2016 #17
yup TeamPooka Jun 2016 #19
Yep, the anti foreigner sentiment is high there. JRLeft Jun 2016 #21
"Playing up their worst fears"??? brentspeak Jun 2016 #15
assassinating one of their MP's is just "panic-mongering bull$hit" to you then too? TeamPooka Jun 2016 #18
Yeah, Brexit must mean that over half of England supported one of their MP's getting assassinated brentspeak Jun 2016 #22
what would have happened if we had not bailed out Wall Street? treestar Jun 2016 #25
If you think that is what it is, then aren't you against treestar Jun 2016 #23
Sure, the people can never be influenced to do something really bad for them or that's evil stevenleser Jun 2016 #26
If you familiarize yourself with what the 13 states were doing in the 1780s... Bucky Jun 2016 #31
The UK also has two legislative chambers, the House of Commons and House of Lords anigbrowl Jun 2016 #35
Gibraltar is fucked lapfog_1 Jun 2016 #3
Spainish commentators are talking about proposing a shared administration... Bucky Jun 2016 #32
I thought the Spanish were talking takeover lapfog_1 Jun 2016 #33
Nothing official yet, I don't think. So far, the UK is shooting down any offer Bucky Jun 2016 #34
More to the point, they'll have to close the border in Ireland. MADem Jun 2016 #4
Northern Ireland/Ireland border? treestar Jun 2016 #24
That is an interesting thought. BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #36
Would they have to rename the country then? Bucky Jun 2016 #5
Well, there have been a few rumors of Northern Ireland splitting over this. musicblind Jun 2016 #6
So it will end up just being the Kingdom of England? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #7
Maybe they can go back to Mercia, Wessex and Northumbria nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #16
UK enid602 Jun 2016 #28
I'm pretty sure Greater London was in the Bremain camp. Bucky Jun 2016 #29
yes enid602 Jun 2016 #38
It will be interesting to see what happens Staph Jun 2016 #8
I don't see it being an even split of the oil. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #9
maybe, but I suspect all or most will eventually fall in line with england swhisper1 Jun 2016 #11
"England prevails, Leader." n/t Orsino Jun 2016 #20
Will Ireland push for unification? apnu Jun 2016 #27
Sinn Fein are pushing for a reunification vote so Northern Ireland can stay in the EU Bucky Jun 2016 #30
Probably not. roamer65 Jun 2016 #37
Why are you so sure about an independence vote? Jim Lane Jun 2016 #40
Good for Scots who are liberal and want to be in the EU. Bad for the English. The Tory lock on pampango Jun 2016 #39

pkdu

(3,977 posts)
1. Yep ...unintended consequences...this is why the US was wise to have HOUSE and SENATE
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 02:12 AM
Jun 2016

referendums , especially in times of turmoil/change are NOT a good idea.

Vote the people you trust IN...let let them handle it.

TeamPooka

(24,220 posts)
10. maybe, when you play up to their worst fears and racial hatreds, right? That was how this was
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:50 AM
Jun 2016

sold to them.
Nothing like a little political assassination to seal the deal for the UK voters too.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
17. I'd say that's naive.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 09:07 AM
Jun 2016

That drove SOME of the vote, no doubt, but I think most of it was plain old nativism, Boris Johnson-style.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
15. "Playing up their worst fears"???
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 08:55 AM
Jun 2016

The entire argument against Brexit was based on panic. "The sky will fall" if England leaves!

Same sort of elite panic-mongering we suffer from here in the US when the nation was told the sky would fall unless Wall Street was bailed out with the tax dollars of those citizens who lost their life savings. The same sort of elite panic-mongering we have drilled into our heads at the slightest mention that we renegotiate NAFTA and kick China out of the WTO.

It's all panic-mongering bull$hit meant to scare the masses while they're being ripped off for the benefit of a tiny elite who are laughing it up in a smoke-filled room.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
22. Yeah, Brexit must mean that over half of England supported one of their MP's getting assassinated
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 11:45 AM
Jun 2016

Any other brilliant deductions on your part?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
23. If you think that is what it is, then aren't you against
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 11:53 AM
Jun 2016

the Constitution, which provides for government by elected bodies and executives? That's our system.

Bucky

(53,987 posts)
31. If you familiarize yourself with what the 13 states were doing in the 1780s...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jun 2016

you'd be skeptical about pure democracy too. The results were chaotic, self defeating, and threatening to leave the states open to manipulation by European states. The principal impediment to economic prosperity was irresponsible democratic legislation.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
35. The UK also has two legislative chambers, the House of Commons and House of Lords
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jun 2016

We have referendums all the time in California, but they're quite rare in places like the UK.

Bucky

(53,987 posts)
32. Spainish commentators are talking about proposing a shared administration...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 05:06 PM
Jun 2016

kind of like what got worked out with Ireland and the late UK over Northern Ireland.

Freaky-deaky times indeed.

lapfog_1

(29,199 posts)
33. I thought the Spanish were talking takeover
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 05:11 PM
Jun 2016

and for the people who live there, that is a disaster. But they don't want to leave the EU either.

Bucky

(53,987 posts)
34. Nothing official yet, I don't think. So far, the UK is shooting down any offer
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 05:31 PM
Jun 2016
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/24/britain-gibraltar-rejects-spains-talk-joint-sovereignty

Britain rejects Spain's talk of joint sovereignty for Gibraltar

The UK and Gibraltar governments have flatly rejected Madrid’s suggestion that the Brexit vote could lead to shared sovereignty of the British territory and may even pave the way for its eventual return to Spain.

In an interview on Friday morning, Spain’s acting foreign minister, José Manuel García-Margallo, said the referendum result had significantly advanced the prospect of a Spanish flag flying on the rock of Gibraltar.

“It’s a complete change of outlook that opens up new possibilities on Gibraltar not seen for a very long time,” he told Onda Cero radio. “I hope the formula of co-sovereignty – to be clear, the Spanish flag on the rock – is much closer than before.”

He said the envisaged joint sovereignty would be along the lines of the model discussed by the former Spanish prime minister, José María Aznar and his then British counterpart, Tony Blair, 14 years ago: “British-Spanish sovereignty for a time, followed by Gibraltar’s return to Spanish sovereignty”.

He stressed that he was not celebrating the UK’s decision to leave the EU, but his remarks – and his suggestion that any talks on sovereignty should include Gibraltar – were met with a blunt response.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
4. More to the point, they'll have to close the border in Ireland.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 02:27 AM
Jun 2016

People were getting used to going back and forth. Now there will be formalities.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
24. Northern Ireland/Ireland border?
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jun 2016

Because Ireland is still in the EU? Interesting side effect. And Scotland leaves - NI might almost want to go with it.

BlueMTexpat

(15,366 posts)
36. That is an interesting thought.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 06:15 PM
Jun 2016

There have been calls by some Irish politicians for a union or some-such arrangement between the two Irelands, which is likely a long shot.

But the idea of NI teaming up with Scotland might actually have better odds. They have some shared history that is not necessarily belligerent. http://www.bbc.co.uk/legacies/immig_emig/northern_ireland/ni_3/article_1.shtml Then both Scotland and NI could remain in the EU and nothing necessarily need be changed between NI and the ROI.

musicblind

(4,484 posts)
6. Well, there have been a few rumors of Northern Ireland splitting over this.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 02:57 AM
Jun 2016

Northern Ireland also voted solidly to remain. So....

Bucky

(53,987 posts)
29. I'm pretty sure Greater London was in the Bremain camp.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 04:57 PM
Jun 2016

If they split up further, there may be a fight next for a Londexit referendum

Staph

(6,251 posts)
8. It will be interesting to see what happens
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:42 AM
Jun 2016

with North Sea oil. Norway and the UK own the majority of the oilfields, but the UK portion appears to be split between Scotland and England.

The licensing fees paid by the oil companies to the nations is some really serious bucks (or pounds or krone). How do they divide those fields?


Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
9. I don't see it being an even split of the oil.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:47 AM
Jun 2016

Scotland would by all rights get the lion's share. Though the natural gas fields on the southern end of the North Sea would all go to England.

Bucky

(53,987 posts)
30. Sinn Fein are pushing for a reunification vote so Northern Ireland can stay in the EU
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jun 2016

They do more business with the Republic of Ireland than with the rest of the UK. As long as the Catholics can reassure the Protestant majority they'll have their rights protected, it'd be a savvy move.

Jesus, this discussion is surreal.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
37. Probably not.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 06:21 PM
Jun 2016

The turnout was way lower on the EU referendum than it was on the independence referendum and it failed.

The numbers aren't there yet to pass a independence referendum.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
40. Why are you so sure about an independence vote?
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jun 2016

In the 2014 referendum in Scotland, the vote on independence was Yes 44.7%, No 55.3%. That doesn't seem like such a huge margin against independence. If the Brexit backlash persuades 6% of electorate to flip from No to Yes, then independence prevails.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
39. Good for Scots who are liberal and want to be in the EU. Bad for the English. The Tory lock on
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jun 2016

parliament will get worse if liberal Scots are no longer in the electoral mix.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Brexit means Scotland wil...