Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:01 PM Jun 2016

I no longer think Sanders should quit before the convention

Had he quit right after the DC primary, it would seem like a natural progression to his quitting and endorsing her. At this point, it's too far away from the primaries and just would seem weird if he did it now.

At this point his most high profile endorsement could only come at the convention. Any quitting at this stage would be both lackluster and seem strangely contrived

I would have certainly preferred had he done it right after DC, but at this stage I think the convention is better than now/some point before convention.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I no longer think Sanders should quit before the convention (Original Post) La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 OP
As a Faux pas Jun 2016 #1
No endorsement, no speaking slot at the convention n/t cosmicone Jun 2016 #2
i dont think that's a good idea. he's going to endorse her and vote for her. he said so himself La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #4
But he did a takeback on national TV earlier today "Likelihood"??? tonyt53 Jun 2016 #8
so i have a hypothesis as to why he's remaining lukewarm before the primaries La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #11
That seems right. DemocraticWing Jun 2016 #12
People who don't endorse the nominee and whose speech is not pre-vetted cosmicone Jun 2016 #13
She isn't officially the nominee yet. floppyboo Jun 2016 #18
I disagree Gothmog Jun 2016 #15
It probably wouldn't be noticed much now... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #3
that's exactly my point La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #5
How about after the final results from California are reported, would that work? still_one Jun 2016 #6
i guess, i still think convention bring Hillary more attention and that would be a good thing La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #7
I'm totally indifferent. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #9
I no longer think of Sanders. Beacool Jun 2016 #10
+ a million! eom BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #14
I don't think he should have a speaking slot. fun n serious Jun 2016 #16
Too right, mate sturnz0r Jun 2016 #17
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
4. i dont think that's a good idea. he's going to endorse her and vote for her. he said so himself
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jun 2016

i think there is no reason to alienate his base and no need to be punitive

hillary isn't suffering because of him, she's ahead in the polls, and at this point all he can do is aid her not hurt her. so i think she should welcome his speech at the convention.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
11. so i have a hypothesis as to why he's remaining lukewarm before the primaries
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jun 2016

because he is trying to get that part of his base that is anti-hillary a chance to warm up to her. had he jumped ship immediately, maybe they would dismiss him as a sell out? whereas if he seems like he is slowly making his mind, they might continue to trust his judgment

i'm feeling benevolent after seeing hillary's numbers, so i am interpreting things as benevolently as I can.

DemocraticWing

(1,290 posts)
12. That seems right.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jun 2016

I don't have any insight to Bernie's thought process but it seems correct. Some of us are fine with voting for her, but he also brought in a lot of young people, independents, etc. who might stay home otherwise. It's in everybody's best interest if slowly we integrate those people into the Democratic Party rather than pushing them away.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
13. People who don't endorse the nominee and whose speech is not pre-vetted
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jun 2016

are never given prime-time slots. That is the tradition since 1980 when Ted Kennedy ruined Jimmy Carter's chances. Same thing happened to Poppy Bush at the hands of Pat Buchanan.

Hillary's team is seasoned and won't allow a repeat of Ted Kennedy/Jerry Brown/Pat Buchanan/Clint Eastwood to be a major story of the convention.

Bernie is not "owed" anything -- if he wants a prime-time speaking slot, he needs to get with the program and do things in the interests of the democratic party in general and Hillary Clinton in particular. To victors go the spoils.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. It probably wouldn't be noticed much now...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:15 PM
Jun 2016

but the convention would be the right time to endorse her and try to heal the rifts.

Everybody's paying attention then.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
10. I no longer think of Sanders.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016

Far too many other things are taking precedence. Like working our butts off to stop Trump and the Republicans. Like trying to figure out the long term damage from Brexit.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
16. I don't think he should have a speaking slot.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 07:50 PM
Jun 2016

He will use the prime time speaking slot to rail against democrats and talk about all these things he thinks are "rigged." Bad idea in my opinion. I don't think he will concede before convention, and maybe not after either.

sturnz0r

(30 posts)
17. Too right, mate
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jun 2016

The bernieorBusters are real.. bernie doesn't want to endorse too quickly after DC after he had already said we're raking it to the convention. He would have seemed like a sell-out at that time, to them..

Additionally, he really does want to do everything in his power to make America a better place, for what that is worth..

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I no longer think Sanders...