Mon Aug 1, 2016, 05:17 AM
OnDoutside (19,705 posts)
Comey - Gowdy exchange on July 7, can anyone clarify the following ?
In their exchange, Gowdy asked was Clinton telling the truth that there was no classified material in the emails, to which Comey replied it was not truthful.
Now my recollection is that at that point, there were 3 emails that Comey had determined as Classified, and that subsequently a Democrat Congressman had honed in on those 3 emails, and got Comey to admit that there should have been Classified markings on the Headers (but there weren't), so those also could not be adjudged to Classified. Consequently, Clinton HAD been telling the truth. I just watched MSNBC show the Comey - Gowdy exchange and it stops at that point, judging Hillary's claim to be untrue. Can anyone explain this ? Did Comey issue a clarification, and if so, where is it ?
|
12 replies, 1377 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
OnDoutside | Aug 2016 | OP |
TBA | Aug 2016 | #1 | |
OnDoutside | Aug 2016 | #3 | |
BlueStateLib | Aug 2016 | #2 | |
OnDoutside | Aug 2016 | #4 | |
OnDoutside | Aug 2016 | #5 | |
karynnj | Aug 2016 | #6 | |
OnDoutside | Aug 2016 | #9 | |
baldguy | Aug 2016 | #7 | |
BlueMTexpat | Aug 2016 | #8 | |
OnDoutside | Aug 2016 | #10 | |
BlueMTexpat | Aug 2016 | #11 | |
OnDoutside | Aug 2016 | #12 |
Response to OnDoutside (Original post)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 05:22 AM
TBA (817 posts)
1. Take a look at factcheck.org
They have a good article about Clintons emails.
|
Response to TBA (Reply #1)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 05:39 AM
OnDoutside (19,705 posts)
3. That doesn't clarify it unfortunately
Did Clinton’s emails contain classified information? |
Response to OnDoutside (Original post)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 05:39 AM
BlueStateLib (937 posts)
2. Director Comey and Rep. Cummings
Response to BlueStateLib (Reply #2)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 05:51 AM
OnDoutside (19,705 posts)
4. Thanks for that. To me, that clears Hillary completely but where is the official statement that she
WAS being truthful ? If there isn't one, shouldn't someone in the Clinton campaign have requested Comey issue a public statement clarifying this ? Is anyone from the campaign going to contact MSNBC about this morning's hatchet job ?
|
Response to OnDoutside (Original post)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 06:18 AM
OnDoutside (19,705 posts)
5. Morning Joe has just said Hillary LIED about the emails. This is something that should be hammered
back by the Clinton campaign....it's stupidity that they have not done so.
|
Response to OnDoutside (Reply #5)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 06:27 AM
karynnj (59,153 posts)
6. It is pretty complicated and it may be the campaign thinks ir worse to bring up
It might be that no one who is likely to vote for Clinton will not do so due to the emsil charges. It might be the fact that Comey said no prosecutor would indict is the real final word.
They may feel that ANYTHING not questioning Trump or talking issues is a bad idea. The email thing is a bad topic where HRC herself said what she did was a mistake. |
Response to karynnj (Reply #6)
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 04:37 AM
OnDoutside (19,705 posts)
9. It may well be the case, though even Chris Matthews was saying that "Comey's report
brings up questions", however THAT was before the hearing with Comey where he accepted that ALL the contested emails were not classified. If a pro Democrat like him didn't understand the consequences, what hope has the voter ?
|
Response to OnDoutside (Original post)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 06:29 AM
baldguy (36,649 posts)
7. The first thing that should be said is that the whole Benghazi/email thing was a GOP witch hunt.
The premise of the investigation was a lie.
|
Response to OnDoutside (Original post)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 08:04 AM
BlueMTexpat (15,130 posts)
8. Can we ixnay the GOP-created
scandals on DU, please?
If this is literally the only thing bothering you about this election, you are on the wrong website. ![]() ![]() |
Response to BlueMTexpat (Reply #8)
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 04:39 AM
OnDoutside (19,705 posts)
10. If you read the post you'd see that it was in reference to a current MSNBC peddling inaccuracies.
Response to OnDoutside (Reply #10)
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 06:02 AM
BlueMTexpat (15,130 posts)
11. I did read it.
But why continue to give it exposure here?
![]() We see enough of it everywhere else. |
Response to BlueMTexpat (Reply #11)
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 10:30 AM
OnDoutside (19,705 posts)