2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis is why Bill Clinton should STFU.
"Bill Clinton calls Obamacare 'the craziest thing in the world'
"Bill Clinton criticized President Barack Obama's signature policy reform while on the stump for his wife, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, calling Obamacare "the craziest thing in the world."
Speaking Monday at a Democratic rally in Flint, Michigan, the former president ripped into the Affordable Care Act for flooding the health care insurance market and causing premiums to rise for middle-class Americans who do not qualify for subsidies.
"So you've got this crazy system where all of a sudden 25 million more people have health care and then the people who are out there busting it, sometimes 60 hours a week, wind up with their premiums doubled and their coverage cut in half. It's the craziest thing in the world," Clinton said.
Clinton, whose efforts with his wife to overhaul health care in the 1990s were stymied by a recalcitrant Congress and the insurance lobby, told the crowd the insurance model "doesn't make sense" and "doesn't work here."
Touting his wife's proposal to allow people without access to subsidies to buy into Medicare and Medicaid, he also acknowledged that market-based solutions would not solve the country's problems with insurance costs and coverage.
"On the other hand, the current system works fine if you're eligible for Medicaid, if you're a lower-income working person; if you're already on Medicare, or if you get enough subsidies on a modest income that you can afford your health care," Clinton said. "But the people that are getting killed in this deal are small business people and individuals who make just a little too much to get any of these subsidies."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/04/politics/bill-clinton-obamacare-craziest-thing/
Does the ACA have issues, yes it does, and they need to be addressed, but I would like to remind Bill that the healthcare attempt by his administration went no where, and nothing happened until President Obama was able to get the ACA through Congress, and that included blue dog Democrats who wouldn't accept single payer, a public option, or Medicare for all.
Get off your F*King high horse Bill, you are not helping anyone
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Groan.
still_one
(92,061 posts)We need a united party, and I do not see him contributing to that
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Been a few months since I saw such obvious pretzel logic being deployed to defend violating the Terms of Service.
monmouth4
(9,686 posts)on the tarmac after the funeral. He's comes off as quite self-important with little thought or consideration of others..
MaeScott
(878 posts)pnwmom
(108,955 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)I have no doubt the media is presenting this in more of a negative light than it is. The media is looking for anything to stir the pot. When Hillary made an observation regarding millineals at a fund raising event, the media sure distorted the meaning of that.
a kennedy
(29,615 posts)u
Mamajami
(257 posts)What he says about the ACA at this point is going to bring some folks to her side. Bill is smart and know exactly what he is doing. Hillary can't do this she would offend the base she needs to hold.
Chill!
radius777
(3,635 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)and people thought it was a horrible idea.
Why is it now OK for Bill to argue against it?
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)I am currently without health insurance because I actually cannot afford the $400+ a month I'd have to pay for my "subsidized" health care. They don't take into consideration my monthly costs (rent, car payment, car insurance, groceries, etc.). I live in DC, where the cost of living should be factored into what I'd have to pay.
still_one
(92,061 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)It doesn't really help the middle class who have to buy their own insurance. I'm a freelancer so I have to provide my own insurance (which I can't afford) and it's crazy to think that I don't need more than a $35 subsidy (which is what I qualify for).
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)And EVERYTHING went up while coverage went down. I pay over $500/month. Prescription coverage is now worse and co pays went up.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)My monthly premium is $1,000 per month.
Bill's comments will most definitely get the attention of undecideds who have been affected in the same way. Big Dawg knows exactly what he's doing.
still_one
(92,061 posts)using this as a slight against President Obama.
Hillary has talking about inequities that need to be addressed and fixed with the ACA, but not in an adversarial way.
It was the blue dogs at the time who refused to sign onto a public option, single payer, or Medicare for all, so it wasn't going to happen in 2008. It would have been something or nothing, and while your situation has left you out in the cold with the ACA, that the foot is now in the door means that revisions and enhancements can be made to cover those who did not get any benefit from it. Another reason why controlling the Senate, and gaining in the House is critical, or nothing will really change if Hillary becomes President
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)We get a subsidy, but just a little. The problem is, if you are young, the subsidy is great because insurance is cheaper, but the older you get...watch out. If you are over 60 you get killed unless you are near poverty level.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)or anyone else for that matter. I rarely go to the doctor because fortunately I don't need to often (although I am due for a knee replacement) but who in the hell can afford a $10k deductible? Why bother with insurance with something like that?
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Plus all the stuff they don't cover.
We HAVE used it this year. First time ever anyone in my family has been sick. We have so far spent over $9,000 out of pocket.
My husband is out of work for a while. Hopefully he will recover enough to go back to work. We took early retirement as a stop-gap.
My family has pitched in to help and we drained some of an IRA to pay for it.
And starting in January... repeat.
Oh, total Blue Cross has paid is $116,000
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)goal needs to be Medicare for all, a public option, or single payer
vi5
(13,305 posts)..the king of third way triangulating doesn't like a bill that was watered down to the point of ineffectivity because of.....the third way triangulating required to get it passed.
Please tell us more, Mr. President.
anamandujano
(7,004 posts)He doesn't have to get so detailed about policy. I agree with the OP. Why give the tRump@sskissers fodder to spin?
still_one
(92,061 posts)President in a negative light on this.
The blue dogs were instrumental in preventing a public option, single payer, or Medicare for those 55 or older. Not one republican voted for it, and nothing would have happened without the blue dogs support.
It was a rock and a hard place.
radius777
(3,635 posts)I think Team Dem realizes there are issues with the ACA that many middle class voters are having, and he is speaking to this concern, lest they be lured in by Trump.
Remember, the Big Dawg has street cred with many working class voters who remember how good the 90's were; he came from that background and speaks their language, with the same type of righteous indignation about kitchen table issues.
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Here is a little secret. He said something all of us are already aware of. All of us. Right, left, spineless Stein supporters and ignorant Johnson supporters.
The fact you call these comments as Clinton being on a high horse is really revealing. Not about Bill. Sticking up for middle class America is "high horse" to you. Hmmm.
anamandujano
(7,004 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Speaking up for middle class families is now "high horse". Transparent.
I understand you disagree with Clinton here. I an a majority of Americans are in full agreement with him.
anamandujano
(7,004 posts)It sounds like he is criticizing Obama.
still_one
(92,061 posts)more diplomatic terminology. Maybe I could have too in my original OP.
PragmaticLiberal
(904 posts)Still doesn't mean he couldn't have phrased it differently....
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)Don't say POTUS had to compromise with the GOP.
If anything, he compromised with Blue Dogs that got rolled out of Congress.
The public option (Medicare buy in), much less Medicare for all, was never even on the negotiation table. What kind of starting point is that?
anamandujano
(7,004 posts)Leave Obama out of it. Don't you see how that could make problems?
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)People tried to get the President to not make it such a corporate giveaway (absolutely no controls on pricing, just improvements in levels of service).
People that are not poor are still stuck with high ass deductibles and out of control drug prices. And zero competition from Medicare.
anamandujano
(7,004 posts)Why have it appear that we are eating our own? There is no. good. reason.
I'm not talking policy. I'm talking diplomacy. To be fair, Bill's judgment has not always been stellar.
still_one
(92,061 posts)Ms. Yertle
(466 posts)with the R's. They weren't going to vote for ANYTHING he proposed. The compromises were all with the D side. This is one thing we can't blame the R's for.
former9thward
(31,936 posts)Not one Republican voted for the ACA.
GhostofFDR
(32 posts)He had to compromise with moderate Dems after Scott Brown won a Senate spot to replace Kennedy's previous seat.
The ACA was teetering on getting enough Democratic backing to have the votes. The Public Option was dropped to get moderate Dems on board, unfortunately.
former9thward
(31,936 posts)Didn't you read that?
still_one
(92,061 posts)insinuation that somehow I am "slighting the middle class', that is uncalled for, and wrong.
If you need me to remind you how when Bill Clinton was President how he helped the middle class, I will be more than happy
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I don't believe my words are uncalled for, and you have actually agreed that they are not wrong. You don't need to remind me, you need to recognize helping the middle class is still important today. You have gone to a level of nit pick that has opened the door for these questions.
still_one
(92,061 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)So when other Dems argued that we need to move toward single-payer they were accused of trying to "dismantle" Obamacare and that was something HORRIBLE.
Now we all know there are problems that need to be fixed?
I woke up in Bizzaroworld
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)And we should move towards single payer for all including the elderly...what we said should not happen is to dismantle Obamacare before having single payer...we need something. And Obamacare has saved many lives including that of my daughter. We could not get single payer through and still can't so right now we need to sustain Obamacare...someday maybe single payer.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"So when other Dems argued that we need to move toward single-payer they were accused of trying to "dismantle" Obamacare and that was something HORRIBLE. "
I agree we need to move toward single payer. As does Obama. As does the op, I believe. No clue what you are talking about here.
"Now we all know there are problems that need to be fixed?"
I would hope so. I guess everyone but you feels healthcare in this country needs to be fixed. Some things are too obvious to debate.
"I woke up in Bizzaroworld"
Please note I am not the one that claimed it as you place of residence.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)in order to get single payer, that was a compliment?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Totally different now. For reasons.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)It's the problem of the "speak no evil" policy around here. It makes it hard to have a discussion when one isn't supposed to speak the truth. It's funny to realize that if Clinton had posted his comments here, they'd be alert worthy. There are real, serious problems with the ACA and the middle class, that Clinton is trying to appeal for support, knows some of what they are. A presidential candidate has to be able to address those things. And they shouldn't have to worry about hurting the feelings of the democrats that have gone before them.
George II
(67,782 posts)...and just after that?
still_one
(92,061 posts)way to present something as diversionary between Democrats
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Hillary has said in the primaries that it needs adjusting and the recent news on Obamacare is forcing her hand. As it sits the ACA isn't sustainable.
still_one
(92,061 posts)Auggie
(31,133 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)Auggie
(31,133 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)The republicans and the blue dogs made it clear that wasn't going to happen
What the ACA did is get the foot in the door
The short comings can and should be addressed, but unless Congress changes drastically, single payer does not look like in the cards
Auggie
(31,133 posts)I know what and how it happened. That doesn't make it right. The ACA still sucks.
I have my fingers crossed that California (my state) can put together a public option to add to Covered California. This might help get the ball rolling in other states.
Bill Clinton absolutely nailed it.
still_one
(92,061 posts)not what he was suggesting. I also never said it was right.
The ACA has a lot of problems, but it has also helped a lot of folks
To put it your way, sure, it sucks for a good number of people, but compared to what was there before it is an improvement.
The all or nothing philosophy would have done nothing.
10 years ago before the ACA, if I was to get an individual policy with no preexisting conditions, which had good coverage, it would cost me 500-1000 dollars a month, and that sucked too. I was fortunate, the companies I worked for split the heath insurance premium cost, and with a family that helped big time.
California is my state also, and unfortunately there isn't a public option on the ballot in November, so the only way that is going to happen is through the legislature and the Governor. I hope it happens, and I hope The Giants make it to the series also
Auggie
(31,133 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)The task falls to Clinton to preserve what's good and make it better.
It is how we do things in the US.
I am glad to hear them talking about those adjustments that must be made rather than run with the Turmpenservatives with "Repeal! Repeal! Repeal!"
still_one
(92,061 posts)because they slightly exceed the subsidy limit. Assuming that Medicare for all could not pass in this environment, they need to do exactly as you are suggesting
Response to still_one (Original post)
Post removed
apcalc
(4,462 posts)anamandujano
(7,004 posts)apcalc
(4,462 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)and the failure of states to expand Medicaid. But I am the first one to admit there are issues that must be dealt with...this is what president Obama could get... not necessarily what he wanted. I didn't hear you complain when during the primary Bernie Sanders attacked Obamacare relentlessly. I hope we will move towards single payer with a public option.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)Best comment so far today, imho.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)My support for the Obama family is a record I am proud of. I have the right to disagree with the implementation of the strategy.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)retirement health care (over 22 grandfathered in policy ), she is in college and has a pre-existing. She could not get insurance at any price under the old system...This is where I part company with some...those people who are willing to sacrifice the lives of innocent people for single payer and refuse to accept any other plan...well we might have to wait another 100 years for that to happen...Obama got what he could. Had he not passed some health care, thousand would have died by now maybe more...including my daughter ...so disagree all you want. I will simply remain grateful that we had such a decent compassionate president who put people first and not ideology.
SixString
(1,057 posts)...they were quickly taken to task.
I guess it's ok to do that now.
radius777
(3,635 posts)Bill said Trump wants to go back to the old system that was the most expensive in the world, and that the ACA helped many, but still has issues for middle class or small business people who don't qualify for subsidies, and that Hillary will address this concern.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)But it was the best you could do at the time, wasn't it, Bill? Even though it destroyed careers and hurt our military readiness.
Right, Bill?
radius777
(3,635 posts)era in modern American history, caught in the grip of the Reagan Revolution. It's amazing a Democrat, even a moderate like Clinton/Gore even got elected, it was only the force of Bill's charisma that allowed it to happen.
I suppose Bill could've pushed for gay marriage/gays serving openly and lost all 50 states, and caused Dems to hemorrhage seats all over the country.
President Pat Buchanan surely would've done alot for gay people.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)What we squeezed out of Congress was about the best we could have hoped for.
radius777
(3,635 posts)and now it's time for Dems to go for more if H is elected.
That's all Bill is saying, not bashing Obama.
It is strategy to try to reclaim voters who may have some issue with the ACA, and who may be leaning towards Trump or 3rd party.
yardwork
(61,538 posts)jalan48
(13,841 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)The next president will need to fix it....Obama would be the first to agree
tman
(983 posts)She's up in the polls and Trump was drowning in bad headlines.
Context or no context. A stupid choice of words.
Mamajami
(257 posts)tman
(983 posts)Bill has put his foot in it multiple times in the last year, just as he did in 08.
When it becomes a pattern, it's probably personal.
Kathy M
(1,242 posts)posted link at the bottom of this thread from conversation the other day if interested .
Its good to have this subject on the table .....
Let Trump talk away and repeat Clinton ' s words .... maybe there are some supporters of trumps interested in this subject
yardwork
(61,538 posts)I think this might be a smart move.
Remember it's all about optics. Obamacare is very unpopular among the demographics that Hillary has to persuade to vote for her. This way, candidate Hillary can distance herself from an unpopular law while not personally showing disloyalty to the president.
Anyway, we all want single payer.
still_one
(92,061 posts)"criticism of President Obama", than there actually is.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)but Bill should just hold this type of speech until after the election. We are on the cusp of victory and Bill is not helping the situation by giving the repubs ammo.
still_one
(92,061 posts)a little less criticism of the President, and more about what needs to be done to fix it
Joe941
(2,848 posts)this story is plastered across all the media now and its being portrayed as bill and obama in a spat. We need to be portraying unity so close to the election. After the election we can tell it like it is - its a matter of optics and timing.
yardwork
(61,538 posts)Not after the week Trump had. This can only help us.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)blame mostly as I posted before.
yardwork
(61,538 posts)One of the last remaining reasons that people cling to Trump is because they've been taught to hate Obamacare. Now a Clinton is saying that he feels their pain. Way to take the air out of Trump.
helpisontheway
(5,004 posts)during his presidency. Hillary needs Barack and Michelle. Let him piss them off if he wants to...Barack should have let him take his own flight back after the funeral.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)louis-t
(23,267 posts)I now have drug co-pay, and it costs $30 a month less than I was paying before.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)While the ACA has not delivered on some of the cost savings promised the positives far outweigh the negatives. Two of the biggest positives are the 25 million that didn't have health insurance before but now they do and the elimination of pre-existing conditions. We have this "crazy system" because it took people like Ben Nelson to get it passed and with his insurance background they were going to be protected.
still_one
(92,061 posts)something needs to be done to address those issues, where if someone's income is slightly over, they do not get a subsidy because they cannot afford the premiums.
While everything you point out is accurate, there are a good number who don't get the benefit, because the premium is too costly
My issue was that go after improving the ACA, and fixing the discrepancies, with less emphasis on slight the administration for at least getting a landmark heathcare bill foundation, that can be improved upon, or perhaps evolved into Medicare for all.
I have been fortunate in my career where my employer shared the cost of health insurance. Ten years ago before the ACA, if I was going to go out and get good healthcare insurance coverage, with no pre-existing conditions, just for myself, it would cost anywhere from 500-1000 dollars/month.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)The ACA is health care insurance reform
Not health care reform.
Good for him.
The solution is obvious. Just do it.
apnu
(8,749 posts)The ACA is the Republican plan from the 90s that went up against the Clinton initiative. I know I was there for it and I canvassed for the Clinton plan.
ACA is, at best, "OK" but it is a hot mess. It will remain a hot mess while we still have a for-profit health insurance system. That model has no interest in healing people because sick people are profitable and will pay anything to live. Its extortion, plain and simple.
The ACA needs much improvement, and the first thing we need is to burn down the for-profit insurance industry and replace it with a non-profit model focused on wellness and health.
That would come as an incredible shock to America and most Americans are stuck in their ways and would be resistant to that kind of upheaval change, but its what we need if America is serious about the health of its citizens.
The ACA is what the Dems could pass at the time when they had that tiny window do do so. Its clearly rushed, but yes it got done and it does help people far more than what we had before.
reflection
(6,286 posts)Consider making this an OP.
pansypoo53219
(20,952 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)Response to still_one (Original post)
Post removed
OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)message thoughts, that don't screw your wife's chances, use a TELEPROMPTER.
Stuckinthebush
(10,836 posts)He gave Trump and the GOP a really nice gift. Just shut up, Bill.
All that said, it won't have any effect on the race. It was just stunningly stupid for him to say that
OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)That I agree with. That's the guy I voted for in 1992. Not the one who signed NAFTA, DOMA, and telecommunications deregulation.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)Yes I love the flawed, wonderful, despicable, brilliant, idiot, intelectual, horn dog, best president ever and a major asshole on occasion. It's an acquired taste to hate loving and admiring this man. I bet Hillary has had a few of those incidents.
still_one
(92,061 posts)GhostofFDR
(32 posts)that Bill doesn't handle criticisms of failings of his administration, even if well intentioned that were bad in retrospect. The kicker is he can't bite his tongue and zip it while his wife is running for the same office. Pride seems to be more important than not damaging her campaign.
Kathy M
(1,242 posts)Kathy M
(1,242 posts)Post below is not as long as this but some information inside
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141589172
Senate and House seats are just as important to have
Joe941
(2,848 posts)Biden has basically said: he knows people aren't crazy about Hillary but vote for her anyway. Ugg