2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton is a 68 year old woman. And plenty of people hate her for it.
It's not that she's unlikable . . . any more than most older women.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/hillary-clinton-is-a-68-year-old-woman-and-plenty-of-people-hate-her-for-it/2016/10/06/fac46ee8-8bd9-11e6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html?hpid=hp_special-topic-chain_dvorak-8pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
A woman her age is supposed to be invisible. But Hillary Clinton, who is 68, refuses to disappear and there is no shortage of people who despise her for it.
One voter at a Donald Trump rally described her to The Washington Posts Jenna Johnson last week as an angry, crotchety old hag. Trump, who isnt exactly a spring chicken at age 70, claims Clinton lacks stamina and a presidential look and mocked her by acting out her stumble when she had pneumonia last month.
Theres misogyny, and then theres the ageist misogyny that older women face. That undercurrent runs very deep in our culture, and its one of the reasons the haters hate Hillary Clinton so deeply.
No one has talked about this much, but its a very real phenomenon in this election.
SNIP
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Just resting her hands, he did not display stamina.
JI7
(89,247 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Bongo Prophet
(2,643 posts)Fuck that noise.
procon
(15,805 posts)Response to procon (Reply #5)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Goodness. Time to remember that a whole lot of women are Republicans. This is DU, not a Trump rally.
procon
(15,805 posts)Republican women don't hang out in DU.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)people mostly vote their VALUES.
procon
(15,805 posts)"Values" are a moral judgement, and many Republican voters are quite flexible when it comes to applying those so called values to themselves. Just look at the list of staunch Republican politicos who vociferously claim to be champions of "family values" whilst they clandestinely visit hookers, gay bars and keep mistresses on the side. That's why they can overlook Trumps womanizing, his infidelities and 3 marriages.
Self interests are tangible benefits like Medicare and SS that Republican politicians and rightwing pundits have convinced their voter base to undermine. Jeopardizing the indefensible public health and safety regs that protect them, and chopping down educational and employment benefits that boost everyone's incomes, is good policy. Republican voters routinely oppose the social welfare programs that they themselves depend, and object to any efforts to modernize our flagging infrastructure, transportation, energy, communication policies.
The irrational inconsistencies don't matter, for people who don't use critical thinking skills, they automatically filter out information that doesn't confirm what they already believe, so their own individual confirmation biases is continually reinforced. That explains why Republicans still believe in trickle down economics, and why they think that repealing the "Death Tax" or Obamacare is going to benefit them.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)values. Researchers went searching for an explanation for why conservatives were voting "against their interests" and found the same answer again and again. They don't. It's that it's not all about money for most people, or even mostly.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Trump Is 70 Hillary is 68. Reagan was pretty old when he took office and already going around the bend his last couple of years.
I think it's a legit issue....I'm a bit younger but not sure I'd want that grind. And if it is an issue Trump is the elder of the two.
One might think people between 42 and maybe 57 or so would be the best combo of relative youth and experience.
Some of it is misogyny to be sure because again Trump is older and I hear nothing about his age.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)because Trump is even older and yet he keeps suggesting that she's old and frail -- despite the fact that her life expectancy is likely years longer, because she's a woman.
And she is much, much sharper than Reagan was when he took office. She's still brilliant, actually. He covered up his slips with geniality.
And no one ever seemed to care that Bernie was 74. How come Hillary's the only one who's disparaged for her age?
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Clinton Derangement Syndrome transverses all ages.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)movement was something that ended before they were born, viewed in grainy old documentaries that always show someone burning a bra.
Instead, Hillary drew the same kind of hate-filled backlash our first black president did when she became the assertive wife of a governor, and then president, who said plainly that she intended to make the most of her relation to power, not just gratify the DC elites by giving good parties and dressing glamorously.
Now, a quarter century later, Hillary's still busy smashing down barriers to equality, and those "barriers" are still screaming in outrage at the very idea, epitomized by her.
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)is being an older woman of color.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I've even whined about it in the past, when I was kind of a newbie to a club I was always afraid of and didn't want to join. Emotionally it's not an easy transition, and even worse--it's so stigmatized that even just talking about your feelings is taboo. So of course, you're afraid to even broach the subject.
Older women are another receptacle for contempt; we're expected to take it silently. We're expected to slink meekly into a lonely darkened room.
Well, anyway, we all need to see multitudes of role-models that break those claustrophobic molds we're all supposed to fit.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)'I'm not a stand by your man sort'...a reason to hate.
It doesn't matter what she does, the people who hate her will create excuse after excuse to back their own hate. I blame Rush for creating it.
senseandsensibility
(17,000 posts)when she was younger, too.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)If you have a problem with Hillary's voice, you have a problem with women.
Fuck that shit.
She sounds like an average 68 yo woman. No difference. It's pretty telling when people have a serious problem with her voice or her looks.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)tavernier
(12,377 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)And my mom has literally gone full on Clinton supporter, blowing my mind.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)Nuts on that noise-as my mom used to say.
Maeve
(42,279 posts)In western thought, we often have the division of women into maid, matron, crone and we're finally getting to break some of that stereotype. There's been a movement to claim our age--Red Hat Society and that sort of thing--but it is taking a major political campaign to shatter thru to something approaching 'normalized' views of women. About. Freaking. Time.
Personal note--When I stopped coloring my hair and let it go silver and grey, I watched myself 'disappear'. Fuck that shit.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I recalled this passage from Roger Angell's piece "This Old Man," on being in his 90s (which I've recommended before: read it!). He discusses the invisibility he has come to inhabit in his old age, and specifically mentions that it seems to come much earlier for women:
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/02/17/old-man-3
Any woman over 50 who has failed to recognize her duty to become invisible is apparently not to be trusted.
UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)That makes them upset. Why? Women are suppose to be dumb, eye candy.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)The Trumpites control that stage and the juries so the misogyny rarely gets a hide.