Watching Joy Reid's second hour of broadcast, she didn't let the bullsh*t just fly...

[LowerManhattanite]

...as one of Trump's nastier and more condescending (and she called him condescending to his quivering face) surrogates—Peter Navarro tried to bogart the segment.

She stopped him from NOT answering the questions posed, called him out on being little more than a spinmeister and didn't allow him to buffalo the other guests.

Well done, Joy Ann!

[Madam45for2923]

1. Hahaha!!! I like your verbs!

[ashling]

2. She had some female Trump supporter / surrogate who said Trumps was to be presumed innocent

until proven guilty in a court of law .... this is akin to how Anita Hill was attacked. or claiming that somebody is violating their First Am. rights. No one is charging him in a court of law . No one is threatening to put HIM in jail.

Next time hie throngs call for her to be locked up I guess he will calmly inform them that she has a right to be considered innocent ... yeah, not frickin' likely!

I wonder what these great legal minds thought / said about O.J. Simpson when he WAS in a court of law?

[Gabi Hayes]

3. saw that. rerunning it now. navarro, to be fair, tried to talk policy, but

she wanted to stick to the first ten minutes of trump's speech, which was about the women

he then gishgalloped through a supplyside/protectionist screed, complete with confabulated statistics that nobody there was prepared to dispute. he was MOST obnoxious, as he always is

they should have had somebody moderately versed in economics, to take him on regarding his voodoo economic plan. here's an example:

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2016/09/who_is_peter_na.html

[Gabi Hayes]

4. she just showed a link to a site rebutting some false claims he made about wages

didn't catch the site, because some raving maniac is on the phone, assaulting me for not responding to his early morning phone solicitation

poor bob, I feel sorry for you!

[LowerManhattanite]

5. He was pissed...

She was 'I'm the host—I call the tune.”, he was “I am focusing on THESE talking points only and I don't appreciate you asking me stuff that doesn't allow for these to come out natural-sounding.”

He also pretty much said that E.J. Dionne—the only man on the panel—was the only one who understood him.

He was livid. Good!

[Gabi Hayes]

6. he's like that all the time. I've seen him at least five times, and he's very agressive,

always spouting voodoo econ dogma, in the most supercilious, aggressive manner

they never have anybody on who can go toe to toe with his gobbledeegook, which is a shame, cause it's all right wing dogma, unrooted in reality

did you go to the link I posted? it takes apart his wingnut BS point by point

[LowerManhattanite]

11. I did indeed!

Thank you!

[Gabi Hayes]

12. how do you take creeps like him seriously?

nobody with any economic knowledge does

and yet we we had Laffer's ridiculous fantasy made the bulwark of an economic policy that helped DESTROY the backbone of our working class and accelerate the gap between rich and poor logarithmically

[LowerManhattanite]

13. Hyper-aggressive master salesman...

...sometimes über-confidence while presenting bullsh*t can make said said bullsh*t look like gold to those who know just enough to get themselves (us) in trouble.

[Lucinda]

7. She should be getting hazardous duty pay these days

[TeeYiYi]

8. k+r for 'bogart.' ..nt

TYY

[Generic Brad]

9. Which network is she on these days?

I would like to catch her. I have always admired the way she voices her opinions.

[Gabi Hayes]

10. msnbc, sat and sun, 9AM central, for two hours

popping up more and more at night, as fill in and guest

she'll no doubt be on a lot during trump's swan song performance in 17 days