Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,036 posts)
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 11:02 PM Oct 2016

Ruth Marcus: Taking Trump to court: The evidence against a nasty man

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/taking-trump-to-court-the-evidence-against-a-nasty-man/2016/10/21/13b9f0c8-97b3-11e6-bb29-bf2701dbe0a3_story.html?postshare=9381477177508530&tid=ss_fb-bottom&utm_term=.fccbceb15231

Taking Trump to court: The evidence against a nasty man

By Ruth Marcus Columnist October 21



Even as the country recoils, justifiably, from the prospect of Donald Trump threatening not to respect the election results, let us not lose sight of the mounting evidence of Trump’s mistreatment of women — and his offensive debate dismissal of their claims.

At the second debate, Trump claimed that his taped boasting about grabbing women without consent was just that — all talk, no action. In the 10 days before the third debate, nine women came forward to dispute that assertion.

So moderator Chris Wallace posed the key question: “Why would so many different women from so many different circumstances over so many different years . . . all make up these stories?

Trump’s response was a characteristically repulsive stew of dishonesty, outright lies, conspiracy theorizing and blame-shifting.

snip//

Imagining this evidence assessed in court isn’t just instructive — it’s tempting. Because while the time has long passed for filing charges over the underlying behavior, Trump’s description of Stoynoff as “a liar” and “the dishonest writer from People magazine” opens the door to a defamation suit.

And the prospect of discovery, including Trump being forced to submit to a deposition. Imagine the man who threatens to sue everyone in sight having to answer questions about his conduct toward women, under oath. What a fitting coda for such an ugly campaign, and for such a, pardon the phrase, nasty man.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ruth Marcus: Taking Trump to court: The evidence against a nasty man (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2016 OP
this, below, says it all....and now, it's CUBBY time! Gabi Hayes Oct 2016 #1
Has been going on for years ronlit1 Oct 2016 #2
Not "a" deposition, but for each of the 13 women (and counting) he wants to sue... IllinoisBirdWatcher Oct 2016 #3
And the Apprentice Tapes GopherGal Oct 2016 #4
 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
1. this, below, says it all....and now, it's CUBBY time!
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 11:05 PM
Oct 2016
Trump’s response was a characteristically repulsive stew of dishonesty, outright lies, conspiracy theorizing and blame-shifting.

ronlit1

(13 posts)
2. Has been going on for years
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 11:15 PM
Oct 2016

Trump makes it sound like the women have only come forward within the past several weeks to ruin the election, but this has been going on for years.
His wife Ivana accused him of rape years ago, so this really is nothing new.

IllinoisBirdWatcher

(2,315 posts)
3. Not "a" deposition, but for each of the 13 women (and counting) he wants to sue...
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 12:05 AM
Oct 2016

He can be deposed by the other side. 13 depositions. 13 times to keep his story straight. I seriously doubt it.

GopherGal

(2,007 posts)
4. And the Apprentice Tapes
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 12:27 AM
Oct 2016

would likely become subject to discovery.. Gloria Alred has to be thinking "Go ahead, make my day!"

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ruth Marcus: Taking Trump...