2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThat time Molly Ivins indisputably explained late-term abortion—in 121 seconds
This is old but very applicable to today and my 'friends' who hold late-term abortions against Hillary.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/1/23/1342876/-Molly-Ivans-Explains-Late-Term-Abortion-Perfectly?detail=email&link_id=16&can_id=a669183db7994fba72d4ab49be4423cd&source=email-trumps-grievanceburg-address-a-fever-swamp-of-paranoia-rage-to-delegitimize-hillarys-victory&email_referrer=trumps-grievanceburg-address-a-fever-swamp-of-paranoia-rage-to-delegitimize-hillarys-victory___123268&email_subject=nasty-women-for-hillary-its-finally-our-time
That time Molly Ivins indisputably explained late-term abortionin 121 seconds
By Leslie Salzillo
Friday Jan 23, 2015 · 1:41 PM EDT
For decades, anti-choice Republican lawmakers have tried to chip away at the legal reproductive rights of women, and the battle continues today. When it comes to late-term abortion, the topic is more difficult even for some Liberals/Democrats. The reason for this is because late-term abortion is highly misunderstood. The late Molly Ivins was never known to hold back on her thoughts and beliefs. The journalist, columnist, commentator, and author, raised in Texas, had a wonderful gift of getting her messages across through endearing humor and streetwise reality. Here she is speaking about late-term abortions at The Connecticut Forum's "A Changing Political Landscape" in 1996. Ivins explains late-term abortions in a way I've never heard before, and in a way I will never forget. Other panelists on this particular forum included James Carville, Oliver North, Ralph Reed (not seen in this video) and moderator Gwen Ifill. Here is text from the video:
Here is the video (at link) . You can see full Forums at www.theforumchannel.tv.
The battle for reproductive freedom is an ongoing struggle that will most likely continue past our lifetimes. We continue this fight for our daughters, and granddaughters, because our mothers, grandmothers, and male/female pro-choice supporters did the same for us. There are many ways we can support reproductive rights. Here are 10 large/small pro-choice organizations/Facebook pages you can visit/join now. They offer ways to help and be helped.
Planned Parenthood NARAL/Pro-Choice America NOW NAF/National Abortion Federation UniteWomen.org Abortion.com Fight Laws Against Women Pro-Choice Liberals Abigail Adams Brigade One Millon Vaginas _______________ The Guttmacher Institute is an excellent source of current reproductive rights legislation.
Thank you, Molly Ivins. You are greatly missed.
AmericanActivist
(1,019 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)I honestly don't understand how ending a viable pregnancy with a healthy child because the mother's life is at risk if the pregnancy continues is legitimate reason to do a late term abortion.
The pregnancy can be brought to an end via induction or C-section. Why abort in this case?
If the baby has a condition incompatible with life, I totally get that.
babylonsister
(171,048 posts)but puts mom's health at risk, a c-section would be done to save both mother and child. I don't know any one who would choose to abort a healthy baby if that baby could be saved.
B2G
(9,766 posts)She specifically stated that the mother might die.
babylonsister
(171,048 posts)said the baby was developing without a brain; I don't know which part you're disagreeing with.
B2G
(9,766 posts)"You have those late-term abortions, because either the mother is going to die, the child is going to die, or both are going to die."
If the baby has a condition incompatible with life, I get it.
What I don't get is the argument that late term abortion is acceptable if the MOTHER'S life is at risk (for the reason I stated above), but the baby is fine.
It's not an 'or' argument.
babylonsister
(171,048 posts)And I didn't get that as part of Ivin's argument. I maintain if the mom's life is at risk but the baby is fine, a c-section would be the result.
B2G
(9,766 posts)But it's good to hear that we agree that if the baby is fine, late term abortion isn't acceptable.
MoonchildCA
(1,301 posts)This is a republican argument, and it's just not what late term abortion is about. Nobody gives birth to a living, viable child--as Trump said, uncontested, in the debate--and then kills it. The situations where the mother's life is in danger, most likely occur before the child is viable. Late term usually means after 20 weeks, but babies born that early cannot survive. I'm sure, in cases where the mother can carry long enough for the fetus to be viable, she would choose to do that. Again though, it's her choice--it's a risk, but these are pregnancies that were expected to be full term.
No one decides in their 8th or 9th month of pregnancy, "Eh, I changed my mind, I'm going down to the corner Planned Parenthood and having this thing ripped out and killed." Sorry, to be so blunt, but that's how the other side makes it's argument, and it's a lie.
B2G
(9,766 posts)babylonsister
(171,048 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Mariana
(14,854 posts)is that in a situation like that, the mother's health might be too fragile for her to safely go through labor via induction or a C-section surgery. I feel comfortable leaving it to the women and their doctors to decide what is the best course of action.
It would be interesting to know exactly how many abortions take place to end pregnancies in which the fetus is viable and healthy. Do you know?
Fewer than 1%.
shrike
(3,817 posts)"After Tiller" focused on the late-term abortion doctors who carried after Tiller's murder. One young woman had an abortion at 20 weeks; she'd been raped. Perfectly understandable. Then a pregnancy was terminated because the patient was 16. She was 16 weeks along and the doctors agreed it was ultimately better to terminate the pregnancy and let her put her life back together.
The one case all the doctors refused to take on was one where the woman was 36 weeks along. She had all these reasons why she hadn't sought an abortion earlier. (Nothing was wrong with the pregnancy or her.) She was from France; apparently the abortion laws were restrictive enough that she couldn't seek an abortion there. Her last hope was the United States. New Mexico has no restrictions but the doctor ultimately turned her down. Healthy pregnancy too far along. Woman said she couldn't afford to raise the child. Clinic advised her to consider adoption; she said she couldn't do that, either. Abortion was her only hope. I hope she made peace with being a mother, because a mother was what she was going to be.
Most of the women in the movie wept through the appointment. Something one of them said stuck with me. She said the procedure was the last thing she could do for her son, who wouldn't have survived birth. A quick and merciful death.
It's none of your damn business??? These procedures are between a woman and her doctor. They will decide. No one asked for your opinion.
progressoid
(49,961 posts)Welcome to DU Emilybemily!
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)facing this kind of decision, YOU don't have to understand, it's not any of your business. It is the business of the pregnant woman, her doctors, and if she chooses, her family members.
I'm tired of having this conversation with people who feel like someone else's decision needs to be justified to them so they can feel "right" about it.
I'd say more, but I am really fucking angry right now.
progressoid
(49,961 posts)MisterFred
(525 posts)Induction or C-section is actually a common way to go about these abortions. The fetus then dies (or is destroyed because its only other option is to watch it suffer for hours and then die).
If the fetus could survive a C-section, it wouldn't be an abortion. It'd be an early birth for medical reasons. Roe vs. Wade covers this. Abortion isn't allowed under Roe vs. Wade if the fetus can survive on its own.
In other words, the part you totally get is what ALWAYS happens with late-term abortions. Legal ones, anyway.
Edit: The mother's life being at risk is why the abortion is done when it is done - and not later/not at all. Example: a fetus that could have survived a C-section with another few weeks/month of development never gets there because otherwise the mother would probably die - and probably the fetus since it didn't get those few weeks/month either way.
Johnny2X2X
(19,006 posts)No wonder Republicans want these kids born with. I brains, they'd surely be future GOP voters.
dem in texas
(2,673 posts)My late sister- in- law (who was also my childhood friend) had two children, then started having health problems. The doctor told her not to have anymore children, but she went off the pill without telling my brother and got pregnant.
She had problems in the pregnancy from day one, but carried the baby until the doctor told her it was going to kill her. She was faced with carrying the child to full term and possibly dying and leaving two little boys under age 5 without a mother or getting a "a partial-birth-abortion". She took the abortion route. It was a girl and years later she told me that not a day went by that she didn't think about that baby. Her health continued to decline and she passed away in her mid 40's while waiting for a kidney transplant.
My beautiful daughter had two problem pregnancies that required full bed rest before each her daughters were born. She got pregnant again and was pretty far along when she began to bleed. The doctor could not stop the bleeding and told her she needed to have the baby aborted or she was going to bleed to death. She had the abortion after she'd lost over half the blood in her body. It took her over a year to recover. If she'd died, the baby would have died with her and my two little granddaughters would have been left without a mother.
I get so mad when I hear the "righties" talk about how horrible women are to have partial birth abortion (later term is a better phrase to use). These types of abortions are terrible things for the mother and her family and the politicians and Christian conservatives need to stay the hell out of the abortion business. That should be a personal and family matter.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)Thank you for sharing this. It is absolutely heart rending for anyone to have to make this decision, regardless of WHEN in the pregnancy. Late terms decisions must absolutely stay with the woman and her doctor.
treestar
(82,383 posts)they ought to be ashamed of their callous use of these cases.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)You are sorely missed, Molly Ivens!
TNNurse
(6,926 posts)do not just read the text. Please pay attention to who is sitting on either side of her.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)of Molly Ivins videos there.
And North interrupting her made me mad. lol
progressoid
(49,961 posts)progressoid
(49,961 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)After listening to her give that explanation of late term abortion, I continued to watch and listen to other film clips featuring Molly talking about numerous other subjects. She is among the funniest, most insightful people I have every heard speak. I am going to look up some of her columns next. I'll bet that they are a hoot.
babylonsister
(171,048 posts)Yes, smart, progressive, informed, and funny. She is greatly missed.
CaptainTruth
(6,582 posts)I miss her wit.