Greg Sargent has a good article on the latest dark Come(d)y
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/10/29/james-comey-needs-to-clean-up-his-mess-heres-what-we-need-to-know/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.26ff4424bbb8
There is a lot of new reporting out there this morning about the letter that FBI director James Comey sent to Members of Congress, notifying them about newly discovered emails that may be pertinent to the FBIs previous investigation into Clintons use of a private email server.
Those emails reportedly could number in the thousands and were discovered on a laptop used jointly by former Congressman Anthony Weiner and his wife, Huma Abedin, a top aide to Clinton, and were discovered in the course of an unrelated probe into Weiners sexting.
Unfortunately, the latest reporting is often contradictory and confusing. So heres my best effort to sift through it.
Comeys language is maddeningly opaque and cryptic. In his letter to lawmakers, Comey says that the new emails appear to be pertinent to the previous investigation into Clintons use of a private server. He also says the FBI is now seeking to determine whether they contain classified information, and cannot yet assess whether the material may or may not be significant. (Emphasis mine.)
But Comeys own declaration that the new emails appear to be pertinent suggests that they are significant. Comey surely knew that news organizations would conclude as much, which is what they are now doing, with screaming headlines and with analysis claiming this could impact the presidential race.
Perversely, we are being told by news outlets that the new info may not be substantively significant, but it may be politically significant, which, youd think, is an outcome Comey would have wanted to avoid.
-Snip-