2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI won't contribute to NPR again
There was an interview with Mara Liasson on NPR this morning. She was truly nasty in her discussion of the Comey scandal. You won't get harsh tone of voice, but here is the end of the piece......
LIASSON: Well, this really is "Back To The Future." The campaign started with the emails. It's ending with the emails. All the threads of the Clintons' 30-year political story seem to be coming together - the penchant for secrecy that led her to choose a private server; her penchant for defensiveness; her tone deafness and the way she initially dealt with this, which only exacerbated her image as dishonest and untrustworthy; and then the sex scandals that always seemed to dog the Clintons and the ongoing investigations that often end up turning something else. So it's all there, the messy drama that seems to always be part of the Clintons' story.
MARTIN: Mara Liasson, thanks so much.
LIASSON: Thank you.
I have never understood why NPR thinks Liasson, who is a FOX-shill, is a value to their operation.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I always knew NPR was fake progressive and Trumpish. I thought it was common knowledge.
They've been trash for years.
Since Bush put the foxes in charge of the henhouse NPR has turned into National Republican Radio.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)NPR has some entertainment programs ("Wait wait ..." e.g.) that aren't afraid to poke fun at the right wing institutions. But the "news" coverage has been moving steadily rightward. PBS-TV has been there for 20 years.
I contributed regularly up to about 2007, but I just can't bring myself to do that anymore.
In my local market, Morning Edition has now been usurped about 10 minutes every hour by programming produced by (essentially) the Chamber of Commerce). That is all pro-corporate anti-environment, anti-labor, anti- living-wage stuff. And overnight they run BBC, which has become every bit as right wing as NPR.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 31, 2016, 12:38 AM - Edit history (1)
My friends insisted that i listen to NPR and so i gave it a whirl. It wasnt long before i concluded that National Public Radio is little different from any other government or corporate owned mainstream news com regarding mainstream media, i know full well that unbiased, relevant topics of the day are not going to be dealt with in any objective and granular manner on FM radio anymore than they would be on mainstream television. To understand why this is, one must understand who owns mainstream media , who sits on their boards of directors, and the relationships those board members have with other corporations.
Media Ownership
Almost all of mainstream media television, radio, publishing companies, the music and film industries are owned by an ever dwindling number of extremely wealthy and influential, multinational corporations, the number of which has fallen from around 50 to just 5 in the last 20 years or so and the mergers continue. A few hours of research on your part will shed some light on why, for instance, a particular mainstream media company with defense contractors sitting on its board has little incentive to inform the public about devastating human and environmental consequences that depleted uranium weaponry has caused, and continues to cause, in the middle east , as well as other locations around the world that the U.S. and its allies choose to inflict democracy upon.
Media Ownership Graph - 1983-2004
2011 Media Ownership Chart
2011 Media Ownership Chart
Not biting the hand that feeds you
As they say, follow the money, and researching the NPR money trail leads to some interesting places.
Lockheed Martin
From an article at socialscience.com titled Campaign to make NPR accountable for representing Lockheed-Martin over the people i found the following:
My friends insisted that i listen to NPR and so i gave it a whirl. It wasnt long before i concluded that National Public Radio is little different from any other government or corporate owned mainstream news company. Heres why:
Red Flags
The simple fact that NPR broadcasts on the FM band raises the first red flag of many to follow. Because of my earlier extensive research regarding mainstream media, i know full well that unbiased, relevant topics of the day are not going to be dealt with in any objective and granular manner on FM radio anymore than they would be on mainstream television. To understand why this is, one must understand who owns mainstream media , who sits on their boards of directors, and the relationships those board members have with other corporations.
Media Ownership
Almost all of mainstream media television, radio, publishing companies, the music and film industries are owned by an ever dwindling number of extremely wealthy and influential, multinational corporations, the number of which has fallen from around 50 to just 5 in the last 20 years or so and the mergers continue. A few hours of research on your part will shed some light on why, for instance, a particular mainstream media company with defense contractors sitting on its board has little incentive to inform the public about devastating human and environmental consequences that depleted uranium weaponry has caused, and continues to cause, in the middle east , as well as other locations around the world that the U.S. and its allies choose to inflict democracy upon.
Media Ownership Graph - 1983-2004
2011 Media Ownership Chart
2011 Media Ownership Chart
Not biting the hand that feeds you
As they say, follow the money, and researching the NPR money trail leads to some interesting places.
Lockheed Martin
From an article at socialscience.com titled Campaign to make NPR accountable for representing Lockheed-Martin over the people i found the following:
NPR: We never forget who were working for
Millions of dollars from Lockheed-Martin, Wal-Mart, big oil
On October 26, 2002, over 100,000 people came to the Vietnam Memorial in D.C. to protest U.S. foreign policy, mainly the coming attack on Iraq. Organizers and those on the ground said there were over 200,000 people. UPI, Washington Post, and L.A. Times all estimated that over 100,000 rallied. Meanwhile, on National Public Radio, Nancy Marshall was on the scene, and reported, Id say there were fewer than ten thousand.
She also reported that protesters agreed with Bush that we need to do something in Iraq. Thousands of protest signs (see below) with slogans along the lines of Regime Change in U.S. and Stop U.S. terror, clearly showed that the majority of protesters think we need to do something in the United States, not Iraq. Its also hard to imagine that she actually found a protester who said they would support U.S. to ratchet up sanctions.
Following is a transcript of the audio file:
This is NPR, National Public Radio. Support for WAMU is provided by Lockheed Martin. Bringing criminals to justice is more important than ever. Advanced systems developed by Lockheed Martin help Federal agents get the job done faster. Lockheed Martin: we never forget who were working for.
This made me wonder about the kind of reporting NPR has done on Lockheed Martin in the past, so i headed back to their website. As you can see for yourself, NPR appears to have almost nothing negative to say about one of the largest defense contractors on the planet which, considering Lockheed helps fund NPR and/or its affiliates, is not at all surprising.
make of this what you will....not much media to trust out there for us pawns
tough to enjoy the Cher bread/circus divertissements with certain knowledge that the average gube is gonna be in for a very rude awakening when the warlord with whom he's cast his shield is
nothing but fodder next big geopolitical shift, perhaps put into motion as a result of a biosphere that has been overwhelmed......ambient seems to kick in, so if any other thoughts result, feel free.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Chathamization
(1,638 posts)It's kind of amazing how NPR is trying to link Clinton to the Weiner scandal, when the entire link is nothing more than her aid being married to Weiner.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)electioneering for Trump. They won't, but they should.
Jason1961
(413 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)gort
(687 posts)National Petroleum Radio
NBachers
(17,081 posts)Every once in a while, I'll switch it on to see if maybe I've been wrong. But, so often, I immediately hear some fascist lunatic buzzwords, and I'm tempted to smash my radio against the wall.
It's too bad.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)I hope she can clean some house after she's elected.