Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 07:54 PM Nov 2016

So are we to dismiss the Trump/Russia connection due to a quick counterpunch and media indifference?

I'm appalled that these allegations have apparently been cast aside without continued media due diligence and investigation.

Even Hillary sent out a series of tweets the day the news broke on four fronts regarding Trump's Russian connection.

News of this nature is so profoundly adverse to our national security interests that it should be leading the news cycles, if indeed it was founded in any form of corroborated fact.

I voted for Hillary today. I believe that she will become our 45th President. This concern has nothing to do with the election itself.

The highest institutions of the USA may have been infiltrated and compromised. Has partisanship led to indifference to treasonous acts?

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So are we to dismiss the Trump/Russia connection due to a quick counterpunch and media indifference? (Original Post) Mr. Ected Nov 2016 OP
the NYT tried to kill the story but, I think it still has feet.. And will.. some are picking it up juxtaposed Nov 2016 #1
 

juxtaposed

(2,778 posts)
1. the NYT tried to kill the story but, I think it still has feet.. And will.. some are picking it up
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 08:00 PM
Nov 2016

and investigating the story..

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So are we to dismiss the ...