2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOK, here's a poll puzzle (Hassan vs Ayotte)
These are probabilities, not averages.
538 Hassan 55%, Ayotte 45%
Upshot Hassan 45%, Ayotte 55%
Can anyone explain this????
NOTE - A couple of respondents seem to think 538 is giving Hillary a worse probability. It's Upshot that does. And I don't know where the 85% is coming from.
Rats. I can't seem to get two different public links from DropBox. Anyway, the other aggregator looks like this, but with the 44 and 45% reversed.
BzaDem
(11,142 posts)I assume the upshot does not, because they are being paid for by a third party (Auto Alliance).
MADem
(135,425 posts)The Upshot explains its methodology in less detail, though Josh Katzs write-up of the presidential prediction model does go over the general principles. Unlike FiveThirtyEight, the Upshot does not weight its polls based on pollster reliability, focusing exclusively on sample sizes and recency. The Upshots regressions are also simpler than FiveThirtyEights, relying more on past election data than the demographic information and regional groupings that Silver incorporates. The model is also designed to be slow to move.
Garbage in/garbage out.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)85% last I saw.
Soooooo, how do you mitigate that?
MADem
(135,425 posts)They don't care if a poll is "reliable" or any good, they throw it in the pot anyway.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)That's too bad, I liked it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)November 3rd, 2016, 4:55am by Sam Wang
For a moment this morning, the top banner probability has read 100%. Sorry, rounding glitch in the software. It should simply say >99%. Fixing soon.
http://election.princeton.edu/
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)So 538 must be bullshit too.
Honestly, I think 100% is a bit foolish. I'd say 85-90 is about right, due to Clinton's firewall hinging on one huge state that has no early voting, Pennsylvania.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They often--but not always--get it right.
Here's what I really think: GOTV. Do what you can. Stop fretting about numbers because they don't mean what they used to.
I used to respond to polls all the time...well, if I was in USA and the phone rang.
Now I only pick up my land line phone if I recognize the number. They call me, I don't answer. I'll bet I'm not the only one.
And I have a HOUSE FULL of Hillary voters--we're cheek by jowl up in here.
LAS14
(13,769 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)All I can say is, if you go by commercials, Hassan has Ayotte beat hands down. Hassan talks about issues and programs, Ayotte's commercials show her playing basketball with her kid (one of the commercials is nothing but outtakes), playing softball, and running.
My attitude? If she likes exercise so much, she should go get a goddamned job running a gym. She's unfit as a Senator.
LAS14
(13,769 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Not Hassan/Ayotte.
I was just wondering if people think it's bullshit garbage when it's better for our side.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)66 or 67 percent in 538
LAS14
(13,769 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Also, yes, 538 does discount certain pollsters.
LAS14
(13,769 posts)538 has Hassan at 55%. Could there be something wrong with this Upshot report? Why would Ayotte be in blue?