Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fahrenthold451

(436 posts)
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 12:02 PM Nov 2016

Bridgegate Defendants Facing 86 Years. Kelly will probably sing to mitigate sentence

Kelly's defense team has an interesting choice. They could not cooperate and lay the foundation for an appeal. Or they could have their client agree to testify against Christie in the hopes of getting a mitigated sentence. Kelly is facing life in prison (although highly unlikely she would get that type of time). Psychologically, though, when a client is facing life it tends to sharpen the focus a little and self-interest tends to dominate the discussion.


My feeling is that Mr. Christie just got fried today.

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/05/bridgegate_how_much_prison_time_could_they_face.html
"It is typical when people are cooperating for that cooperation to be brought to the attention of the sentencing judge, and for the sentencing judge to take that into account," Fishman said.

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bridgegate Defendants Facing 86 Years. Kelly will probably sing to mitigate sentence (Original Post) Fahrenthold451 Nov 2016 OP
If he got fried we are gonna need an awfully big pan. TrekLuver Nov 2016 #1
Christieduckin. Mind the splash when you drop it in. Fahrenthold451 Nov 2016 #5
Agreed, she will let it all out. emulatorloo Nov 2016 #2
Didn't she already swear under oath all that she knew? That might bring more conspiracy charges. TheBlackAdder Nov 2016 #16
I'm guessing they will work some kind of immunity deal out. emulatorloo Nov 2016 #24
I was thinking the same and I sure hope so! arthritisR_US Nov 2016 #4
And she might will say that closing the lanes on the GWB was Christie's idea Botany Nov 2016 #6
So sad jberryhill Nov 2016 #7
Reminds me of that wide world of sports ski jumper.... Fahrenthold451 Nov 2016 #8
Vinko Bogataj jberryhill Nov 2016 #11
Niiiiiiiice Fahrenthold451 Nov 2016 #25
On a personal level, I do feel a bit sorry for her even as she deserves to be in the mess she is in karynnj Nov 2016 #15
Yeah, she did. Then she was comforted to know they were all Barbara Buono supporters. All OK! TheBlackAdder Nov 2016 #17
Yep. Once you dehumanize political opposition, anything is possible. jberryhill Nov 2016 #22
The comments in the WSJ article about this are so typical. Native Nov 2016 #10
Nope...she's already implicated Christie on the stand... brooklynite Nov 2016 #12
Ah, but who would believe a convicted criminal? jberryhill Nov 2016 #26
What they did was wrong but 86 years is a bit much. vdogg Nov 2016 #13
Here is a thought - can christie pardon kelly and baroni?? asiliveandbreathe Nov 2016 #14
Due to the interstate nature, this was a federal trial. I guess Obama could. TheBlackAdder Nov 2016 #18
Tks - hubby and I just discussing..makes sense.. asiliveandbreathe Nov 2016 #20
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

TheBlackAdder

(28,182 posts)
16. Didn't she already swear under oath all that she knew? That might bring more conspiracy charges.
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 02:05 PM
Nov 2016

.


She swears under oath to tell everything, but doesn't... to protect Christie.


Her adding more testimony, after the fact, would make it look like a conspiracy to protect Christie exists.


.

Botany

(70,483 posts)
6. And she might will say that closing the lanes on the GWB was Christie's idea
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 12:08 PM
Nov 2016

I feel a little bit sorry for her because she got caught up in somethings
and some people that were way over her head.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
15. On a personal level, I do feel a bit sorry for her even as she deserves to be in the mess she is in
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 02:04 PM
Nov 2016

Sorry because she is a single mother of 4 children - I would guess teens as she is 44.

However, I reject my own sympathy realizing that she was in a center of power and never stopped to think about the impact on people that this idiotic revenge on the mayor of Fort Lee would cause. In fact, the most stunning thing is that NO ONE - not her Baroni or Wildstein (and very possibly Christie) seemed to push back that this was a horrible idea that could have very serious negative consequences for innocent people. (Not to mention - punishing a Democratic mayor for not endorsing a Republican is strange in itself. Punishing him by punishing the regular citizens of that town and neighboring towns is a bizarre way to do this.

Did this mother of four even think of how this would impact little children who were taking school buses for their first week in school? Did she stop to think ... even on the second, third or fourth day when the impact on the town was known in great detail -- that an accident or a sudden illness could make getting to the hospital something where minutes could mean a huge amount to the outcome?

It is shocking that someone could fall from being so privileged that she was a top aide to a Governor - then touted as the most likely potential Republican nominee for President 2016 - where she would likely have had a possibility of continuing in his entourage had he (heaven forbid) have become President to someone likely to go to jail. Yet, it is people like her - no matter which party - who most need the consequences of thinking they are above the law ... and here, in a public position working against the interests of some of the people in the state.

brooklynite

(94,489 posts)
12. Nope...she's already implicated Christie on the stand...
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 12:52 PM
Nov 2016

This boils down to "he said, she said". Unless she has harder evidence, I don't know that she has much of a negotiating position.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
26. Ah, but who would believe a convicted criminal?
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 05:17 PM
Nov 2016

That's where you go with that sort of thing... "Ms. Kelly is simply trying to blame others for her proven criminal plot."

vdogg

(1,384 posts)
13. What they did was wrong but 86 years is a bit much.
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 01:05 PM
Nov 2016

I oppose over sentencing no matter who it's against.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bridgegate Defendants Fac...