Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Networks have no obligation to broadcast political ads that are proven false (Original Post) maxrandb Nov 2016 OP
"obligation"? they're happy to get paid unblock Nov 2016 #1
They sure didn't care during the swiftpuke ads against Kerry, so I wouldn't hold my breath still_one Nov 2016 #2
bingo SharonClark Nov 2016 #4
What channel was the ad on? Kelt_Gyrl Nov 2016 #3
Actually they could technotwit Nov 2016 #5
It was a super PAC ad maxrandb Nov 2016 #6
yes technotwit Nov 2016 #7

unblock

(52,196 posts)
1. "obligation"? they're happy to get paid
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 08:04 PM
Nov 2016

they're happy to talk about trump, and they're happy to lie, and they're even happier to get paid.

we're gonna need a much better argument....

still_one

(92,134 posts)
2. They sure didn't care during the swiftpuke ads against Kerry, so I wouldn't hold my breath
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 08:06 PM
Nov 2016

They want the revenue from those ads, not honesty



Kelt_Gyrl

(24 posts)
3. What channel was the ad on?
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 08:09 PM
Nov 2016

Frankly, all of DTC ads need to be pulled because they are all flawed! I will call the station and complain and talk with an attorney about the ads being propaganda instead of facts. I am just so sick of the crap that the Republican fed networks have allowed. The people will speak and then Hillary will start working on cleaning things up. It really shows the antiquated views of Republicans. They want a dictator not a president.

 

technotwit

(71 posts)
5. Actually they could
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 08:14 PM
Nov 2016

FCC Rules say stations may NOT censor any ad paid for directly by the candidates own campaign.
"but if any licensee shall permit any such candidate to use its facilities, it shall afford equal opportunities to all other candidates for that office to use such facilities. Such licensee shall have no power of censorship over the material broadcast by any such candidate. "

 

technotwit

(71 posts)
7. yes
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 03:34 AM
Nov 2016

Only candidate's own ads. Others could get station sued in a civil case or sanctioned by the government, more likely by the FTC for false and deceptive advertising, though someone might file with the FCC for not operating in the public interest. The station would need to receive a legal take down notice in order to have this happen. In other words they can be found defamatory if the distributor knew they were false or should have known, yet continued to distribute it regardless.
However if the candidates own campaign bought the ads the Communications act has no censorship allowed (except in the case of it being categorized as obscene, which is a high bar - From what I know the FCC hasn't sanctioned anyone for obscene, only indecent.)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Networks have no obligati...