Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 538 Election Forecast is a complete joke (Original Post) Norbert Nov 2016 OP
Nevada? ham_actor Nov 2016 #2
More unskewing of the data. Buzz Clik Nov 2016 #3
I read an article on Huff that he adjusts the data Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #9
Yep. That is exactly what he does. Buzz Clik Nov 2016 #12
This morning, it was almost 67% HRC, NV was light blue obamanut2012 Nov 2016 #4
I don't get it either, BUT 7worldtrade Nov 2016 #8
Nate Silver is just as irrelevant as any other pundit. book_worm Nov 2016 #13
Anyone here attacking Nate Silver because they don't like the data is just Pisces Nov 2016 #15
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

ham_actor

(38 posts)
2. Nevada?
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:37 AM
Nov 2016

And it shifted Nevada from light blue to light red. Was there an overnight poll no one knows about?

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
3. More unskewing of the data.
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:37 AM
Nov 2016

In other words, he has a gut feeling about the election, and the model isn't showing it. So, he tweaks.

538 has fallen off the list of reliable services. I absolutely different opinions, and I don't mind hearing opinions contrary to mine. But to simply nudge the numbers in a so-called scientific analysis? Bullshit.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
9. I read an article on Huff that he adjusts the data
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:15 AM
Nov 2016

to where he thinks it is...and then runs the data using his model...he seems to think it takes into account 'uncertainty'...that is punditry as the article pointed out ...not math. I wonder if he will make predictions state by state...final numbers.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
12. Yep. That is exactly what he does.
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:48 AM
Nov 2016

What was cool about Nate was when he was telling the world he did it all with models and statistics. Now that we find he's just another person using stats to help him guess, it's not as cool.

obamanut2012

(26,064 posts)
4. This morning, it was almost 67% HRC, NV was light blue
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:45 AM
Nov 2016

And FL and NC were just about a tossup.

Too garbage polls later, and....

7worldtrade

(85 posts)
8. I don't get it either, BUT
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:10 AM
Nov 2016

He is upfront about his model, and how he weights polls, etc. By today it will all pretty much be based on public polls. On the other hand, I think his articles are designed to freak people out and get hits to his site. Probably has something to do with the fact that his site was bought by ESPN AFTER 2012. Need to generate revenues.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FiveThirtyEight

Pisces

(5,599 posts)
15. Anyone here attacking Nate Silver because they don't like the data is just
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 10:03 AM
Nov 2016

As bad as Republicans last time around doubting the numbers. Nate doesn't make the polling up.
He just extrapolates from the information. She still has a 65% chance of winning. That seems right
To me. he still has a shot. We don't know much damage the Comey letter has done. The polls are much to close for my liking. He doesn't have her losing.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The 538 Election Forecast...