Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,622 posts)
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 07:46 PM Nov 2016

Battle for Senate Control Is a Toss Up

Battle for Senate Control Is a Toss Up

https://politicalwire.com/2016/11/07/battle-senate-control-toss/

"SNIP............


Harry Enten: “The fight for control of the United States Senate is really close. It’s basically a coin-flip. Democrats have a 53 percent chance of winning a Senate majority according to FiveThirtyEight’s polls-plus model, or a 52 percent chance according to our polls-only forecast. There is about a 16 percent chance, in fact, that we’ll end up with a 50-50 Senate and the presidential race will decide control. (The vice-president breaks ties in the Senate.)”


...............SNIP"
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Battle for Senate Control Is a Toss Up (Original Post) applegrove Nov 2016 OP
...democrats will have 52-48 majority.... beachbumbob Nov 2016 #1
538 has. . . pat_k Nov 2016 #3

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
3. 538 has. . .
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:58 PM
Nov 2016

. . . gone from Dems chances of control at 64.4% Nov 3 (and bouncing around 70% before that) to chances of control 49.2%.

That sort of last minute swing seems out of line.

I could be wrong, but I think the changes are adjustments to expected turnout based on early voting figures, with the assumption being that higher Repub turnout necessarily means more Trump. But, if more Repubs are crossing over, that assumption wouldn't hold.

I hope Nate's predictions Nov 3 turn out to be the accurate ones. But, looking at another site, Cook Political Report, it does look like it might be a nail biter.


Here's current from Cook (Contests rated Solid, Likely, Lean, Toss Up).
http://cookpolitical.com/senate/charts/race-ratings

Assuming Cook Lean D, and Cook Lean R go the way they lean, we have

Cook Lean D
------
IL (D Gain)

Cook Lean R
------
AZ (R Hold)
FL (R Hold)
OH (R Hold)


So, with IL as D Gain, we need 3 more D Gains for 50/50 (with Kaine making it 51 for Dem control)

Cook Toss Up, with percentages from 538
--------------------------------------------------
Ayotte (NH) Hassan 51% v. Ayotte (Possible D Gain)

Toomey (PA) McGinty 61% v. Toomey (D Gain)

Johnson (WI) Feingold 81% v. Johnson (D-Gain)

Coats (IN) Bayh 33% v. Young (R Hold)

Blunt (MO) Kander 42% v. Blunt (R Hold)

Burr (NC) Ross 26% v. Burr (R Hold)

Reid (NV) Cortez Masto 59% v. Heck (D Hold)



So, it if things go as predictions indicate, it comes down to NH.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Battle for Senate Control...