Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 08:41 AM Nov 2016

42 States Shifted to the Right in 2016

If we'd have just nominated a self-described "socialist..."



From: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/09/us/elections/states-shift.html?utm_source=huffingtonpost.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pubexchange&_r=1

The Majority of Battleground States Went for Trump

Donald J. Trump secured his victory by winning seven out of 13 battleground states that President Obama won at least once...

Many Republican-Leaning States Became Even More So

Thirteen Republican strongholds increased their margins for Mr. Trump by more than five percentage points over what Mitt Romney secured in 2012, reinforcing the country’s swing to the right.

Some Democratic States Shifted Toward the Center

Eight reliably Democratic states, primarily in the Northeast, shifted more than five percentage points toward the center, reflecting Mr. Trump’s strength with white, working-class voters.


20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
42 States Shifted to the Right in 2016 (Original Post) yallerdawg Nov 2016 OP
seriously! I don't think Bernie was the answer... Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #1
It was about left right, it was about listening and giving a damn.nt LostOne4Ever Nov 2016 #2
I saw one candidate who sat in small groups and town halls - listening. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #3
Really? LostOne4Ever Nov 2016 #4
She won the primary votes. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #5
No she lost the general electoral votes LostOne4Ever Nov 2016 #6
Still peddling those two myths. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #7
Projection is a dangerous thing LostOne4Ever Nov 2016 #9
It's easy to say what you say when all you cared about was what Trump was peddling boston bean Nov 2016 #11
My main concern has always been social issue and the Supreme Court LostOne4Ever Nov 2016 #15
Michael Moore wants to take our party back for white men. I'm like no thanks. boston bean Nov 2016 #17
Read Eichenwald's postmortem, try to take that into account in your narrative emulatorloo Nov 2016 #18
So will Democratic leaders think they need to move more to the right B Calm Nov 2016 #8
It will depend entirely on... yallerdawg Nov 2016 #10
not if we have the right leaders. Cobalt Violet Nov 2016 #12
If the conservadems continue to control the direction of B Calm Nov 2016 #13
Yet it was the strategy of the alt-left to vote against Hillary, so this mantra R B Garr Nov 2016 #14
Party needs to move to the left. But remaking the party in the image of Bernie or Busters emulatorloo Nov 2016 #19
Stupid, entitled white dudes are the reason duffyduff Nov 2016 #16
no. astral Nov 2016 #20
 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
1. seriously! I don't think Bernie was the answer...
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 08:43 AM
Nov 2016

but I don't know what *is* the answer the increasing idiocy of this country.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
3. I saw one candidate who sat in small groups and town halls - listening.
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 09:28 AM
Nov 2016

I saw two candidates who flew into big rallies and gave big lectures - listening to adulation.

I guess we know what the people want now, don't we?

LostOne4Ever

(9,286 posts)
4. Really?
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 09:37 AM
Nov 2016

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]Then what part of not wanting an insider, not wanting another mainstream politician, not wanting another dynasty did she not get?

What part of wanting CHANGE did she not understand?

Looks to me like she heard them, but didn't listen.[/font]

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
5. She won the primary votes.
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 09:58 AM
Nov 2016

She won the general election votes.

Sounds to me we got what we wanted.

The other party voted for exactly what Bernie opposed - and those cheap, meaningless slogans you mention.

LostOne4Ever

(9,286 posts)
6. No she lost the general electoral votes
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 10:09 AM
Nov 2016

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]And with it the presidency and the Supreme Court. THAT is what we wanted.

Who gives a shit about winning a popularity with no power associated with it?

Those slogans cost us everything. If we had a candidate with them we would have had the presidency and SC.



Btw: She had to have an uneven plying field to win the primary[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
7. Still peddling those two myths.
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 10:17 AM
Nov 2016


That's cool.

"True believers" don't need facts or truth. We are, as they say, "post truth" now.

LostOne4Ever

(9,286 posts)
9. Projection is a dangerous thing
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 10:24 AM
Nov 2016

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]And an opinion piece is not fact.

We see the states that were lost. We saw what the voters said they were voting for.

Had we lost because of different states, and had the voters had a different reason for voting the way they did I wouldn't be so angry. But the way it ended makes it quite clear: Bernie would have beaten Trump.

We all know it. Put your head in the sand if you want, but it is obvious to everyone. [/font]

boston bean

(36,218 posts)
11. It's easy to say what you say when all you cared about was what Trump was peddling
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 10:44 AM
Nov 2016

and thinking he spoke more to the people than Hillary. These people had other motivations.

White men and their wives in rural areas are not and have never been democratic voters. What don't you get about that?

What went wrong on the Dem party side was too many people voting third party to not offset the bigoted nuts in the hills, and possible some not voting because they thought she had it in the bag.

LostOne4Ever

(9,286 posts)
15. My main concern has always been social issue and the Supreme Court
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 11:14 AM
Nov 2016

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]In particular LGBTQ rights, and with trans rights coming before the court it was particularly important for the Dems to win this one. Trump never peddled in that.

Unions, laborers, and the working class have been part of the Democratic Party for decades: what do you not get about that? Especially in the BLUE states of Michigan, Penn, and Wisconsin! We have to get these voters back!

Yes third party people deserve blame. But so does the DNC for not listening. Michael Moore saw this coming months ago as did many others. To look away from the obvious will only assure us another defeat![/font]

boston bean

(36,218 posts)
17. Michael Moore wants to take our party back for white men. I'm like no thanks.
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 11:15 AM
Nov 2016

I see no evidence that the Dems are actually harming them. It is a mixture of bigotry and propaganda. They've been doing it since Reagan.

emulatorloo

(44,063 posts)
18. Read Eichenwald's postmortem, try to take that into account in your narrative
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 11:17 AM
Nov 2016
THE MYTHS DEMOCRATS SWALLOWED THAT COST THEM THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
BY KURT EICHENWALD ON 11/14/16

http://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044

1. The Myth of the All-Powerful Democratic National Committee
2. The Myth That Sanders Would Have Won Against Trump

We def need to change and move forward, we need to be as accurate and truth-based as we can as we do so.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
10. It will depend entirely on...
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 10:33 AM
Nov 2016

the success or failure of Trump.

The pendulum swings back and forth trying to find a center. We don't know what Trump is, or what he can actually accomplish.

It presidency may just be a back and forth on cleaning up messes.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
12. not if we have the right leaders.
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 10:49 AM
Nov 2016

but if we have the corporate wing of the party still in charge then yes they will abandon the working and middle class even more.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
13. If the conservadems continue to control the direction of
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 10:59 AM
Nov 2016

the party, it will be a long time before we have another Democratic president. Democratic politicians need to be seeking Bernie's advice right fucking now!

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
14. Yet it was the strategy of the alt-left to vote against Hillary, so this mantra
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 11:07 AM
Nov 2016

is still really phony. The protest votes were planned by the left, so it has nothing to do with the direction of the party. I think it was called, Bern it down. So quit blaming a planned strategy to undermine a general election candidate on the will of the people. Those third party votes were planned and encouraged.

emulatorloo

(44,063 posts)
19. Party needs to move to the left. But remaking the party in the image of Bernie or Busters
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 11:27 AM
Nov 2016

would be a disaster. Conspiracy theorists, feels over reals, et cetera. Agree w you.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
16. Stupid, entitled white dudes are the reason
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 11:15 AM
Nov 2016

The same people who bitched and moaned about "affirmative action" years ago.

The women are mostly religious types who are against abortion because legalizing it makes it harder for them to hold men responsible for what they do to women. Outlawing it makes it easier for them to bind men to them.

 

astral

(2,531 posts)
20. no.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 11:54 PM
Nov 2016

Abortion is one thing and late-term abortion is something else. Our country is hardly united on this issue.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»42 States Shifted to the ...